Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T05:52:28.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Infant Learning in the Digital Age

from Part III - Cognitive Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2020

Jeffrey J. Lockman
Affiliation:
Tulane University, Louisiana
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Media is so embedded in the lives of infants and toddlers that it should no longer be considered a nuisance variable that could affect development but rather a fundamental part of the context in which development occurs. Parents, educators, and policy makers often remain polarized in the adoption of digital devices, either acting with extreme concern or overly optimistic enthusiasm (Lauricella, Blackwell, & Wartella, 2017). Researchers have recognized that it is not only the amount of time with which children were interacting with these technologies but also how and what they were engaging with that predicted learning and other outcomes (Lauricella et al., 2017). However, accurately assessing the content and context of media use during early childhood has been problematic, with some methods leading to overestimation and others to underreporting of media exposure (Vandewater & Lee, 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development
Brain, Behavior, and Cultural Context
, pp. 435 - 466
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, L. B., & Frick, J. E. (2003). The still face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy, 4, 451473.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Public Education (1999). Media education. Pediatrics, 104, 341343. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.2.341Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Council on Communications and Media (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016–2593Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., & Davidson, M. C. (2019). Receptive versus interactive video screens: A role for the brain’s default mode network in learning from media. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 168180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.008Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Fite, K. V., Petrovich, N., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Cortical activation while watching video montage: An fMRI study. Media Psychology, 8, 724.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., & Hanson, K. G. (2017). Screen media and parent–child interactions. In Barr, R. & Linebarger, D. N. (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development (pp. 173194). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 505522.Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N. (2012). Questioning the questions that have been asked about the infant brain using near-infrared spectroscopy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bank, A. M., Barr, R., Calvert, S. L., Parrott, W. G., McDonough, S. C., & Rosenblum, K. (2012). Maternal depression and family media use: A questionnaire and diary analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 208216. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9464-1.Google Scholar
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612637. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.Google Scholar
Barr, R. (2010). Transfer of learning between 2D and 3D sources during infancy: Informing theory and practice. Developmental Review, 30, 128154. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.001.Google Scholar
Barr, R. (2013). Memory constraints on infant learning from picture books, television, and touch-screens. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 205210. doi:10.1111/cdep.12041.Google Scholar
Barr, R., & Hayne, H. (1999). Developmental changes in imitation from television during infancy. Child Development, 70, 10671081.Google Scholar
Barr, R., Kirkorian, H., Radesky, J., Coyne, S., Nichols, D., Blanchfield, O., Rusnak, S., Stockdale, L., Ribner, A., Durnez, J., Epstein, M., Heimann, M., Koch, F.-S., Sundqvist, A., Birberg-Thornberg, U., Konrad, C., Slussareff, M., Bus, A., Bellagamba, F., Fitzpatrick, C. and CAFE Consortium Key Investigators (in revision). Beyond Screen Time: A synergistic approach to a more comprehensive assessment of family media exposure during early childhood.Google Scholar
Barr, R., Lauricella, A., Zack, E., & Calvert, S. L. (2010). The relation between infant exposure to television and executive functioning, cognitive skills, and school readiness at age four. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 56, 2148.Google Scholar
Barr, R., & Linebarger, D. N. (Eds.) (2017). Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Barr, R., McClure, E., & Palarkain, R. (2018). What the research says about the impact of media on children aged 0–3 years old. Retrieved from www.zerotothree.org/resources/series/screen-sense.Google Scholar
