Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:15:17.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Creativity and Personality

Nuances of Domain and Mood

from Part II - Creativity and Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

Gregory J. Feist
Affiliation:
San José State University, California
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, A., & Windmann, S. (2007). Creative cognition: the diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods, 42(1), 3848. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: a meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6 (4), 341–50. doi:10.1037/a0027497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367403. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th text revision edn.). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–50. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.106.3.529Google Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779806. doi:10.1037/a0012815Google Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794809. doi:10.1037/a0022981Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–7. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1102_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: the amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–63.Google Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816–21. doi:10.1016/j.pa id.2008.08.014Google Scholar
Beedie, C., Terry, P., & Lane, A. (2005). Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 847–78. doi:10.1080/02699930541000057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: an initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266–76. doi:10.1037/a0036618Google Scholar
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 634–9. doi:10.3758/BF03195543CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. (2014). The Shared Vulnerability Model of Creativity and Psychopathology. In Kaufman, J. C. (ed.), Creativity and Mental Illness. (pp. 253–80). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. J. (1994). On Emotion, Mood and Related Affective Constructs. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion (pp. 51–5). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739–56. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.94.5.739Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/Intellect: A Dimension of Personality Reflecting Cognitive Exploration. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Cooper, M. L., & Larsen, R. J. (eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Personality Processes and Individual Differences (pp. 369–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2005.00330.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–96. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dostál, D., Plháková, A., & Záškodná, T. (2015). Domain-specific creativity in relation to the level of empathy and systemizing. Journal of Creative Behavior, doi:10.1002/jocb.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i113..Google Scholar
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, M. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational and Human Decision Processes, 72, 117–35.Google Scholar
Estrada, C., Young, M., & Isen, A. M. (1994). Positive affect influences creative problem solving and reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 285–99. doi: 10.1007/BF02856470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147–78. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0403_1Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2012). Affective States and Affective Traits in Creativity: Evidence for Non-Linear Relationships. In Runco, M. A. (ed.). The Creativity Research Handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 61102). New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Fink, A., & Woschnjak, S. (2011). Creativity and personality in professional dancers. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 754–8.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–19. doi: 10.1037/1089–2680.2.3.300Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19 (3), 313–32. doi:10.1080/02699930441000238Google Scholar
Friedman, R. S., Förster, J., & Denzler, M. (2007). Interactive effects of mood and task framing on creative generation. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 141–62. doi:10.1080/10400410701397206Google Scholar
Gale, A. (1983). Electroencephalographic studies of extraversion-introversion: a case study in the psychophysiology of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 4(4), 371–80. doi:10.1016/0191–8869(83)90002-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, K., & Middlewood, B. L. (2014). Approaching novel thoughts: understanding why elation and boredom promote associative thought more than distress and relaxation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 50–7. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.007Google Scholar
Geen, R. G. (1984). Preferred stimulation levels in introverts and extroverts: effects on arousal and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1303–12. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.46.6.1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geen, R. G., McCown, E. J., & Broyles, J. W. (1985). Effects of noise on sensitivity of introverts and extraverts to signals in a vigilance task. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(2), 237–41. doi:10.1016/0191–8869(85)90114-XGoogle Scholar
Greene, T. R., & Noice, H. (1988). Influence of positive affect upon creative thinking and problem solving in children. Psychological Reports, 63, 895–8. doi: 10.2466/ pr0.1988.63.3.895Google Scholar
Hoff, E. V., Carlsson, I. M., & Smith, G. J. W. (2012). Personality. In Mumford, M. D. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 241–70). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–31. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.52.6.1122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413–26. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.48.6.1413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeon, K.-N., Moon, S. M., & French, B. (2011). Differential effects of divergent thinking, domain knowledge, and interest on creative performance in art and math. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 6071. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545750Google Scholar
Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 303–15. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1004_2Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 3750.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Narrative and paradigmatic thinking styles in creative writing and journalism students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2003). The cost of the muse: poets die young. Death Studies, 27, 813–22.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2005). The door that leads into madness: Eastern European poets and mental illness. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 99103.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: development of the Kaufman-Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (ed.) (2014). Creativity and Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd edn.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C, & Baer, J. (2002). I bask in dreams of suicide: mental illness and poetry. Review of General Psychology, 6, 271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, 1525.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J., (2005). The Amusement Park Theory of Creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (eds.), Creativity across Domains: Faces of the Muse (pp. 321–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligent testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99102.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V., & Baer, J. (in press). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Disciplines. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2006). Why doesn’t the writing cure help poets? Review of General Psychology, 10, 268–82.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 233–55.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, , et al. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 4, 8. doi:10.1111/jopy.12156.Google Scholar
Kline, P., & Cooper, C. (1986). Psychoticism and creativity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147(2), 183–8. doi:10.1080/00221325.1986.9914492Google Scholar
Kyaga, S., Landén, M., Boman, M., Hultman, C. M., Långström, N., et al. (2012). Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-year prospective total population study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47 (1), 8390. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.010Google Scholar
