Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:02:40.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Individualism and the Capability Approach

The Role of Collectivities in Expanding Human Capabilities

from Part I - Historical Antecedents and Philosophical Debates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

By
Solava Ibrahim
Edited by
Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti ,
Siddiqur Osmani  and
Mozaffar Qizilbash
Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti
Affiliation:
University of Pavia
Siddiqur Osmani
Affiliation:
Ulster University
Mozaffar Qizilbash
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

This chapter critically reviews the debate on individualism and the capability approach, arguing for the need to account for those capabilities that result from social interaction and collective action and are unachievable by single individuals. The first section explains how the capability approach adopts ethical individualism with its emphasis on the individual as the only unit of moral concern. Drawing on Sen’s and Nussbaum’s works, the second section explains how the approach accounts for the instrumental role of social structures in affecting individual freedoms, agency, identities and affiliations. The third section presents different concepts, such as irreducibly social goods, structures of living together, group capabilities and collective capabilities that aim to emphasize the intrinsic importance of collectivities and societal structures. The last section presents Sen’s responses to these critiques and highlights the need to account for a new type of capabilities that are generated at the collective level without necessarily sacrificing the primary focus on individual capabilities.

Keywords

individualismcapability approachcollective capabilitiesgroup capabilitiessocial responsibilities
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach , pp. 206 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, S. 2002. ‘Dimensions of Human Development’. World Development 30/2: 181–205.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. 2005. ‘Why the Capability Approach’. Journal of Human Development 6/1: 115–133.Google Scholar
Alkire, S. 2008. ‘Using the Capability Approach: Prospective and Evaluative Analyses’, in Comim, F, Qizilbash, M and Alkire, S (eds.). The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application. Cambridge University Press: 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballet, J., Dubois, J. L. and Mahieu, F. R. 2007. ‘Responsibility for Each Other’s Freedom: Agency as the Source of Collective Capability’. Journal of Human Development 8/2: 185–201.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R. 1992. Individualism in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 1990. ‘Irreducibly Social Goods: Comment II’, in Brennan, G and Walsh, C (eds.). Rationality, Individualism and Public Policy. Canberra: Australian National University: 80–85.Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. 1999. ‘Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development’. Journal of International Development 11/4: 597–612.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleaver, F. 2007. ‘Understanding Agency in Collective Action’. Journal of Human Development 8/2: 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comim, F. and Carey, F. 2001. ‘Social Capital and the Capability Approach: Are Putnam and Sen Incompatible Bedfellows?’ Paper presented at the 13th Annual EAEPE Conference, Comparing Economic Institutions. Siena.Google Scholar
Comim, F. and Kuklys, W. 2002. ‘Is Poverty about Poor Individuals?’ Mimeo. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crocker, D. 2008. Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A. 1996. ‘Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos’. Social Indicators Research 38/3: 303–328.Google Scholar
De Herdt, T. and Deneulin, S. 2007. ‘Guest Editors’ Introduction’. Journal of Human Development 8/2: 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneulin, S. 2008 ‘Beyond Individual Freedom and Agency: Structures of Living Together in the Capability Approach’, in Comim, F, Qizilbash, M and Alkire, S (eds.). The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application. Cambridge University Press: 105–124.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. 2002. India: Development and Participation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, J. L. and Trani, J. F. 2009. ‘Extending the Capability Paradigm to Address the Complexity of Disability’. European Journal of Disability Research 3/3: 192–218.Google Scholar
Dubois, J. L., Lompo, K., Giraud, G. and Renouard, C. 2008. ‘The Relational Capability: Theory and Empirical Evidence in Nigeria’. Paper presented at the Human Development and Capability Association conference. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Evans, P. 2002. ‘Collective Capabilities, Culture and Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom’. Studies in Comparative International Development 37/2: 54–60.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Baldor, A., Hueso, A. and Boni, A. 2012. ‘From Individuality to Collectivity: The Challenges for Technology-Oriented Development Projects’, in Oosterlaken, I and Hoven, J (eds.). The Capability Approach: Technology and Design. London: Springer: 135–152.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1997. ‘Commensuration and Public Reason’, in Chang, R (ed.). Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 215–233.Google Scholar
Foster, J. and Handy, C. 2009 ‘External Capabilities’, in Basu, K and Kanbur, R (eds.). Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Oxford University Press, vol. 1, ch. 19: 362–374.Google Scholar
Frediani, A. A. 2010. ‘Sen’s Capability Approach as a Framework to the Practice of Development’. Development in Practice 20/2:173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardenfors, P. 1990. ‘Social Intentions and Irreducibly Social Goods: Comments on Charles Taylor’, in Brennan, G and Walsh, C (eds.). Rationality, Individualism and Public Policy. Canberra: Australian National University: 91–96.Google Scholar
Gasper, D. and Van Staeveren, I. 2003. ‘Development as Freedom – and as What Else?’ Feminist Economics 9/2–3: 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Wood, R. and Mamani-Vargas, G. 2017. ‘The Coercive Side of Collective Capabilities: Evidence from the Bolivian Altiplano’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18/1: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1990. ‘Irreducibly Social Goods: Comment I’, in Brennan, G and Walsh, C (eds.). Rationality, Individualism and Public Policy. Canberra: Australian National University: 64–79.Google Scholar
Gooptu, N. 2002. ‘Sex Workers in Calcutta and the Dynamics of Collective Action: Political Activism, Community Identity and Group Behaviour’, in Heyer, J, Stewart, F and Thorp, R (eds.). Group Behaviour and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation? Oxford University Press: 227–252.Google Scholar
Gore, C. 1997. ‘Irreducible Social Goods and the Informational Basis of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach’. Journal of International Development 9/2: 235–250.Google Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J. 1987. ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 32: 99–151.Google Scholar
Heyer, J., Stewart, F. and Thorp, R. 2002. Group Behaviour and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation? Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2006. ‘From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-Help’. Journal of Human Development 7/3: 398–416.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2008. ‘Collective Agency: Wider Freedoms and New Capabilities through Self-Help’, in Dubois, J.-L., Brouillet, A.-S., Bakhshi, P and Duray-Soundron, S (eds.). Repenser l’action collective: Une approche par les capabilités. Paris: l’Harmattan: 61–81.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2013. ‘Collective Capabilities: What Are They and Why Are They Important?’ Maiyteree 22: 4–8.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2014. ‘The Dynamics of Collective Agency in Practice: Women’s Fight against FGM in Upper Egypt’, in Ibrahim, S and Tiwari, M (eds.). The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 52–72.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. 2017. ‘How to Build Collective Capabilities: The 3 C-Model for Grassroots-Led Development’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: 1–26.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N. 2003. ‘Making Rights Work for the Poor: Nijera Kori and the Construction of “Collective Capabilities” in Rural Bangladesh’. Working Paper series, 200. Brighton: IDS.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N. and Sulaiman, M. 2015. ‘Assessing the Impact of Social Mobilization: Nijera Kori and the Construction of Collective Capabilities in Rural Bangladesh’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16/1: 47–68.Google Scholar
Mahmud, S. 2002. ‘Informal Women’s Groups in Rural Bangladesh: Operation and Outcomes’, in Heyer, J, Stewart, F and Thorp, R (eds.). Group Behaviour and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation? Oxford University Press: 209–226.Google Scholar
Max-Neef, M. 1993. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application, and Further Reflections. London: Apex Press.Google Scholar
Metz, T. 2016. ‘Recent Philosophical Approaches to Social Protection: From Capability to ubuntu’. Global Social Policy 16/2: 132–150.Google Scholar
Narayan, D. and Petesch, P. (eds.). 2007. Moving Out of Poverty. Vol. I: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Mobility. Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan/World Bank.Google Scholar
Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A. and Koch-Schulte, S. 2000. Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pelenc, J., Bazile, D. and Ceruti, C. 2015. ‘Collective Capability and Collective Agency for Sustainability: A Case Study’. Ecological Economics 118: 226–239.Google Scholar
Pelenc, J., Lompo, M., Ballet, J. and Dubois, J. 2013. ‘Sustainable Human Development and the Capability Approach: Integrating Environment, Responsibility and Collective Agency’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14/1: 77–94.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. 2009. ‘Identity, Community, and Justice’. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8/3: 251–266.Google Scholar
Rao, V. and Walton, M. (eds.). 2004. Culture and Public Action. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2005. ‘The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey’. Journal of Human Development 6/1: 93–114.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2008. ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and Feminist Concerns’, in Comim, F, Qizilbash, M and Alkire, S (eds.). The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge University Press: 82–104.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Cambridge: OpenBook Publishers.Google Scholar
Schaff, R. 2010. ‘Do Groups Matter? Using a Wellbeing Framework to Understand Collective Activities in Northeast Thailand’. Oxford Development Studies 38/2: 241–257.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1984. Resources, Values and Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985. ‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’. Journal of Philosophy 82/4:169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999a. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1999b. Reason before Identity. The Romanes Lecture for 1998. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2002a. ‘Response to Commentaries’. Studies in Comparative International Development 37/2: 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2002b. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2004. ‘How Does Culture Matter?’ in Rao, V and Walton, M (eds.). Culture and Public Action. Stanford University Press: 37–58.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. 2005. ‘Groups and Capabilities’. Journal of Human Development 6/2:185–204.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. and Deneulin, S. 2002. ‘Amartya Sen’s Contribution to Development Thinking’. Studies in Comparative International Development 37/2: 61–70.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1990. ‘Irreducibly Social Goods’, in Brennan, G and Walsh, C (eds.). Rationality, Individualism and Public Policy. Canberra: Australian National University: 45–63.Google Scholar
Thorp, R., Stewart, F. and Heyer, J. 2005. ‘When and How Far Is Group Formation a Route Out of Chronic Poverty?’ World Development 33/6: 907–920.Google Scholar
Tiwari, M. and Ibrahim, S. 2012. ‘Sustainable Human Development at Grassroots: Different Contexts, Similar Ingredients?’ Oxford Development Studies 40/1: 69–85.Google Scholar
Volkert, J. 2013. ‘Concepts of Agency, Sustainable Human Development (SHD) and Collective Abilities’. Maiyteree 22: 4–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×