Barr, R., Muentener, P., & Garcia, A. (2007). Age-related changes in deferred imitation from television by 6- to 18-month-olds. Developmental Science, 10, 910921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, R., Muentener, P., Garcia, A., Fujimoto, M., & Chávez, V. (2007). The effect of repetition on imitation from television during infancy. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 196207.Google Scholar
Barr, R., Shuck, L., Salerno, K., Atkinson, E., & Linebarger, D. L. (2010). Music interferes with learning from television during infancy. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 19, 313331.Google Scholar
Barr, R., Zack, E., Garcia, A., & Muentener, P. (2008). Infants’ attention and responsiveness to television increases with prior exposure and parental interaction. Infancy, 13, 3056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2008). Mother–infant interaction. In Bremner, J. G. & Wachs, T. D. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp. 269295). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H., Wruck, E., & Boas, D. A. (2007). Assessing infants’ cortical response to speech using near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 34, 407415.Google Scholar
Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. T. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 7997.Google Scholar
Buss, A. T., Fox, N., Boas, D. A., & Spencer, J. P. (2014). Probing the early development of visual working memory capacity with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 85, 314325, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.034Google Scholar
Calvert, S. L., Rideout, V. J., Woolard, J. L., Barr, R. F., & Strouse, G. A. (2005). Age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic patterns in early computer use: A national survey. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 590607.Google Scholar
Carver, L. J., Meltzoff, A. N., & Dawson, G. (2006). Event-related potential (ERP) indices of infants’ recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects in two and three dimensions. Developmental Science, 9, 5162.Google Scholar
Choi, J. H., Mendelsohn, A. L, Weisleder, A., Brockmeyer Cates, C., Canfield, C., Seery, A., … Tomopoulos, S. (2018). Real-world usage of educational media does not promote parent–child cognitive stimulation activities. Academic Pediatrics, 18, 172178. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christakis, D. A., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Zimmerman, F. J., Garrison, M. M., Xu, D., … Yapanel, U. (2009). Audible television and decreased adult words, infant vocalizations, and conversational turns: A population-based study. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 554558.Google Scholar
Connell, S. L., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their parents in the U.S.A. Journal of Children and Media, 9, 521.Google Scholar
Courage, M. L., Murphy, A. N., Goulding, S., & Setliff, A. E. (2010). When the television is on: The impact of infant-directed video on 6- and 18-month-olds’ attention during toy play and on parent–infant interaction. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 176188.Google Scholar
Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2015) Parental reports on touch screen use in early childhood. PLoS ONE, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuevas, K., Cannon, E. N., Yoo, K., & Fox, N. A. (2013). The infant EEG Mu rhythm: Methodological considerations and best practices. Developmental Review, 34, 2643.Google Scholar
Dayanim, S., & Namy, L. L. (2015). Infants learn baby signs from video. Child Development, 86, 800811.Google Scholar
DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Early symbol understanding and use. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 33, 65116.Google Scholar
DeLoache, J. S., Chiong, C., Sherman, K., Islam, N., Vanderborght, M., Troseth, G. L., … O’Doherty, K. (2010). Do babies learn from baby media?. Psychological Science, 21, 15701574.Google Scholar
DeLoache, J. S., Strauss, M. S., & Maynard, J. (1979). Picture perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 7789.Google Scholar
Demers, L. B., Hanson, K. G., Kirkorian, H. L., Pempek, T. A., & Anderson, D. R. (2013). Infant gaze following during parent–infant coviewing of baby videos. Child Development, 84, 591603. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01868.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickerson, K., Gerhardstein, P., & Moser, A. (2017). The role of the human mirror neuron system in supporting communication in a digital world. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, K., Gerhardstein, P., Zack, E., & Barr, R. (2013). Age-related changes in learning across early childhood: A new imitation task. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 719732. doi:10.1002/dev.21068.Google Scholar
Dirks, J., & Gibson, E. (1977). Infants’ perception of similarity between live people and their photographs. Child Development, 48(1), 124130.Google Scholar
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (2018). Media exposure and early child development workshop. Retrieved from www.nichd.nih.gov/about/meetings/2018/012518.Google Scholar
