Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice?
- PART I ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL QUESTIONS
- 1 Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy
- 2 Epistemological alternatives for researching Strategy as Practice: building and dwelling worldviews
- 3 Practice, strategy making and intentionality: a Heideggerian onto-epistemology for Strategy as Practice
- 4 Constructivist epistemologies in Strategy as Practice research
- 5 Constructing contribution in ‘Strategy as Practice’ research
- 6 The challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about Strategy as Practice
- PART II THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
- PART III METHODOLOGICAL TRACKS
- PART IV APPLICATION VARIATIONS
- Author Index
- Index
- References
3 - Practice, strategy making and intentionality: a Heideggerian onto-epistemology for Strategy as Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice?
- PART I ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL QUESTIONS
- 1 Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy
- 2 Epistemological alternatives for researching Strategy as Practice: building and dwelling worldviews
- 3 Practice, strategy making and intentionality: a Heideggerian onto-epistemology for Strategy as Practice
- 4 Constructivist epistemologies in Strategy as Practice research
- 5 Constructing contribution in ‘Strategy as Practice’ research
- 6 The challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about Strategy as Practice
- PART II THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS
- PART III METHODOLOGICAL TRACKS
- PART IV APPLICATION VARIATIONS
- Author Index
- Index
- References
Summary
A little strategy goes a long way. Too much can paralyze or splinter an organization. That conclusion derives from the possibility that strategy-like outcomes originate from sources other than strategy.
(Karl Weick 2001, p. 345)Research on strategy from a practice perspective has been steadily gaining momentum, as attested by, among other things, several journal special issues, an increasing number of publications (including this volume) and long-standing conference streams. Although it has been a mainly European pursuit, it is also spreading to other academic milieus in other continents. Strategy as Practice calls for nothing less than a re-orientation of the field of strategy research. By re-conceiving strategy as not something organizations have but as something organizations do, Strategy as Practice is shifting the focus of analytical attention towards the making of strategy (Whittington 2006), thus departing from traditional variance-model approaches (Tsoukas and Knudsen 2002).
Insofar as this is the case, Strategy as Practice shares important assumptions with an earlier perspective in strategy research, namely the process approach. Both Strategy as Practice and process research do not treat strategy as a dependent variable, the variance of which is to be explained through the construction of a model consisting of a set of contributory variables, each one of which has its own variance (Langley 2007; Pettigrew 1992; van de Ven and Poole 2005). The main research question these two perspectives seek to address is: How do organizations make strategies (or fail to do so)?
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 47 - 62Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(1994) The role of articulation in understanding practice and experience as sources of knowledge in clinical nursing. In (ed.), Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: 136–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1999) Clinical Wisdom and Interventions in Critical Care. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
and (2006) Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007) Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007) Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Holism and hermeneutics. In (ed.), Hermeneutics and Praxis: 227–247. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
(1991b) Reflection on the workshop on ‘The Self’, Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 16: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Responses. In and (eds.), Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science:313–349. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and (2005) Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity, Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 58–77.CrossRef
, and (2007) Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) Top teams and strategy in a UK university, Journal of Management Studies, 39/3: 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003) Guest Editors' Introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning, Organization Science, 7: 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007) Struggling over subjectivity: A discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978) The methodology of scientific research programmes. In and (eds.), Philosophical Papers (Vol.1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Process thinking in strategic organization, Strategic Organization, 5: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: Understanding failure in organizational strategizing, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 11: 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 160–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982) Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial firm, Academy of Management Journal, 25/3: 465–499.Google Scholar
and (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent, Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work, Organization Studies, 28: 1435–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Perspectives on strategy: The real story behind Honda's success, California Management Review, 26/3: 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) The character and significance of strategy process research, Strategic Management Journal, 13/S2: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers, Journal of Management Studies, 26: 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Towards a theory of social practice: A development in cultural theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Strategy creation in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy making, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day, Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1413–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Coping and its contrasts. In and (eds.), Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science: 7–28. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Strategizing as lived experience and strategists' everyday efforts to shape strategic direction, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Coping with others with folk psychology. In and (eds.), Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science: 29–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and (1996) Articulating a practice from within the practice itself: Establishing formative dialogues by the use of a ‘social poetics’, Concepts and Transformation, 1: 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985a) Human Agency and Language, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985b) Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) The dialogical self. In , and (eds.), The Interpretive Turn: 304–314. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Engaged agency and background in Heidegger. In (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger: 317–336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (2002) The conduct of strategy research. In , and (eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management: 411–435. London: Sage.Google Scholar
and (2005) Alternative approaches for studying organizational change, Organization Studies, 26/9: 1377–1404.Google Scholar
and (1991) Intentionality and the phenomenology of action. In and (eds.), John Searle and his Critics: 259–270. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2001) Substitutes for strategy. In , Making Sense of the Organization: 345–360. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2006) Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–634.CrossRef
(2007) Strategy practice and strategy process: Family differences and the sociological eye, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980a) Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol.II. Edited by and ; translated by and . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1980b) Culture and Value. Edited by and ; translated by . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 44
- Cited by