Abbi, Anvita, 2012. Dictionary of the Great Andamanese Language: English–Great Andamanese–Hindi. Delhi: Ratna Sagar.Google Scholar

Abbi, Anvita, 2013. A Grammar of the Great Andamanese Language: An Ethnolinguistic Study. Leiden: Brill Academic.Google Scholar

Abramson, Arthur S. and L-Thongkum, Theraphan, 2009. A fuzzy boundary between tone languages and voice-register languages. In Fant, Gunnar, Fujisaki, Hiroya and Shen, Jiaxuen (eds), Frontiers in Phonetics and Speech Science, pp. 149–155. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Alexander and Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., 2005. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alves, Mark J., 2001. What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese? In Thurgood, Graham W. (ed.), Papers from the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, pp. 221–242. Phoenix: Arizona State University.Google Scholar

Alves, Mark J., 2006. A Grammar of Pacoh: A Mon-Khmer Language of the Central Highlands of Vietnam (Shorter Grammars). Pacific Linguistics, vol. 580. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Alves, Mark J., 2009. Sino-Vietnamese grammatical vocabulary and sociolinguistic conditions for borrowing. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 1–9.Google Scholar

Alves, Mark J., 2015. Morphological functions among Mon-Khmer languages: Beyond the basics. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 524–550.Google Scholar

Ammerman, Albert J. and Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi L., 1971. Measuring the rate of spread of early farming in Europe. Man 6 (4): 674–688.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto, 1999. Comparative Constructions in Sinitic: Areal Typology and Patterns of Grammaticalisation. Dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto and Matthews, Stephen J., 2001. Typical creoles and simple languages: The case of Sinitic. Linguistic Typology 5 (2/3): 311–324.Google Scholar

Bauer, Robert S., 1996. Identifying the Tai substratum in Cantonese. In Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, vol. V, pp. 1806–1844. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter, 1992. Southeast Asia before prehistory. In Tarling, (ed.), vol. 1, pp. 55–136.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey, 2006. Hervey’s ‘Kenaboi’: Lost Malayan language or forest-collecting taboo jargon? Paper presented at the 10th International Association of Historians of Asia Conference, Singapore, October 1986.Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter, 1991. Verb serialization, grammaticalization and attractor positions in Chinese, Hmong, Vietnamese, Thai and Khmer. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, pp. 509–562. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Blench, Roger, 2011. The role of agriculture in the evolution of Mainland Southeast Asian language phyla. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 125–152.Google Scholar

Blench, Roger, 2015. The origins of nominal classification markers in MSEA languages: Convergence, contact and some African parallels. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 551–578.Google Scholar

Blench, Roger and Post, Mark W., 2013. Re-thinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages. In Hill, Nathan and Owen-Smith, Thomas (eds), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, pp. 71–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert, 1994. The Austronesian settlement of Mainland Southeast Asia. In Adams, Karen L. and Hudak, Thomas John (eds), Papers from the Second Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, pp. 25–83. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert, 2013a. Southeast Asian islands and Oceania: Austronesian linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration, vol. 1: Prehistory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert, 2013b. The Austronesian Languages (revised edition). Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bo, Wenze, 2002. A Study of Mulao. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar

Bon, Noëllie, 2014. Une Grammaire de la Langue Stieng, Langue en Danger du Cambodge et du Vietnam. Dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon.Google Scholar

Bradley, David, 1995. Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, vol. 13: Studies in Burmese Languages. Pacific Linguistics, vol. A-83. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Bradley, David, 2007. Language endangerment in China and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language Diversity Endangered, pp. 278–302. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

van Breugel, Seino, 2014. A Grammar of Atong. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, 2009. Contact-induced change? Register in three Cham dialects. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2: 1–22.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc and Kirby, James, 2015. Re-assessing tonal diversity and geographical convergence in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 80–108.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc, Dương, Nguyễn Duy and Hùng, Nguyễn Khắc, 2010. A laryngographic and laryngoscopic study of Northern Vietnamese tones. Phonetica 67: 147–169.Google Scholar

Buakaw, Supakit, 2012. A Phonological Study of Palaung Dialects Spoken in Thailand and Myanmar, with Focuses on Vowels and Final Nasals. Doctoral dissertation, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar

Bulbeck, David, 2011. Biological and cultural evolution in the population and culture history of Homo sapiens in Malaya. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 207–255.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas, 2005. A Grammar of Jahai. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 566. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas, 2006. Body part terms in Jahai. Language Sciences 28: 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas, Kruspe, Nicole and Dunn, Michael, 2011. Language history and culture groups among Austroasiatic-speaking foragers of the Malay Peninsula. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 257–275.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas and Majid, Asifa, 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses and Society 6 (1): 19–29.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas and Wegener, Claudia, 2009. Preliminary notes on the phonology, orthography and vocabulary of Semnam (Austroasiatic, Malay Peninsula). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 283–312.Google Scholar

Burling, Robbins, 2004. The Language of the Modhipur Mandi (Garo), vol. I: Grammar. New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia.Google Scholar

Butler, Becky, 2015. Approaching a phonological understanding of the sesquisyllable with phonetic evidence from Khmer and Bunong. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 437–493.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1979. Further typological studies in southeast Asian languages. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistic Studies, vol. 3, pp. 1–42. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi, Menozzi, Paolo and Piazza, Alberto, 1993. Demic expansions and human evolution. Science 259 (5095): 639–646.Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary, 2001. Language contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, pp. 328–357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, John and Shackleton, N. J., 1986. Oxygen isotopes and sea level. Nature 324 (6093): 137–140.Google Scholar

Chen, Guoqing, 2005. Kemieyu yanjiu [A Study of Kemie]. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar

Clark, Marybeth, 1989. Hmong and areal South-East Asia. In Bradley, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, vol. 11: Southeast Asian Syntax, pp. 175–230. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Clark, Marybeth and Prasithrathsint, Amara, 1985. Synchronic lexical derivation in Southeast Asian languages. In Ratanakul, Suriya and Premsrirat, Suwilai (eds), Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies Presented to André-G. Haudricourt, pp. 34–81. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard (ed.), 1990. The Major Languages of East and South-East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, 2007. Areal typology of mainland Southeast Asia: What we learn from the WALS maps. In Kullavanijaya, Pranee (ed.), Trends in Thai Linguistics, pp. 18–47. Special issue of Manusya 13. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar

Cooke, Joseph R., 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese and Vietnamese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Coupe, A. R., 2003. A Phonetic and Phonological Description of Ao: A Tibeto-Burman Language of Nagaland, North-East India. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Coupe, A. R., 2007. A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Mouton Grammar Library, vol. 39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2008. An exercise in ‘a posteriori’ language sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61 (3): 208–220.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard, 2011. Austroasiatic word histories: Boat, husked rice and taro. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 295–313.Google Scholar

Diller, Anthony V. N., Edmondson, Jerold A. and Luo, Yongxian, 2008. The Tai-Kadai Languages. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, Hetherington, Rebecca, McElvenny, James and Dawson, Virginia, 2013. World Phonotactics Database. Canberra: Australian National University. http://phonotactics.anu.edu.auGoogle Scholar

van Driem, George, 2007. Austroasiatic phylogeny and the Austroasiatic homeland in light of recent population genetic studies. Mon-Khmer Studies 37: 1–14.Google Scholar

van Driem, George, 2011. Rice and the Austroasiatic and Hmong-Mien homelands. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 361–390.Google Scholar

van Driem, George, 2013. Trans-Himalayan. In Hill, Nathan and Owen-Smith, Thomas (eds), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds), 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.infoGoogle Scholar

Dunn, Michael, Burenhult, Niclas, Kruspe, Nicole, Tufvesson, Sylvia and Becker, Neele, 2011. Aslian linguistic prehistory: A case study in computational phylogenetics. Diachronica 28 (3): 291–323.Google Scholar

Dunn, Michael, Kruspe, Nicole and Burenhult, Niclas, 2013. Time and place in the prehistory of the Aslian languages. Human Biology 85: 383–399.Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold A. and Esling, John H., 2006. The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register and stress: laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology 23 (2): 157–191.Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold A. and Gregerson, Kenneth J., 2007. The languages of Vietnam: Mosaics and expansions. Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (6): 727–749.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2006. Languages as historical documents: The endangered archive in Laos. South East Asia Research 14 (3): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Mouton Grammar Library, vol. 38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (ed.), 2011a. Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2011b. Introduction: Dynamics of Human Diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, (ed.) pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2011c. Linguistic diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., 2015. The Utility of Meaning: What Words Mean and Why. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds), 2015. The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. and Diffloth, Gérard, 2009. Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 38 (1): 3–69.Google Scholar