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Barch, D. M., … Schlaggar, B. L. (2008). The maturing architecture of the brain’s default network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 40284032.Google Scholar
Fenstermacher, S. K., Barr, R., Brey, E., Pempek, T. A, Ryan, M., Calvert, S., … Linebarger, D. (2010). Interactional quality depicted in infant-directed videos: Where are the interactions? Infant and Child Development, 19, 594612. doi: 10.1002/icd.714Google Scholar
Fenstermacher, S. K., Barr, R., Salerno, K., Garcia, A., Shwery, C. E., Calvert, S. L., & Linebarger, D. L. (2010). Infant-directed media: An analysis of product information and claims. Infant & Child Development, 19, 557576.Google Scholar
Gao, W., Zhu, H., Giovanello, K. S., Smith, J. K., Dinggang, S., Gilmore, J. H., & Lin, W. (2009). Evidence on the emergence of the brain’s default network from 2-week-old to 2-year-old healthy pediatric subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 67906795.Google Scholar
Gervain, J., Mehler, J., Werker, J. F., Nelson, C. A., Csibra, G., Lloyd-Fox, S., … Aslin, R. N. (2011). Near-infrared spectroscopy: A report from the McDonnell infant methodology consortium. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 2246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goedhart, G., Kromhout, H., Wiart, J., & Vermeulen, R. (2015). Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 72(1), 812818.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H., Schwade, J. A., & Bornstein, M. H. (2009). The value of vocalizing: Five-month-old infants associate their own noncry vocalizations with responses from caregivers. Child Development, 80, 636644.Google Scholar
Guernsey, L. (2012). Screen time: How electronic media – from baby videos to educational software – affects your young child. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hasson, U., Yang, E., Vallines, I., Heeger, D.J., & Rubin, N. (2008). A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 25392550.Google Scholar
Henning, A., & Striano, T. (2011). Infant and maternal sensitivity to interpersonal timing. Child Development, 82, 916931.Google Scholar
Heron-Delaney, M., Anzures, G., Herbert, J. S., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Tanaka, J. W., … Pascalis, O. (2011). Perceptual training prevents the emergence of the other race effect during infancy. PLoS ONE, 6. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019858Google Scholar
Hipp, D., Gerhardstein, P., Zimmermann, L., Moser, A., Taylor, G., & Barr, R. (2017). The dimensional divide: Learning from TV and touchscreens during early childhood. In Barr, R. & Linebarger, D. N. (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development (pp. 3354). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., & Bonner Jr, R. L. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics, 136, 10441050.Google Scholar
Khan, M., Chakraborty, N., Rahman, A., & Nasrin, T. (2007). 2007 follow-up (wave II) evaluation of the reach and impact of Sisimpur: A technical report. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Associates for Community and Population Research.Google Scholar
Kirkorian, H. L. (2018). When and how do interactive digital media help children connect what they see on and off the screen? Child Development Perspectives, 12, 210214. doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12290.Google Scholar
Kirkorian, H. L., Anderson, D. R., & Keen, R. (2012). Age differences in online processing of video: An eye movement study. Child Development, 83, 497507.Google Scholar
Kirkorian, H. L., & Choi, K. (2017). Associations between toddlers’ naturalistic media experience and observed learning from screens. Infancy, 22, 271277.Google Scholar
Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., & Pempek, T. A. (2016). Toddlers’ word learning from contingent and noncontingent video on touchscreens. Child Development, 87, 405413. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12508Google Scholar
Kirkorian, H. L., Pempek, T. A., Murphy, L. A., Schmidt, M. E., & Anderson, D. R. (2009). The impact of background television on parent–child interaction. Child Development, 80, 13501359.Google Scholar
Koenig, M. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2010). Sensitivity of 24-month-olds to the prior inaccuracy of the source: Possible mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 46, 815.Google Scholar
Krcmar, M. (2010). Can social meaningfulness and repeat exposure help infants and toddlers overcome the video deficit?. Media Psychology, 13, 3153.Google Scholar
Kuchirko, Y., Tafuro, L., & Tamis-LeMonda, C.S. (2018). Becoming a communicative partner: Infant contingent responsiveness to maternal language and gestures. Infancy, 23, 558576. doi: 10.1111/infa.12222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M., & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 90969101.Google Scholar
Landau, S., Lorch, E.P., & Milich, R. (1992). Visual attention to and comprehension of television in attention-deficit hyperactivity disordered and normal boys. Child Development, 63, 928937.Google Scholar
