Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:58:56.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Equity and Diversity

from Systemic Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

By
Colleen M. Lewis ,
Niral Shah  and
Katrina Falkner
Edited by
Sally A. Fincher  and
Anthony V. Robins
Sally A. Fincher
Affiliation:
University of Kent, Canterbury
Anthony V. Robins
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

It is frequently observed that some groups are underrepresented in computing. In this chapter, we provide readers with resources for understanding the roots of underrepresentation and how these can play out in computing classrooms. We begin by developing a shared set of terminology. Next, we introduce research related to implicit bias and identify the ways in which societal narratives about computing and computer scientists can produce harm and can produce these patterns of underrepresentation. We ground our review of additional literature within four hypothetical vignettes of common scenarios in computing education. The vignettes focus on research related to: structural barriers and stereotype threat, belonging and participation, biased statements in the classroom and their impact, and the importance of listening to the experiences of students from marginalized groups in computing. These vignettes also concretely illustrate the relevance of particular interventions used to attenuate inequity in computing. We hope that our chapter will spark continued research into these important issues and also support computing instructors to pursue equity and justice in their current contexts.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research , pp. 481 - 510
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarado, C., Dodds, Z., & Libeskind-Hadas, R. (2012). Increasing women’s participation in computing at Harvey Mudd College. ACM Inroads, 3(4), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(10), 670–682.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. J. (2012). Black achievers’ experiences with racial spotlighting and ignoring in a predominantly White high school. In Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–46.Google Scholar
Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.Google Scholar
Barker, L. (2010). Avoiding Unintended Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation (Case Study 1). Reducing Unconscious Bias to Increase Women’s Success in IT. Promising Practices, National Center for Women and Information Technology. Retrived from www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/avoidingunintendedgenderbiaslettersrecommendation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Barker, L. J. Garvin-Doxas, K., & Jackson, M. (2002). Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(1), 43–47.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.Google Scholar
Bobb, K. (2016). Why teaching computer science to students of color is vital to the future of our nation. The Root. Retrieved from www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/03/why_teaching_computer_science_to_students_of_color_is_vital_to_the_future/Google Scholar
Bobo, L. D., Charles, C. Z., Krysan, M., Simmons, A. D., & Fredrickson, G. M. (2012). The real record on racial attitudes. In Social Trends in American Life: Findings from the General Social Survey since 1972 (pp. 38–83). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). “New racism,” color-blind racism, and the future of whiteness in America. In Doane, A. W. & Bonlilla-Silva, E. (Eds.), White Out: The Continuing Significance of Racism (pp. 271–284). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brady, C., Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Anton, G., Rodriguez, S., & Wilensky, U. (2017). All roads lead to computing: Making, participatory simulations, and social computing as pathways to computer science. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(1), 59–66.Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chinn, D., Martin, K., & Spencer, C. (2007). Treisman workshops and student performance in CS. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 203–207.Google Scholar
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. D. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1302–1318.Google Scholar
Cohoon, J. M., Wu, Z., & Chao, J. (2009). Sexism: Toxic to women’s persistence in CSE doctoral programs. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 158–162.Google Scholar
College Board (2017). AP program participation and performance data 2017 [Data file]. Retrieved from https://research.collegeboard.org/programs/ap/data/archived/ap-2017Google Scholar
Cvencek, D., Nasir, N. I. S., O’Connor, K., Wischnia, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). The development of math–race stereotypes: “They say Chinese people are the best at math”. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(4), 630–637.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Eglash, R. (2002). Race, sex, and nerds: From black geeks to Asian American hipsters. Social Text, 20(2), 49–64.Google Scholar
Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., Taylor, V., & Geier, S. R. (2013). Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education, 48(5), 629–656.Google Scholar
Ensmenger, N. (2010). Making programming masculine. In Misa, T. J. (Ed.), Gender Codes: Why Women Are Leaving Computing (pp. 115–141). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ensmenger, N. L. (2012). The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Essed, P. (2002). Cloning cultural homogeneity while talking diversity: Old wine in new bottles in Dutch organizations. Transforming Anthropology, 11(1), 2–12.Google Scholar
Fairchild, H. H. (1991). Scientific racism: The cloak of objectivity. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 101–115.Google Scholar
Falkner, K., Falkner, N., Szabo, C., & Vivian, R. (2016). Applying validated pedagogy to MOOCs: An introductory programming course with media computation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ‘16) (pp. 326–331). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Fiarman, S. E. (2016). Unconscious bias: When good intentions aren’t enough. Educational Leadership, 74(3), 10–15.Google Scholar
Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., Nakajima, T., & Goode, J. (2017). Teaching practices for making e-textiles in high school computing classrooms. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (FabLearn ‘17) (p. 5). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goode, J. (2008). Increasing diversity in K–12 computer science: Strategies from the field. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 362–366.Google Scholar
Goode, J., Chapman, G., & Margolis, J. (2012). Beyond curriculum: The exploring computer science program. ACM Inroads, 3(2), 47–53.Google Scholar
Google Inc. (2014). Women who choose computer science – What really matters: The critical role of exposure and encouragement. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-E2rcvhnlQ_a1Q4VUxWQ2dtTHM/editGoogle Scholar