Ferlus, Michel, 2014. Arem, a Vietic Language. Mon-Khmer Studies 43 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar

Fix, Alan, 2011. Origin of genetic diversity among Malaysian Orang Asli: An alternative to the demic diffusion model. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 277–291.Google Scholar

Gai, Xingzhi, 2002. A Study of Tanglang. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar

Giaphong, Suchada, 2004. Plang Grammar as Spoken in Huay Namkhun Village, Chiang Rai Province. MA thesis, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar

Gil, David, 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 262–351.Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff, 2005. The Languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grant, Anthony and Sidwell, Paul, 2005. Chamic and Beyond: Studies in Mainland Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette, 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of Nominal Classification, pp. 50–92.Google Scholar

Hạ, Kiều Phương, 2010. Prosody of Vietnamese from an interactional perspective: ờ, ừ and vâng in backchannels and requests for information. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 3 (1): 56–76.Google Scholar

Hạ, Kiều Phương, 2013. Prosodic means in repair initiation as an activity in Northern Vietnamese conversation. In Hole, Daniel and Löbel, Elisabeth (eds), Linguistics of Vietnamese: An International Survey, pp. 35–54. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Haas, Mary Rosamond, 1969. Sibling terms as used by marriage partners. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 25 (3): 228–235.Google Scholar

Haiman, John, 2011. Cambodian: Khmer. London Oriental and African Language Library, vol. 16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hajek, John, 1998. Kenaboi: An extinct unclassified language of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 28: 137–149.Google Scholar

Hartmann, John, 1998. A linguistic geography and history of Tai Meuang-Fai (Ditch-Dike) techno-culture. Language and Linguistics 16 (2): 67–101.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds), 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 149–174.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1965. The topography of certain phonetic and morphological characteristics of South East Asian languages. Lingua 15: 400–434.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A., 1967. Grammar and tone in South East Asian languages. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig 16 (1/2): 171–178.Google Scholar

Higbie, James and Thinsan, Snea, 2003. Thai Reference Grammar: The Structure of Spoken Thai. Bangkok: Orchid Press.Google Scholar

Higham, C., 2002. Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia. Bangkok: River Books.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds), 2011. North East Indian Linguistics, vol. 3. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds), 2012. North East Indian Linguistics, vol. 4. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn, Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds), 2013. North East Indian Linguistics, vol. 5. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Horie, Preeya Ingkaphirom, 2005. A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jacquesson, François, 2004. Le Deuri: Langue Tibéto-Birmane d’Assam. Leuven, Paris and Dudley, MA: Peeters.Google Scholar

Jenny, Mathias and Sidwell, Paul (eds), 2015. Handbook of the Austroasiatic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jonsson, Hjorleifur, 2011. Ethnology and the issue of human diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 109–122.Google Scholar

Jonsson, Hjorleifur, 2014. Slow Anthropology: Negotiating Difference with the Iu Mien. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar

Konnerth, Linda, 2014. A Grammar of Karbi. Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar

Kosaka, Ryuichi, 2000. A Descriptive Study of the Lachi Language: Syntactic Description, Historical Reconstruction and Genetic Relation. Doctoral dissertation, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Kölver, Ulrike, 1991. Local prepositions and serial verb constructions in Thai. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, pp. 485–508. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Kruspe, Nicole, 2004. A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Larish, Michael D., 2005. Moken and Moklen. In Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Adelaar, Alexander (eds), The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, pp. 513–533. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Lebar, Frank, Hickey, Gerald and Musgrave, John, 1964. Ethnic Groups of Mainland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar

Li, Daqin, 2003. A Study of Geman. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar

Li, Daqin, 2004. Sulong Yu Yan Jiu [A Study of Sulong]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Li, Yongsui, 2003. A Study of Sangkong. Beijing: The Nationalities Press.Google Scholar

