Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:52:21.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Émile Durkheim: Theorist of Solidarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

This article illustrates how contemporary Durkheim studies offer a corrective to previous misinterpretations. They stress the significance of his work for subsequent developments in cultural sociology and his contribution to our understanding of solidarity, which has informed recent developments in civil society theorizing.

Peter Kivisto is the Richard A. Swanson Professor of Social Thought at Augustana College and International Reader at the University of Helsinki’s Center for Research on Ethnic Relations and Nationalism (CEREN). He is the author or editor of 37 books and over 180 articles and book chapters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988a. “Introduction: Durkheimian Sociology and Cultural Studies Today.” In Alexander, Jeffrey C. (ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies (pp. 121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988b. Action and Its Environments: Toward a New Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Smith, Philip (eds.). 2005. The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. 1967. “Civil Religion in America.” Daedalus 96(1): 121.Google Scholar
Benoit-Smullyan, Émile. 1948. “The Sociologism of Émile Durkheim and His School.” In Barnes, Harry Elmer (ed.), An Introduction to the History of Sociology (pp. 205243). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Besnard, Philippe. 1993. “Anomie and Fatalism in Durkheim’s Theory of Regulation.” In Turner, Stephen P. (ed.), Émile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist (pp. 169190). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowring, Finn. 2016. “The Individual and Society in Durkheim.” European Journal of Social Theory 19(1): 2138.Google Scholar
Callegaro, Francesco. 2012. “The Ideal of the Person: Recovering the Novelty of Durkheim’s Sociology. Part I: The Idea of Society and Its Relation to the Individual.” Journal of Classical Sociology 12(3–4): 449478.Google Scholar
Callegaro, Francesco.2016. “The Idea of the Person: Recovering the Novelty of Durkheim’s Sociology. Part II: Modern Society, the Cult of the Person, and the Sociological Project.” Journal of Classical Sociology 16(1): 3752.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2014. “Durkheim: via Fournier, via Lukes, a Review Essay.” Theory and Society 43(6): 667673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Jack D. 1967. The Social Meanings of Suicide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1938 [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1951 [1897]. Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1958a. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1958b. Socialism and Saint-Simon. Edited by Gouldner, Alvin. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch College.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1961. Moral Education. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1964 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1965 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1969 [1898]. “Individualism and the Intellectuals,” with an introduction by Steven Lukes. Political Studies 17(1): 1430.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1972 [1889]. “Review of Toennies: Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft.” Revue philosophique 27. In Giddens, Anthony (ed.), Émile Durkheim: Selected Writings (pp. 146147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1974 [1924]. Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 2008 [1899]. “Anti-Semitism and Social Crisis.” Sociological Theory 26(4): 321323.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile and Mauss, Marcel. 1963 [1903]. Primitive Classification. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile and Mauss, Marcel 1971. “Note on the Notion of Civilization.” Social Research 38(4): 808813.Google Scholar
Filloux, Jean-Claude. 1976. “Il ne faut pas oublier que je suis fils de rabbin.” Revue française de sociologie 17(2): 259266.Google Scholar
Fournier, Marcel. 2012. “Is There Anything New to Say about Émile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss?International Sociology 27(2): 170178.Google Scholar
Fournier, Marcel. 2013. Émile Durkheim: A Biography. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Fournier, Marcel. 2014. “Les Formes Élémentaires comme Oeuvre Collective: Les Contributions d’Hanri Hubert et de Marcel Mauss à la Sociologie de la Religion Tardive d’Émile Durkheim.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 39(4): 523546.Google Scholar
Gane, Mike. 1988. On Durkheim’s Rules of Sociological Method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gane, Mike.1992. The Radical Sociology of Durkheim and Mauss. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1971. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim, and Max Weber. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Chad Alan. 2008. “Introduction to Émile Durkheim’s ‘Anti-Semitism and Social Crisis.’” Sociological Theory 26(4): 299321.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Chad Alan. 2017. Modernity and the Jews in Western Social Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Graeff, Peter and Mehlkop, Guido. 2007. “When Anomie Becomes a Reason for Suicide: A New Macro-sociological Approach in the Durkheimian Tradition.” European Sociological Review 23(4): 521535.Google Scholar
