Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Problems Related to Health, Safety, and Security
- Chapter 1 Illness and Health Care
- Chapter 2 Mental Illness and Social Problems
- Chapter 3 Substance Abuse
- Chapter 4 Epidemics, Pandemics, and Outbreaks
- Chapter 5 Disaster as Social Problem and Social Construct
- Chapter 6 Surveillance
- Chapter 7 Domestic Spying: A Historical-Comparative Perspective
- Chapter 8 Computer Hacking as a Social Problem
- Chapter 9 War and Militarism
- Chapter 10 The Social Problem of Terrorism
- Chapter 11 Genocide
- Part II Problems Related to Crime and Violence
- Part III Problems of Global Impact
- Index
- References
Chapter 5 - Disaster as Social Problem and Social Construct
from Part I - Problems Related to Health, Safety, and Security
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Problems Related to Health, Safety, and Security
- Chapter 1 Illness and Health Care
- Chapter 2 Mental Illness and Social Problems
- Chapter 3 Substance Abuse
- Chapter 4 Epidemics, Pandemics, and Outbreaks
- Chapter 5 Disaster as Social Problem and Social Construct
- Chapter 6 Surveillance
- Chapter 7 Domestic Spying: A Historical-Comparative Perspective
- Chapter 8 Computer Hacking as a Social Problem
- Chapter 9 War and Militarism
- Chapter 10 The Social Problem of Terrorism
- Chapter 11 Genocide
- Part II Problems Related to Crime and Violence
- Part III Problems of Global Impact
- Index
- References
Summary
There are few examples of studies that view disasters through a social problems lens. Disasters are seldom constructed as social problems, and when they are, such collective definitions typically follow the occurrence of major disasters that are defined as revealing policy deficits. While recognizing the importance of symbolic processes surrounding disaster-related phenomena, most research proceeds from a realist stance that takes the occurrence and consequences of disasters as givens. Too little attention has been paid to how hazards and disasters are discursively framed and how their consequences are produced through institutional and elite action. At the same time, both research and real-world developments illustrate the extent to which claims regarding the genesis of disasters, the nature of the harms disasters produce, and responsibility for causing and ameliorating such harms shift and evolve. Constructions of disaster and other perils reveal the power dynamics and reigning ideologies within the societies in which they occur.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems , pp. 79 - 94Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Adams, Vincanne. 2012. The other road to serfdom: Recovery by the market and the affect economy. Public Culture 24:185–216.Google Scholar
Adams, Vincanne. 2013. Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Aguirre, Benigno, and Quarantelli, Enrico L.. 2008. Phenomenology of death counts in disasters: The invisible dead in the 9/11 WTC attack. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 26:19–39.Google Scholar
Ahern, Jennifer, Galea, Sandro, Resnick, Heidi, and Vlahov, David. 2004. Television images and probable posttraumatic stress disorder after September 11: The role of background characteristics, event exposures, and perievent panic. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 192:217–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Civil Engineers. 2007. The New Orleans Hurricane Protection System: What Went Wrong and Why. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier, and Swistun, Debora. 2008. The social production of toxic uncertainty. American Sociological Review 73:357–79.Google Scholar
Beamish, Thomas D. 2002. Waiting for crisis: Regulatory inaction and ineptitude and the Guadalupe dunes oil spill. Social Problems 49:150–77.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 2006. Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change After Catastrophic Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bourque, Linda B., Siegel, Judith M., Kano, Megumi, and Wood, Michele M.. 2007. Morbidity and mortality associated with disasters. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Rodriguez, Havidan, Quarantelli, Enrico L., and Dynes, Russell R., 97–112. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Burby, Raymond J. 2006. Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604:171–91.Google Scholar
Cable, Sherry, Shriver, Thomas E., and Mix, Tamara L.. 2008. Risk society and contested illness: The case of nuclear weapons workers. American Sociological Review 73:380–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartlidge, Edwin. 2014. Updated: Appeals court overturns manslaughter convictions of six earthquake scientists. Science. November 10. www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/updated-appeals-court-overturns-manslaughter-convictions-six-earthquake-scientists.Google Scholar
Cerulo, Karen. 2008. Never Saw It Coming: Cultural Challenges to Envisioning the Worst. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Lee. 1988. Politics and bias in risk assessment. The Social Science Journal 25:155–65.Google Scholar
Clarke, Lee. 1993. The disqualification heuristic: When do organizations misperceive risk? In Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, vol. 5, edited by Freudenburg, William R. and Youn, Ted I. K., 289–310. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Lee. 1999. Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Lee. 2006. Worst Cases: Terror and Catastrophe in the Popular Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, Peter. 2007. The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, Peter, and Schneider, Joseph W.. 1992. Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Couch, Stephen R., and Kroll-Smith, Steve. 1994. Environmental controversies, interactional resources, and rural communities: Siting versus exposure disputes. Rural Sociology 59:25–44.Google Scholar
Dauber, Michele Landis. 2013. The Sympathetic State: Disaster Relief and the Origins of the American Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Mike. 1998. Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1972. Up and down with ecology – The “issue-attention cycle.” Public Interest 28:38–50.Google Scholar
Drabek, Thomas E. 1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Drabek, Thomas E. 1989. Disasters as nonroutine social problems. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 7:253–64.Google Scholar
Drabek, Thomas E. 2007. Social problems perspectives, disaster research, and emergency management: Intellectual contexts, theoretical extensions, and policy implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York.Google Scholar
Drabek, Thomas E., and McEntire, David A.. 2003. Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management 12:97–112.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., and McCright, Aaron M.. 2015. Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement. In Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives, edited by Dunlap, Riley E. and Brulle, Robert J., 300–322. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dynes, Russell. 2000. The dialogue between Voltaire and Rousseau on the Lisbon earthquake: The emergence of a social science view. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 32:97–115.Google Scholar