Lidz, Liberty A., 2010. A Descriptive Grammar of Yongning Na (Mosuo). Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Luong, H. V., 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist 15 (2): 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luong, H. V., 1990. Discursive Practices and Linguistic Meanings: The Vietnamese System of Person Reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa and Burenhult, Niclas, 2014. Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition 130 (2): 266–270.Google Scholar

Mao, Zongwu and Li, Yunbing, 2002. A Study of Jiongnai. Beijing: Central Nationalities University Press.Google Scholar

Mao, Zongwu and Li, Yunbing, 2007. Younuoyu Yanjiu [A Study of Younuo]. Beijing: Minzu University of China Publishing House.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, no. 1, pp. 72–95. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 1991. Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, pp. 383–453. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 2003a. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 2003b. Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 33: 1–58.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A., 2015. Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: Putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 109–150.Google Scholar

Mayuree, Thawornpat, 2006. Gong: An Endangered Language of Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar

Michaud, Jean (ed.), 2010. Editorial: Zomia and beyond (Special Issue). Journal of Global History 5 (2): 187–214.Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen, 2005. The Tai Languages of Assam: A Grammar and Texts. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen, 2010. Turung: A Variety of Singpho Language Spoken in Assam. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds), 2008. North East Indian Linguistics, vol. 1. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen and Post, Mark W. (eds), 2010. North East Indian Linguistics, vol. 2. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter (ed.), 2008. From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel, 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nonaka, Angela M., 2004. The forgotten endangered languages: Lessons on the importance of remembering from Thailand’s Ban Khor sign language. Language in Society 33 (5): 737–767.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Richard A., 1995. Agricultural change and ethnic succession in Southeast Asian states: A case for regional anthropology. The Journal of Asian Studies 54 (4): 968–996.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Stephen, 2011. MtDNA variation and southward Holocene human dispersals within Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 81–108.Google Scholar

Oxenham, Marc and Tayles, Nancy, 2006. Bioarchaeology of Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Phattharathanit, Srichomthong, 2012. Identity maintenance in Lanna (Northern Thai). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 5: 67–84.Google Scholar

Pittayaporn, Pittayawat, 2009. Proto-Southwestern-Thai: A new reconstruction. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2: 119–143.Google Scholar

Pittayaporn, Pittayawat, 2015. Typologizing sesquisyllabicity: The role of structural analysis in the study of linguistic diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 494–523.Google Scholar

Ploykaew, Pornsawan, 2001. Samre Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar

Post, Mark W., 2007. A Grammar of Galo. Dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Post, Mark W., 2011. Prosody and typological drift in Austroasiatic and Tibeto-Burman: Against ‘Indosphere’ and ‘Sinosphere’. In Srichampa, S., Sidwell, Paul and Gregerson, K. J. (eds), Austroasiatic Studies: Papers from International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL4), pp. 198–211. Special issue of Mon-Khmer Studies 3. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Post, Mark W. 2015. Morphosyntactic reconstruction in an areal-historical context: A pre-historical relationship between North East India and Mainland Southeast Asia? In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 205–261.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 2010. Hmong-Mien Language History. Studies in Language Change, vol. 8. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha, 2015. Word-initial prenasalization in Southeast Asia: A historical perspective. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent, 2011. The Austroasiatics: East to west or west to east? In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 345–359.Google Scholar

Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger and Sanchez-Mazas, A. (eds), 2005. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Samarina, Irina, 2011. Jazyki gelao: Materialy k sopostavitel’nomu slovarju kadajskich jazykov [Gael Languages: Materials for a Comparative Dictionary of Kadai Languages]. Moskva: Academia.Google Scholar

van Schendel, Willem, 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20 (6): 647–668.Google Scholar

Scott, James C., 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Seng Mai, Ma, 2012. A Descriptive Grammar of Wa. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar

Shee, Naw Hsar, 2008. A Descriptive Grammar of Geba Karen. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar

Shintani, Tadahiko, 2008. The Palaung Language: the Comparative Lexicon of its Southern Dialects. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCCA).Google Scholar

Shorto, H. L., 1960. Word and syllable pattern in Palaung. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23 (3): 544–557.Google Scholar

