Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:21:21.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Imaginative Creativity in the Writing and Reading of Stories

from Part III - Modes of Enhancement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

Sandra W. Russ
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Jessica D. Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, the creative processes that are explored include those of writers and readers. Narrative stories derive from conversation, which is thought to have begun with the evolution of language between 500,000 and 100,000 years ago. Conversation is a mode in which people develop and sustain relationships by sharing memories, perceptions, emotions, anecdotes, thoughts, and understandings – pieces of consciousness – with others. It’s fundamentally creative; each conversation today, engaged in by each of the world’s 7.5 billion inhabitants, with relatives, friends, and other people, is unique, as have been all other conversations. Written stories, which started some 5,000 to 4,000 years ago, have taken this further, with pieces of consciousness being sent by writers to others whom they do not usually know.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. (1700 BCE). The epic of Gilgamesh: The Babylonian epic poem and other texts in Akkadian and Sumerian (A. George, Trans.). London: Penguin. (Current edition 2000).Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1970). Poetics (G. E. Else, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. (Original publication c. 330 BCE).Google Scholar
Aubert, M., Lebe, R., Oktaviana, A. A., Tang, M., Burhan, B., Hamrullah, A. J., … Brumm, A. (2019). Earliest hunting scene in prehistoric art. Nature, 576, 442445. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1806-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austen, J. (1813). Pride and prejudice. London: Egerton.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. E., Verdersmeersch, B., & Bar-Yosef, O. (2009). Shells and ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: Indications for modern behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 56, 307314. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.10.005Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chekhov, A. (1890). “Gusev” (R. Pevear & L. Volokhonsky, Trans.). In Pevear, R & Volokhonsky, L (Eds.), Anton Chekhov Stories (pp. 109–122). New York: Bantam. (Current edition 2000).Google Scholar
Comay, J. (2008). Individual differences in narrative perspective-taking and theory of mind [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2016). An introduction to cognitive archaeology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 386392. doi:10.1177/0963721416657085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
De Waal, F. (2019). Mama’s last hug: Animal emotions and what they tell us about ourselves. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Debray-Genette, R. (2004). Flaubert’s “A Simple Heart,” or how to make an ending: A study of manuscripts. In Deppman, J., Ferrer, D., & Groden, M. (Eds.), Genetic criticism: Texts and avant-textes (pp. 6995). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
DeLoache, J. (1987). Rapid change in symbolic functioning in young children. Science, 238, 15561557. doi:10.1126/science.2446392Google Scholar
Dias, M., Roazzi, A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Reasoning from unfamiliar premises: A study with unschooled adults. Psychological Science, 16, 550554. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01573.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Carland, M. (2012). Genre or artistic merit: The effect of literature on personality. Scientific Study of Literature, 2, 2536. doi:10.1075/ssol.2.1.02djiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. (2009). On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 2429. doi:10.1080/10400410802633392Google Scholar
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/xge0000395Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). The human story: A new history of mankind’s evolution. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2004). Children’s friendships: The beginnings of intimacy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eliot, G. (1871–1872). Middlemarch: A study of provincial life. London: Penguin. (Current edition 1965).Google Scholar
Erasmus, D. (1508). Praise of folly (Adams, R. M, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Norton. (Current edition 1989).Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46, 621646. doi:10.1086/431525Google Scholar
Flaubert, G. (2005). A simple heart (R. Whitehouse, Trans.). In Flaubert, G, Three tales (pp. 340). London: Penguin. (Original work published 1877).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1908). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In Dickson, A (Ed.), Pelican Freud library, 14: Art and literature (pp. 130141). London: Penguin. (Current edition 1985).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002). The aesthetics of mimesis: Ancient texts and modern problems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Henshilwood, C. S., d’Errico, F., van Niekerk, K. L., Dayet, L., Queffelec, A., & Pollarolo, L. (2018). An abstract drawing from the 73,000-year-old levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Nature, 562, 115118. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0514-3Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The psychology of creative writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1846). Concluding unscientific postscript (D. F. Swenson & W. Lowrie, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Current edition 1968).Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretence and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94, 412426. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.4.412Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55, 454479. doi:10.1080/0163853x.2018.1448209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694712. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002Google Scholar
Maslej, M. M., Oatley, K., & Mar, R. A. (2017). Creating fictional characters: The role of experience, personality, and social processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 487499. doi:10.1037/aca0000094Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1995). A theory of the role of imitation in the emergence of self. In Rochat, P. (Ed.), The self in early infancy: Theory and research (pp. 7393). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: The cognitive origins of art and science. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Moran, J. (2019). First you write a sentence: The elements of reading, writing … and life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mumper, M. J., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 109120. doi:10.1037/aca0000089Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2006). Simulation of substance and shadow: Inner emotions and outer behavior in Shakespeare’s psychology of character. College Literature, 33, 1533. doi:10.1353/lit.2006.0009Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2011). Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. (2013). Worlds of the possible: Abstraction, imagination, consciousness. Pragmatics and Cognition, 21, 448468. doi:10.1075/pc.21.3.02oatGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 618628. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2018). Our minds, our selves: A brief history of psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Djikic, M. (2008). Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12, 927. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.9Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Djikic, M. (2017). The creativity of literary writing. In Kaufman, J. C., Glǎveanu, V., & Baer, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains (pp. 6379). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (2005). Beyond a joke: From animal laughter to human joy. Science, 308, 6263. doi:10.1126/science.1112066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proust, M. (1913). Du côté de chez Swann. Paris: Gallimard. (Current publication 1987).Google Scholar
Proust, M. (1927). Le temps retrouvé. Paris: Gallimard. (Current publication 1954).Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. A., & Mar, R. A. (2020). How imagination supports narrative experiences for textual, audiovisual, and interactive narratives. In Abraham, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of imagination (pp. 466–478). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D., & Bloom, H. (1990). The book of J. New York: Grove Weidenfeld.Google Scholar
Sappho (c. 550 BCE). Poems and fragments (J. Balmer, Trans.). New York: Carol Publishing Group. (Current edition 1993).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1600). A midsummer night’s dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Current edition 1995).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1623a). Henry, V. In Greenblatt, S (Ed.), The Norton Shakespeare (pp. 14541523). New York: Norton. (Current edition 1997).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1623b). The Tempest (Kermode, F, Ed.). London: Methuen. (Current edition 1958).Google Scholar
Teglas, E., Vul, E., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., Tennenbaum, J. B., & Bonatti, L. L. (2011). Pure reasoning in 12-month-old infants as probabilistic inference. Science, 332, 10541059. doi:10.1126/science.1196404Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Herrmann, E. (2010). Ape and human cognition: What’s the difference. Psychological Science, 19, 38. doi:10.1177/0963721409359300Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 18, 121147. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00217Google Scholar
Vanhaeren, M., d’Errico, F., Stringer, C., James, S. L., Todd, J. A., & Mienis, H. K. (2006). Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science, 312, 17851788. doi:10.1126/science.1128139Google Scholar
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). The roots of human altruism. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 455471. doi:10.1348/000712608x379061Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. (1925). Mrs Dalloway. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Yarmolinsky, A. (Ed.). (1973). Letters of Anton Chekhov. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×