Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:27:00.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2011

Lloyd Gerson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eriugena, John Scotus. Translation (into Latin) of the Dionysian corpus. In Dionysius Areopagita. Dionysiaca I–II. Recueil donnant l’ensemble des traductions latines des ouvrages attribués au Denys de l’Aéropage, ed. Chevallier, Ph. (1937, 1949). Bruges.
évrard, E. (1960) ‘LeMaître de Plutarque d’Athènes et les origines du néoplatonisme athénien II: Plutarque, Jamblique, Porphyre’, L’Antiquité Classique 29: 391–406.Google Scholar
évrard, é. (1953) ‘Les convictions religieuses de Jean Philopon et la date de son Commentaire aux Météorologiques’, Bulletin de l’Académie royale de Belgique, Classe des lettres, sciences morales et politiques. Série 5, 39: 299–35.Google Scholar
œuvres philosophiques et scientifiques d’al-KindĪ, vol. II.Métaphysique et cosmologie, eds. Rashed, R. and Jolivet, J. (1999). Leiden–Boston, MA–Cologne.
ševčenko, I. (1956) ‘The Definition of Philosophy in the Life of Saint Constantine’, in Halle, M. et. al. (eds.), For Roman Jakobson. Essays on his Sixtieth Birthday. The Hague, 449–57; also in ševčenko, Byzantium and the Slavs in Letters and Culture. Cambridge, MA. 1991, 93– 106.Google Scholar
A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, trans. with introduction and notes by Morrow, G. R. (1970). Princeton. NJ [reprinted 1992, with a new foreword by I. Mueller].
Sinaïta, Anastasios, A Guide for Life: PG 89, 36–309; Anastasius Sinaïtae viae dux, ed. Uthemann, K.-H. (1981) CCSG 8.
Greek Wisdom Literature in Arabic Translation. A Study of the Graeco-Arabic Gnomologia, ed. Gutas, D. (1975). New Haven, CT.
A Thirteenth-Century Textbook of Mystical Theology at the University of Paris. The Mystical Theology of Dionysius the Areopagite in Eriugena’s Latin Translation with the Scholia translated by Anastasius the Librarian and Excerpts from Eriugena’s Periphyseon, edition, translation, and introduction by Michael, L. Harrington (2004). Dallas Medieval Texts and Translations 4, Paris–Leuven–Dudley, MA.
Al-Kindi’s Metaphysics. A Translation of Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq al-KindĪ’s Treatise «On First Philosophy» (fĪ al-Falsafah al-ūlā), trans. Ivry, A. L., with Introduction and Commentary (1974). Albany, NY.
Abailard, Peter. Peter Abaelards philosophische Schriften II. Die Logica ‘Nostrorum Petitioni Sociorum’. Die Glossen zu Porphyrios, ed. Geyer, B. (1973). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters xxi/4. Münster i. W.
Abramowski, L. (2006) ‘“Audi, ut dico” – Literary Observations and Chronological Considerations of Marius Victorinus and the “Platonic” Nag Hammadi treatises’, Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 117: 145–68.Google Scholar
Abu l-’Abbas an-Nayrizis Exzerpte aus (Ps.-?)Simplicius Kommentar zu den Definitionen, Postulaten und Axiomen in Euclids Elementa I [Anaritius, d. ca. 922], ed. Arnzen, R. (2002). Cologne.
Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M.F.W. (2004) Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries, vol. I. London.
Adamson, P. et al. (2004) Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 83. 1. London.
Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.) (2004) Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Latin and Arabic Commentaries, 2 vols. London.
Adamson, P. (2003) The Arabic Plotinus. A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle. London.
Adamson, P. (2006) Al-KindĪ. Oxford.
Adamson, P. (2007) ‘The Kindian Tradition. The Structure of Philosophy in Arabic Neoplatonism’, in D’Ancona, (2007) 35–70.
,Aeneas of Gaza: Theophrastus, ed. Colonna, M. E., Eneadi Gaza: Teofnasto (1958), Naples.
AflūṭĪn ʿinda l-ʿarab. Plotinus apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et fragmenta quae supersunt, ed. BadawĪ, ʿA. (1966). Dār al-nahḍa al-miṣriyya, Cairo.
Badaw, ʿA., AflūọĪn ʿinda l-ʿarab. Plotinus apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et fragmenta quae supersunt, Dār al-nahḍa al-miṣriyya (1966). Cairo; Plotino. La discesa dell’anima nei corpi (IV 8[6]). Plotiniana Arabica (pseudo-Teologia di Aristotele, capitoli I e VII; “Detti del Sapiente Greco”), in D’Ancona et al. (2003).
Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World [in Phys 1326.38–36.34], trans. Wildberg, C. (1991).
Ahbel-Rappe, Sara (2000) Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus and Damascius. Cambridge.
Al-FārābĪ’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione, trans. Zimmermann, F. W. (1981). Oxford.
,Alan of Lille. Anticlaudianus, ed. by Bossuat, R. (1955). Paris.
Albert the Great. De Causis et Processu Universitatis a Prima Causa, ed. Fauser, W. (1993). Alberti Magni Opera Omnia xvii/2 (Cologne edition). Münster.
De Homine, ed. Borgnet, A.. Alberti Magni Opera Omnia xxxv (1986). Paris.
Super Ethica Commentum et Quaestiones, Libri Quinque Priores, ed. Kübel, W.. Alberti Magni Opera Omnia xiv/1 (1968–72). Cologne edition, Münster.
,Alessandro di Afrodisia. La Provvidenza. Questioni sulla provvidenza, a cura di Fazzo, S., trad. dal greco Fazzo, di S., trad. dall’arabo di Zonta, M. (1998). Milan. 96–164.
Alexander, P. (1958) The Patriarch Nicephorus of Constantinople. Oxford.
On the First Cause (lost in Greek): ‘Alexander Arabus On the First Cause. Aristotle’s First Mover in an Arabic treatise attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias’, ed. Endress, G., in D’Ancona, C. and Serra, G. (eds.), Aristotele e Alessandro di Afrodisia nella tradizione araba (2002). Padua. 19–74.Google Scholar
,Alexander of Aphrodisias. Quaestiones 2.16–3.15, trans. Sharples, R. W. (1994). London.
Arabic: Alexander of Aphrodisias On the Cosmos, ed. Genequand, Ch. (2001). Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
,Alexandre d’ Aphrodise. Traité de la providence, περὶ προνοίας, version arabe de Abū Bišr Mattā ibn Yūnus, introduction, édition et traduction de Thillet, P. (2003). Paris.
Allan, D. J. (1950) ‘Mediaeval Versions of Aristotle, De Caelo, and the Commentary of Simplicius’, in Hunt, R. and Klibansky, R. (eds.), Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies. London, 82–120.Google Scholar
Allard, G.-H. (ed.) (1986) Jean Scot écrivain. Montréal–Paris.
Allard, M. (1962) ‘Les Chrétiens à Bagdad’, Arabica 9: 375–88.Google Scholar
Allen, P. and Neil, B. (2002) Maximus the Confessor and His Companions: Documents from Exile. Oxford.
Allen, Pauline and Neil, Bronwen (2002) Maximus the Confessor and His Companions: Documents from Exile. Oxford.
Translation (into Latin) of Maximus the Confessor. Ambigua ad Iohannem iuxta Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae latinam interpretationem, ed. Jeauneau, é. (1988). CCSG 18.
Ammonii in Aristotelis Analyticorum Priorum Librum I Commentarium, ed. Wallies, M. (1899). CAG IV.6.
Blank’s translation (slightly revised by Seel, G. and Schneider, J.-P.) is also found in Seel (2000) Ammonius and the Seabattle: Texts, Commentary and Essays (Peripatoi 18). Berlin–New York.
Ammonius in Aristotelis Categorias, ed. Busse, A. (1895). CAG IV.4.
Ammonius in Aristotelis De Interpretatione Commentarius, ed. Busse, A. (1897). CAG IV.5.
Ammonius in Porphyrii Isagogen sive V Voces, ed. Busse, A. (1891). CAG IV.3.
Amsler, O. (1981) Die exegetische Methode des Photios. Munich.
In De An. (Arabic): An Arabic Translation of Themistius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima, ed. Lyons, M. C. (1973). Oxford.
Tranq. an.: Analecta Syriaca, ed. Lagarde, P. (1858). Leipzig. 186–95.
Analytica priora, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1962). AL 3.1–2, Leiden.
,Anastasios I of Antiocheia, Philosophical Chapter, K.-H. Uthemann, ‘Die “Philosophischen Kapitel” des Anastasius I. von Antiochien’, Orientalia Christiana Periodica 46 (1980) 306–66.
Anastos, M. (1979) Studies in Byzantine Intellectual History. London.
Andia, Ysabel (1996) Henosis: L’union à Dieu chez Denys l’Aréopagite. Leiden.
