Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    von Mende, Erling 2004. Herrscherchronologien der antiken Welt. p. 135.

    Houston, Stephen D. 2004. The Archaeology of Communication Technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 223.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1999
  • Online publication date: March 2008

2 - Language and Writing

Summary

No one needs to be persuaded that language plays a fundamental part in any society’s everyday activities and constitutes one of the most durable fibers in the tapestry of human history. Indeed, language is a defining feature of our species. The present chapter describes the structure, history, and setting of the Chinese language, as well as the first appearance and subsequent development of its script, over the millennium from 1200 B.C., the time of the earliest known written record of Chinese, down to the beginning of the imperial era, ca. 200 B.C. While this is primarily a linguistically slanted presentation, it is important to remain aware of the extent to which language history is intertwined with fundamental issues of cultural history in general. The historian may see in language history a rich record of the lives of real people played out in a real world setting and may find clues even to a people’s prehistory. These kinds of broad historical considerations depend on the narrower work of the linguist.

For the linguist, language history is the sum of a painstakingly assembled collection of internal analyses of speech forms and phonetic formulas. The historical linguist is concerned with the evolution of sounds, words, and structures of language, and with linguistic affinities per se. The fact that the linguist’s work is accomplished with little reference to the associated nonlinguistic culture enables the linguist to make an especially valuable contribution to the overall historical study of a people by providing a body of evidence largely independent of the historian’s other sources.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Ancient China
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053709
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521470308
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Bailey, H. W.Recent Work in ‘Tocharian.’Transactions of the Philological Society 1947:.
Bartoli, Matteo. Saggi di linguistica spaziale. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier, 1945.
Baxter, William H.Zhou and Han Phonology in the Shijing” In Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages, ed. Boltz, William G. and Shapiro, Michael C.. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, series 4: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, no. 77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1991.
Baxter, William H. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Trends in Linguistics: Notes and Monographs, no. 64. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992.
Bodman, Nicholas C.Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: Data Towards Establishing the Nature of the Relationship.” In Contributions to Historical Linguistics. Cornell Linguistic Contributions, III, ed. Coetsem, Frans and Waugh, Linda R.. Leiden: Brill, 1980.
Boltz, William G.East Asian Writing Systems (Introduction).” In The World’s Writing Systems, ed. Daniels, Peter T. and Bright, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Boltz, William G.Notes on the Reconstruction of Old Chinese.” Oriens Extremus 36, 2 (1993):.
Boltz, William G. The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System. American Oriental Series, vol. 78. New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society, 1994.
Bonfante, G., and Sebeok, Thomas. “Linguistics and the Age and Area Hypothesis.” American Anthropologist 46 (1944):.
Boodberg, Peter A.Marginalia to the Histories of the Northern Dynasties.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 4 (1939):.
Boodberg, Peter A.Some Proleptical Remarks on the Evolution of Archaic Chinese.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 2 (1937):.
Chavannes, E.Les livres chinois avant l’invention du papier.” Journal asiatique series 10, 5 (1905):.
Coblin, W. South. A Sinologist’s Handlist of Sino-Tibetan Lexical Comparisons. Monumenta Serica monograph series 18. Nettetal: Steyler, 1986.
Downer, Gordon B.Derivation by Tone Change in Classical Chinese.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 22 (1959):.
Drews, Robert. The Coming of the Greeks. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988.
Elman, Benjamin. From Philosophy to Philology. Harvard East Asian Monographs, no. 110. Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1984.
