Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 32
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abrahamson, Dor and Kapur, Manu 2018. Reinventing discovery learning: a field-wide research program . Instructional Science, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Sommerhoff, Daniel Szameitat, Andrea Vogel, Freydis Chernikova, Olga Loderer, Kristina and Fischer, Frank 2018. What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 319.

    Matuk, Camillia and Linn, Marcia C. 2018. Why and how do middle school students exchange ideas during science inquiry?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,

    Meijer, Paulien C. and Oosterheert, Ida E. 2018. Research on Teacher Identity. p. 121.

    Pijeira-Díaz, H.J. Drachsler, H. Kirschner, P.A. and Järvelä, S. 2018. Profiling sympathetic arousal in a physics course: How active are students?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 397.

    Lee, Kyungmee 2018. Everyone already has their community beyond the screen: reconceptualizing online learning and expanding boundaries. Educational Technology Research and Development,

    Badie, Farshad 2018. Smart Universities. Vol. 70, Issue. , p. 385.

    Hod, Yotam and Ben-Zvi, Dani 2018. Co-development patterns of knowledge, experience, and self in humanistic knowledge building communities. Instructional Science, Vol. 46, Issue. 4, p. 593.

    Zhang, Jianwei Tao, Dan Chen, Mei-Hwa Sun, Yanqing Judson, Darlene and Naqvi, Sarah 2018. Co-Organizing the Collective Journey of Inquiry With Idea Thread Mapper. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 390.

    Ben-Zvi, Dani Gravemeijer, Koeno and Ainley, Janet 2018. International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education. p. 473.

    Lin, Feng and Chan, Carol K.K. 2018. Examining the role of computer-supported knowledge-building discourse in epistemic and conceptual understanding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,

    Lin, Feng and Chan, Carol K. K. 2018. Promoting elementary students’ epistemology of science through computer-supported knowledge-building discourse and epistemic reflection. International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 40, Issue. 6, p. 668.

    Crook, Charles and Sutherland, Rosamund 2017. Technology Enhanced Learning. p. 11.

    Ludvigsen, Sten and Arnseth, Hans Christian 2017. Technology Enhanced Learning. p. 47.

    Chen, Bodong Resendes, Monica Chai, Ching Sing and Hong, Huang-Yao 2017. Two tales of time: uncovering the significance of sequential patterns among contribution types in knowledge-building discourse. Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 162.

    Bereiter, Carl 2017. Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. p. 2348.

    Chen, Bodong 2017. Fostering scientific understanding and epistemic beliefs through judgments of promisingness. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 65, Issue. 2, p. 255.

    Tsai, Pei-Shan Chai, Ching Sing Hong, Huang-Yao and Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling 2017. Students’ conceptions of and approaches to knowledge building and its relationship to learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 25, Issue. 6, p. 749.

    Hod, Yotam 2017. Future Learning Spaces in Schools: Concepts and Designs from the Learning Sciences. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 99.

    Yang, Yuqin van Aalst, Jan Chan, Carol K. K. and Tian, Wen 2016. Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 281.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: November 2014

20 - Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation

from Part IV - Learning Together
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
  • Online ISBN: 9781139519526
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×

References

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4–17.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. D. Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. V. Merriënboer(Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 73–78). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Can children really create knowledge? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/585.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2012). Theory building and the pursuit of understanding in history, social studies, and literature. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 160–177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bielaczyz, K., & Kapur, M. (2010). Playing epistemic games in science and mathematics classrooms. Educational Technology, 50(5), 19–25.
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Caswell, B., & Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Knowledge Forum: Altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Education, Communication & Information, 1, 281–305.
Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Honk Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147–186.
Chan, C. K. K., Lam, I. C. K., & Leung, R. W. H. (2012). Can collaborative knowledge building promote both scientific processes and science achievement? International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 199–227.
Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., Acosta, A., Resendes, M., & Kici, D. (2013). Promisingness judgments as facilitators of knowledge building. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 2 – Short papers, panels, posters, demos & community events (pp. 231–232). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., Resendes, M., Chuy, M., & Bereiter, C. (2012). Students’ intuitive understanding of promisingness and promisingness judgments to facilitate knowledge advancement. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012) – Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 111–118). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
Chuy, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Prinsen, F., Resendes, M., Messina, R., Hunsburger, W., Teplovs, C., & Chow, A. (2010). Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/580.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 259–288). New York: Springer.
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper and Row.
Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & S. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery and change (pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (Eds.) (2013). Multiple document comprehension (Special issue). Cognition and Instruction, 31(2).
Hemetsberger, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2006). Learning and knowledge-building in open-source communities: A social-experimental approach. Management Learning, 37(2), 187–214.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Liu, A. (2012). This is not a book: Transliteracies and long forms of digital attention. Paper presented at the Translittératies Conference, ENS Cachan, Paris, 7 November 2012. Web: www.stef.ens-cachan.fr/manifs/translit/Alan_Liu_this-is-not-a-book-slides_2012_11_07.pdf.
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. powerpress http://gsbm-med.pepperdine.edu/gbr/audio/spring2010/designofbiz.mp3.
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). 21st century learning: Research, innovation and policy. Paris: OECD.
Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge Building Discourse Explorer: A social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 903–921.
Petroski, H. (1998). Invention by design: How engineers get from thought to thing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Philip, D. N. (2010). Social network analysis to examine interaction patterns in knowledge building communities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Published online at http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/577.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Resendes, M., Chen, B., Acosta, A., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The effect of formative feedback on vocabulary use and distribution of vocabulary knowledge in a grade two knowledge building class. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 – Full Papers & Symposia (pp. 391–398). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Resendes, M., Chen, B., Chuy, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2012, August). The effect of meta-discourse on ways of contributing to an explanation-seeking dialogue in grade 2. Paper presented at the 16th Knowledge Building Summer Institute (KBSI2012), Toronto, Canada. Web: ikit.org/SummerInstitute2012/Papers/3024-Resendes.pdf.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 8, 345–373.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183–192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Smith Lea, N. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45–71.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Web: http://GerryStahl.net/mit.
Sun, Y., Zhang. J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Developing deep understanding and literacy while addressing a gender-based literacy gap. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1). Web: http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/576.
Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, P. (2006). Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20, 941–957.
Van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.
Van Aalst, J., & Truong, M. S. (2011). Promoting knowledge creation discourse in an Asian primary five classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 487–515.
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.
Woodruff, E., & Meyer, K. (1997). Explanations from intra- and intergroup discourse: Students building knowledge in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 25–39.
Zhang, J., Chen, M.-H., Chen, J., & Mico, T. F. (2013). Computer-supported metadiscourse to foster collective progress in knowledge-building communities. Proceedings of the International Conference of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Madison, Wisconsin.
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.