Lapierre, M. A., Piotrowski, J. T., & Linebarger, D. L. (2012). Background television in the homes of US children. Pediatrics, 130, 839846.Google Scholar
Lauricella, A. R., Blackwell, C. K., & Wartella, E. (2017). The “new” technology environment: The role of content and context on learning and development from mobile media. In Barr, R. & Linebarger, D. N. (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development (pp. 124). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Lauricella, A. R., Pempek, T. A., Barr, R., & Calvert, S. L. (2010). Contingent computer interactions for young children’s object retrieval success. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 362369.Google Scholar
Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., & Rideout, V. (2015). Young children’s screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 1117. doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001Google Scholar
Lerner, C., & Barr, R. (2015). Screen sense: Setting the record straight – research-based guidelines for screen use for children under 3 years old. Zero to Three, 35, 110.Google Scholar
Li, H., Subrahmanyam, K., Bai, X., Xie, X., & Liu, T. (2018). Viewing fantastical events versus touching fantastical events: Short-term effects on children’s inhibitory control. Child Development, 89, 4857. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12820Google Scholar
Lillard, A. S., Drell, M. B., Richey, E. M., Boguszewski, K., & Smith, E. D. (2015). Further examination of the immediate impact of television on children’s executive function. Developmental Psychology, 51, 792805. doi: 10.1037/a0039097Google Scholar
Lin, P., Yang, Y., Jovicich, J., de Pisapia, N., Wang, X., Zuo, C. S., & Levitt, J. J. (2016). Static and dynamic posterior cingulate cortex nodal topology of default mode network predicts attention task performance. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10, 212225.Google Scholar
Linebarger, D. L., Barr, R., Lapierre, M. A., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2014). Associations between parenting, media use, cumulative risk, and children’s executive functioning. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 35, 367377.Google Scholar
Linebarger, D. L., & Walker, D. (2005). Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and language outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 624645.Google Scholar
Mandel, D. R., Jusczyk, P. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (1995). Infants’ recognition of the sound patterns of their own names. Psychological Science, 6, 314317.Google Scholar
Markant, J., & Scott, L. S. (2018). Attention and perceptual learning interact in the development of the other-race effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 163169.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, A. L., Brockmeyer, C. A., Dreyer, B. P., Fierman, A. H., Berkule-Silberman, S. B., & Tomopoulos, S. (2010). Do verbal interactions with infants during electronic media exposure mitigate adverse impacts on their language development as toddlers? Infant and Child Development, 19, 577593. http://doi.org/10.1002/icd.711.Google Scholar
McCall, R. B., Parke, R. D., Kavanaugh, R. D., Engstrom, R., Russell, J., & Wycoff, E. (1977). Imitation of live and televised models by children one to three years of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 194.Google Scholar
McClure, E. R., Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., Barr, R. F., Holochwost, S., & Parrott, W. G. (2015). “FaceTime doesn’t count”: Video chat as an exception to media restrictions for infants and toddlers. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 6, 16. doi: x10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.02.002Google Scholar
McClure, E. R., Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., Holochwost, S. J., Parrott, W. G., & Barr, R. (2017). Look at that! Video chat and joint visual attention development among babies and toddlers. Child Development, 89(1), 2736. doi:10.1111/cdev.12833Google Scholar
McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 89, 100109. doi:10.1111/cdev.12822Google Scholar
Meek, J. H., Firbank, M., Elwell, C. E., Atkinson, J., Braddick, O., & Wyatt, J. S. (1998). Regional hemodynamic responses to visual stimulation in awake infants. Pediatric Research, 43(6), 840.Google Scholar
Moser, A., Zimmermann, L., Dickerson, K., Grenell, A., Barr, R., & Gerhardstein, P. (2015). They can interact, but can they learn? Toddlers’ transfer learning from touchscreens and television. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 137155. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.002.Google Scholar
Mumme, D. L., & Fernald, A. (2003). The infant as onlooker: Learning from emotional reactions observed in a television scenario. Child Development, 74, 221237.Google Scholar
Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In Field, T. & Fox, N. (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 177197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Myers, L. J., Crawford, E., Murphy, C., Aka-Ezoua, E., & Felix, C. (2018). Eyes in the room trump eyes on the screen: Effects of a responsive co-viewer on toddlers’ responses to and learning from video chat. Journal of Children and Media, 12(3), 275294.Google Scholar
