Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:06:42.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Semantic Networks

from Part II - Discourse Analysis within SFL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

By
Andy Fung  and
Francis Robert Low
Edited by
Geoff Thompson ,
Wendy L. Bowcher ,
Lise Fontaine  and
David Schönthal
Geoff Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Wendy L. Bowcher
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Lise Fontaine
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
David Schönthal
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access

Summary

Since the early developments of the 1980s, Hasan and her colleagues have laid a solid foundation in systemic functional semantics – both theory and description. Indeed, Hasan’s insights on message semantics and her contextually open semantic networks have extended beyond her semantic variation or integrated sociolinguistic research. One consequence of the productivity of this paradigmatic description of meanings has been the increasing applications in various discourse studies. To highlight this ‘extended’ use of semantic descriptions, we survey the use of semantic networks in discourse analysis, presenting an up-to-date retrospective review on the different uses of message semantics. By accounting for the various domains of application, we seek to exemplify in what ways message semantic networks are employed by discourse analysts to tackle various research problems, enabling discourse analysts to understand ‘the nature of the relationship between language and society’ and ‘how and why language works’ (Hasan 2005:56). This chapter thus demonstrates one claim, namely that Hasan’s message semantics network is essentially a discourse analytical tool enabling discourse analysts to study language in use in various contexts.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics , pp. 333 - 357
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, T. and Chen, H.. 2012. Applying Linguistics in Making Professional Practice Re-Visible. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control: Theoretical Studies towards a Sociology of Language, Volume 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1975 Class, Codes and Control: Applied Studies towards a Theory of Educational Transmission, Volume 3. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1987. Social Class, Codes and Communication. In Ammon, V., Dittmar, N., and Matthier, K. J., eds., Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 536–79.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1990. Class, Codes and Control: The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse, Volume 4. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. 2nd ed. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bowcher, W. L. 2007. Field and Multimodal Texts. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 619–46.Google Scholar
Bowcher, W. L. 2014. Issues in Developing Unified Systems for Contextual Field and Mode. Functions of Language 21(2): 176–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, D. 2004. Parameters of Context: On Establishing the Similarities and Differences between Social Processes. Unpublished mimeo, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Chu, P. Y. 2011. Picture Book Reading in a New Arrival Context: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching Reading. PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J.. 2002. The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloran, C. 1994. Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into Some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar. Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Cloran, C. 1999. Context, Material Situation and Text. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Text and Context in Functional Linguistics: Systemic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 219–328.Google Scholar
Cloran, C. 2000. Socio-semantic Variation: Different Wordings, Different Meanings. In Unsworth, L., ed., Researching Language in Schools and Communities: Functional Linguistic Perspectives. London: Cassell. 152–83.Google Scholar
Cloran, C., Stuart-Smith, V., and Young, Y.. 2007. Models of Discourse. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 647–70.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. 1990. Keeping the Conversation Going: A Systemic-functional Analysis of Conversational Structure in Casual Sustained Talk. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. and Slade, D.. 2004. Analyzing Casual Conversation. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fung, A. 2016. Hasan’s Semantic Networks Revisited: A Cantonese Systemic Functional Approach. In Bowcher, W. L. and Liang, J. Y., eds., Society in Language, Language in Society: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave Macmillan.115–40.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. and Handford, M., eds. 2012. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. 1985. Towards ‘Communication’ Linguistics: A Framework. In Benson, J. and Greaves, W., eds., Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Volume 1: Selected Theoretical Papers from the Ninth International Systemic Workshop. Norwood: Ablex. 119–34.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 2004. Prone to Distortion? Undue Reliance on Unreliable Records in NSW Police Service Formal Interview Model. In Gibbons, J., Prakasam, V., Tirumalesh, K. V., and Nagrajan, H., eds., Language in the Law. New Delhi: Orient Longman Private Limited. 44–81.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Towards a Sociological Semantics. In Halliday, M. A. K., Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold. 72–102.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1984. Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic-functional Interpretation of the Nature and Ontogenesis of Dialogue. In Fawcett, R. P. et al., eds., The Semiotics of Culture and Language, Volume 1: Language as Social Semiotic. London: Pinter. 3–35.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2006a. Some Theoretical Considerations Underlying the Teaching of English in China. The Journal of English Studies (Sichuan International Studies University) 4: 7–20.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2006b. Working with Meaning: Towards an Appliable Linguistics. In Webster, J. J.. ed., Meaning in Context: Implementing Intelligent Applications of Language Studies. London: Continuum. 7–23.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2008. Complementarities in Language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2009. Methods – Techniques – Problems. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum. 59–86.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1985. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1983. A Semantic Network for the Analysis of Messages in Everyday Talk between Mothers and Their Children. Unpublished mimeo, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1984. Coherence and Cohesive Harmony. In Flood, J., ed., Understanding Reading Comprehension. Newark: International Reading Association. 181–219.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1989. Semantic Variation and Sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 9(2): 221–76.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1996. Semantic Networks: A Tool for the Analysis of Meaning. In Cloran, C., Butt, D., and Williams, G., eds., Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Cassell. 104–30.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1999. Speaking with Reference to Context. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 219–328.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2000. The Uses of Talk. In Sarangi, S. and Coulthard, M., eds., Discourse and Social Life. London: Longman. 30–81.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2005. Language in Society in a Systemic Functional Perspective. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 1. Sheffield: Equinox. 55–80.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009a. Language in the Processes of Socialization: Home and School. In Webster, J. J., ed., Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics: The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 119–79.