Google Inc., & Gallup Inc. (2015). Searching for computer science: Access and barriers in U.S. K–12 education. Retrieved from http://g.co/cseduresearchGoogle Scholar
Google Inc., & Gallup Inc. (2016). Diversity Gaps in Computer Science: Exploring the Underrepresentation of Girls, Blacks and Hispanics. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/PG34aHGoogle Scholar
Google Inc., & Gallup Inc. (2017). Encouraging Students Toward Computer Science Learning. Results From the 2015–2016 Google–Gallup Study of Computer Science in U.S. K–12 Schools (Issue Brief No. 5). Retrieved from https://goo.gl/iM5g3AGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. B. (1989). Funds of knowledge: Historical constitution, social distribution, and transmission. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Society for Applied Anthropology, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.Google Scholar
Guzdial, M. (2013). Exploring hypotheses about media computation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 19–26). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2007). Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation. New Directions for Student Services, 2007(120), 7–24.Google Scholar
Harrell, D. F. (2013). Phantasmal Media: An Approach to Imagination, Computation, and Expression. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, V., Yee, L., Prince, S., & Dixon-Fyle, S. (2018). Delivering through Diversity. McKinsey & Company Report. Retrieved from www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/delivering-through-diversityGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J. S., & Jaffee, S. (1998). Perspectives from social and feminist psychology. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 14–16.Google Scholar
Information is Beautiful (2016). Diversity in tech: Employee breakdown of key technology companies. Retrieved from www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/diversity-in-tech/Google Scholar
Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 241–246). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, C. (2001). Effect of teachers’ stereotyping on students’ stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 165–173.Google Scholar
Kendi, I. X. (2016). Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. N. (2012). A study of stereotype threat in computer science. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 273–278). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Ladner, R., & Israel, M. (2016). “For all” in “computer science for all.” Communications of the ACM, 59(9), 26–28.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, J., & Martin, D. B. (Eds.) (2013). The Brilliance of Black Children in Mathematics. Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. M., Anderson, R. E., & Yasuhara, K. (2016). I don’t code all day: Fitting in computer science when the stereotypes don’t fit. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 23–32). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. M., Yasuhara, K., & Anderson, R. E. (2011a). Deciding to major in computer science: A grounded theory of students’ self-assessment of ability. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 3–10). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. M., Titterton, N., & Clancy, M. (2012). Using collaboration to overcome disparities in Java experience. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 79–86). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. M. (2017). Twelve tips for creating a culture that supports all students in computing. ACM Inroads, 8(4), 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. M., & Shah, N. (2015). How equity and inequity can emerge in pair programming. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123–1135.Google Scholar
Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1591–1599.Google Scholar
Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976). The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Malouff, J. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016). Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings. Australian Journal of Education, 60(3), 245–256.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Jellison-Holme, J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., Goode, J., & Chapman, G. (2015). An equity lens for scaling: A critical juncture for exploring computer science. ACM Inroads, 6(3), 58–66.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., Goode, J., Chapman, G., & Ryoo, J. J. (2014). That classroom “magic”. Communications of the ACM, 57(7), 31–33.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., Ryoo, J., Sandoval, C., Lee, C., Goode, J., & Chapman, G. (2012). Beyond access: Broadening participation in high school computer science. ACM Inroads, 3(4), 72–78.Google Scholar
Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male–female differences: A computer simulation. Retrieved from www.ruf.rice.edu/~lane/papers/male_female.pdfGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. B. (2003). Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 7–21.Google Scholar
McAfee, M. (2014). The kinesiology of race. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 468–491.Google Scholar
McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389.Google Scholar
Medel, P., & Pournaghshband, V. (2017). Eliminating gender bias in computer science education materials. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 411–416). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of US draw-a-scientist studies. Child Development, doi:10.1111/cdev.13039.Google Scholar
Milner IV, H. R. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718.Google Scholar
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (2006). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (Eds.), Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms (pp. 71–87). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno, S. E., & Muller, C. (1999). Success and diversity: The transition through first-year calculus in the university. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 30–57.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C. W., Korris, J. H., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Debiasing decisions: Improved decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 129–140.Google Scholar
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.Google Scholar
Mulkey, L. M., Catsambis, S., Steelman, L. C., & Crain, R. L. (2005). The long-term effects of ability grouping in mathematics: A national investigation. Social Psychology of Education, 8(2), 137–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, N. I. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, N. S., Atukpawu, G., O’Connor, K., Davis, M., Wischnia, S., & Tsang, J. (2009). Wrestling with the legacy of stereotypes: Being African American in math class. In Martin, D. B. (Ed.), Mathematics Teaching, Learning, and Liberation in the Lives of Black Children (pp. 231–248). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nasir, N. S., & Shah, N. (2011). On defense: African American males making sense of racialized narratives in mathematics education. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2(1), 24–45.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/Google Scholar
