Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations of Morphological Theory
- Part II Issues in Morphological Theory
- Part III Morphological Principles
- Part IV Morphological Frameworks
- Part V The Role of Morphology in Theories of Phonology and Syntax
- Part VI Domains for the Evaluation of Morphological Theories
- 24 Frequency and Corpora
- 25 Morphology in Typology
- 26 Morphological Change
- 27 Morphology and Language Acquisition
- 28 Experimental Studies of Morphology and Morphological Processing
- 29 Computational Morphology
- Index of languages
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
- References
26 - Morphological Change
from Part VI - Domains for the Evaluation of Morphological Theories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations of Morphological Theory
- Part II Issues in Morphological Theory
- Part III Morphological Principles
- Part IV Morphological Frameworks
- Part V The Role of Morphology in Theories of Phonology and Syntax
- Part VI Domains for the Evaluation of Morphological Theories
- 24 Frequency and Corpora
- 25 Morphology in Typology
- 26 Morphological Change
- 27 Morphology and Language Acquisition
- 28 Experimental Studies of Morphology and Morphological Processing
- 29 Computational Morphology
- Index of languages
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology , pp. 743 - 764Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Grannes, Alf. 1977. The use of the Turkish pluralizer -lx2r in South Slavic and Albanian. The New Zealand Slavonic Journal 3.2, 83–93.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel, and Perridson, Harry (eds.), Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, 7–44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics [1986], 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1980. Analogy as a source of morphological complexity. Folia Linguistica Historica 1.2, 277–84.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1994. Phonogenesis. In Pagliuca, William (ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization, 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2003. Grammaticalization [1993], 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. 1985. From agreement affix to subject “clitic”—and bound root: mos > -nos vs. (-)nos(-) and nos-otros in New Mexican and other regional Spanish dialects. Chicago Linguistic Society 31.1, 118–39.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D.. 2003a. Reconsidering the canons of sound change: Towards a Big Bang Theory. In Blake, Barry, and Burridge, Kate (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001, 205–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D.. 2003b. On language, change, and language change—Or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 3–180. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 2009. Watkins’ Law and the development of agglutinative inflections in Asia Minor Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2001. Defining “Word” in Modern Greek: A Response to Philippaki-Warburton and Spyropoulos 1999. Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 87–114.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2004. Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization “theory.” In Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel, and Perridon, Harry (eds.), Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, 44–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2011. Grammaticalization: A general critique. In Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Handbook of Grammaticalization, 193–205. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2014. What counts as (an instance of) grammaticalization? Folia Linguistica, 48.2, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., and Janda, Richard D.. 1988. The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization. In Hammond, Michael and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, 193–210. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1945–9. La nature des procès dits “analogiques.” Acta Linguistica 5, 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightner, Theodore. 1975. The role of derivational morphology in generative grammar. Language 51, 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightner, Theodore. 1983. Introduction to English Derivational Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. 1957. Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7, 298–325, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez Dosuna, Julian. 1997. Fusion, fission, and relevance in language change: Deuniverbation in Greek verb morphology. Studies in Language 21, 577–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolph. 1946. A Grammar of Old Irish, translated from the German by Binchy, D. A. and Bergin, Osborn. The Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert W. 1962. Indo-European Origins of the Celtic Verb I: The Sigmatic Aorist. The Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret E. 1995. Jerzy Kurylowicz: the so-called laws of analogy. Diachronica 12, 113–45.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1994. What is a clitic? In Nevis, Joel A., Joseph, Brian D., Wanner, Dieter, and Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography, 1892–1991, xii–xx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by