Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- 17 Transnationalism, Globalization and Superdiversity
- 18 Translanguaging and Momentarity in Social Interaction
- 19 Intersectionality, Affect and Discourse
- 20 Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- Index
- References
19 - Intersectionality, Affect and Discourse
from Part IV - (Trans)Locations and Intersections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- 17 Transnationalism, Globalization and Superdiversity
- 18 Translanguaging and Momentarity in Social Interaction
- 19 Intersectionality, Affect and Discourse
- 20 Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter argues for the importance of intersectionality as a heuristic framework through which to understand how identities and emotions are produced in discourse. The chapter begins with a historical overview of theoretical discussions around intersectionality. Particular focus is put on the ways in which intersectionality has been recently rediscovered in different strands of research on language in society. The chapter then moves on to showcase discourse analytical work that has operationalized intersectionality with the help of a variety of techniques such as conversation analysis, online ethnography and multimodal critical discourse analysis in order to understand the social and political life of three emotions: hate, desire and shame. The chapter closes with a few reflections about future avenues for further investigation such as the domain of hope and its potential for social justice and sociopolitical change.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 417 - 436Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Further Reading
This monograph offers an illuminating analysis of the relationships among bilingualism, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and race among Latinx in the United States.
This insightful special issue illustrates how intersectionality can be analytically useful in the study of queer lives in a variety of contexts.
This important edited collection showcases sociolinguistic studies that operationalize the notion of intersectionality with the help of different analytical and methodological techniques.
This useful book summarizes debates about emotions and affect in the social sciences and offers clear examples of the ways in which discourse analysts can go about analyzing emotions in discourse.
Cashman, H. (2017). Queer, Latinx and Bilingual: Narrative Resources in the Negotiation of Identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gray, J. and Cooke, M. (2018). Special Issue: Intersectionality, Language, and Queer Lives. Gender and Language 12(4).Google Scholar
Levon, E. and Mendes, R. (2016). Language, Sexuality, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Ameeriar, L. (2014). Investing in Whiteness: The UCSB Tragedy and Asian America. Social Text Online. https://socialtextjournal.org/investing-in-whiteness-the-ucsb-tragedy-and-asian-america/.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis/St Paul: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, R. (2017). From Drag Queens to Leathermen: Language, Gender, and Gay Male Subcultures. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (1993). A Good Judge of Character: Men, Metaphors, and the Common Culture. In Morrison, T. (ed.) Racing Justice, Engendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality. New York: Pantheon. 232–49.Google Scholar
Block, D. and Corona, V. (2014). Exploring Class-Based Intersectionality. Language, Culture and Curriculum 27(1): 28–42.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2017). Online-Offline Modes of Identity and Community: Elliot Rodger’s Twisted World of Masculine Victimhood. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 200. www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/5a9ff4f6-4c84-4b93-8724-500f32578cd0_TPCS_200_Blommaert.pdf.Google Scholar
Bogetić, K. (2013). Normal Straight Gays: Lexical Collocations and Ideologies of Masculinity in Personal Ads of Serbian Gay Teenagers. Gender and Language 7(3): 333–67.Google Scholar
Borba, R. (2019). Injurious Signs: The Geopolitics of Hate and Hope in the Linguistic Landscape of a Political Crisis. In Peck, A., Williams, Q. E. and Stroud, C. (eds.) People in Place: Making Sense of Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury. 161–81.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2016). Why Bodies Matter: Discourse and Materiality after Mass Murder. Unpublished essay. www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/bucholtz/research.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2016). Embodied Sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173–98.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2018). Is “Terrorism” the Right Word? Language: A Feminist Guide https://debuk.wordpress.com/2018/05/01/is-terrorism-the-right-word/.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. and Kulick, D. (2003). Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carbin, M. and Edenheim, S. (2013). The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language? European Journal of Women’s Studies 20(3): 233–48.Google Scholar
Cashman, H. (2017). Queer, Latinx and Bilingual: Narrative Resources in the Negotiation of Identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. and McCall, L. (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Signs 38(4): 785–810.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1): 139–67.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Whose Story Is It Anyway? Feminist and Antiracist Appropriations of Anita Hill. In Morrison, T. (ed.) Racing Justice, Engendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality. New York: Pantheon. 402–40.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (2011). Postscript. In Lutz, H., Herrera Vivar, M. T. and Supik, L. (eds.) Framing Intersectionality: Debated on a Multi-faceted Concept in Gender Studies. Farnham: Ashgate. 221–33.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (2018). We Still Haven’t Learned from Anita Hill’s Testimony. www.nytimes.com/2018/09/27/opinion/anita-hill-clarence-thomas-brett-kavanaugh-christine-ford.html.Google Scholar
