Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:46:52.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Self-Regulation of Motivation

A Renewable Resource for Learning

from Part I - The Self and Its Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

K. Ann Renninger
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Suzanne E. Hidi
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we review our Self-Regulation of Motivation (SRM) model, which identifies the important role that interest plays in students’ motivational experiences. When learning requires persistence and re-engagement over time, activities, and contexts, the ability to maintain motivation becomes a critical self-regulatory task. The SRM model proposes that while motivation to attain goals can be sufficient to start a learning activity, experiencing interest becomes important once engaged. Aspects of the goal striving process (such as goal congruence and the expectancy-value of goals) affect the interest experience, over and above objective activity characteristics. Moreover, when interest is low but reaching a goal is important, students purposely engage in actions that make the experience more interesting (e.g., by making it more congruent with their goals or by exploratory engagement with the activity and context). Further, the ways in which students try to make the experience interesting can influence performance in both positive and negative ways (e.g., potential trade-offs between short-term output and longer-term persistence, re-engagement, and learning). We discuss evidence for this model across a variety of contexts (including online learning and science classrooms) and discuss the implications for understanding group-level differences (e.g., in gender or ethnicity) in students’ interest and motivation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. M., Muragishi, G. A., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & Brown, E. R. (2015). To grab and to hold: Cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first-generation college students’ science interest. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 331–41. doi: 10.1037/tps0000046.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Azevedo, R., Moos, D., Greene, J., Winters, F., & Cromley, J. (2008). Why is externally facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 4572.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 2533. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3731.25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bianco, A. T., Higgins, E. T., & Klem, A. (2003). How “fun/importance” fit affects performance: Relating implicit theories to instruction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091–103.Google Scholar
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.Google Scholar
Brown, E. R., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., Allen, J. M., & Muragishi, G. (2015). From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1116–35. doi: 10.1037/edu0000033.Google Scholar
Butner, J. E., Gagnon, K. T., Geuss, M. N., Lessard, D. A., & Story, T. N. (2015). Utilizing topology to generate and test theories of change. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 125. doi: 10.1037/a0037802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cech, E. A., Metz, A., Smith, J. L., & deVries, K. (2017). Epistemological dominance and social inequality: Experiences of Native American science, engineering, and health students. Science, Technology & Human Values, 42(5), 3157–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J. & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108.Google Scholar
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 9801008. doi: 10.1037/a0035661.Google Scholar
de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students' motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–31. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–7. doi: 10.1177/0956797610377342.Google Scholar
Durik, A. M. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597610. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgements and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–32.Google Scholar
Else-Quest, N. M. & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research II: Methods and techniques. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 319–36. doi: 10.1177/0361684316647953.Google Scholar
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 4157. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2.Google Scholar
Geerling, D. M. (2017). Dynamical systems analysis of gender-related interest development in online coursework. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016a). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–65. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–22. doi: 10.1037/ 0022-0663.100.1.105.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M. & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 904–15. doi: 10.1037/ 0022-3514.65.5.904.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M. & Manderlink, G. (1984). A process analysis of the effects of performance-contingent rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20(6), 531–51. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031 (84)90042-8.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M. & Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7, 2149.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016b). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–7. doi: 10.1177/2372732216655542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hidi, S. (2016). Revisiting the role of rewards in motivation and learning: Implications of neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 6193. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9307-5.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–79.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–27. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.Google Scholar
Hulleman, C. S. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1177067.Google Scholar
Isaac, J. D., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 239–65. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1385.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. C., Galvez, G., Landa, I., Buonora, P., & Thoman, D. B. (2016). Science that matters: the importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 112. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067.Google Scholar
Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 3950. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lent, R. W., Hackett, G., & Brown, S. D. (1996). A social cognitive framework for studying career choice and transition to work. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 21, 331.Google Scholar
Lepper, M.R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R.E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–37.Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R. & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning “play” into “work” and “work” into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257307). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R., Sagotsky, G., Dafoe, J. L., & Greene, D. (1982). Consequences of superfluous social constraints: Effects on young children's social inferences and subsequent intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.51.Google Scholar
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–37. doi: 10.1037/edu0000061.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–9. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.Google Scholar