Graham, A. C. Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. Hong Kong: Chinese University; and London: University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies, 1978.
Hadingham, Evan. “The Mummies of Xinjiang.” Discover, April 1994.
Henning, W. B.Argi and the ‘Tocharians.’Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 9, 3 (1938):.
Hopkirk, Peter. Foreign Devils on the Silk Road. London: John Murray, 1980.
Hulsewé, A. F. P.Weights and Measures in Ch’in Law.” In State ȧnd Law in East Asia: Festschrift Karl Bünger, ed. Eikemeier, D. and Franke, Herbert. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1981.
Ji, Xianlin Dunhuang Tulufan Tuhuoluo yu yanjiu daolun. Dunhuangxue daolun congkan, no. 6, ed. Lin Congming, Taibei: Xinwenfeng, 1993.
Karlgren, Bernhard, Analytic Dictionary of Chienese and Sino Japanese (Paris: Librarie orientaliste Paul Geuthner, 1923) 2;
Keightley, David N. Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze Age China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978. (2nd printing, with minor revisions, 1985.)
Knoblock, John H. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. 3 vols. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, vol. 1, 1988; vol. 2, 1990; vol. 3, 1994.
Le Blanc, Charles. Tzu, Huai-nan: Philosophical Synthesis in Early Han Thought: The Idea of Resonance (Kan-ying), with a Translation and Analysis of Chapter Six. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1985.
Mair, Victor H.Mummies of the Tarim Basin.Archaeology March–April, 1995.
Makeham, John. Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
Mallory, J. P. In Search of the Indo-Europeans. London: Thames & Hudson, 1989.
Mawangdui Han mu bo shu. Vol. 1, ed. Wenwu, Guojia ju guwenxian yanjiushi. Beijing: Wenwu, 1980; Vol. 3, ed. Han, Mawangdui mu boshu zhengli xiaozu. Beijing: Wenwu, 1983; Vol. 4, 1985.
Mei, Tsu-lin and Norman, Jerry. “The Austroasiatics in Ancient South China: Some Lexical Evidence.Monumenta Serica 32 (1976):.
Miller, Roy A.The Far East.” In Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 13, pt. 2, “Historiography of Linguistics,” ed. Sebeok, Thomas. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
Norman, Jerry. “Pharyngealization in Early Chinese.Journal of the American Oriental Society 114, 3 (1994):.
Norman, Jerry. Chinese. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Piggott, Stuart. “Chariots in the Caucasus and in China.Antiquity 48 (1974):.
Postgate, Nicholas, Wang, Tao, and Wilkinson, Toby. “The Evidence for Early Writing: Utilitarian or Ceremonial?Antiquity 69 (1995):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.Ablaut and Initial Voicing in Old Chinese Morphology: *a as an Infix and Prefix.Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sinology, Section on Linguistics and Paleography. Taibei: Academia Sinica, 1989.
Pulleyblank, E. G.An Interpretation of the Vowel Systems of Old Chinese and Written Burmese.Asia Major, n.s., 21 (1963):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.Chinese and Indo-Europeans.Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (April 1966):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.Close/Open Ablaut in Sino-Tibetan.Lingua 14 (1965):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.European Studies on Chinese Phonology, the First Phase.” In Europe Studies China: Papers from an International Conference on the History of European Sinology, ed. Wilson, Ming and Cayley, John. London: Han-shan Tang, 1995.
Pulleyblank, E. G.Some New Hypotheses Concerning Word Families in Chinese.Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1 (1973):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.The Ganzhi as Phonograms and Their Application to the Calendar.Early China 16 (1991):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.The Locative Particles yu, yu and hu.JOAS 106 (1986):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.The Old Chinese Origin of Type A and B Syllables.Journal of Chinese Linguistics 22 (1994):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.The Typology of Indo-European.Journal of Indo-European Studies 21 (1993):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.Why Tocharians?Journal of Indo-European Studies 23 (1995):.
Pulleyblank, E. G.Zou and Lu and the Sinification of Shandong.” In Chinese Language, Thought and Culture: Nivison and His Critics, ed. Ivanhoe, P.. La Salle, Ill: Open Court, 1996.
Pulleyblank, E. G. Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1991.
Pulleyblank, E. G. Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Phonobgy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1984.
Qiu, Xigui. “Hanzi xingcheng wenti de chubu tansuoZhongguo yuwen 1978. 3:.