Andia, Ysabel (ed.) (1997) Denys l’Aréopagite et sa postérité en Orient et en Occident. Paris.
Andia, Ysabel (1996) ‘Transfiguration et théologie négative chez Maxime de Confesseur et Denys l’Aréopagite’, in idem, (ed.), Denys l’Aréopagite et sa posterérité en Orient et en Occident. Paris, 291–326.Google Scholar
Andresen, C. (1955) Logos und Nomos: Die Polemik des Kelsos wider das Christentum. Berlin.
Eriugena, John Scotus. Annotationes in Marcianum, (ed.) Lutz, C. (1939). Cambridge, MA.
Eriugena, John Scottus. Annotationes in Marcianum, ed. Lutz, C. E. (1939). Cambridge, MA.
Anonymous Professor (10th century), Anonymi professoris epistulae, ed. Markopoulos, A. (2000) [CFHB 37]. Berlin.
,Anonymous (c. 700), Philosophical excerpts: in Kotter, B. P., Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, 1 [PTS 7] (1969). Berlin. 151–73.
Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione (Codex Parisinus Graecus 2064), ed. Tarán, L. (1978). Meisenheim am Glan, xxv–xli.
Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1962). Amsterdam.
,Anonymus Heiberg / Gregory Aneponymous, Anonymi Logica et Quadrivium cum scholiis antiquis, ed. Heiberg, J. L. (1929). Copenhagen.
,Anselm of Canterbury. Monologion, ed. S., F. S. Schmitt.Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia i (1938). Edinburgh.
Anton, J. (1994) ‘The Aristotelianism of Photius’ Philosophical Theology’, in Schrenk, L. R. (ed.), Aristotle in Late Antiquity. Washington, DC, 158–83.Google Scholar
Anton, J. (1997) ‘Neoplatonic Elements in Arethas’ Scholia on Aristotle and Porphyry’, in Benakis, L. G. (ed.), Néoplatonisme et Philosophie Médiévale, Actes du Colloque international, Société International pour L’ étude de la Philosophie Médiéval (Octobre 1995). Brepols, 291–306.Google Scholar
Isagoge (Syriac): ‘Aqdam tarğama suryāniyya li-Isāġūği Fūrfuriyūs’, ed. Brock, S., Mağallat almağma’ al-’ilmĪ al-’irāqĪ (Journal of the Iraqi Academy) 12 (1988), 315–66Google Scholar
Regulae Caelestis Iuris, ed. Häring, N. M.. In Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen âge 48 (1981) 121–226.
,Arethas of Caesarea, Arethae archiepiscopi Caesariensis scripta minora, ed. Westerink, L. G., 2 vols. (1968–72). Leipzig.
,Arethas of Caesarea, Arethas of Caesarea’s Scholia on Porphyry’s Isagoge and Aristotle’s Categories, ed. Share, M. (1994). CphMA-CAB 1.
,Arethas of Caesarea, Letters, in Jenkins, R. J. H., ‘Eight Letters of Arethas on the Fourth Marriage of Leo the Wise’, Hellenica (Thessaloniki) 14 (1956) 293–372.Google Scholar
,Arethas of Caesarea, Scholia Arethae in Cyrilli apologiam xii anathematismorum contra Theodoretum et in Theodoreti impugnationem, ed. Schwartz, E., Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum, 1.1.6 (1928; repr. 1960). Berlin, 112–20, 123–5, 127–8, 130–2, 135, 138–43.
,Arethas of Caesarea, Scholia on Alcinous and Albinous: Westerink, L. G. and Laourdas, B., ‘Scholia by Arethas in Vindob. Phil. Gr. 314’, Hellenika (Thessaloniki) 17 (1960) 105–31; repr. in Westerink (1980) 31–57.Google Scholar
,Arethas of Caesarea, Various Scholia, in Westerink, L. G., ‘Marginalia by Arethas in Moscow Greek Ms 231’, Byzantion 42 (1972) 196–244; repr. in Westerink (1980) 295–343.Google Scholar
On the Reduction of Syllogisms (lost in Greek): Arisṭū ’inda l-’arab. Dirāsāt wa-nuṣūṣ ġayr manšūra, Maktabat al-nahḍa al-miṣriyya, ed. BadawĪ, ʿA. (1947), Cairo, 309–25. French trans.: La transmission de la philosophie grecque au monde arabe (1968). Paris.
In Metaph. Lambda (lost in Greek): Arisṭū inda l-’arab. Dirāsāt wa-nuṣūṣ ġayr manšūra, Maktabat al-nahḍa al-miṣriyya, ed. BadawĪ, ʿA. (1947). Cairo, 12–21, 329–33.