Miele, D. B. & Scholer, A. A. (2016). Self-regulation of motivation. In Wentzel, K. R. & Miele, D. B. (Eds.). Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 363384). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morf, C. C., Weir, C., & Davidov, M. (2000). Narcissism and intrinsic motivation: The role of goal congruence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(4), 424–38. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44(5–6), 295320. doi: 10.1023/A:1010929600004.Google Scholar
Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2012). Vocational interests and performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 384403. doi: 10.1177/1745691612449021.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J., 1998. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. & Moskal, J. (2008). Dopamine and seeking: Subcortical “reward” systems and appetitive urges. In Elliot, A. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation (pp. 6787). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Plass, J. L., O'Keefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., & Perlin, K. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1050–66. doi: 10.1037/a0032688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–84. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587723.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (2015). Interest in K-16 mathematics and science learning. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J. L., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why and how. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 199212. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9193-6.Google Scholar
Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). “I don't feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In Martin & A. Tesser, L. M. (Eds.) Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 203–28). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sansone, C. & Morgan, C. (1992). Intrinsic motivation and education: Competence in context. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 249–70.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Sachau, D. A., & Weir, C. (1989). Effects of instruction on intrinsic interest: The importance of context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 819–29. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sansone, C. & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 341–72). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & MacNamara, A. (2012). Regulating interest when learning online: Potential motivation and performance trade-offs. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 141–9. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.004.Google Scholar
Sansone, C. & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10(3), 175–86. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175.Google Scholar
Sansone, C. & Thoman, D. B. (2006). Maintaining activity engagement: Individual differences in the process of self-regulating motivation. Journal of Personality, 74, 1697–720.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Thoman, D. B., & Smith, J. L. (2010). Interest and self-regulation: Understanding individual variability in choices, efforts and persistence over time. In Hoyle, R. (Ed.) Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 191217). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 379–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379.Google Scholar
Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C. (1999). Self-regulating interest: The moderating role of hardiness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67(4), 701–33. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shechter, O. G., Durik, A. M., Miyamoto, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). The role of utility value in achievement behavior: The importance of culture. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 303–17. doi: 10.1177/0146167210396380.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L., Brown, E. R., Thoman, D. B., & Deemer, E. D. (2015). Losing its expected communal value: How stereotype threat undermines women's identity as research scientists. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 443–66. doi: 10.1007/s11218-015-9296-8.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L., Deemer, E. D., Thoman, D. B., & Zazworsky, L. (2014). Motivation under the microscope: Understanding undergraduate science students’ multiple motivations for research. Motivation and Emotion, 38(4), 496512. doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9388-8.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L., Morgan, C. L., & White, P. H. (2005). Investigating a measure of computer technology domain identification: A tool for understanding gender differences and stereotypes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 336–55. doi: 10.1177/0013164404272486.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L. & Ruiz, J. M. (2007). Interpersonal orientation in context: Correlates and effects of interpersonal complementarity on subjective and cardiovascular experiences. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 679708. doi: 10.1111/ j.1467-6494.2007.00453.x.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L., Sansone, C., & White, P. H. (2007). The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 99114. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.99.Google Scholar
Smith, J. L., Wagaman, J., & Handley, I. M. (2009). Keeping it dull or making it fun: Task variation as a function of promotion versus prevention focus. Motivation and Emotion, 33(2), 150–60. doi: 10.1007/s11031-008-9118-9.Google Scholar
Tauer, J. M. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2004). The effects of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 849–61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoman, D. B., Arizaga, J. A., Smith, J. L., Story, T. S., & Soncuya, G. A., (2014). The grass is greener in non-STEM: Examining the role of competing belonging in undergraduate women's vulnerability to being pulled away from science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 246–58. doi: 10.1177/0361684313499899.Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Brown, E. R., Mason, A. Z., Harmsen, A. G., & Smith, J. L. (2015). The role of altruistic values in motivating underrepresented minority students for biomedicine. BioScience, 65, 183–8. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu199.Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Sansone, C., Robinson, J., & Helm, J. (2018). Implicit theories of interest regulation. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., Brown, E. R., Chase, J. P., & Lee, J. K. (2013). Beyond performance: The motivational experience model of stereotype threat. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 211–43. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9219-1.Google Scholar
Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). The resource replenishment function of interest. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 592–9. doi: 10.1177/1948550611402521.Google Scholar
Turner, S. A. Jr. & Silvia, P. J. (2006). Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 6, 670–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756–67. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756.Google Scholar
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224.Google Scholar
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211–38.Google Scholar
Woodcock, A., Graziano, W. G., Branch, S. E., Habashi, M. M., Ngambeki, I., & Evangelou, D. (2012). Person and thing orientations: Psychological correlates and predictive utility. Social Psychological and Personality Sciences. 4, 116.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×