Myers, L. J., LeWitt, R. B., Gallo, R. E., & Maselli, N. M. (2017). Baby FaceTime: Can toddlers learn from online video chat?. Developmental Science, 20(4), 115.Google Scholar
Myruski, S., Gulyayeva, O., Birk, S., Pérez-Edgar, K., Buss, K. A., & Dennis-Tiwary, T. A. (2018) Digital disruption? Maternal mobile device use is related to infant social-emotional functioning. Developmental Science, 21, e12610. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12610Google Scholar
Nakano, T., Kato, M., Morito, Y., Itoi, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2013). Blink-related momentary activation of the default mode network while viewing videos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 702706.Google Scholar
Nathanson, A. I., Aladé, F., Sharp, M. L., Rasmussen, E. E., & Christy, K. (2014). The relation between television exposure and executive function among preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1497.Google Scholar
National Association for the Education of Young Children & the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media at Saint Vincent College. (2012, January). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Joint position statement. Reston, VA.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Simcock, G., & Jenkins, L. (2008). The effect of social engagement on 24 month olds’ imitation from live and televised models. Developmental Science, 11, 722731. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00722.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nussenbaum, K., & Amso, D. (2016). An attentional Goldilocks effect: An optimal amount of social interactivity promotes word learning from video. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 3040.Google Scholar
Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., & Kuorelahti, J. (2005, April). Interaction in 4-second bursts: The fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 919928). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055101Google Scholar
Pempek, T. A., Kirkorian, H. L., & Anderson, D. R. (2014). The effects of background television on the quantity and quality of child-directed speech by parents. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 211222.Google Scholar
Pempek, T. A., Kirkorian, H. L., Richards, J. E., Anderson, D. R., Lund, A. F., & Stevens, M. (2010). Video comprehensibility and attention in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 46, 12831293.Google Scholar
Pempek, T. A., & McDaniel, B. T. (2016). Young children’s tablet use and associations with maternal well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 26362647.Google Scholar
Peña, M., Maki, A., Kovacic, D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Koizumi, H., Bouquet, F., & Mehler, J. (2003). Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 1170211705.Google Scholar
Perlman, S. B., Huppert, T. J., & Luna, B. (2015). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy evidence for development of prefrontal engagement in working memory in early through middle childhood. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 27902799.Google Scholar
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). Digital screen time limits and young children’s psychological well-being: Evidence from a population-based study. Child Development, 90(1), e56e65. doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13007Google Scholar
Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., … Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast-food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133, 843849.Google Scholar
Radesky, J. S., Peacock-Chambers, E., Zuckerman, B., & Silverstein, M. (2016). Use of mobile technology to calm upset children: Associations with social-emotional development. JAMA Pediatrics, 170, 397399.Google Scholar
Radesky, J. S., Silverstein, M., Zuckerman, B., & Christakis, D. A. (2014). Infant self-regulation and early childhood media exposure. Pediatrics, 133(5), e1172e1178. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013–2367Google Scholar
Reed, J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2017). Learning on hold: Cell phones sidetrack parent–child interactions. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1428.Google Scholar
Regev, M., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., & Hasson, U. (2013). Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 1597815988.Google Scholar
Richards, J. E. (2010). The development of attention to simple and complex visual stimuli in infants: Behavioral and psychophysiological measures. Developmental Review, 30, 203219.Google Scholar
Richards, M. N., & Calvert, S. L. (2017). Media characters, parasocial relationships, and the social aspects of children’s learning across media platforms. In Barr, R. & Linebarger, D. N. (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development (pp. 141163). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Richert, R. A., Robb, M. B., Fender, J. G., & Wartella, E. (2010). Word learning from baby videos. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164, 432437.Google Scholar