Aristoteles arabus. The Oriental Translations and Commentaries on the Aristotelian Corpus, ed. Peters, F. E. (1968). Leiden, 37.
Aristotelis De caelo commentaria. Latin Commentaire sur le traité Du ciel d’Aristote, vol. I, traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke; édition critique par F. Bossier avec la collaboration de Chr. Van de Veire et Guldentops, G. (2004). Leuven.
[Revised in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentaries and their Influence. London, 1990, 349–72.]
Aristotle. De caelo. English. The treatises of Aristotle … Translated from the Greek; with copious elucidations, from the commentaries of Simplicius on the first, and of Olympiodorus on the last of these treatises, trans. Taylor, Thomas (1807). London [vii, 608 p.; Contents: On the heavens; On generation and corruption; Meteorology].
Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) (1967) The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge.
Armstrong, A. H. (1973) ‘Man in the Cosmos. A Study of Some Differences between Pagan Neoplatonism and Christianity’, in Doer, W. den, Nat, P. G. G., Sicking, C. M. and Winden, J. C. M. (eds.), Romanitas et Christianitas. Studia I. H. Waszink a. d. VI Kal. Nov. a MCMLXXIII XIII lustra complenti oblata. Amsterdam, 5–14.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1979) ‘Tradition, Reason and Experience in the Thought of Plotinus’, in Plotinian and Christian Studies, XVII. London.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) (1982) ‘Two Views of Freedom: A Christian Objection in Plotinus vi.8 (39) 7.11–15’, Studia Patristica 17.1: 397–406.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1961) ‘Platonic Eros and Christian Agape’, Downside Review 79: 105–21. (Reprinted in Plotinian and Christian Studies, IX.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1977) ‘Negative Theology’, Downside Review 95: 176–89. (Reprinted in Plotinian and Christian Studies, XXIV.)Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1979) Plotinian and Christian Studies. London.
Arnzen, R. (2002) Abu l-’Abbas an-Nayrizis Exzerpte aus (Ps.-?)Simplicius Kommentar zu den Definitionen, Postulaten und Axiomen in Euclids Elementa I [Anaritius, d. ca. 922] ed., introd., with Latin and Arabic glossaries. Cologne.
Asclepii in Aristotelis Metaphysicorum Libros A–Z Commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M. (1888). CAG IV.2.
Asclepius of Tralles, Commentary to Nicomachus’ Introduction to Arithmetic, ed. Tarán, L. (1969). Transactions of the American Philosophical Society n.s. 59.4.
Asztalos, M. (1993) ‘Boethius as a Transmitter of Greek Logic to the Latin West: The Categories’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 367–407.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, P. (1993) ‘Persecution and Response in Late Paganism’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 113: 1–29.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, P. (1995) ‘The Oecumenism of Iamblichus: Latent Knowledge and Its Awakening’, Journal of Roman Studies 85: 244–50.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia (2006) La lutte pour l’orthodoxie dans le platonisme tardif de Numénius à Damascius (L’âne d’or, 25). Paris.
Athanassiadi, P. (1999) Damascius. The Philosophical History. Athens.
Athanassiadi, P. (1993) ‘Persecution and Response in Late Paganism: the Evidence of Damascius’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 103: 1–29.Google Scholar
Aujoulat, N. (1998) ‘Le Pneuma et le corps lumineux de l’âme d’après le Prologue du Commentaire sur le De Anima de Jean Philopon’, Byzantinoslavica 59: 1–23.Google Scholar
,Averroès. Tafsir Ma baʿd at-tabiʿat, Texte arabe inédit établi par Bouyges, M. (1938–52). Imprimerie Catholique, Beirut.
Ayres, Lewis (2004) Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford.
Börm, H. (2006) ‘Der Perserkönig im Imperium Romanum. Chosroes I und der sasanidische Einfall in das Oströmische Reich 540 n. Chr.’, Chiron 36: 299–328.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. (2003) ‘Boèce et le Timée’, in Galonnier (2003) 5–22.Google Scholar
Bakhouche, B. (1997) ‘La transmission du Timée dans le monde latin’, in Jacquart, D. (ed.), Les voies de la science grecque. études sur la transmission des textes de l’Antiquité au dix-neuvième siècle. Geneva, 1–31.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von (1984). ‘Denys’, in Louth, A. et al. (trans.), The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, vol. II: Studies in Theological Style: Clerical Styles. San Francisco and New York, 144–210.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von (1940) ‘Das Scholien-werk des Johannes von Scythopolis’, Scholastik 15: 16–38.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von (2003) Cosmic Liturgy: The Universe according to Maximus the Confessor. San Francisco, CA.
