Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-jtjl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-16T03:21:48.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Relating strategy as practice to the resource-based view, capabilities perspectives and the micro-foundations approach

from Part III - Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Patrick Regnér
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Patrick Regnér
Affiliation:
Institute of International Business
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
Grenoble School of Management
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Svenska Handelshögskolan, Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Although strategy-as-practice research has thrived during the last decade, the resource-based view (RBV: Barney 1991; Peteraf 1993; Wernerfelt 1984) and capabilities perspectives (Dosi, Nelson and Winter 2000; Eisenhardt and Martin 2000; Winter 2003) have continued to dominate mainstream strategic management research. Recent work has also started to show an increased interest in the micro aspects of strategy, emphasizing micro-foundations as essential in understanding organizational capabilities and resources and their origins (Abell, Felin and Foss 2008; Felin and Foss 2005; Gavetti 2005; Teece 2007). There have been repeated calls for examinations at the intersection between these research directions and SAP research (Jarzabkowski and Kaplan 2010; Johnson et al. 2007; Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Regnér 2012; Vaara and Whittington 2012), but surprisingly little of this nature has materialized so far, with a few exceptions (for example, Ambrosini 2003; Ambrosini, Bowman and Burton-Taylor 2007; Kaplan 2008; Regnér 2003; 2008; Salvato 2003; 2009).

This chapter examines the intersection between strategy as practice and perspectives that have dominated strategy content research during the last couple of decades. Specifically, it examines differences and commonalities, potential relationships and synergies between strategy as practice and the RBV, capabilities perspectives and the micro-foundations approach. It further investigates extant strategy-as-practice research at this intersection and identifies potential future research opportunities. What can possibly be gained from investigating this intersection? There are four points that are of particular importance. First, besides underlining the importance of strategy practices and activities generally for strategic management, it may provide insights into how practices, praxis and practitioners underlie resources and capabilities that maintain competitive advantage. If we accept that there is a relationship between what managers do and strategy content and outcomes, a key issue is determining how practices both enable and impede managers in their strategy praxis concerning resources and capabilities. By linking strategy as practice to resource-based, capabilities and micro-foundations research, it is thus possible to demonstrate the prominence of practices, social contexts and interactions for strategy. This is, of course, in contrast to extant assumptions in these strategy content research areas that often primarily emphasize rational top managers and individuals. The link to the resource-based and capabilities views may thus strengthen the main theoretical traits of the SAP approach and consolidate it.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 301 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abell, P., Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2008), ‘Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 29/6: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A. and Barney, J. (2008), ‘Opportunities, organizations, and entrepreneurship’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2/4: 265–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosini, V. (2003), Tacit and Ambiguous Resources as Sources of Competitive Advantage. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., and Burton-Taylor, S. B. (2007), ‘Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction’, Human Relations, 60/1: 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amit, R., and Schoemaker, P. J. (1993), ‘Strategic assets and organizational rent’, Strategic Management Journal, 14/1: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1986a), ‘Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy’, Management Science, 32/10: 1231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1986b), ‘Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?’, Academy of Management Review, 11/3: 656–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17/1: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1997), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (2001), ‘Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view’, Journal of Management, 27/6: 643–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J., and Felin, T. (2013), ‘What are microfoundations?’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27/2: 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (2005), ‘Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14/5: 775–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P., and Papenhausen, C. (2003), ‘Assumptions of rationality and equilibrium in strategy research: the limits of traditional economic analysis’, Strategic Organization, 1/4: 413–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgelman, R. A. (1983), ‘A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28/2: 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R., and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. (1989), ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage’, Management Science, 35/12: 1504–11.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (eds.) (2000), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eggers, J. P., and Kaplan, S. (2009), ‘Cognition and renewal: comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change’, Organization Science, 20/2: 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, J. P., and Kaplan, S. (2013), ‘Cognition and capabilities: a multi-level perspective’, Academy of Management Annals, 7/1: 295–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000), ‘Dynamic capabilities: what are they?’, Strategic Management Journal, 21/10–11: 1105–21.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000), ‘Organizational routines as a source of continuous change’, Organization Science, 11/6: 611–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39/3: 484–510.Google Scholar
Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2005), ‘Strategic organization: a field in search of microfoundations’, Strategic Organization, 3/4: 441–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2011), ‘The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: the poverty of stimulus’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/2: 231–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., and Madsen, T. L. (2012), ‘Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1351–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S. W., and Sputtek, R. (2011), ‘Rediscovering the individual in strategy: methodological challenges, strategies, and prospects’, in Bergh, D. D., and Ketchen, D. J. (eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. VI, Building Methodological Bridges: 3–30. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J. (2011), ‘Invited editorial: why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like’, Journal of Management, 37/51413–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2005), ‘Cognition and hierarchy: rethinking microfoundations of capabilities development’, Organization Science, 16/6: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G. (2012), ‘Toward a behavioral theory of strategy’, Organization Science, 23/1: 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., and Ocasio, W. (2007), ‘Perspective – neo-Carnegie: the Carnegie School's past, present, and reconstructing for the future’, Organization Science, 18/3: 523–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Grant, B. (1996), ‘Toward a knowledge-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S1: 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérard, S., Langley, A., and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking the concept of performance in strategy research: towards a performativity perspective’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 566–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., and Winter, S. G. (2007), Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., and Healey, M. P. (2011), ‘Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 32/13: 1500–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2012),‘The mirage of microfoundations’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M., and Knudsen, T. (2011), ‘Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause: some questions for Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/2: 295–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Kaplan, S. (2010), ‘Taking “strategy-as-practice” across the Atlantic’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 51–71. Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2007), The Practice of Strategy: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., and Regnér, P. (2014), Exploring Strategy: Text and Cases,. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Jonsson, S., and Regnér, P. (2009), ‘Normative barriers to imitation: social complexity of core competences in a mutual fund industry’, Strategic Management Journal, 30/5: 517–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19/5: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1992), ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’, Organization Science, 3/3: 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1996), ‘What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning’, Organization Science, 7/5: 502–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., and Groen, A. J. (2010), ‘The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques’, Journal of Management, 36/1: 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. (1995), ‘Strategic management and the exploration of diversity’, in Montgomery, C. A. (ed.), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: 19–42. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. A., and Rumelt, R. P. (1982), ‘Uncertain imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition’, Bell Journal of Economics, 13/2: 418–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makadok, R. (2001), ‘Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation’, Strategic Management Journal, 22/5: 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, A., and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011), ‘Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives’, Academy of Management Annals, 5/1: 413–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peteraf, M. (1993), ‘The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view’, Strategic Management Journal, 14/3: 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, T., Lovallo, D., and Fox, C. (2011), ‘Behavioral strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 32/13: 1369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priem, R. L., and Butler, J. E. (2001), ‘Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?’, Academy of Management Review, 26/1: 22–40.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, R., and Defillippi, R. J. (1990), ‘Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 15/1, 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2003), ‘Strategy creation in the periphery: inductive versus deductive strategy making’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2008), ‘Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: steps towards a more dynamic view of strategy’, Human Relations, 61/4: 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnér, P. (2010), ‘Strategy process research and the RBV: social barriers to imitation’, in Mazzola, P., and Kellermanns, F. W. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Strategy Process: 90–108. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Regnér, P. (2011), ‘Book review of Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice’, Management, 14/2: 157–76.Google Scholar
Regnér, P. (2012), ‘Strategy as practice: untangling the emergence of competitive positions’, in Dagnino, G. B. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Competitive Strategy: 182–200. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Regnér, P. (2014), ‘Strategy-as-practice and micro-foundations’, online seminar, Henry Stewart Talks, http://hstalks.com/main/view_talk.php?t=2724&r=693&c=250.
Rivkin, J. W. (2000), ‘Imitation of complex strategies’, Management Science, 46/6: 824–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. (1984), ‘Towards a strategic theory of the firm’, in Lamb, R. B. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management: 556–70. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Salvato, C. (2003), ‘The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2009), ‘Capabilities unveiled: the role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes’, Organization Science, 20/2: 384–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. (2007), ‘General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective’, Organization Studies, 28/2: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spender, J. C. (1996), ‘Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S1: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulanski, G. (1996), ‘Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17/S2: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2007), ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: nature and microfoundations’, Strategic Management Journal, 28/13: 1319–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18/7: 509–33.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5/2: 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1987), ‘Knowledge and competence as strategic assets’, in Teece, D. J. (ed.), The Competitive Advantage: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal: 159–84. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1988), ‘On Coase, competence, and the corporation’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4/1: 163–80.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2003), ‘Understanding dynamic capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, 24/10: 991–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2011), ‘Problems at the foundations? Comments on Felin and Foss’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7/2: 257–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. (2012), ‘Capabilities: their origins and ancestry’, Journal of Management Studies, 49/8: 1402–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, U., and Kogut, B. (1995), ‘Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test’, Organization Science, 6/1: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. (2002), ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities’, Organization Science, 13/3: 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×