Rideout, V. (2017). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2017. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media. Retrieved from www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2017.Google Scholar
Roseberry, S. L., Garcia-Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2018). Two are better than one: Infant language learning from video improves in the presence of peers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(40), 98599866.Google Scholar
Roseberry, S. L., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85, 956970. doi:10.1111/cdev.12166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruysschaert, L., Warreyn, P., Wiersema, J. R., Metin, B., & Roeyers, H. (2013). Neural mirroring during the observation of live and video actions in infants. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, 17651770. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.007Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. E., Pempek, T. A., Kirkorian, H. L., Lund, A. F., & Anderson, D. R. (2008). The effects of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children. Child Development, 79, 11371151.Google Scholar
Setliff, A. E., & Courage, M. L. (2011). Background television and infants’ allocation of their attention during toy play. Infancy, 16, 611639.Google Scholar
Shimada, S., & Hiraki, K. (2006). Infant’s brain responses to live and televised action. Neuroimage, 32, 930939. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.044Google Scholar
Simcock, G., Garrity, K., & Barr, R. (2011). The effect of narrative cues on infants’ imitation from television and picture books. Child Development, 82, 16071619. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01636.xGoogle Scholar
Strouse, G. A., & Troseth, G. L. (2014). Supporting toddlers’ transfer of word learning from video. Cognitive Development, 30, 4764.Google Scholar
Sudre, G., Szekely, E., Sharp, W., Kasparek, S., & Shaw, P. (2017). Multimodal mapping of the brain’s functional connectivity and the adult outcome of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 1178711792.Google Scholar
Troseth, G. L. (2010). Is it life or is it Memorex? Video as a representation of reality. Developmental Review, 30, 155175. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.007.Google Scholar
Troseth, G. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1998). The medium can obscure the message: Young children’s understanding of video. Child Development, 69, 950965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troseth, G. L., Saylor, M. M., & Archer, A. H. (2006). Young children’s use of video as a source of socially relevant information. Child Development, 77, 786799.Google Scholar
Vaala, S. E., Linebarger, D. L., Fenstermacher, S. K., Tedone, A., Brey, E., Barr, R., … Calvert, S. L. (2010). Content analysis of language-promoting teaching strategies used in infant-directed media. Infant and Child Development, 19, 628648.Google Scholar
Vandewater, E. A., & Lee, S. -J. (2009). Measuring children’s media use in the digital age: Issues and challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 11521176.Google Scholar
Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Lauricella, A., & Connell, S. (2014). Revised parenting in the age of digital technology: A national survey. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://web5.soc.northwestern.edu/cmhd/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NWU.MediaTechReading.Hispanic.FINAL2014.pdf.Google Scholar
West, G. L., Konishi, K., & Bohbot, V. D. (2017). Video games and hippocampus-dependent learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 152158.Google Scholar
Wilcox, T., & Biondi, M. (2015). fNIRS in the developmental sciences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6, 263283.Google Scholar
Wood, E., Petkovski, M., de Pasquale, D., Gottardo, A., Evans, M. A., & Savage, R. S. (2016). Parent scaffolding of young children when engaged with mobile technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 690. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00690Google Scholar
Zack, E., & Barr, R. (2016). The role of interactional quality in learning from touch screens during infancy: Context matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1264.Google Scholar
Zack, E., Barr, R., Gerhardstein, P., Dickerson, K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2009). Infant imitation from television using novel touch screen technology. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 1326.Google Scholar
Zosh, J. M., Lytle, S. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2017). Putting the education back in educational apps: How content and context interact to promote learning. In Barr, R. & Linebarger, D. N. (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development (pp. 259282). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×