Dynes, Russell, and Quarantelli, Enrico L.. 1968. What looting in civil disturbances really means. Trans-Action 5:9–14.Google Scholar
Eden, Lynn. 2006. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fortun, Kim, and Frickel, Scott. 2013. Making a case for disaster science and technology studies. An STS Forum on the East Japan Disaster: Interdisciplinary Conversations about the 2011 Disaster including the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Accident. https://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/online-forum-2/online-forum/making-a-case-for-disaster-science-and-technology-studies/.Google Scholar
Fradkin, Philip L. 2006. The Great Earthquake and Firestorms of 1906: How San Francisco Nearly Destroyed Itself. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, William F. 1993. Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions. Social Forces 71:900–932.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, William F. 1996. Risky thinking: Irrational fears about risk and society. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545:44–53.Google Scholar
Fritz, Charles E. 1961. Disasters. In Contemporary Social Problems, edited by Merton, Robert K. and Nisbet, Robert A., 651–94. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Gotham, Kevin F. 2012. Disaster, Inc.: Privatization and post-Katrina rebuilding in New Orleans. Perspectives on Politics 10:1314–26.Google Scholar
Gunter, Valerie J., Aronoff, Marilyn, and Joel, Susan. 1999. Contamination and communities: Using an ecological-symbolic perspective to theorize response contingencies. The Sociological Quarterly 40:623–40.Google Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen, and Bosk, Charles L.. 1988. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 94:53–78.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Leslie. 2009. Filling the Ark: Animal Welfare in Disasters. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Pubic Policies, Update Edition, with an Epilogue on Health Care. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Klinenberg, Eric. 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knowles, Scott Gabriel. 2011. The Disaster Experts: Mastering Risk in Modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kreps, Gary A., and Drabek, Thomas E.. 1996. Disasters are nonroutine social problems. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 14:129–53.Google Scholar
Kurokawa, Kiyoshi. 2012. The Official Report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Committee. Tokyo: National Diet of Japan.Google Scholar
Leonard, Andrew. 2008. China's earthquake and the mandate of heaven. Salon May 13. www.salon.com/2008/05/13/earthquake_in_china/.Google Scholar
Lindell, Michael K., and Perry, Ronald W.. 2004. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multi-Ethnic Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Martin, Aryn, and Lynch, Michael. 2009. Counting things and people: The practices and politics of counting. Social Problems 56:243–66.Google Scholar
McCright, Aaron M., and Dunlap, Riley E.. 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems 47:499–522.Google Scholar
Mix, Tamara L., Cable, Sherry, and Shriver, Thomas E.. 2009. Social control and contested environmental illness: The repression of ill nuclear weapons workers. Human Ecology Review 16:172–83.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2006. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Norgaard, Kari Marie. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pappas, Stephanie. 2012. Dogs suffer PTSD-like stress after Japan disaster. NBCnews.com. October 11. www.nbcnews.com/id/49377791/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/dogs-suffer-ptsd-like-stress-after-japan-disaster/#.V8cuITW4IsI.Google Scholar
Perry, Ronald W., Lindell, Michael K., and Greene, Marjorie R.. 1981. Evacuation Planning in Emergency Management. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.Google Scholar
Picou, J. Steven, Marshall, Brent K., and Gill, Duane A.. 2004. Disaster, litigation, and the corrosive community. Social Forces 84:1493–522.Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert N., and Schiebinger, Londa, eds. 2008. Agnatology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Quarantelli, Enrico L. 1987. Disaster studies: An analysis of the social historical factors affecting the development of research in the area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 5:285–310.Google Scholar
Quigley, J. T. 2014. PTSD plagues Tohoku three years after March 11 Disaster. The Diplomat. March 11. http://thediplomat.com/2014/03/ptsd-plagues-tohoku-three-years-after-march-11-disaster/.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Liesel A., and Gill, Duane A.. 2013. Recreancy revisited: Beliefs about institutional failure following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Society and Natural Resources 26:655–71.Google Scholar
Rodin, Judith. 2014. The Resilience Dividend: Being Strong in a World Where Things Go Wrong. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., Wright, James D., and Weber-Burdin, Eleanor. 1982. Natural Hazards and Public Choice: The State and Local Politics of Hazard Mitigation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Wilbur J. 1990. PTSD in DSM-III: A case in the politics of diagnosis and disease. Social Problems 37:294–310.Google Scholar
Shoaf, Kimberly I., Nguyen, Loc H., Sareen, Harvinder R., and Bourque, Linda B.. 1998. Injuries as a result of California earthquakes in the past decade. Disasters 22:218–35.Google Scholar
Stallings, Robert A. 1995. Promoting Risk: Constructing the Earthquake Threat. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Summerfield, Derek. 2001. The invention of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the social usefulness of a psychiatric category. BMJ 322:95–98.Google Scholar
Tierney, Kathleen. 2007. From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology 33:503–25.Google Scholar
Tierney, Kathleen. 2010. L'analyse des risques et leurs dimensions sociales [Risk analysis and the social dimensions of risk]. Telescope 16:93–114.Google Scholar
Tierney, Kathleen. 2014. The Social Roots of Risk: Producing Disasters, Promoting Resilience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, Kathleen. 2015. Resilience and the neoliberal project: discourses, critiques, practices – and Katrina. American Behavioral Scientist 59:1327–42.Google Scholar
Tierney, Kathleen, Lindell, Michael K., and Perry, Ronald W.. 2001. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Wright, James D., and Rossi, Peter H., eds. 1981. Social Science and Natural Hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by