Crowley, J. (1999). The Politics of Belonging: Some Theoretical Considerations. In Geddes, A. and Favell, A. (eds.) The Politics of Belonging: Migrants and Minorities in Contemporary Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate. 15–41.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2002). Demystifying Sexuality and Desire. In Campbell-Kibler, K., Podesva, R. J., Roberts, S. J. and Wong, A. (eds.) Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning, Theory and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 99–110.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (2014). Language, Gender and Sexual Violence: Legal Perspective. In Ehrlich, S., Meyerhoff, M. and Holmes, J. (eds.) The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 452–70.Google Scholar
Ferrada, J. S., Bucholtz, M. and Corella, M. (2020). “Respecta mi idioma”: Latinx Youth Enacting Affective Agency. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 19(20): 79–94.Google Scholar
Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities OnlineFirst. www.researchgate.net/publication/316845210_Alphas_Betas_and_Incels_Theorizing_the_Masculinities_of_the_Manosphere.Google Scholar
Gomes de Jesus, J. (2015). Homofobia: identificar e prevenir. Rio de Janeiro: Metanóia.Google Scholar
Gray, J. and Cooke, M. (2018). Intersectionality, Language, and Queer Lives, Gender and Language 12(4): 401–15.Google Scholar
Kiesling, S. F. (2013). Flirting and “Normative” Sexualities. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1): 101–21.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. (2009). Can There Be an Anthropology of Homophobia? In Murray, D. A. B. (ed.) Homophobias: Lust and Loathing across Time and Space. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, D. and Rydström, J. (2015). Loneliness and Its Opposite: Sex, Disability, and the Ethics of Engagement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Levon, E. and Mendes, R. (eds.) (2016). Language, Sexuality, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matebeni, Z. (2013). Exploring Black Lesbian Sexualities and Identities in Johannesburg. PhD thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Witswatersrand. http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10539/10274/Matebeni%20PhD%20thesis%202011.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Milani, T. M. (2013). Are “Queers” Really “Queer”? Language, Identity and Same-Sex Desire in a South African Online Community. Discourse & Society 24(5): 615–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, T. M. (2015). Sexual Citizenship: Discourses, Spaces and Bodies at Joburg Pride 2012. Journal of Language and Politics 14(3): 431–54.Google Scholar
Mortensen, K. K. (2015). A Bit Too Skinny for Me: Women’s Homosocial Constructions of Heterosexual Desire in Online Dating. Gender and Language 9(3): 461–88.Google Scholar
Mortensen, K. K. (2017). Flirting in Online Dating: Giving Empirical Grounds to Flirtatious Implicitness. Discourse Studies 19(5): 581–97.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Munt, S. (2007). Queer Attachments: The Cultural Politics of Shame. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Murray, D. A. B. (2009). Introduction. In Murray, D. A. B. (ed.) Homophobias: Lust and Loathing across Time and Space. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. A. B. (ed.) (2014). Special Issue: Queering Borders. Journal of Language and Sexuality 3(1).Google Scholar
Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. London: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. and Blackledge, A. (2004). Introduction: New Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. In Pavlenko, A. and Blackledge, A. (eds.) Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 1–33.Google Scholar
Peck, A., Williams, Q. E. and Stroud, C. (eds.) (2019). People in Place: Making Sense of Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pichler, P. (2017). “You Are Stupid, You Are Cupid”: Playful Polyphony as a Resource for Affectionate Expression in the Talk of a Young London Couple. Gender and Language 11(2): 153–75.Google Scholar
Piller, I. and Takahashi, K. (2006). A Passion for English: Desire and the Language Market. In Pavlenko, A. (ed.) Bilingual Minds: Emotional Experience, Expression, and Representation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 59–83.Google Scholar
Provencher, D. M. (2010). “I Dislike Politicians and Homosexuals”: Language and Homophobia in France. Gender and Language 4(2): 287–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Salem, S. (2018). Intersectionality and Its Discontents: Intersectionality as Traveling Theory. European Journal of Women’s Studies 25(4): 403–18.Google Scholar
Schmith, R. M. and Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Portrayals of Manhood in Men’s Rights Activist Websites. Social Sciences 5(2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. ([1990]2008). The Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, D. (2017). The Pragmatics of Hope, or How to Emancipate Yourself from Violent (Speech) Acts. Paper presented at AILA 2017, Rio de Janeiro, July 23–28.Google Scholar
Swarr, A. L. (2012). Paradoxes of Butchness: Lesbian Masculinities and Sexual Violence in Contemporary South Africa. Signs 37(4): 961–86.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. (2013). Language Learning, Gender and Desire: Japanese Women on the Move. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Thorne, L. (2013). “But I’m Attracted to Women”: Sexuality and Sexual Identity Performance in Interactional Discourse among Bisexual Students. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1): 70–100.Google Scholar
Thurlow, T. and Pennycook, A. (2018). Affecting Sociolinguistics. Panel presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, Auckland, New Zealand, June, 27–30.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (2013). Colonizing Intersectionality: Replicating Racial Hierarchy in Feminist Academic Arguments. Social Identities 19(2): 254–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergueiro, V. (2015). Por inflexões decoloniais de corpos e identidades de gênero inconformes: uma análise autoetnográfica da cisgeneridade como normatividade. Dissertação de Mestrado. Bahia: Universidade Federal da Bahia.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yep, G. (2003). The Violence of Heteronormativity in Communication Studies. Journal of Homosexuality 45(2–4): 11–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yep, G. (2016). Toward Thick(er) Intersectionalities: Theorizing, Researching, and Activating the Complexities of Communication and Identities. In Sorrells, K. and Sekimoto, S. (eds.) Globalizing Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 85–94.Google Scholar