Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education
- The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- How Cognitive Psychology Can Inform Evidence-Based Education Reform
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Science and Math
- 3 Teaching Critical Thinking as if Our Future Depends on It, Because It Does
- 4 Improving Students’ Scientific Thinking
- 5 Spatial Skills, Reasoning, and Mathematics
- 6 Iterative Development of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics Learning and Instruction
- 7 Development of Fraction Understanding
- 8 Learning How to Solve Problems by Studying Examples
- 9 Harnessing Our Hands to Teach Mathematics
- Part III Reading and Writing
- Part IV General Learning Strategies
- Part V Metacognition
- Index
- References
3 - Teaching Critical Thinking as if Our Future Depends on It, Because It Does
from Part II - Science and Math
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education
- The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- How Cognitive Psychology Can Inform Evidence-Based Education Reform
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Science and Math
- 3 Teaching Critical Thinking as if Our Future Depends on It, Because It Does
- 4 Improving Students’ Scientific Thinking
- 5 Spatial Skills, Reasoning, and Mathematics
- 6 Iterative Development of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics Learning and Instruction
- 7 Development of Fraction Understanding
- 8 Learning How to Solve Problems by Studying Examples
- 9 Harnessing Our Hands to Teach Mathematics
- Part III Reading and Writing
- Part IV General Learning Strategies
- Part V Metacognition
- Index
- References
Summary
Critical thinking is the antidote for the chaos of our time, a time when facts are considered relative and the truth takes a backseat to what is popular (or gets you more air time in the media). We need to inoculate our students, so that they recognize fallacious reasoning and can resist the persuasive appeals of others, as well as encouraging them to be mindful of their own thinking biases. This chapter extols the importance of critical thinking instruction, offers a historical perspective to critical thinking instruction (and resistance to it) and the educational and assessment implications of teaching critical thinking, and places special emphasis on the real-world implications of thinking critically in an effort to create a better future for the next generations.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education , pp. 51 - 66Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A Stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1102–1134.Google Scholar
Arum, R. (2011). A Lack of Rigor Leaves Students “Adrift” in College. NPR. February 9, 2011. www.npr.org/2011/02/09/133310978/in-college-a-lack-of-rigor-leaves-students-adriftGoogle Scholar
Arum, R. & Roksa, J. (2010). Academically adrift. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L. & Bankert, E. (1990). Meta-analysis of effects of explicit instruction for critical thinking. ERIC, Collection of Educational Resources. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED328614Google Scholar
Butler, H. A. (2012). Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment predicts real-world outcomes of critical thinking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2851Google Scholar
Butler, H. A., Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J. et al. (2012). Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment and real-world outcomes: Cross-national applications. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.001Google Scholar
Butler, H. A., Pentoney, C., & Bong, M. (2017). Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 38–46.Google Scholar
De Bie, H., Wilhelm, P., & Van der Meij, H. (2015). The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment: Toward a Dutch appraisal of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 33–44.Google Scholar
De Bruin, W. B., Parker, B., & Fischhoff, A. M. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938–956.Google Scholar
Facione, P., Facione, N., & Giancarlo, C. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61–84.Google Scholar
Flat Earth Society. (2016). The Flat Earth Society (website). www.theflatearthsociety.org/home/index.phpGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, C .M., Graesser, A. C., Walker, B. et al. (2013). Didactic galactic: Acquiring knowledge learned in a serious game. In Lane, H. C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., & Pavlik, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: 16th International Conference (AIED 2013) (pp. 832–835). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. M., Pavlik, P., Graesser, A. C., Cai, Z., Germany, M., Millis, K., Butler, H., Halpern, D. F., & Dolan, R. (2012). Learning gains for core concepts in a serious game on scientific reasoning. In Yacef, K., Zaïane, O., Hershkovitz, H., Yudelson, M., & Stamper, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 172–175). Chania: International Educational Data Mining Society.Google Scholar
Franco, A. H. R., Butler, H. A., & Halpern, D. F. (2015). Teaching critical thinking to promote learning. In Dunn, D. S. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psychology education (pp. 65–74). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/0.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933815.013.007Google Scholar
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732Google Scholar
Furnham, A. & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and intelligence predicts academic school grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, I., Varnum, M. E. W., Na, J., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 944–953.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2012). “Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment.” SCHUHFRIED (Vienna Test System) (website).https://www.schuhfried.com/test/HCTAGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking, 5th edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. & Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond: Teaching for long-term retention and transfer. Change, July/August, 2–13.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., Millis, K., Graesser., A., Butler, H., Forsyth, C. & Cai, Z. (2012). Operation ARA: A computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College learning and career success Washington, DC: Hart Research Associates. www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2015employerstudentsurvey.pdfGoogle Scholar
Heijltjes, A., Van, Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving students’ critical thinking: Empirical support for explicit instructions combined with practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3025Google Scholar
Huber, C. R. & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86, 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, A., Melchers, K. G., Lievens, F., Kleinmann, M., Brändli, M., Fraefel, L., & König, C. J. (2013). Situation assessment as an ignored factor in the behavioral consistency paradigm underlying the validity of personnel selection procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.Google Scholar
Kuncel, N. R., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2010). Individual differences as predictors of work, educational, and broad life outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 331–336.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01685.xGoogle Scholar
Marin, L. & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 1–13https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08Google Scholar
Mosley, D., Miller, J., & Higgins, S. (2003). Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training. Paper prepared for the Knowledge and Skills for Learning to Learn Seminar. London, UK.Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics. (2015). Health, United States, 2015, with special feature on racial and ethnic health disparities. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Otto, S. (2016). A plan to defend against the war on science. Scientific American. October 9, 2016. www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-plan-to-defend-against-the-war-on-science/Google Scholar
P21 (Partnership for 21st Century Learning). (n.d.). “List of Exemplar Schools” (website). http://www.p21.org/exemplar-program-case-studies/about-the-programGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. A., Savolainen, J., Aaltonen, M., Merikukka, M., Paananen, R., & Gissler, M. (2015). Intelligence and criminal behavior in a total birth cohort: An examination of functional form, dimensions of intelligence, and the nature of offending. Intelligence, 51, 109–118.Google Scholar
Soars, D. L., Lemos, G. C., Primi, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2010). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2008). On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking & Reasoning, 14, 129–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780701679764Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, V. (2012). Texas GOP rejects “critical thinking” skills. Really. The Washington Post. July 9, 2012. www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/texas-gop-rejects-critical-thinking-skills-really/2012/07/08/gJQAHNpFXW_blog.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015–9417-2Google Scholar
Van der Linden, S. (2013). New psychological research helps explain why some see intricate government conspiracies behind events like 9/11 or the Boston bombing. Scientific American. April 30, 2013. www.scientificamerican.com/article/moon-landing-faked-hy-people-believe-conspiracy-theories/Google Scholar
Van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10(2): e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by