Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Nisenbaum, Karin 2015. Modern Jewish Philosophy: Universal Human Questions Phrased in Concepts Derived from the Jewish Tradition. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 111.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy
    • Online ISBN: 9781139016537
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The second volume of The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy provides a comprehensive overview of Jewish philosophy from the seventeenth century to the present day. Written by a distinguished group of experts in the field, its essays examine how Jewish thinking was modified in its encounter with modern Europe and America and challenge longstanding assumptions about the nature and purpose of modern Jewish philosophy. The volume also treats modern Jewish philosophy's continuities with premodern texts and thinkers, the relationship between philosophy and theology, the ritual and political life of the people of Israel and the ways in which classic modern philosophical categories help or hinder Jewish self-articulation. These essays offer readers a multi-faceted understanding of the Jewish philosophical enterprise in the modern period.

Reviews

'This volume offers a 'big-tent' approach to the semantic and substantive questions of the overlapping categories of modern Jewish thought, theology, and philosophy … a generous view of the boundaries of the field lead to inclusion of themes and thinkers too often left out in earlier outlines of the 'canon', such as the theme of aesthetics, the contributions of Eastern European thinkers, and the relationship to the medievals. The book is organized thematically, and assumes a basic familiarity with the central figures in the history of Jewish thought in the modern period. It is a wise organizational choice that leads to fresh readings and pairings.'

