Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hong, Sehee and Kim, Soyoung 2018. Comparisons of Multilevel Modeling and Structural Equation Modeling Approaches to Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. Psychological Reports, p. 003329411876660.

    Habeeb, Christine M. and Eklund, Robert C. 2016. The Development of an Individuals-Within-Dyads Multilevel Performance Measure for an Interactive Cheerleading Task. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 16.

    Chow, Chong Man Claxton, Shannon E. and van Dulmen, Manfred H. M. 2015. Testing Dyadic Mechanisms the Right Way. Emerging Adulthood, Vol. 3, Issue. 6, p. 421.

    Dijkstra, Pieternel Barelds, Dick P.H. Groothof, Hinke A.K. and van Bruggen, Marnix 2014. Empathy in intimate relationships: The role of positive illusions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 55, Issue. 5, p. 477.

    Peugh, James L. DiLillo, David and Panuzio, Jillian 2013. Analyzing Mixed-Dyadic Data Using Structural Equation Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 314.

    Van ERP, KIM J. P. M. GIEBELS, ELLEN Van Der ZEE, KAREN I. and Van DUIJN, MARIJTJE A. J. 2011. Expatriate adjustment: The role of justice and conflict in intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 58.

    Velotti, Patrizia Castellano, Rosetta and Zavattini, Giulio Cesare 2011. Adjustment of Couples Following Childbirth. European Psychologist, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    BARELDS, DICK P. H. and DIJKSTRA, PIETERNEL 2009. Positive illusions about a partner's physical attractiveness and relationship quality. Personal Relationships, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 263.

    CAMPBELL, LORNE MARTIN, ROD A. and WARD, JENNIE R. 2008. An observational study of humor use while resolving conflict in dating couples. Personal Relationships, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    BUTZER, BETHANY and CAMPBELL, LORNE 2008. Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 141.

    Barelds, D. P. H. and Barelds-Dijkstra, P. 2007. Relations between different types of jealousy and self and partner perceptions of relationship quality. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 176.

    Barelds, Dick P. H. and Barelds-Dijkstra, Pieternel 2007. Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 479.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2012

Chapter 5 - Advances in Data Analytic Approaches for Relationships Research: The Broad Utility of Hierarchical Linear Modeling

from Part II - FOUNDATIONS FOR STUDYING RELATIONSHIPS
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships
  • Online ISBN: 9780511606632
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606632
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×

References

Arriaga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765.
Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A guided tour. Personal Relationships, 9, 327–342.
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Kashy, D. A. (2004) Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447–462.
Cook, W. L. (2000). Understanding attachment security in family context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 285–294.
Cook, W. L. (2001). Interpersonal influence in family systems: A social relations analysis. Child Development, 72, 1179–1197.
Cross, S. E., Bacon, P., & Morris, M. (2000). The relational–interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.
Delsing, M. J. M. H., Oud, J. H. L., De-Bruyn, E. E., & van-Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Current and recollected perceptions of family relationships: The social relations model approach applied to members of three generations. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 445–459.
DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63–79.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Dindia, K. (1986). Couples and other strangers: Talk time in spouse– stranger interaction. Communication Research, 13, 625–652.
Fletcher, G. J. O. (2002). The new science of intimate relationships. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2002). Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 425–433.
Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Plewis, I., Draper, D., Browne, W., Yang, M., Woodhouse, G., & Healy, M. (1998). A user’s guide to MLwiN. Institute of Education, University of London.
Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1997). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 271–302). New York: Wiley.
Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D., (1999). The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case. Personal Relationships, 6, 449–469.
Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2002). Modeling the personality of dyads and groups. Journal of Personality, 70, 901–924.
Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430–439.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Assessing longitudinal change in marriage: An introduction to the analysis of growth curves. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1091–1108.
Karney, B. R., & Frye, N. E. (2002). “But we’ve been getting better lately”: Comparing prospective and retrospective views of relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 222–238.
Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G., (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 20–67). New York: Freeman.
Kenny, D. A. (1988). The analysis of data from two person relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal relationships (pp. 57–77). London: Wiley.
Kenny, D. A. (1990). Design issues in dyadic research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 164–184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Kenny, D. A. (1995). The effect of non-independence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2, 67–75.
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of interdependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.
Kenny, D. A., Bolger, N., & Kashy, D. A. (2001). Traditional methods of estimating multilevel models. In D. S. Moskowitz & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433–448.
Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Enhanced co-orientation in the perception of friends: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1024–1033.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 223–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. (2005). The analysis of dyadic data. New York: Guilford Press.
Kreft, I. G. G., & DeLeeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Kreft, I. G. G., DeLeeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1–22.
MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.
Murray, S. L., Bellavia, G. M., Rose, P., & Griffin, D. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.
Newsom, J. T., & Nishishiba, M. (2002). Nonconvergence and sample bias in hierarchical linear modeling of dyadic data. Retrieved from http://www.upa.pdx.edu/IOA/newsom/mlrdyad4.doc, June 22, 2004. Unpublished manuscript.
Onishi, M., & Gjerde, P. F. (2002). Attachment strategies in Japanese urban middle-class couples: A cultural theme analysis of asymmetry in marital relationships. Personal Relationships, 9, 435–455.
Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical modeling for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161–174.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2001). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (2nd ed.). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251–259.
Sabatelli, R. M., Buck, R., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). A social relations analysis of nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples. Journal of Personality, 53, 513–527.
Simpkins, S. D., & Parke, R. D. (2002). Do friends and nonfriends behave differently? A social relations analysis of children’s behavior. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 48, 263–283.
Simpson, J. A., Orina, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881–893.