Technology and Social Problems

doi:10.1017/9781108550710.029

Chapter 28 - Technology and Social Problems

from Part III - Problems of Global Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2018

Govert Valkenburg and

Harro van Lente

Edited by

A. Javier Treviño

Show author details

A. Javier Treviño: Affiliation:
Wheaton College, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Many social problems have important technological aspects. At the same time, it is usually impossible to identify a single, purely technological cause for the problem, nor is it in most cases possible to identify a single technological solution. In practice, such problems can best be understood by conceptualizing the social and the technical as mutually constitutive. It then follows that specific technologies can help reproduce and exacerbate social inequalities, and that unjust social relations can be conducive to the emergence of “bad” technologies. Social exclusion, offshoring, and humankind's proliferating ecological footprint are exemplary problems that have significant social as well as technological aspects. In addition, it is important to realize that technological change in general comes together with social change, and that these at a deeper level correlate with changing moralities, epistemologies, and ontologies. By consequence, technological societies are highly dynamic and reflexive, and the ensuing complexity might itself become socially problematic.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems , pp. 489 - 502

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108550710.029 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achterhuis, H. J. 1998. De erfenis van de utopie. Amsterdam: Ambo.Google Scholar

Agar, Nicholas. 2004. Liberal Eugenics – In Defence of Human Enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

BBC. 2009. HP camera “can't see” black faces. BBC. December 24. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8429634.stm.Google Scholar

Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bimber, Bruce. 1990. Karl Marx and the three faces of technological determinism. Social Studies of Science 20(2):333–51.Google Scholar

Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: a Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chapman, Katie, and Gordon, Gill. 1998. Reproductive health technologies and gender: Is participation the key? In Gender and Technology, edited by Sweetman, Caroline, 34–44. Oxford: Oxfam GB.Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew. 1991. Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew. 1995. Alternative Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Feenberg, Andrew. 2005. Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies 1(1):47–64.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, Robert. Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline & Punish. The Birth of the Prison. 2nd ed. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2003. Governmentality. In The Essential Foucault. Selections form Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by Rabinow, Paul and Rose, Nikolas, 229–44. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology, edited by Shaw, Robert E. and Bransford, John, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Haggerty, Kevin D., and Ericson, Richard V.. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4):605–22.Google Scholar

Hargittai, Eszter, and Hinnant, Amanda. 2008. Digital inequality. Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research 35(5):602–21.Google Scholar

Hilberg, Raul. 1998. German railroads/Jewish souls. Society 35(2):162–74.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Arjen Y., and Wiedmann, Thomas O.. 2014. Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344(6188):1114–17.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Edited by Urry, J.. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Joerges, Bernward. 1999. Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science 29(3):411–31.Google Scholar

Keulartz, Jozef, Schermer, Maartje, Korthals, Michiel, and Swierstra, Tsjalling E.. 2004. Ethics in technological culture: A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29(1):3–29.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1993a. La clef de Berlin et autres leçons d'un amateur de sciences. Paris: Éditions la Découverte.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1993b. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Wheatsheaf, Harvester. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Wendy. 2015. How tech's lack of diversity leads to racist software. SF Gate. July 22. www.sfgate.com/business/article/How-tech-s-lack-of-diversity-leads-to-racist-6398224.php.Google Scholar

Lyon, David. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 2013. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. Wordsworth Classics of World Literature 1 and 2. Hertfordshire, UK: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar

Miah, Andy. 2003. Gene-doping: Sport, values and bioethics. In The Ethics of Human Genetics: Challenges of the (Post) Genomic Era, edited by Glasa, Jozef, 171–80. Strasburg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Mol, Annemarie. 2005. Het leven met technieken voorbij de mythe van de rationaliteit. Tijdschrift voor Humanistiek 6(23):70–76.Google Scholar

Monahan, Torin. 2006. Questioning surveillance and security. In Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life, edited by Monahan, Torin, 1–23. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Monahan, Torin. 2011. Surveillance as cultural practice. The Sociological Quarterly 52:495–508.Google Scholar

Nauta, Lolle. 1984. Historical roots of the concept of autonomy in Western philosophy. PRAXIS International 1984(4):363–77.Google Scholar

Nordmann, Alfred. 2007. If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics 1(1):31–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norman, Donald. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Oudshoorn, Nelly. 1995. Technologie en zorg: Vrienden en vijanden. Het voorbeeld van nieuwe anticonceptiemiddelen voor vrouwen en mannen. Gezondheid 3(3):278–89.Google Scholar

Pfaffenberger, Bryan. 1992. Technological dramas. Science, Technology & Human Values 17(3):282–312.Google Scholar

Rip, Arie, and Kemp, René. 1998. Technological change. In Human Choice and Climate Change: Resources and Technology, vol. 2, edited by Rayner, Steve and Malone, Liz, 327–99. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.Google Scholar

Roco, Mihail C., and Bainbridge, William Sims, eds. 2004. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Sarewitz, Daniel. 2013. The idea of progress. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Olsen Friis, Jan Kyre Berg, Pedersen, Stig Andur, and Hendricks, Vincent F., 303–7. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Solove, Daniel J. 2007. “I've got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review 44:747–72.Google Scholar

Swierstra, Tsjalling E., Est, Rinie Van, and Boenink, Marianne. 2009. Taking care of the symbolic order. How converging technologies challenge our concepts. NanoEthics 3(3):269–80.Google Scholar

Urry, John. 2014. Offshoring. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Valkenburg, Govert, and Van derPloeg, Irma. 2015. Materialities between security and privacy: A constructivist account of airport security scanners. Security Dialogue 46(4):326–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van der Ploeg, Irma. 2005. Keys to privacy: Translations of “the privacy problem” in information technologies. In The Machine-Readable Body: Essays on Biometrics and the Informatization of the Body, edited by Van der Ploeg, Irma, 15–36. Maastricht, Netherlands: Shaker.Google Scholar

Van der Ploeg, Irma, and Pridmore, Jason, eds. 2016. Digitizing Identities: Doing Identity in a Networked World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. 2005. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Van Hilvoorde, Ivo, Vos, Rein, and De Wert, Guido. 2007. Flopping, klapping and gene doping: Dichotomies between “natural” and “artificial” in elite sport. Social Studies of Science 37(2):173–200.Google Scholar

Van Lente, Harro. 2000. Forceful futures: From promise to requirement. In Contested Futures. A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science, edited by Brown, Nik, Rappert, Brian, and Webster, Andrew, 43–64. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Winner, Langdon. 1988. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1):121–36.Google Scholar

Winner, Langdon. 1993. Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 18(3):362–78.Google Scholar

Woolgar, Steve, and Cooper, Geoff. 1999. Do artefacts have ambivalence? Moses' bridges, winner's bridges and other urban legends in S&TS. Social Studies of Science 29(3):433–49.Google Scholar

World Bank. 2013. Warming climate to hit Bangladesh hard with sea level rise, more floods and cyclones, World Bank report says. www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2013/06/19/warming-climate-to-hit-bangladesh-hard-with-sea-level-rise-more-floods-and-cyclones-world-bank-report-says.Google Scholar

Wyatt, Sally. 2008. Technological determinism is dead; Long live technological determinism. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Hacket, Edward J., Amsterdamska, Olga, Lynch, Michael and Wajcman, Judy, 165–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.