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009b. Meaning in Sociolinguistic Theory. In Webster, J. J., ed., Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics: The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 271–308.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009c. The Place of Context in a Systemic Functional Model. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum. 165–89.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009d. Questions as a Mode of Learning in Everyday Talk. In Webster, J. J., ed., Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics: The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 231–68.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009e. Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics: The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2. Edited by Webster, J. J.. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009f. A Sociolinguistic Interpretation of Everyday Talk between Mothers and Children. In Webster, J. J., ed., Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics: The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 75–118.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2010. The Meaning of ‘Not’ Is Not in ‘Not’. In Mahboob, A. and Knight, N. K., eds., Appliable Linguistics: Texts, Contexts and Meanings. London: Continuum. 267–305.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2011. A Timeless Journey: On the Past and Future of Present Knowledge. In Cheng, D. N., ed., Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan on Applied Linguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. xiv–xliii.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2013. Choice, System, Realization: Describing Language as Meaning Potential. In Fontaine, L., Bartlett, T., and O’Grady, G., eds., Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 269–99.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2014. Towards a Paradigmatic Description of Context: Systems, Metafunctions, and Semantics. Functional Linguistics 2(9): 1–54.Google Scholar
Hasan, R., Cloran, C., Williams, G., and Lukin, A.. 2007. Semantic networks: The Description of Meaning in SFL. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 697–738.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., ed. 2013. Discourse Studies Reader: Essential Excerpts. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B., eds. 2011. Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kim, J. E. 2014. Parent Child Sharing Reading: The Affordances of Print, Digital and Hand-held Electronic Storybooks. PhD Thesis, The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1978. Where Does the Sociolinguistic Variable Stop? A response to Beatriz Lavandera. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics Paper #44. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. 1–16.Google Scholar
Lukin, A. 2012. Hasan’s Semantic Networks as a Tool in Discourse Analysis. In Knox, J. S., ed., Papers from the 39th International Systemic Functional Congress. Sydney: Organising Committee of the 39th International Systemic Functional Congress. 141–6.Google Scholar
Lukin, A. 2013. Evaluating Questions in Journalism: A Case Study of the Australian Public Broadcaster’s Coverage of the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9(1): 127–47.Google Scholar
Lukin, A., Moore, A., Herke, M., Wu, C., and Wegener, R.. 2011. Halliday’s Model of Register Revisited and Explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2): 187–213.Google Scholar
Mahboob, A. and Knight, N.. 2010a. Appliable Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mahboob, A. and Knight, N.. 2010b. Appliable Linguistics: An Introduction. In Mahboob, A. and Knight, N., Appliable Linguistics. London: Continuum. 1–12.Google Scholar
Maley, Y. and Fahey, R.. 1991. Presenting the Evidence: Constructions of Reality in the Court. International Journal for the Science of Law 4(1): 3–17.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2000. Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. In Hunston, S. and Thompson, G., eds., Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 142–75.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2014. Evolving Systemic Functional Linguistics: Beyond the Clause. Functional Linguistics 1(1): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1988a. Representational Issues in Systemic Functional Grammar. In Benson, J. D. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Systemic Functional Perspectives on Discourse. Norwood: Ablex. 136–75.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1988b. Semantics for a Systemic Grammar: The Chooser and Inquiry Framework. In Benson, J. D, Cummings, M. J., and Greaves, W. S., eds., Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 221–42.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1990. Two Approaches to Semantic Interfaces in Text Generation. COLING 90: 322–9.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1993. Register in the Round: Diversity in a Unified Theory of Register Analysis. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Register Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Painter. 221–92.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2004. The Semantic System of Relational Expansion: Rhetorical Structure Theory Revised. Unpublished draft, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2007. The Architecture of Language According to Systemic Functional Theory: Developments since the 1970s. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 505–61.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2009. Ideas & New Directions. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum. 12–58.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2012. Systemic Functional Linguistics as Applicable Linguistics: Social Accountability and Critical Approaches. D.E.L.T.A. 28: 435–71.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2014. Appliable Discourse Analysis. In Fang, Y. and Webster, J. J., eds., Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application. Sheffield: Equinox. 138–208.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2015a. Halliday on Language. In Webster, J. J., ed., The Bloomsbury Companion to M. A. K. Halliday. London: Bloomsbury. 137–202.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2015b. Modelling Context and Register: The Long-term Project of Registerial Cartography. Letras, Santa Maria 25(50): 15–90.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Bateman, J.. 1991. Systemic Linguistics and Text Generation: Experiences from Japanese and English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Moore, A. R. 2016. Can Semantic Networks Capture Intra- and Inter-Registerial Variation? Palliative Care Discourse Interrogates Hasan’s Message Semantics. In Bowcher, W. L. and Liang, J. Y., eds., Society in Language, Language in Society: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 83–114.Google Scholar
Patten, T. 1988. Systemic Text Generation as Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torr, J. 2004. Talking about Picture Books: The Influence of Maternal Education on Four-year-old Children’s Talk with Mothers and Pre-school Teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 4(2): 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, G. J. 1973. Social Class and Children’s Language of Control at Age Five and Age Seven. In Bernstein, B., ed., Class, Codes and Control, Volume 2: Applied Studies towards a Sociology of Language. London: Routledge. 121–79.Google Scholar
Wake, B. J. 2006. Dialogic Learning in Tutorial Talk: A Case Study of Semiotic Mediation as a Learning Resource for Second Language International Students. PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1995. Joint Book-Reading and Literacy Pedagogy: A Sociosemantic Examination. PhD Thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2005. Semantic Variation. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J.. eds., Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 1. Sheffield: Equinox. 457–80.Google Scholar
Wong, Y. T. 2009. The Linguistic Function of Cantonese Discourse Particles in the English Medium Online Chat of Cantonese Speakers. MA Dissertation, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×