Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Development of Sociology
- Part II Sociological Theory
- Part III Sociological Research Methods
- Chapter 11 Quantitative Methods
- Chapter 12 Social Network Analysis (SNA)
- Chapter 13 Qualitative Sociology
- Chapter 14 Mixed Methods Research
- Chapter 15 Comparative-Historical Sociology: A Multi-Method, Combinatorial Approach
- Chapter 16 Demography
- Part IV Culture and Socialization
- Part V Social Structure and the Organization of Society
- Part VI Social Inequality and Diversity
- Part VII Social Institutions
- Part VIII Social Problems and Deviant Behavior
- Part IX Locality, Geography, and the Environment
- Part X Social Change
- Index
- References
Chapter 14 - Mixed Methods Research
from Part III - Sociological Research Methods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Development of Sociology
- Part II Sociological Theory
- Part III Sociological Research Methods
- Chapter 11 Quantitative Methods
- Chapter 12 Social Network Analysis (SNA)
- Chapter 13 Qualitative Sociology
- Chapter 14 Mixed Methods Research
- Chapter 15 Comparative-Historical Sociology: A Multi-Method, Combinatorial Approach
- Chapter 16 Demography
- Part IV Culture and Socialization
- Part V Social Structure and the Organization of Society
- Part VI Social Inequality and Diversity
- Part VII Social Institutions
- Part VIII Social Problems and Deviant Behavior
- Part IX Locality, Geography, and the Environment
- Part X Social Change
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of SociologyCore Areas in Sociology and the Development of the Discipline, pp. 143 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Brown, Hana. 2013. Racialized Conflict and Policy Spillover Effects: The Role of Race in the Contemporary U.S. Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology 119: 394–443.Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan 2006. Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done? Qualitative Research 6: 97–113.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew, Burton, Linda, Hurt, Tera, and Purvin, Diana. 2004. Why Did the Moving to Opportunity Experiment Not Get Young People into Better Schools? American Sociological Review 69: 768–789.Google Scholar
Creswell, John, and Clark, Vicki Plano. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jennifer, Greene, Caracelli, Valerie, and Graham, Wendy. 1989. Toward a Conceptual Framework For Mixed Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Analysis and Policy Design 11: 255–274.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene. 2010. Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene and Burke, R. Johnson. 2015. Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laubach, Marty. 2005. Consent, Informal Organization and Job Rewards: A Mixed Methods Analysis. Social Forces 83: 1535–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mignon. 2008. Gendered Power Relations among Women: A Study of Household Decision Making in Black, Lesbian Stepfamilies. American Sociological Review 73: 335–356.Google Scholar
Moran-Ellis, Jo, Alexander, Victoria, Cronin, Ann, Dickinson, Mary, Fielding, Jane, Sleney, Judith, and Thomas, Hilary. 2006. Triangulation and Integration: Processes, Claims and Implications. Qualitative Research 61: 45–59.Google Scholar
Morgan, David. 2013. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Morse, Janice and Niehaus, Linda. 2009. Mixed Method Design. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, Lisa. 2012. Mixed Methods Inquiry in Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist 56: 829–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Mario. 2011. How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature. Annual Review of Sociology. 37: 57–86.Google Scholar
Small, Mario, Jacobs, Erin, and Massengill, Rebekah. 2008. Why Organizational Ties Matter for Neighborhood Effects: Resource Access through Childcare Centers. Social Forces 87: 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sandra and Moore, Mignon. 2000. Intraracial Diversity and Relations among African Americans at a Predominantly White University: Closeness among Black Students. American Journal of Sociology. 106: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, Abbas and Teddlie, Charles. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, Abbas and Teddlie, Charles. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods Research for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Abbas, Tashakkori and Teddlie, Charles. 2010. Handbook of Mixed Methods Research for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Trend, M. G. 1979. On the Reconciliation of Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses: A Case Study. In Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Edited by Cook, T. and Reichardt, C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 68–86.Google Scholar
Webb, Eugene, Campbell, Donald, Schwartz, Richard, and Sechrest, Lee. 1966. Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar