Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T23:39:00.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Academic epistemology

from PART III - EPISTEMOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Early in the Hellenistic period the Academy went sceptic. Sceptic it remained until the two leading figures in the school at the beginning of the first century BC, Philo of Larissa and Antiochus of Ascalon, adopted more sanguine positions on the possibility of cognition – albeit mutually incompatible positions. The philosopher who effected this change of outlook in the Academy was Arcesilaus, scholarch from c. 265 BC until his death around twenty-five years later, and reputed as a dialectician whose employment of the Socratic method led him to suspend judgement about everything. He impressed the contemporary polymath Eratosthenes as one of the two leading philosophers of his time. And in his assaults on the Stoic theory of cognition he established the principal focus of argument between the Stoa and the Academy for the best part of the next two hundred years.

The most notable of Arcesilaus' sceptical successors was Carneades, the greatest philosopher of the second century BC. Although like Arcesilaus – and in similar emulation of Socrates – Carneades wrote nothing, his pupil Clitomachus published voluminous accounts of his arguments on issues across the whole range of philosophical inquiry; and it is principally to this source that – albeit indirectly – we owe our knowledge of a subtle system of thought. In the course of his engagement with both Stoicism and Epicureanism Carneades worked out for the first time in Greek philosophy an alternative non-foundationalist epistemology, sometimes misleadingly dubbed ‘probabilism’ in modern discussions of his views – although whether Arcesilaus or Carneades had any views of their own, or were simply dialecticians intent on undermining the positions of others, is a disputed question.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. (1994) ‘Academic probabilism and Stoic epistemology’, CQ 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1988b) ‘The heirs of Socrates’, Phronesis 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1990b) ‘Stoic epistemology’, in Everson, (1990a).Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1992c) ‘Plato the Sceptic’, OSAP suppl. vol.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989c) ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982b) ‘Medicine, experience and logic’, in Barnes, J. et al. (1982a).Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1989) ‘Carneades' pithanon: a reappraisal of its role and status’, OSAP 7.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1990) ‘Carneades' distinction between assent and approval’, The Monist 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988b) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the kritērion’, in Dillon, & Long, (1988), repr. in Brunschwig, (1994a).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1976) ‘Protagoras and self-refutation in later Greek philosophy’, PhR 85.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980a (1983)) ‘Can the sceptic live his scepticism?’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) ; repr. in Burnyeat, (1983).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982b) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Schofield, & Nussbaum, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘Antipater and self-refutation: elusive arguments in Cicero's Academica’, in Inwood, & Mansfeld, (1997).Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1929) ‘Le stoïcisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d'Histoire de la Philosophie Générale de la Civilisation 3. Cited in the English version (1983) ‘The Stoicism of the New Academy’, in Burnyeat, (1983).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1983) ‘Stoics and Skeptics on clear and distinct impressions’, in Burnyeat (1983) ; repr. in Frede (1987a).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1984) ‘The sceptic's two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge’, in Rorty et al. (1984) ; repr. Frede (1987a).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992) ‘Plato's arguments and the dialogue form’, OSAP suppl. vol.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy, Hypomnemata 56 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1994b) ‘Älterer Pyrrhonismus, Jüngere Akademie, Antiochos aus Askalon’, Flashar (1994).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics (London).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1986) Opinione e scienza: il dibattito tra Stoici e Accademici nel III e nel II secolo a. C., Elenchos 12 (Naples).Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. (1971) Platonismus und Hellenistische Philosophie (Berlin/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. (1978) ‘Scepticisme et dogmatisme dans l'Académie: “l'ésotéricisme de Arcésilas”’, REL 56.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1993) ‘Le concept de doxa des Stoïciens à Philon d' Alexandrie: essai d' étude diachronique’, in Brunschwig & Nussbaum (1993).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986a) ‘Diogenes Laertius, life of Arcesilaus’, in Giannantoni (1986a).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).Google Scholar
Maconi, H. (1988) ‘Nova non philosophandi philosophia’, OSAP 6.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor und Arkesilaos’, Lustrum 26.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (1911b) ‘Die Stufen der Wahrscheinlichkeit bei Karneades’, RhM 66.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1984) ‘Ariston of Chios and the unity of virtue’, AncPhil 4.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1981) ‘The end of the Academy’, Phronesis 26.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1983a) ‘The motivation of Greek skepticism’, in Burnyeat, (1983).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1992a) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the atomist criteria of truth’, Elenchos 13.Google Scholar
Shields, C. J. (1994) ‘Socrates among the Skeptics’, in Vander Waerdt, P. A., ed., The Socratic Movement (Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Stough, Ch.L. (1969) Greek Scepticism (Berkeley/Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1974) Kριτ̮ριoν τἀς ἀαληθ∊ια, NGG, Philol.-hist. Klasse, 2 ; repr. in Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1980) ‘Sceptical strategies’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) ; repr. in Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1981) ‘Über den Unterschied zwischen den Pyrrhoneern und den Akademikern’, Phronesis 26 ; English version in Striker, (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1984) ‘Zeno on knowledge or on geometry? The evidence of Anon. In Theaetetum’, Phronesis 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1986) ‘The skeptical side of Plato's method’, RIPh 90.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×