Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Tietjen, Phil and Akgun, Mahir 2018. End-User Considerations in Educational Technology Design. p. 263.

    Saar, Merike Prieto, Luis P. Rodriguez-Triana, Maria Jesus and Kusmin, Marge 2018. Personalized, Teacher-Driven in-Action Data Collection: Technology Design Principles. p. 58.

    Acosta, Alisa and Slotta, James D. 2018. CKBiology: An Active Learning Curriculum Design for Secondary Biology. Frontiers in Education, Vol. 3, Issue. ,

    Bartolomé, Elena Florensa, Ignasi Bosch, Marianna and Gascón, Josep 2018. A ‘study and research path’ enriching the learning of mechanical engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, p. 1.

    Sawyer, R. Keith 2018. Teaching and Learning How to Create in Schools of Art and Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 137.

    Greener, Sue 2018. Methodological choices for research into interactive learning. Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 149.

    Payne, Angela Sadauskas, John Conley, Quincy and Shapera, Daniel 2018. Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Design, Development and Technological Innovation. Vol. 10924, Issue. , p. 170.

    Ludi, Stephanie Bernstein, Debra and Mutch-Jones, Karen 2018. Enhanced Robotics!. p. 372.

    Meza, Jaime Jimenez, Alex Mendoza, Karina and Vaca-Cardenas, Leticia 2018. Collective Intelligence Education, Enhancing the Collaborative Learning. p. 24.

    Lönngren, Johanna Adawi, Tom and Svanström, Magdalena 2017. Scaffolding strategies in a rubric-based intervention to promote engineering students’ ability to address wicked problems. European Journal of Engineering Education, p. 1.

    Zuiker, Steven J. Piepgrass, Niels and Evans, Mathew D. 2017. Learning, Design, and Technology. p. 1.

    Reimann, Peter 2016. Connecting learning analytics with learning research: the role of design-based research. Learning: Research and Practice, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 130.

    Baker, Michael J. 2007. Learning in Work, Work in Learning. p. 1.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: November 2014

8 - Design-Based Research

from Part II - Methodologies
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online ISBN: 9781139519526
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×

References

Abbott, A. (1992). What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundation of social inquiry (pp. 53–82). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported teacher professional development community. Information Society, 19(3), 237–256.
Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Squire, K., & Newell, M. (2004). Critical design ethnography: Designing for change. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(2), 254–268.
Barrett, C. B. (2006). Food Aid’s Intended and Unintended Consequences. FAO. Agriculture and Economics Division. ESA Working paper No. 06-05
Beane, J. (1996). On the shoulders of giants! The case for curriculum integration. The Middle School Journal, 28, 6–11.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1972). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
Christensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator’s dilemma: The revolutionary book that will change the way you do business. New York: Harper Business.
Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 1–11.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
Connell, J. P. & Klem, A. M. (2000). You can’t get there from here: Using a theory of change approach to plan urban education reform. Journal of Educational Psychological Consulting, 11, 93–110.
Confrey, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as a methodology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135–151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York: H. Holt and Co.
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.
Gee, J. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Geertz, C. (1976). From the native’s point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In K. Basso & H. A. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). A discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Gomez, L. (2005, April). The Learning Sciences: A consequential form of social science. Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, CA.
Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (Eds.). (1997). Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lagemann, E. C., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lesh, R. A., & Kelly, A. E. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 197–230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levin, J. R., & O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). What to do about educational research’s credibility gaps? Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 5, 177–229.
MaKinster, J. G., Barab, S. A., Harwood, W., & Andersen, H. O. (2006). The effect of social context on the reflective practice of pre-service science teachers: Incorporating a web-supported community of teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 543–579.
Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.
McKinsey & Co. (2004). Using Logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action: Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.
McLaren, P. L. (1988). On ideology and education: Critical pedagogy and the politics of empowerment. Social Text, 19/20, pp. 153–185.
Messick, S. (1992). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23.
Mink, L. O., Fay, B., Golob, E. O., & Vann, R. T. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337.
Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.
Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Torres, C. A. (1998). Education, power, and personal biography: Dialogues with critical educators. New York: Routledge.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.