National Center for Women and Information Technology (2017). By the Numbers. Retrieved from www.ncwit.org/bythenumbersGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Ong, M. (2011). The status of women of color in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 54(7), 32–34.Google Scholar
Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2015). Racial Formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orfield, G., & Eaton, S. E. (1996). Dismantling Desegregation. The Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Paek, H. J., & Shah, H. (2003). Racial ideology, model minorities, and the “not-so-silent partner”: Stereotyping of Asian Americans in US magazine advertising. Howard Journal of Communication, 14(4), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 937–975.Google Scholar
Patitsas, E., Berlin, J., Craig, M., & Easterbrook, S. (2016). Evidence that computer science grades are not bimodal. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 113–121). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, M. (2004). Race wrestling: Struggling strategically with race in educational practice and research. American Journal of Education, 111(1), 25–67.Google Scholar
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231.Google Scholar
Reich, D. (2018). Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinholz, D., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177.Google Scholar
Robins, A. (2010). Learning edge momentum: A new account of outcomes in CS1. Computer Science Education, 20(1), 37–71.Google Scholar
Rose, A. (2010). Are face-detection cameras racist? TIME. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1954643,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rubio, M. A., Romero-Zaliz, R., Mañoso, C., & Angel, P. (2015). Closing the gender gap in an introductory programming course. Computers & Education, 82(1), 409–420.Google Scholar
Sadker, D., Sadker, M., & Zittleman, K. (2009). Still Failing at Fairness: How Gender Bias Cheats Girls and Boys in School and What We Can Do about It. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Schaffer, R., & Skinner, D. G. (2009). Performing race in four culturally diverse fourth grade classrooms: Silence, race talk, and the negotiation of social boundaries. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(3), 277–296.Google Scholar
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356.Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253–286.Google Scholar
Scott, K. A., & White, M. A. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’ standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681.Google Scholar
Scott, A., & Martin, A. (2014). Perceived barriers to higher education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(3), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N., & Lewis, C.M. (in press). Amplifying and attenuating inequity in collaborative learning: Toward an analytical framework. Cognition and Instruction.Google Scholar
Shah, N. (2013). Racial Discourse in Mathematics and its Impact on Student Learning, Identity, and Participation (PhD thesis). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Shah, N., Lewis, C. M., Caires, R., Khan, N., Qureshi, A., Ehsanipour, D., & Gupta, N. (2013). Building equitable computer science classrooms: Elements of a teaching approach. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 263–268). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Shah, N. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42.Google Scholar
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80–83.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. (2015). Diversity’s Promise for Higher Education: Making it Work. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do. New York: WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41(7–8), 509–528.Google Scholar
Stinson, D. W. (2008). Negotiating sociocultural discourses: The counter-storytelling of academically (and mathematically) successful African American male students. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 975–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, H., & Ewing, J. (2016). Volkswagen to pay $14.7 billion to settle diesel claims in U.S. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2016/06/28/business/volkswagen-settlement-diesel-scandal.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tapia, J. (1991). Cultural Reproduction: Funds of Knowledge as Survival Strategies in the Mexican American Community (doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Tatman, R. (2016). Google’s speech recognition has a gender bias. Making noise and hearing things. Retrieved from https://makingnoiseandhearingthings.com/2016/07/12/googles-speech-recognition-has-a-gender-bias/Google Scholar
Telles, E. E. (2004). Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 144–151.Google Scholar
Toyama, K. (2015). Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology. Philadelphia, PA: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362–372.Google Scholar
Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191–220.Google Scholar
Trytten, D. A., Lowe, A. W., & Walden, S. E. (2012). “Asians are good at math. What an awful stereotype.” The model minority stereotype’s impact on asian american engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 439–468.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16(6), 474–480.Google Scholar
Vakil, S. (2014). A critical pedagogy approach for engaging urban youth in mobile app development in an after-school program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
Vélez-Ibáñez, C. G. (1988). Networks of exchange among Mexicans in the U.S. and Mexico: Local level mediating responses to national and international transformations. Urban Anthropology, 17, 27–51.Google Scholar
Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232.Google Scholar
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451.Google Scholar
Wang, J. Hejazi Moghadam, S., & Tiffany-Morales, J. (2017). Social perceptions in computer science and implications for diverse students. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 47–55). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. C., Phillips, K. W., & Hall, E. V. (2014). Double Jeopardy: Gender Bias Against Women of Color in Science. Retrieved from https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/1278Google Scholar
Winkelmes, M. A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1/2), 31.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2006). Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×