Kyaga, S., Lichtenstein, P., Boman, M., Hultman, C., Långström, N., et al. (2011). Creativity and mental disorder: family study of 300,000 people with severe mental disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 199(5), 373–9. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085316Google Scholar
Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, A. M. (1992). Creative achievement and psychopathology: comparison among professions. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 330–56.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The Price of Greatness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1999). The Biological Basis of Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 137–52). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity, primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(4), 409–14. doi:10.1016/0191- 8869(95)00202–2Google Scholar
Matt, G. E., Vázquez, C., & Campbell, W. K. (1992). Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12 (2), 227–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.52.6.1258Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 8190. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.52.1.81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Literary Geniuses: Their Life, Work, and Death. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Genius (pp. 473–87). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–32. doi:10.1037/h0048850Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, G. a. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance1. Journal of Personality, 44(2), 341369. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.1976.tb00127.xGoogle Scholar
Merten, T., & Fischer, I. (1999). Creativity, personality and word association responses: associative behaviour in forty supposedly creative persons. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(5), 933–42. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00042–2Google Scholar
Mussel, P. (2013). Intellect: a theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 885906. doi:10.1037/a0031918Google Scholar
Mussel, P., McKay, A. S., Ziegler, M., Hewig, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Predicting creativity based on the facets of the theoretical intellect framework. European Journal of Personality, 29, 459–67. doi:10.1002/per.2000Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876–90. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2 005.09.004Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113–31. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.65.1.113Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are openness and intellect distinct aspects of openness to experience? A test of the O/I model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 571–4. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.013Google Scholar
Papworth, M. A., & James, I. A. (2003). Creativity and mood: towards a model of cognitive mediation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 116. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.2003.tb00823.xGoogle Scholar
Papworth, M. A., Jordan, G., Backhouse, C., Evans, N., Kent-Lemon, N., et al. (2008). Artists’ vulnerability to psychopathology: towards an integrative cognitive perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 149–64. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.2008.tb01292.xGoogle Scholar
Palermo, D. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Word Association Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: the case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 179–82. doi: 10.1207/s1532693 4crj1102_8Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Doesn’t Matter. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization (pp. 153–67). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of Creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 4873). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: a study of 291 world-famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 2234. doi:10.1192/bjp.165.1.22Google Scholar
Preti, A., & Vellante, M. (2007). Creativity and psychopathology: higher rates of psychosis proneness and nonright-handedness among creative artists compared to same age and gender peers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(10), 837–45. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181568180Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: the case of creativity. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19, 2745.Google Scholar
Reuter, M., Panksepp, J., Schnabel, N., Kellerhoff, N., Kempel, P., et al. (2005). Personality and biological markers of creativity. European Journal of Personality, 19(2), 8395. doi:10.1002/per.534Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–72. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.110.1.145Google Scholar
Rybakowski, J. K., & Klonowska, P. (2011). Bipolar mood disorder, creativity and schizotypy: an experimental study. Psychopathology, 44(5), 296302. doi:10.1159/000322814Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J. (2009). Creative mythconceptions: a closer look at the evidence for the “mad genius” hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 6272. doi: 10.1037/a0013975Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J. (2014). Building Connections on Sand: The Cautionary Chapter. In Kaufman, J. C. (ed.), Creativity and Mental Illness (pp. 6075). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-Information Theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 385407). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1993). Correlations among creativity, intelligence, personality, and academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(2), 497–8. doi:10.2466/pms.1993.77.2.497Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Creativity and Mental Illness. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 381–94). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 139–48. doi:10.1037/a0014940Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Biographical typicality, eminence and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 1422. doi:10.1002/j.2162–6057.1986.tb00413.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2010). So You Want to Become a Creative Genius? You Must Be Crazy! In Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., Cropley, A. J., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The Dark Side of Creativity (pp. 218–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014). The mad-genius paradox: can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470–80. doi:10.1177/1745691614543973Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain. Psychological Science, 20, 429–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02313.xGoogle Scholar
Stavridou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait creativity, and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 143–53. doi:10.1016/0191–8869(96)00030-XGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. L. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between creativity and mood disorder. Paper presented at the 123rd Annual American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–9. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01633.xGoogle Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A., Anastasopoulou, C., & Nijstad, B. A. (2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1042–8. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.015Google Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Cheshin, A. (2012). Emotional influence at work: take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 311–39. doi:10.1177/2041386612454911Google Scholar
Visser, V. A., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & Wisse, B. (2013). How leader displays of happiness and sadness influence follower performance: emotional contagion and creative versus analytical performance. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 172–88. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.003Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–35. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.98.2.219Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity–Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z.-X., Chiu, C.-Y., et al. (2013). Openness to experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 2945. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.806328Google Scholar
Woody, E., & Claridge, G. (1977). Psychoticism and thinking. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(3), 241–8. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8260.1977.tb00225.xGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×