Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dragouni, Mina Fouseki, Kalliopi and Georgantzis, Nikolaos 2018. Community participation in heritage tourism planning: is it too much to ask?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 759.

    Lee, Taedong An, Jungbae Sohn, Hyodong and Yoo, In Tae 2018. An Experiment of Community-Based Learning Effects on Civic Participation. Journal of Political Science Education, p. 1.

    Muise, Daniel and Pan, Jennifer 2018. Online field experiments. Asian Journal of Communication, p. 1.

    Elman, Colin Kapiszewski, Diana and Lupia, Arthur 2018. Transparent Social Inquiry: Implications for Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 29.

    Morisi, Davide 2016. Voting under uncertainty: the effect of information in the Scottish independence referendum. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 354.

    2015. WITHDRAWN: Framing consensus. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 52, Issue. 4, p. np1.

    Veszteg, Róbert Ferenc Funaki, Yukihiko and Tanaka, Aiji 2015. The impact of the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami on social capital in Japan: Trust before and after the disaster. International Political Science Review, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 119.

    Zellman, Ariel 2015. Framing consensus. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 52, Issue. 4, p. 492.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

2 - Experiments

Summary

The experimental study of politics has grown explosively in the past two decades. Part of that explosion takes the form of a dramatic increase in the number of published articles that use experiments. Perhaps less evident, and arguably more important, experimentalists are exploring topics that would have been unimaginable only a few years ago. Laboratory researchers have studied topics ranging from the effects of media exposure (Iyengar and Kinder 1987) to the conditions under which groups solve collective action problems (Ostrom, Walker, and Gardner 1992), and, at times, have identified empirical anomalies that produced new theoretical insights (McKelvey and Palfrey 1992). Some survey experimenters have developed experimental techniques to measure prejudice (Kuklinski, Cobb, and Gilens 1997) and its effects on support for policies such as welfare or affirmative action (Sniderman and Piazza 1995); others have explored the ways in which framing, information, and decision cues influence voters' policy preferences and support for public officials (Druckman 2004; Tomz 2007). And although the initial wave of field experiments focused on the effects of campaign communications on turnout and voters' preferences (Eldersveld 1956; Gerber and Green 2000; Wantchekon 2003), researchers increasingly use field experiments and natural experiments to study phenomena as varied as election fraud (Hyde 2009), representation (Butler and Nickerson 2009), counterinsurgency (Lyall 2009), and interpersonal communication (Nickerson 2008).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
  • Online ISBN: 9780511921452
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Albertson, Bethany, and Lawrence, Adria. 2009. “After the Credits Roll: The Long-Term Effects of Educational Television on Public Knowledge and Attitudes.” American Politics Research 37: 275–300.
Angrist, Joshua D. 1990. “Lifetime Earnings and the Vietnam Era Draft Lottery: Evidence from Social Security Administrative Records.” American Economic Review 80: 313–36.
Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B.. 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 444–55.
Baron, Reuben M., and Kenny, David A.. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–82.
Borenstein, Michael, Hedges, Larry V., Higgins, Julian P. T., and Rothstein, Hannah R.. 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. London: Wiley.
Butler, Daniel M., and Nickerson, David W.. 2009. “How Much Does Constituency Opinion Affect Legislators' Votes? Results from a Field Experiment.” Unpublished manuscript, Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University.
Campbell, Donald T. 1957. “Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in Social Settings.” Psychological Bulletin 54: 297–312.
Clingingsmith, David, Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, and Kremer, Michael. 2009. “Estimating the Impact of the Hajj: Religion and Tolerance in Islam's Global Gathering.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 1133–1170.
Druckman, Daniel. 1994. “Determinants of Compromising Behavior in Negotiation: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38: 507–56.
Druckman, James N. 2003. “The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited.” Journal of Politics 65: 559–71.
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98: 671–86.
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1956. “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 50: 154–65.
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 94: 653–63.
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., Kaplan, Edward H., and Kern, Holger L.. 2010. “Baseline, Placebo, and Treatment: Efficient Estimation for Three-Group Experiments.” Political Analysis 18: 297–315.
Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–60.
Hyde, Susan D. 2009. “The Causes and Consequences of Internationally Monitored Elections.” Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-So-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review 76: 848–58.
Kuklinski, James H., Cobb, Michael D., and Gilens, Martin. 1997. “Racial Attitudes and the New South.” Journal of Politics 59: 323–49.
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, Heldman, Caroline, and Babbitt, Paul. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Review.” American Political Science Review 93: 851–75.
Loewen, Peter John, Koop, Royce, and Fowler, James H.. 2009. “The Power to Propose: A Natural Experiment in Politics.” Unpublished paper, University of British Columbia.
Lyall, Jason. 2009. “Does Indiscriminant Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53: 331–62.
McKelvey, Richard D., and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 1992. “An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game.” Econometrica 4: 803–36.
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mullainathan, Sendhil, Washington, Ebonya, and Azari, Julia R.. 2010. “The Impact of Electoral Debate on Public Opinions: An Experimental Investigation of the 2005 New York City Mayoral Election.” In Political Representation, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan, Wood, Elizabeth, and Kirshner, Alexander S.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 324–42.
Neyman, Jerzy. 1923. “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments: Essay on Principles.” Statistical Science 5: 465–80.
Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious?: Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102: 49–57.
Ostrom, Elinor, Walker, James, and Gardner, Roy. 1992. “Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible.” American Political Science Review 86: 404–17.
Panagopoulos, Costas, and Green, Donald P.. 2008. “Field Experiments Testing the Impact of Radio Advertisements on Electoral Competition.” American Journal of Political Science 52: 156–68.
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–701.
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Piazza, Thomas. 1995. The Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomz, Michael. 2007. “Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach.” International Organization 61: 821–40.
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior.” World Politics 55: 399–422.