Shorto, H. L., 2006. A Mon-Khmer Comparative Dictionary, edited by Sidwell, Paul. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack and Shohet, Merav, 2013. The problem of peers in Vietnamese interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (3): 618–638.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul, 2009. Proto-Mon-Khmer vocalism: Moving on from Shorto’s ‘alternances’. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 205–214.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul, 2013. Southeast Asian Mainland: Linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration, vol. 1: Prehistory, pp. 259–268. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul, 2015. Local drift and areal convergence in the restructuring of Mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 49–79.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul and Blench, Roger, 2011. The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The southeastern riverine hypothesis. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 315–343.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew (ed.), 2007. Language and National Identity in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sophana, Srichampa, 2008. Patterns of polite expressions in Vietnamese. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 38: 117–147.Google Scholar

de Sousa, Hilário, 2015. The Far Southern Sinitic languages as part of Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 352–436.Google Scholar

Srisakorn, Preedaporn, 2008. So (Thavung) Grammar. Dissertation, Mahidol University, Bangkok.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2002. No Sprachbund beyond this line! On the age-old discussion of how to define a linguistic area. In Ramat, Paulo and Stolz, Thomas (eds), Mediterranean Languages: Paper from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000, pp. 259–281. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Sun, Hongkai and Liu, Guangkun, 2009. A Grammar of Anong: Language Death under Intense Contact, edited translation and annotation, with translation, editing, annotation and expansion by Thurgood, Graham, Li, Fengxiang and Thurgood, Ela. Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Suwilai, Premsrirat, 1987. Khmu, a Minority Language of Thailand. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Suwilai, Premsrirat, 1998. Language maintenance and language shift in minority languages of Thailand. In Matsumura, Kazuto (ed.), Studies in Endangered Languages, pp. 191–211. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar

Suwilai, Premsrirat, 2007. Endangered languages of Thailand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 186: 75–93.Google Scholar

Suwilai, Premsrirat, 2008. Orthography development: A tool for revitalizing and maintaining ethnic minority languages. Journal of Language and Culture 26: 18–34.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Kam, Raw, Lindell, Kristina and Lundstrom, Håkan, 2013. Dictionary of Kammu Yuan Language and Culture. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Tarling, Nicholas, 1992. The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: from Early Times to c. 1800, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham, 1998. The development of the Chamic vowel system: the interaction of inheritance and borrowing. In Thomas, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, no. 15: Further Chamic Studies, pp. 61–90. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham, 1999. From Ancient Cham to Modern Dialects: Two Thousand Years of Language Contact and Change. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham, 2010. Hainan Cham, Anong, and Eastern Cham: Three languages, three social contexts, three patterns of change. Journal of Language Contact, Varia 3: 39–61.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham and La Polla, Randy J., 2003. The Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham, Thurgood, Ela and Li, Fengxiang, 2014. A Grammatical Sketch of Hainan Cham: History, Contact, and Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tooley, M. J. and Shennan, Ian (eds), 1987. Sea Level Changes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Umaporn, Sungkaman, 2007. Backchannel response in Mon conversation. Mon-Khmer Studies 37: 67–85.Google Scholar

Vittrant, Alice, 2015. Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian languages. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds), pp. 579–625.Google Scholar

Vittrant, Alice and Watkins, Justin (eds), in press. Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia Linguistic Area: Grammatical Sketches. Boston and Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Voris, Harold K., 2000. Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in Southeast Asia: Shorelines, river systems and time durations. Journal of Biogeography 27 (5): 1153–1167.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin, 2002. The Phonetics of Wa: Experimental Phonetics, Phonology, Orthography and Sociolinguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin (ed.), 2005. Studies in Burmese Linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin, 2013. Dictionary of Wa, two volumes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Wayesha, Ahsi James, 2010. A Phonological Description of Leinong Naga. MA thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar

White, Joyce C., 2011. Cultural diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia: A view from prehistory. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 9–46.Google Scholar

Wnuk, Ewelina, 2016. Semantic Specificity of Perception Verbs in Maniq. Nijmegen: Radboud University.Google Scholar

Wnuk, Ewelina and Majid, Asifa, 2014. Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition 131 (1): 125–138.Google Scholar

Yip, Moira, 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yu, Defen, 2007. Aspects of Lisu Phonology and Grammar, a Language of Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar