Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:47:02.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Natural rights versus human dignity: two conflicting traditions

from Part I - Origins of the concept in European history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Pauline C. Westerman
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Marcus Düwell
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jens Braarvig
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Roger Brownsword
Affiliation:
King's College London
Dietmar Mieth
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

‘All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.’ In the famous first article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), human dignity is mentioned in the same breath as human rights. But what exactly is the relationship between dignity and rights? Are we to endow human beings with dignity because human beings possess certain inalienable rights, or is it the other way round: are we to guarantee people their rights because of their inherent human dignity; an indefinable quality that is proper to human beings alone and by which they are elevated above other natural beings? The relation between the two remains close but obscure. Furthermore, and more importantly: what exactly are we asked to do? It seems that the reader is only presented with a certain state of affairs. Human dignity is presupposed to ‘exist’, and all we have to do is to ‘understand’, to ‘acknowledge’ and to ‘recognize’ it. But, if so, we may ask, with Dylan: where do we find it? Isn't it true that we can only hope to find dignity as a result of the way we treat people? Why are we admonished to begin with dignity as a starting-point? Why aren't we simply told that human dignity is a desirable result; an aim to strive for? Aren't we running in circles by pretending that something is there which should still be realized?

In order to shed some light on these perplexities, it is instructive to take a look at the developments that took place in seventeenth-century natural law theories, which contributed to the vocabulary and style of the UDHR. First, I will briefly sketch the stage on which seventeenth-century natural law thinkers had to play. Then, I will analyze the role of the notion of human nature in the theories of Hugo Grotius and John Locke and its relation to the formulation of natural rights. It will be shown that the formulation of those rights is in no way dependent on the assumption of human dignity. Matters are, however, different for Samuel Pufendorf. In his theory, the notion of human dignity is central. As will be shown, this dignity is God-given and consists in the capacity to understand God's will.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity
Interdisciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 108 - 116
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, T. 1964. Summa Theologiae, ed. Gilby, T. et al. London: BlackfriarsGoogle Scholar
Besselink, L. 1988. ‘The Impious Hypothesis Revisited’, Grotiana 9: 3–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Entrèves, A. P. 1971. Natural Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: TransactionGoogle Scholar
Grotius, H. 1952. De Jure Belli ac Pacis Prolegomena, trans. Dirkzwager, A. and Nielsen, A. C.. ’s Gravenhage: NijhoffGoogle Scholar
Grotius, H. 1964. De Jure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres, trans. Kelsey, F. W.. New York: OceanaGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. 1954. Essays on the Law of Nature, ed. Leyden, W. von. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. 1970. The Second Treatise of Government: An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government, ed. Laslett, P.. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1934. De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, in The Classics of International Law, trans. , C. H. and Oldfather, W. A.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, S. 1991. On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, ed. Tully, J., trans. Silverthorne, M.. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Westerman, P. 1998. The Disintegration of Natural Law Theory: Aquinas to Finnis. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×