Source: Religious Studies Review

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • I - Judaism's Encounter with Modernity
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The critical significance of the trajectory of Jewish philosophers in the Enlightenment lies precisely in the way they use their particular perspective to examine reason's universalist claim. Judaism may have been seen as a regrettable but nevertheless instructive version of philosophy, in all its aberrance and falsity. The history of the Spinoza reception became the conflicted story of a philosopher's reduction to stereotype or moral exemplarity. The Theological-Political Treatise examines the difficult relationship between theology and the politics, a relationship, Spinoza suggests, that cannot simply be severed once and for all. In Jerusalem, or On Religious Power and Judaism, Mendelssohn not only discusses the role of religion and more specifically of Judaism in modernity, but also grounds it in a critical revision of political philosophy. The Jerusalem introduces Mendelssohn's modern conception of Judaism, and examines the theoretical foundations of social and political theory.
  • 2 - The Spirit of Jewish History
    pp 75-96
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In modern times, the philosophers who interpreted Judaism could never totally disavow its progeny, and in fact they rarely wanted to do so. When Karl Popper published his classic The Poverty of Historicism in 1957, he meant by the term the substantive philosophy of history according to which time is characterized by progressive development. In the influential body of the book Totality and Infinity introduced, messianism is extricated from historicism, against the supposedly profane, collectivist, and political connotations of historicism. Further, within monotheistic history, there were crucial progressive steps that moved, much as in the protohistoricist Maimonides as well as in different ways in Krochmal, Cohen, and even Rosenzweig, from myth to reason. As with Walter Benjamin's Weimar-era messianism, which Derrida frequently invoked, Derrida's revival of chiliasm reflected little knowledge of the Jewish tradition.
  • 3 - Phenomenology
    pp 97-127
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter explains the limits and weaknesses of the arguments of twentieth-century Jewish philosophers influenced by phenomenology. It reviews that scholars should have a healthy caution toward giving this kind of philosophical move too much magical power. Husserlian phenomenology lies in a space between introspection and natural science. Treatments of Buber's intellectual heritage customarily focus on his debt to sociology and late nineteenth-century philosophy. Emmanuel Levinas's oeuvre marks a shift from messianism to apocalypticism, and this shift is associated with a shift of the place of phenomenology in his work. Franz Rosenzweig deserves brief treatment in a study of the appropriation of phenomenology by Jewish philosophy. The scene of revelation described by Rosenzweig would be implicit in every liturgical experience. If fulfillment, a defense of claims to experience the supernatural, is what Jewish philosophy sought in phenomenology, then phenomenology has let it down.
  • 4 - America
    pp 128-153
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    American Jewish philosophy can be read as a form of religious mapping, in which the transparency, elasticity, and strength of religious borders help to identify and situate Jews in America. This chapter explores the ways in which Jewish thinkers imagined boundaries, and how the creation of border crossings informed their Jewish philosophy. Philosophers such as Mordecai Kaplan, Joseph Soloveitchik, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Emil Fackenheim, Eugene Borowitz, and Rachel Adler, cover a broad array of perspectives on Jewish practice and thought. To paraphrase Kaplan's famous closing lines of his Judaism as a Civilization, the Jew will have to save the arts before the arts will be in a position to save the Jew. Jewish philosophers have made a home in America by creating maps of border crossings to help Jews navigate in and out of the city. Borowitz's notion of a postmodern Jewish theology jibes with the postmodern condition: a thoroughgoing denial of grounds, fundamental truths, and universal values.
  • 5 - Feminism and Gender
    pp 154-190
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Jewish feminism emerged as a distinctive branch of feminism in the early 1970s with the founding of the Jewish Feminist Organization. Gender analysis exposes the difficulty of defining Jewish philosophy. Franz Rosenzweig's gendered theory of revelation and his understanding of love have continued to engage other scholars of modern Jewish philosophy, but with no consensus. Ecofeminism is as diverse as feminism, and the internal debates among the various practitioners, do not always follow the ideal of sisterhood. This chapter indicates that engagement with gender analysis in Jewish philosophy exists and is more extensive than is usually assumed. Contributors to gender analysis within Jewish philosophy include women and men, feminists and nonfeminists. Feminist Jewish philosophy can continue to enrich the discipline if it remains true to the core mission of philosophy: the pursuit of truth. Attention to gender analysis and feminist philosophy might grow if Jewish philosophy shifts its attention to aesthetics, environmental philosophy, embodiment, and sensuality.
  • II - Retrieving Tradition
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter introduces Jewish textual reasoning (TR) and scriptural reasoning as an approach to contemporary Jewish philosophy (CJP) and as the kind of Jewish philosophy. It explains that this kind of the Jewish philosophy begins with talmud torah, or rabbinic practices of study. The talmud torah in times of crisis offers a rereading of torah, both in the sense of scripture as Tanakh and in the sense of rabbinic text-study of Mishnah, Talmud, and Midrash. TR adopts various elements of rabbinic and scriptural study as first principles for CJP and, as guidelines for conducting Jewish philosophy as reparative reasoning. The chapter provides some illustrations from the work of Moses Mendelssohn, Hermann Cohen, and Franz Rosenzweig. Scientific study of the scriptural traditions had its roots in the medieval period, most likely in Muslim, then Jewish and Christian, sciences of scriptural interpretation.
  • 7 - Medieval Jewish Philosophers in Modern Jewish Philosophy
    pp 224-251
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter focuses on tensions, continuities, and breaks between medieval and modern Jewish philosophy. It analyses the concept of dialogism. The topic of dialogism permits us to witness the ongoing dialogue between medieval and modern Jewish philosophers. Dialogues played an important vehicle in the dissemination and thus popularization of philosophical teachings in premodern Judaism. The chapter provides an excursus on how the past functioned in the rich philosophical milieu of nineteenth-century Germany. Premodern Jewish philosophers became intimately intertwined with decidedly modern concerns of respect, tolerance, and emancipation. It explores the ruptures and correlations, continuities and discontinuities, between premodern and modern Jewish philosophy, focusing on particular clusters of thinkers. The best example of the transition from medieval dialogue to modern dialogic may be found in Martin Buber's Daniel, an early work published in 1913. Revelation, in other words, sets up a dialogical address that enables God to communicate to humans, and humans to approach God.
  • 8 - Jewish Enlightenment Beyond Western Europe
    pp 252-279
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The Haskalah or Jewish Enlightenment, is often regarded as a movement that emerged in eighteenth-century Berlin, in response to social and cultural conditions. All standard histories of Jewish philosophy point to the earliest phases of the Haskalah in Berlin as important in the formation of modern Jewish philosophy. Special focus is on the activity of Moses Mendelssohn, and Solomon Maimon and his encounter with Kantian thought. The new philosophy of Immanuel Kant attracted the attention of maskilim at the turn of the century and assimilates traditional Jewish categories of thought. The eighteenth-century Haskalah continued the harmonistic/synthetic trend of many early modern Jewish intellectuals when it came to philosophy and theosophical Kabbalah. The work of Nachman Krochmal, the most philosophically original of the Galician maskilim, is emblematic of this mixing of eastern and western Ashkenaz. The Haskalah in the Russian Empire has two primary foci similar to the Haskalah in Berlin.
  • 9 - Hasidism, Mitnagdism, and Contemporary American Judaism
    pp 280-308
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    From Reb Yoelish's perspective, the radical edge of the Hasidic revolution had been softened to make Hasidism almost indistinguishable from its Lithuanian antagonists known as the mitnagdim. Modern Jewish traditionalism in America, whether Orthodox or traditional Conservative, is the carrier of the mitnagdic heritage. This chapter focuses on the conception of law outside the realm of pure Talmudism and its accompanying meta-halakhah and its transformation into the post-halakhic Judaism of America. History and myth, Wissenschaft and Kabbalah, serve as the touchstones of contemporary Judaism. Hartman does move us beyond Twersky's vision of meta-halakhah, which is expansive, necessary, and robust but still must play a supporting role to halakhah. Contemporary American Judaism can be viewed, in part, through the lens of a meta-halakhah/post-halakhah dichotomy. The meta-halakhist side of this dichotomy comprises modern Jews who carry the mantle of the Lithuanian school as they adapt historical-critical methods of analysis.
  • III - Modern Jewish Philosophical Theology
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The idea of divine transcendence, that on a literal level God is completely beyond human conceptual and emotional reach, appears very early in the history of Jewish tradition. This chapter explores the opening remarks about Luzzatto to an investigation of the Talmudic and Maimonidean patterns of argument. It elucidates the theoretical currents of early modernity that contribute importantly to shaping Luzzatto's work. The chapter explains the new course in Maimonidean and rabbinic scholarship by uncovering and examining from multiple perspectives the implicit logical connection between negative theology and mysticism. Luzzatto's innovation consists in reading the beraita of R. Pinchos b. Yair explicitly in the light of assigning primacy to the idea of method. Finally, the chapter summarizes Maimonides' naturalistic approach to prophecy as it relates to a whole range of unconscious mental processes. There is a conceptual linkage between the methodism of Mesillat Yesharim and the tenets of negative theology.
  • 11 - God: Divine Immanence
    pp 337-370
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Divine immanence, to the neo-Kantian Hermann Cohen, explains a relation of finitude and infinity. Divine transcendence precludes the immanence of man and God. In the latter half of the twentieth century, a spiritual and political revival in Judaism took place since Jewish philosophy spoke to the individual Jew, the person, and the community of Jews, the people. For Joseph B. Soloveitchik, divine immanence frames the lens of revelation through which the observant, learned Jew experiences the possible redemption of creation. Feminist Jewish philosophy has taken various routes to the question of immanence, which Rachel Adler's book Engendering Judaism addresses. With Spinoza's thought about God or nature its lodestone, modern Jewish philosophy has guardedly engaged immanence, its organic potencies and/or institutional powers, in terms of a threat or resource. God is immanent to something, whether nature, history, life, person, community, body, or soul.
  • 12 - Creation
    pp 371-398
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Medieval Jewish philosophy was to a great extent concerned with the ancient theological doctrine of the divine creation of the universe. However, modern Jewish philosophy has been concerned with it to a lesser extent. The natural theology of the philosophers and the creation philosophy of the theologians are basically the same discipline, both using much the same terminology and conceptuality provided by natural science. The cogent retrieval of the doctrine of creation by modern Jewish thinkers needs to consciously overcome kabbalistic acosmism, just as it consciously overcome Spinoza's monism since both Kabbalah and Spinoza had marginalized creation as a theme for modern Jewish thought. This chapter considers three such daring modern Jewish philosophers: Hermann Cohen, Franz Rosenzweig, and Lenn Goodman. Since all three modern Jewish philosophers consider themselves to be committed participants in Jewish tradition, all three of them have to deal with creation in relation to the most central concern of Jewish tradition: revelation.
  • 13 - Revelation
    pp 399-426
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter focuses on the character of Rosenzweig's return to revelation and upon the role of desire in his view. Spinoza's analysis of biblical Israel in his Theological-Political Treatise serves as a foundation of this retrieval of revelation rather than a dismissal of it. According to Spinoza, an excellent example of a thriving state by examining biblical Israelite society is found. Spinoza's political model does permit the possibility of the critique of a nation and its collective desires as these have been instantiated in law. Rosenzweig takes up Spinoza's authentic account of carnal Israel. Rosenzweig couples it with a theology of a freely acting revelatory God, creates a playing field for Judaism to remain open to non-Jewish cultures and nations. If the divine love of revelation commands and permits persons to testify to and recognize God, the divine law of revelation commands and permits persons to recognize others.
  • 14 - Redemption
    pp 427-464
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter explores the constructive study of the term redemption as a Jewish conception in modern Jewish philosophy. It focuses on religious, neo-rabbinic, modern Jewish thought, to the exclusion of the utopian political views of predominantly Yiddishist Jewish revolutionaries and Hebraist secular Jewish nationalists. All Jewish philosophy arises out of a dialogue between what Jews learned from the authoritative texts of religious and cultural traditions. Modern Jewish philosophy is primarily an engagement, between prevailing views in modern philosophy and a premodern canon of rabbinic texts. Maimonides' understanding of redemption is formed out of his rabbinic interpretations of the Hebrew scriptures. Zohar 1:47a is close to a clear statement about the philosophical concept of redemption as can be found in the Zohar. The chapter concludes the study of the textual influences that directed modern Jewish philosophical conceptions of redemption with a single prayer, the Aleinu.
  • 15 - Providence: Agencies of Redemption
    pp 465-498
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In Jewish belief, divine providence, prophecy, and redemption can be interrelated. In Judaism, ultimate redemption is associated with messianism, and historically, the idea of a messiah arose in Judaism in the biblical period and was associated, even then, with the recovery of political hegemony over a fixed territory. Rosenzweig's view about the primary agency of redemption arises out of his disenchantment with the conception of his teacher Friedrich Meinecke. This chapter shows that various developments in international-relations theory and political philosophy recommend a pluralistic conception of the agencies of redemption. Jewish philosophy would be following Jewish practice, which includes Jewish support for manifold international aid organizations and also the creation of Jewish humanitarian organizations with global concerns. The chapter shows that various strands in recent thinking about international relations recommend a pluralistic view of the agencies whereby global justice and the well-being of persons worldwide are enhanced.
  • IV - Jewish Peoplehood
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Halakhah has been the main arena for the expression of the religious, moral, and practical achievements of the Jewish people. The change regarding Halakhah seems to have begun toward the 1950s, with the publication of philosophical works by Joseph B. Soloveitchik and Yeshayahu Leibowitz. The philosophy of Halakhah endorse the following two strategies: rely on the achievements of positive research in the field, or ignore them and turn Halakhah, as a family name, into its object of study. Some of the scholars involved in the field known as the philosophy of Halakhah were, explicitly or implicitly, aware of the problem. Seeking solutions, they suggested that, instead of Halakhah, the object of the philosophy of Halakhah is the halakhists' self-reflection about their pursuit. The schematic account of hermeneutics lays the ground for solving the methodological problem in the philosophy of Halakhah by recognizing it as typical of the interpretation project.
  • 17 - Liturgy
    pp 519-537
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Hermann Cohen argues that liturgy provides the language of reason of the Jewish congregation. Franz Rosenzweig proposes that liturgy provides a special Organonstellung or system of reasoning for Jewish thought. Moses Mendelssohn's Jerusalem, or On Religious Power and Judaism contains an important early modern philosophy of Jewish liturgy. The neo-Kantian philosopher, Hermann Cohen, produced the influential statement of modern Jewish philosophy and ethics in his published Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism. In turning to Franz Rosenzweig and his writings on liturgy, this chapter considers additional religious elements that transcend Mendelssohn's and Cohen's interpretations. In the third part of The Star, Rosenzweig focuses on the ability of liturgy to open up and explore dimensions of time that are not available in the purely secular realm. The Reform thinker Lawrence Hoffman has brought new insights to Jewish ritual and liturgy through the cultural anthropology.
  • 18 - Jews Alongside Non-Jews
    pp 538-578
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The Theological-Political Treatise is the direct culmination of this whole current of Jewish philosophy, with Spinoza inheriting the Maimonidean project. The Marrano experience and the Spinozist moment were symptomatic of the transition of European civilization to modernity. Jerusalem by Moses Mendelssohn was the first attempt to justify and found Jewish continuity on the basis of the new modern reality. In this sense, Mendelssohn continued the medieval Jewish philosophical project, albeit on radically different foundations. This chapter distinguishes four strategies for Jewish continuity, evidencing at once the objective end of the universal and its continuity in one form or another: the enchantment of European states and socialities, the ethics of sacrifice, the aesthetics of nihilism, and the building of the Jewish nation. Each of these four strategies involves a type of relationship with gentiles and a definition of the self.
  • 19 - Political Theory: Beyond Sovereignty?
    pp 579-605
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The student of modern Jewish political theory is faced with an insurmountable problem: almost all modern Jewish philosophers claim that Judaism is not centrally concerned with politics. This chapter considers the political implications of various claims of modern Jewish philosophers that Judaism is not political. It describes the practical and theoretical changes within Jewish European thinking about Jewish politics from the premodern to the modern era. The chapter explores alternative accounts of Jewish politics in the American context in which sovereignty is understood not in terms of absolute unity but as at times divided, shared, and overlapping. The Jewish heretic Benedict de Spinoza set the philosophical and political agenda for many debates of modern Jewish philosophy. Like Spinoza, the Zionists understood the possibility of a Jewish state not in religious but in solely political terms. Both the neo-Kantian Jewish philosopher Hermann Cohen and the existentialist Jewish philosopher Franz Rosenzweig reject Zionism while reaffirming the basic premise of Zionism.
  • 20 - Zionism
    pp 606-634
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521852432.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Zionism, a complex ideological form, historically reflected and responded to all early twentieth-century political currents and cultural styles. This chapter examines Zionism in light of postmodernism and postcolonialism when the rightness of Zionism, the claim to Jewish sovereignty in the land of Israel, and the claim to sovereignty tout court are taken for granted. While postmodernism undermines the view of Zionism as a coherent whole, it also allows Zionism to elude the critical scrutiny. In the 1890s and early 1900s, the main split was between two liberal ideological formations, political Zionism and cultural Zionism, whose proponents emphasized either the one or the other dimension of Jewish identity and Zionist activism. In its claims regarding the Jews and Judaism, religious Zionism was no less revolutionary than socialist Zionism. At the turn of the twentieth century, the sole basis of Zionism in natural right was political need in the face of European antisemitism.
  • V - Issues in Modern Jewish Philosophy
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter explores the limits and claims of reason as a paradigm in Jewish philosophy. It describes the Enlightenment rationalism of Moses Mendelssohn, Immanuel Kant, and the great Jewish neo-Kantian, Hermann Cohen. For Hegel, freedom in Kant's sense, self-appropriation of the moral law, cannot be understood apart from the ideals and social institutions of the Enlightenment culture out of which it grew. It is often said that the Holocaust destroyed the Enlightenment's faith in the powers of reason. Under the aegis of new thinking, Rosenzweig went still further: the center of religious life is not reason but revelation, the experience of being loved by God, being commanded by God, and surrendering oneself in obedience to God. The crux of the rationalist position comes to this: in distinguishing reason from revelation. Buber argues that revelation does not pour itself into the world through its recipient as if he were a funnel.

Page 1 of 2


This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Oona Ajzenstat (2005). “Levinas versus Levinas: Hebrew, Greek, and Linguistic Justice.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 38:145–58.

Alexander Altmann (1987a). “The God of Religion, the God of Metaphysics and Wittgenstein's ‘Language-Games.’Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 39:287–306.

Yaakov Ariel (2006). “Can Adam and Eve Reconcile?: Gender and Sexuality in a New Jewish Religious Movement.” Nova Religio 9(4):53–78.

Allan Arkush (2007). “The Liberalism of Moses Mendelssohn,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–52.

Samuel Atlas (1964). From Critical to Speculative Idealism: The Philosophy of Solomon Maimon. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

James Barr (2000). History and Ideology in the Old Testament: Biblical Studies at the End of a Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Israel Bartal (2005). The Jews of Eastern Europe, 1772–1881. Chaya Naor (trans.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Leora Batnitzky (2004b). “The Image of Judaism: German-Jewish Intellectuals and the Ban on Images.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 11:259–81.

Leora Batnitzky (2006). Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frederick Beiser (1993). “Hegel's Historicism,” in Frederick Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 270–300.

Michel Beistigui (2010). Immanence and Philosophy: Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Seyla Benhabib (2004). The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seyla Benhabib (2006). Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mara Benjamin (2007). “Building a Zion in German(y): Franz Rosenzweig on Yehudah Halevi.” Jewish Social Studies 13(2): 127–54.

Mara Benjamin (2009). Rosenzweig's Bible: Reinventing Scripture for Jewish Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael S. Berger (1998). “'U-vikashtem Mi-sham’: Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik's Response to Martin Buber's Religious Existentialism.” Modern Judaism 18:93–118.

Bettina Bergo (1999). Emmanuel Levinas between Ethics and Politics: For the Beauty that Adorns the Earth. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bettina Bergo (2005). “Ontology, Transcendence, and Immanence in Emmanuel Levinas’ Philosophy.” Research in Phenomenology 35:141–77.

Asher Biemann (2001). “The Problem of Tradition and Reform in Jewish Renaissance and Renaissancism.” Jewish Social Studies 8:58–87.

Ruth Birnbaum (1997). “Imagination and Its Gender in Maimonides’ Guide.” Shofar 16:13–27.

Kalman P. Bland (2007). “Welcoming Images: Medievally.” Images: A Journal for Jewish Art and Visual Culture 1:1–2.

Aryeh Botwinick (2008). “Review of Menachem Kellner, Maimonides’ Confrontation with Mysticism.” Philosophy East and West 58:415–20.

Pierre Bouretz (2007). “Messianism and Jewish Philosophy,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–91.

Eric Boynton , and Martin Kavka (eds.) (2009). Saintly Influence: Edith Wyschogrod and the Possibilities of Philosophy of Religion. New York: Fordham University Press.

Zachary Braiterman (1998). (God) After Auschwitz: Tradition and Change in Post-Holocaust Jewish Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Zachary Braiterman (2000–1). “Joseph Soloveitchik and Immanuel Kant's Mitzvah-Aesthetic.” AJS Review 25:1–24.

Robert B. Brandom (2009). Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Martin Brasser (ed.) (2004). Rosenzweig als Leser: Kontextuelle Kommentare zum Stern der Erlösung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

Edward Breuer , and David Sorkin (2003). “Moses Mendelssohn's First Hebrew Publication: An Annotated Translation of the Kohelet Mussar.” Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 48:3–23.

Gregory Brown (1987). “Compossibility, Harmony, and Perfection in Leibniz.” The Philosophical Review 96:173–203.

Carol P. Christ (2002). “Feminist Theology in Post-traditional Theology,” in Susan Frank Parsons (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–96.

Richard A. Cohen (2007). “Emmanuel Levinas: Judaism and the Primacy of the Ethical,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 234–55.

Steven Galt Crowell (2008). “Phenomenological Immanence, Normativity, and Semantic Externalism.” Synthese 160:335–54.

Joseph Davis (2001). “The Ten Questions of Eliezer Eilburg and the Problem of Jewish Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century.” Jewish Quarterly Review 91:293–336.

René Descartes (1985). Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1. John Cottingham , Robert Stoothoff , and Dugald Murdoch (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norman DeWitt (1940). “Semantic Notes to Latin Etymologies.” Language 16:88–94.

James A. Diamond (2010). “Exegetical Idealization: Hermann Cohen's Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Maimonides.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18:49–73.

Geert Edel (1999). “The Hypothesis of the Basic Norm: Hans Kelsen and Hermann Cohen,” in Stanley L. Paulson and Bonnie Litschewski Paulson (eds.), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 195–219.

Carlos M. N. Eire (1986). War against the Idols: The Reformation of Worship from Erasmus to Calvin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arnold Eisen (1998a). “Reflections on the State of Zionist Thought.” Modern Judaism 18:253–66.

Rachel Elior (1986). “Messianic Expectations and Spiritualization of Religious Life in the Sixteenth Century.” Révue des Études juives 145:35–49.

Robert Erlewine (2010a). “Hermann Cohen, Maimonides, and the Jewish Virtue of Humility.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18:27–47.

Ernst Feil (1986). Religio. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

Shmuel Feiner (1995a). “Mendelssohn and ‘Mendelssohn's Disciples’: A Re-examination.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 40:133–68.

Michael Fishbane (2003). Biblical Myth and Rabbinic Mythmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Resianne Fontaine (2006). “The Immortality of the Soul in Pinchas Hurwitz's Sefer ha-Berit: Philosophers versus Kabbalists.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 13:223–33.

Resianne Fontaine (2007a). “Love of One's Neighbour in Pinhas Hurwitz's Sefer ha-Berit,” in Martin F. J. Baasten and Reinier Munk (eds.), Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of His Sixty-fifth Birthday. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 271–96.

William Franke (2005). “Franz Rosenzweig and the Emergence of a Postsecular Philosophy of the Unsayable.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58:161–80.

William Franke (2006). “Apophasis and the Turn of Philosophy to Religion: From Negative Theology to Postmodern Negation of Theology.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60:61–76.

Nancy Frankenberry (ed.) (2002). Radical Interpretation in Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harry G. Frankfurt (1988). The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paul W. Franks (2006). “Everyday Speech and Revelatory Speech in Rosenzweig and Wittgenstein.” Philosophy Today 50:24–39.

Paul W. Franks (2007). “Jewish Philosophy after Kant: The Legacy of Solomon Maimon,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–79.

Gad Freudenthal (2005). “Aaron Salomon Gumpertz, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, and the First Call for an Improvement of the Civil Rights of Jews in Germany.” AJS Review 29:299–354.

Gideon Freudenthal (2003). “A Philosopher Between Two Cultures,” in Gideon Freudenthal (ed.), Solomon Maimon: Rational Dogmatist, Empirical Skeptic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–17.

Else-Rahel Freund (1979). Franz Rosenzweig's Philosophy of Existence: An Analysis of The Star of Redemption. Paul Mendes-Flohr (ed.). Steven L. Weinstein and Robert Israel (trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Harry Friedenwald (1940). “Montaigne's Relation to Judaism and the Jews.” Jewish Quarterly Review 31:141–48.

Ruth Gavison (1999). “Jewish and Democratic? A Rejoinder to the ‘Ethnic Democracy’ Debate.” Israel Studies 4:44–72.

Mark H. Gelber (1986). “The jungjüdische Bewegung: An Unexplored Chapter in German-Jewish Literary and Cultural History.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 31:105–19.

As'ad Ghanem , Nadim Rouhana , and Oren Yiftachel (1998). “Questioning Ethnic Democracy: A Response to Sammy Snooha.” Israel Studies 3: 253–67.

Robert Gibbs (2000). Why Ethics?: Signs of Responsiblities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Robert Gibbs (2009). “The Name of God in Levinas,” in Eric Boynton and Martin Kavka (eds.), Saintly Influence: Edith Wyschogrod and the Possibilities of Philosophy of Religion. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 97–112.

Willi Goetschel (2003). “Heine's Spinoza.” Idealistic Studies 33: 207–221.

Willi Goetschel (2012). Disciplining Philosophy and the Invention of Modern Jewish Thought. New York: Fordham.

Hermann Levin Goldschmidt (2007). The Legacy of German Jewry. David Suchoff (trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.

Peter Eli Gordon (1999). “Science, Finitude, and Infinity: Neo-Kantianism and the Birth of Existentialism.” Jewish Social Studies 6:30–53.

Peter Eli Gordon (2001). “Rosenzweig Redux: The Reception of German-Jewish Thought.” Jewish Social Studies 8:1–57.

Peter Eli Gordon (2007). “Franz Rosenzweig and the Philosophy of Jewish Existence,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–46.

Andreas Gotzmann (2007). “Ambiguous Visions of the Past: The Perception of History in Nineteenth-Century German Jewry.” European Journal of Jewish Studies 1:365–94.

Andreas Gotzmann , and Christian Wiese (2007). Modern Judaism and Historical Consciousness: Identities, Encounters, Perspectives. Leiden: Brill.

Ahad Ha ‘am [Asher Ginzberg] (2000). “Truth from Eretz Israel.” Alan Dowty (trans.). Israel Studies 5:160–79.

Stuart Hampshire (ed.) (1978). Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jay M. Harris (1987). “The Image of Maimonides in Nineteenth-Century Jewish Historiography.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Jewish Research 54:117–40.

Robert Herrera (1982). “Modern Jewish Thought and the Problem of God.” Philosophy Today 26(1):54–64.

Dana Hollander (2008). Exemplarity and Chosenness: Rosenzweig and Derrida on the Nation of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Rivka Horwitz (2000). “Kabbalah in the Writings of Mendelssohn and the Berlin Circle of Maskilim.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 45:3–24.

Aaron W. Hughes (2010a). “Maimonides and the Pre-Maimonidean Jewish Philosophical Tradition According to Hermann Cohen.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18:1–26.

Edmund Husserl (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer (trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Edmund Husserl (1994). Briefwechsel. Karl Schuhmann and Elisabeth Schuhmann (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Edmund Husserl (1997). “Philosophy and Anthropology,” in Thomas Sheehan and Richard E. Palmer (eds. and trans.), Psychological and Transcendental Philosophy and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 485–500.

Edmund Husserl (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology. Lee Hardy (trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Phil Huston (2007). Martin Buber's Journey to Presence. New York: Fordham University Press.

Arthur Hyman (2005). “Maimonidean Elements in Hermann Cohen's Philosophy of Religion,” in Reinier Munk (ed.), Hermann Cohen's Critical Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 357–70.

Jonathan I. Israel (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jonathan I. Israel (2006). Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mark Johnston (2009). Religion after Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Immanuel Kant (1996b). Religion and Rational Theology. Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Immanuel Kant (1997). Lectures on Metaphysics. Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Immanuel Kant (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (eds. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Paul Guyer (ed.). Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawrence Kaplan (2007). “Joseph Soloveitchik and Halakhic Man,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–33.

Martin ( Kavka 2004). Jewish Messianism and the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martin Kavka , and Randi Rashkover (2004). “A Jewish Modified Divine Command Theory.” Journal of Religious Ethics 32:387–414.

Richard Kearney (1988). The Wake of Imagination: Toward a Postmodern Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Menachem Kellner (1995). “Gersonides on Imitatio Dei and the Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Jewish Quarterly Review 85:275–96.

Steven Kepnes (2007). Jewish Liturgical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett (2007). “Towards a Post-disciplinary Jewish Subject.” Images: Journal for Jewish Art and Visual Culture 1:12–14.

Jane Kneller (2007). Kant and the Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lionel Kochan (1977). The Jew and His History. New York: Schocken.

George Y. Kohler (2010). “Finding God's Purpose: Hermann Cohen's Use of Maimonides to Establish the Authority of Mosaic Law.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18:75–105.

Israel Koren (2010). The Mystery of the Earth: Mysticism and Hasidism in the Thought of Martin Buber. Leiden: Brill.

Howard Kreisel (1994). “Imitatio Dei in Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed.” AJS Review 19:169–212.

Howard Kreisel (2001). Prophecy: The History of an Idea in Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Leonard Lawlor (2006). The Implications of Immanence: Toward a New Concept fo Life. New York: Fordham University Press.

J. H. Lehmann (1975). “Maimonides, Mendelssohn, and the Me'asfim: Philosophy and the Biographical Imagination in the Early Haskalah.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 20:87–108.

Nancy K. Levene (2004b). “Levinas's Beginnings: Ethics, Politics, and Origins.” The European Legacy 9:43–54.

Nancy K. Levene (2004c). Spinoza's Revelation: Religion, Democracy, and Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Emmanuel Levinas (1974). Autrement qu’être, ou au-delà de l'essence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff

Emmanuel Levinas (2007). “Being Jewish.” Mary Beth Mader (trans.). Continental Philosophy Review 40:205–10.

John Llewelyn (2000). The Hypocritical Imagination: Between Kant and Levinas. London: Routledge.

Ehud Luz (2003). Wrestling with an Angel: Power, Morality and Jewish Identity. Michael Swirsky (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Barbara Mann (2006b). “Visions of Jewish Modernism.” Modernism/Modernity 13:673–99.

Dalia Manor (2001). “Biblical Zionism in Bezalel Art.” Israel Studies 6:55–75.

Richard Mason (1997). The God of Spinoza: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brian Massumi (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Russell T. McCutcheon (2003). The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. London: Routledge.

Stefan Meinecke (1991). “A Life of Contradiction: The Philosopher Franz Rosenzweig and His Relation to History and Politics.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 36:461–89.

Yitzhak Melamed (2004). “Salomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in German Idealism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42:67–96.

Paul Mendes-Flohr (2009). “Between Sensual and Heavenly Love: Franz Rosenzweig's Reading of the Song of Songs,” in Deborah A. Green and Laura S. Lieber (eds.), Scriptural Exegesis – the Shape of Culture and the Religious Imagination: Essays in Honour of Michael Fishbane. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 310–18.

Jacob Meskin (2007). “The Role of Lurianic Kabbalah in the Early Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas,” Levinas Studies: An Annual Review. 2:49–77.

Arnaldo Momigliano (1975). Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jan Mooij Albinn Johann (1993). Fictional Realities: The Uses of Literary Imagination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Michael L. Morgan (2007). Discovering Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael L. Morgan , and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.) (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Samuel Moyn (2003). “Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Readings: Between Tradition and Innovation.” Prooftexts 23:338–64.

Samuel Moyn (2005a). “Divine and Human Love: Franz Rosenzweig's History of the Song of Songs.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 12:194–212.

Samuel Moyn (2006). “Is Revelation in the World?Jewish Quarterly Review 96:396–403.

Samuel Moyn (2009). “Jewish and Christian Philosophy of History,” in Aviezer Tucker (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 427–36.

Reinier Munk (ed.) (2005). Hermann Cohen's Critical Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer.

Deborah Musher (1998). “Reconstructionist Judaism in the Mind of Mordecai Kaplan: The Transformation from a Philosophy into a Religious Denomination.” American Jewish History 86:397–417.

Allan Nadler (1993). “Soloveitchik's Halakhic Man: Not A Mithnagged.” Modern Judaism 13:119–47.

Steven Nadler (2001). Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

Steven Nadler (2008a). “Theodicy and Providence,” in Steven Nadler and T. M. Rudavsky (eds.), The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy: From Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 619–58.

David Novak (1990). “Jewish Theology.” Modern Judaism 10:311–23.

David Novak (1995). The Election of Israel: The Idea of the Chosen People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David Novak (2006). “Is the God of the Philosophers That Which Nothing Greater Can Be Conceived?Jewish Studies Quarterly 13:196–204.

Saul Olyan (1982). “Zadok's Origins and the Tribal Politics of David.” Journal of Biblical Literature 101:177–93.

Michael Oppenheim (1996). “Feminism, Jewish Philosophy and Religious Pluralism.” Modern Judaism 16: 147–60.

Stanley L. Paulson (1992). “The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12:311–32.

Derek Penslar (2005). “Herzl and the Palestinian Arabs: Myth and Counter-myth.” Journal of Israeli History 24:65–77.

Shlomo Pines , and Yirmiyahu Yovel (eds.) (1986). Maimonides and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

Benjamin Pollock (2004). “From Nation State to World Empire: Franz Rosenzweig's Redemptive Imperialism.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 11:332–53.

Benjamin Pollock (2009). Franz Rosenzweig and the Systematic Task of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Amanda Porterfield (2001). The Transformation of American Religion: The Story of a Late Twentieth-Century Awakening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Russell Powell (2009). “Contingency and Convergence in Macroevolution: A Reply to John Beatty.” Journal of Philosophy 106:390–403.

B. Keith Putt (2006). “Theopoetics of the Possible,” in John Panteleimon Manoussakis (ed.), After God: Richard Kearney and the Religious Turn in Continental Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 241–69.

Aviezer Ravitzky (1986). “Rabbi J. B. Soloveitchik on Human Knowledge: Between Maimonidean and Neo-Kantian Philosophy.” Modern Judaism 6:157–88.

David C. Reisman (2004). “Plato's Republic in Arabic: A Newly Discovered Passage.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14:263–300.

Ira Robinson (1989). “Kabbala and Science in Sefer Ha-Berit: A Modernization Strategy for Orthodox Jews.” Modern Judaism 9:275–88.

Deborah W. Rooke (2000). Zadok's Heirs: The Role and Development of the High Priesthood in Ancient Israel. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richard Rorty (1998). “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres,” in Richard Rorty, Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–73.

Gavriel D. Rosenfeld (1994). “Defining ‘Jewish Art’ in Ost und West, 1901–1908: A Study in the Nationalization of Jewish Culture.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 39:83–110.

Franz Rosenzweig (1979). Briefe und Tagebücher. 2 vols. Rachel Rosenzweig and Edith Rosenzweig-Scheinmann , with Bernhard Casper (eds.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Moshe Rosman (2007). “Haskalah: A New Paradigm.” Jewish Quarterly Review 97:129–36.

Nathan Rotenstreich (1966). “On Mendelssohn's Political Philosophy.” Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 11: 28–41.

Mary-Jane Rubenstein (2005). “The Unbearable Withness of Being: On the Essentialist Blind-Spot of Anti-ontotheology,” in Creston Davis , John Milbank , and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Theology and the Political. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 340–49.

Daniel C. Russell (2004). “Virtue as ‘Likeness to God’ in Plato and Seneca.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42:241–60.

Daniel C. Russell (2005). Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raphael Samuel (1991). “Reading the Signs.” History Workshop Journal 32:88–109.

Norbert M. Samuelson (1994). Judaism and the Doctrine of Creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norbert M. Samuelson (2002). Revelation and the God of Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Sandel (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eric L. Santner (2001). On the Psychotheology of Everyday Life: Reflections on Freud and Rosenzweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jonathan D. Sarna (1998–99). “The Cult of Synthesis in American Jewish Culture.” Jewish Social Studies 5:52–79.

Peter A. Schmid (2005). “Hermann Cohen's Theory of Virtue,” in Reiner Munk (ed.), Hermann Cohen's Critical Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 231–58.

Carl Schmitt (2005). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. George Schwab (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Richard Schusterman (1992). “Aesthetics between Nationalism and Internationalism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51:157–67.

Yossef Schwartz (2003). “Causa Materialis: Solomon Maimon, Moses ben Maimon and the Possibility of Philosophical Transmission,” in Gideon Freudenthal (ed.), Solomon Maimon: Rational Dogmatist, Empirical Skeptic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 125–43.

Julia Schwartzmann (2006). “Isaac Artama and His Theory of Two Matches (Zivugim).” Jewish Studies Quarterly 13:27–49.

Kenneth Seeskin (1991). “Jewish Philosophy in the 1980s.” Modern Judaism 11:157–72.

Kenneth Seeskin (2001). Autonomy in Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kenneth Seeskin (2006). “The God of the Philosophers.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 13:205–14.

Naomi Seidman (2006). Faithful Renderings: Jewish and Christian Difference and the Politics of Translation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gerson Shafir , and Yoav Peled (2002). Being Israeli: The Dynamics of Multiple Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Adam Shear (2010). “Jews and Judaism in Early Modern Europe, c. 1400–1800,” in Judith R. Baskin and Kenneth Seeskin (eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Jewish Religion, History, and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–68.

Nancy Sherman (1991). The Fabric of Character: Aristotle's Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Clarendon.

Michael A. Signer (2009). “‘These Are the Generations’: Reasoning with Rabbi Samuel ben Meier,” in Peter Ochs and Stacy Johnson (eds.), Crisis, Call and Leadership in the Abrahamic Traditions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59–70.

David Singer , and Moshe Sokol (1982). “Joseph Soloveitchik: Lonely Man of Faith.” Modern Judaism 2:227–72.

Mark S. Smith (2001). The Origins of Biblical Monotheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sammy Smooha (1997). “Ethnic Democracy: Israel as an Archetype.” Israel Studies 2:198–241.

Sammy Smooha (2002). “The Model of Ethnic Democracy: Israel and the Jewish Democratic State.” Nations and Nationalism 8:475–503.

Abraham P. Socher (2006). The Radical Enlightenment of Solomon Maimon: Judaism, Heresy, and Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Norman Solomon (2005). “Cohen on Atonement, Purification, and Repentance,” in Reiner Munk (ed.), Hermann Cohen's Critical Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 395–412.

Haym Soloveitchik (1987). “Religious Law and Change: The Medieval Ashkenazic Example.” AJS Review 12:205–21.

Benjamin Sommer (1999). “Revelation at Sinai in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Theology.” Journal of Religion 79:422–51.

Michael Stocker (1976). “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 73:453–66.

Ivan Strenski (1993). Religion in Relation: Method, Application and Moral Location. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Kok-Chor Tan (2004). Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mark C. Taylor (2007). After God. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tirosh-Samuelson , Hava , and Kenneth L. Mossman (eds.) (2012). Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, GmbH.

Shmuel Trigano (1990). “The French Revolution and the Jews.” Modern Judaism 10:171–90.

Donald L. Turner , and Ford Turrell (2007). “The Non-existent God: Transcendence, Humanity, and Ethics in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas.” Philosophia 35:375–82.

Isadore Twersky (2003). “What Must a Jew Study – and Why?” in Seymour Fox , Israel Scheffler , and Daniel Marom (eds.), Visions of Jewish Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–76.

Edna Ullmann-Margalit (1983). “On Presumption.” Journal of Philosophy 80:143–63.

Martina Urban (2008). Aesthetic of Renewal: Martin Buber's Early Representation of Hasidism as Kulturkritik. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Vater , G Michael (2001). “F. W. J. Schelling: Further Presentations from the System of Philosophy (1802).” The Philosophical Forum. 32:373–97.

John Waide (1988). “Virtues and Principles.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48:455–72.

Steven M. Wasserstrom (1999). Religion after Religion: Gershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade and Henri Corbin at Eranos. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Steven M. Wasserstrom (2008). “Melancholy Jouissance and the Study of Kabbalah: A Review Essay of Elliot R. Wolfson, Alef, Mem, Tau.” AJS Review 32:389–96.

Stuart Weeks et al. (eds.) (2004). The Book of Tobit: Texts from the Principal Ancient and Medieval Traditions. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Andrea L. Weiss (2006). Figurative Language in Biblical Prose Narrative: Metaphor in the Book of Samuel. Leiden: Brill.

Hartwig Wiedebach (2002). “Aesthetics in Religion: Remarks on Hermann Cohen's Theory of Jewish Existence.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 11:63–73.

Elliot R. Wolfson (1989). “The Problem of Unity in the Thought of Martin Buber.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27:423–44.

Elliot R. Wolfson (1997). “Facing the Effaced: Mystical Eschatology and the Idealistic Orneitation in the Thought of Franz Rosenzweig.” Zeitschrift für neuere Theologiegeschichte 4:39–81.

Elliot R. Wolfson (2004). “Iconicity of the Text: Reification of Torah and the Idolatrous Impulse of Zoharic Kabbalah.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 11:215–42.

Elliot R. Wolfson (2006a). Alef, Mem, Tau: Kabbalistic Musings on Time, Truth, and Death. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Elliot R. Wolfson (2006b). “Secrecy, Modesty, and the Feminine: Kabbalistic Traces in the Thought of Levinas.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14:193–224.

Elliot R. Wolfson (2009a). “Kenotic Overflow and Temporal Transcendence: Angelic Embodiment and the Alterity of Time in Abraham Abulafia,” in Eric Boynton and Martin Kavka (eds.), Saintly Influence: Edith Wyschogrod and the Possibilities of Philosophy of Religion. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 113–49.

Nicholas Wolterstorff (1995). Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tamra Wright (2007). “Self, Other, Text, God: The Dialogical Thought of Martin Buber,” in Michael L. Morgan and Peter Eli Gordon (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Modern Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–21.

Arthur Wuthnow (1998). After Heaven: Spirituality in America Since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Edith Wyschogrod (1982). “God and ‘Being's Move’ in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas.” Journal of Religion 62:145–56.

Edith Wyschogrod (2002). “Language and Alterity in the Thought of Levinas,” in Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 188–205.

Edith Wyschogrod (2006). Crossover Queries: Dwelling with Negatives, Embodying Philosophy's Others. New York: Fordham University Press.

Dan Zahavi (2007). “Subjectivity and the First-Person Perspective.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 45(supp.): 66–84.

Michael Zank (2006). “The Ethics in Hermann Cohen's Philosophical System.” Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 13:1–15.

Steven Zipperstein (2006). “On Reading Ahad Ha‘am as Mordecai Kaplan Read Him.” Jewish Social Studies 12(2):30–38.

Irene Zwiep (2007b). “From Perush to Be'ur: Authenticity and Authority in Eighteenth-Century Jewish Intepretation,” in Martin F. J. Baasten and Reinier Munk (eds.), Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of His Sixty-fifth Birthday. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 257–70.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1095 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 454 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.