Heilbron, Johan. 2015. French Sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Robert Alun. 1986. Émile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jones, Robert Alun. 1999. The Development of Durkheim’s Social Realism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karady, Victor. 1981. “The Prehistory of Present-Day French Sociology (1917–1957).” In Lemert, Charles C. (ed.), French Sociology: Rupture and Renewal since 1968 (pp. 33–47). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kivisto, Peter, and Sciortino, Giuseppe (eds.). 2015. Solidarity, Justice, and Incorporation: Thinking through The Civil Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Jennifer M. 1993. Deconstructing Durkheim: A Post-Post-Structuralist Critique. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Jennifer M. 1995. “Durkheim’s Theories of Deviance and Suicide: A Feminist Reconsideration.” American Journal of Sociology 100(4): 904930.Google Scholar
Lemert, Charles. 2006. Durkheim’s Ghosts: Cultural Logics and Social Things. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1973. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marske, Charles E. 1987. “Durkheim’s ‘Cult of the Individual’ and the Moral Reconstitution of Society.” Sociological Theory 5(1): 114.Google Scholar
Maryanski, Alexandra. 2014. “The Birth of the Gods: Robertson Smith and Durkheim’s Turn to Religion as the Basis of Social Integration.” Sociological Theory 32(4): 352376.Google Scholar
Meštrović, Stjepan G. and Brown, Helene M.. 1985. “Durkheim’s Concept of Anomie as Dérèglement.” Social Problems 33(2): 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, James. 2018. Can Democracy Work? A Short History of a Radical Idea from Ancient Athens to Our World. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Muller, Jerry Z. 2002. Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Western Thought. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nelson, Benjamin. 1973. “Civilizational Complexes and Intercivilizational Encounters.” Sociological Analysis 34(2): 79105.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert.1974. The Sociology of Émile Durkheim. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action, Volume I. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott.2007. American Society: A Theory of the Societal Community. Edited and introduced by Giuseppe, Sciortino. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Pearce, Frank. 1989. The Radical Durkheim. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 2000. Durkheim. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, Whitney. 1976. Durkheim’s Suicide: A Classic Analyzed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pope, Whitney and Johnson, Barclay D.. 1983. “Inside Organic Solidarity.” American Sociological Review 48(5): 681692.Google Scholar
Riley, Alexander. 2015. The Social Thought of Émile Durkheim. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1971 [1908]. “How Is Society Possible?” In Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms (pp. 622). Edited and introduced by Donald, N. Levine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, David N. 2014. “Review: Slashing at Water with a Knife? Durkheim’s Struggle to Anchor Sociology in First Principles.” Contemporary Sociology 43(2): 165171.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 2014. “The Cost of Collaboration: Reflections upon Randall Collins’ Theory of Collective Intellectual Production via Émile Durkheim: A Biography.” Anthropological Quarterly 87(1): 245254.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, Susan. 2001. Durkheim Reconsidered. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Strenski, Ivan. 1997. Durkheim and the Jews of France. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thijssen, Peter. 2012. “From Mechanical to Organic Solidarity and Back: With Honneth beyond Durkheim.” European Journal of Social Theory 15(4): 454470.Google Scholar
Tiryakian, Edward. 1978. “Émile Durkheim.” In Tom, Bottomore and Robert, Nisbet (eds.), A History of Sociological Analysis (pp. 187–236). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1955 [1856]. The Old Regime and the French Revolution. Translated by Gilbert., Stuart Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de 1969 [1853]. Democracy in America. Translated by Lawrence, George, edited by Mayer, J. P.. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Toennies, Ferdinand. 1957 [1887]. Community and Society. Edited and translated by Loomis, C. P.. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Tole, Lise Ann. 1993. “Durkheim on Religion and Moral Community in Modernity.” Sociological Inquiry 63(1): 129.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×