Baltussen, H. (2003) ‘Early Reactions to Plato’s Timaeus. Polemic and Exegesis in Theophrastus and Epicurus’, in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to the ‘Timaeus’. London, 49–71.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2007) ‘From Polemic to Exegesis: The Ancient Philosophical Commentary,’ in Lavery, J. (ed.), Genres in Philosophy I. Special Issue Poetics Today 28.2: 247–81.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2008a) Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London.
Baltussen, H. (2009) ‘Simplicius and the Subversion of Authority’, Antiquorum Philosophia vol. III, 121–36.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2008) Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London.
Barbanti, M. and Romano, F. (eds.) (2002) Il Parmenide di Platone e la sua tradizione. III. Catania.
Barbotin, E. (1954) La théorie aristotélicienne de l’intellect d’après Théophraste. Louvain.
Barnes, T. D. (1978) ‘A Correspondent of Iamblichus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 19: 99–106Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1981) Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA.
Barnes, T. D. (1986a) The Constantinian Reformation, The Crake Lectures, 1984. Sackville, NB.
Barnes, T. D. (1986b) ‘Synesius in Constantinople’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 27.1: 93–112.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1998) Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality. Ithaca, NY.
Barnes, J. (1991) ‘Ammonius and Adverbs’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Supp. vol.: 145–63.
Barnes, Jonathan (1999) ‘An Introduction to Aspasius’, in Alberti, Antonina and Sharples, Robert W. (eds.), Aspasius: the Earliest Extant commentary on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berlin–New York, 1–50.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1992) ‘Metacommentary’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy x: 267–81.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2002a) ‘Syllogistic in the anon Heiberg’, in Ierodiakonou, (2002) 97–137.
Barnes, J. (2002b) ‘Ancient Philosophers’, in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World. Oxford, 293–306.Google Scholar
,Bate, Henry, of Mechelen. Speculum Divinorum et Quorundam Naturalium VI–VII. On the Unity of the Intellect. On the Platonic Doctrine of the Ideas, eds. Steel, C. and Vyver, E. (1994). Leuven.
Bathrellos, Demetrios (2004) The Byzantine Christ: Person, Nature, and Will in the Christology of Saint Maximus the Confessor. Oxford.
Baudinet, M.-J. (1978) ‘La Relation iconique à Byzance au ixe siècle d’après Nicéphore le Patriarch. Un destin de l’aristotélisme’, Les études philosophiques 1: 85–106.Google Scholar
Baumstark, A. (1975) Aristoteles bei den Syrern vom 5. bis 8. Jahrhunderts. Syrische Texte herausgegeben, übersetzt und untersucht. 1. (einziger) Band. Syrisch-arabische Biographien des Aristoteles. Syrische Kommentare zur εισαγΩγη des Porphyrios, Neudruck der Ausgabe Leipzig 1900. Scientia Verlag, Aachen.
Beard, M. and Crawford, M. (eds.) (1990) Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World. Ithaca, NY.
Beatrice, Pier-Franco (1991) ‘Le traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: L’état de la question’, Kernos 4: 119–38.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier-Franco (1992) ‘Porphyry’s Judgement on Origen’, in Daly, R. J. (ed.), Origeniana quinta. Leuven, 351–67.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier-Franco (2002) ‘The Word “Homoousios” from Hellenism to Christianity’, Church History 71. 2: 243–72.Google Scholar
Beaucamp, Joelle (2008) ‘L’enseignement à Athènes au vie siècle: droit ou science des astres?’, in Hugonnard-Roche, (2008) 201–18.
Beck, Mark (2002) ‘Plutarch to Trajan: The Dedicatory Letter and the Apophthegmata Collection’, in Stadter, P. A. and Stockt, L. (eds.), in Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 AD). Leuven, 163–74.Google Scholar
Beck, H.-G. (1959) Kirche und theologische Literatur im byzantinischen Reich. Munich.
Beierwaltes, W. (1979 Proklos. Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik 2nd edn. Frankfurt am Main.
Beierwaltes, W. (2007) Procliana. Spätantikes Denken und seine Spuren. Frankfurt am Main.
Beierwaltes, Werner (2001) Platonismus im Christentum. Frankfurt.
Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) (1980) Eriugena: Studien zu seinen Quellen. Heidelberg.
Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) (1990a) ‘Eriugena’s Platonism’, Hermathena 149: 53–72.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) (1990b) Begriff und Metapher. Sprachform des Denkens bei Eriugena. Heidelberg.
Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) (1994) ‘Unity and Trinity in Dionysius and Eriugena’, Hermathena 157: 1–20.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (ed.) (1969) Platonismus in der Philosophie des Mittelalters. Darmstadt.
Beierwaltes, W. (1985) Denken des Einen. Studien zur neuplatonischen Philosophie und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main.
Anonymous. Glossae in Porphyrium. Frühmittelalterliche Glossen des angeblichen Jepa zur Isagoge des Porphyrius, eds. Baeumker, C. and Waltershausen, B. S. Freiherr von. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters xxiv/1 (1924). Münster i. W.
Belfiore, G. (1978) ‘Il “Platone” di Giorgio Monaco’, Sileno. Rivista di studi classici e cristiani 4: 23–71.Google Scholar
Benakis, L. G. (1982) ‘The Problem of General Concepts in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Thought’, in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. Norfolk, 75–86.Google Scholar
Benakis, L. G. (1996) ‘Griechische Philosophie im Mittelalter. Stand der Forschung’, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-âge Grec et Latin 66: 51–65.Google Scholar
Benakis, L. G. (2002) Texts and Studies on Byzantine Philosophy. Athens.
Bennett, Julian (1997) Trajan Optimus Princeps. Bloomington, IN.
Berg, R.M. den (2004) ‘Smoothing over the Differences: Proclus and Ammonius on Plato’s Cratylus and Aristotle’s De Interpretatione’, in Adamson et al. (2004) 191–201.
Bergsträsser, G. (1913) Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāḳ und seine Schule: Sprach-und literaturgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu den arabischen Hippokrates- und Galen-übersetzungen. Leiden.
Bergsträsser, G. (1925) ‘Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq über die syrischen und arabischen Galen-übersetzungen, zum ersten Mal herausgegeben und übersetzt’, Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 27.2.Google Scholar
Bergsträsser, G. (1932) ‘Neue Materialen zu Ḥunayn ibn IsḤāqs Galen-Bibliographie’, Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 19.2.Google Scholar
Bernard, M. (1970) L’accord unanime de la communauté comme fondement des statuts légaux de l’Islam. Paris.
,Bernard of Chartres. Glosae super Platonem, ed. Dutton, P. E. (1991). Toronto.
,Bernard Silvestris. Cosmographia, ed. Dronke, P. (1978). Leiden.
Berthold, George Charles (1985) Maximus the Confessor.
Berthold, G. C. (1982) ‘Did Maximus the Confessor Know Augustine?’, Studia Patristica 17: 14–17.Google Scholar
,Berthold of Moosburg. Expositio super Elementationem Theologicam Procli. Prologus. Propositiones 1–13, eds. Pagnoni-Sturlese, M. R. and Sturlese, L., with an Introduction by Flasch, K. (1984). Corpus Philosophorum Teutonicorum Medii Aevi VI/I. Hamburg.
,Berthold of Moosburg. Expositio super Elementationem Theologicam Procli. Propositiones 160–183, eds. Jeck, U. R. and Tautz, I. J.. Prolegomena and Indexes by Bray, N. (2003). Corpus Philosophorum Teutonicorum Medii Aevi VI/7. Hamburg.
Bertier, Janine, Brisson, Luc and Combès, Joseph (eds.) (1977) Recherches sur la tradition platonicienne. Platon, Aristote, Proclus, Damascius (Histoire des doctrines de l’antiquité classique). Paris.
Bettiolo, P. (2003) ‘Dei casi della vita, della pietà e del buon nome. Intorno ai “detti” siriaci di Menandro’, in Funghi, M.-S. (ed.), Aspetti di letteratura gnomica nel mondo antico I. Florence, 83–103.Google Scholar
Beutler, R. (1951) ‘Plutarchos (3)’, in RE 21/1: 962–75.Google Scholar
Beutler, R. (1957) ‘Proklos’, in Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft XXIII, 1. Stuttgart, cols. 186–247.Google Scholar
Beutler, Rudolf (1939) ‘Olympiodoros d. J. (13)’, in: RE, 35. Hb., 207.13–227.53.Google Scholar
Birley, A. (1987) Marcus Aurelius. New Haven, CT.
Birley, A. (1997) Hadrian: The Restless Emperor. London–New York.
Blank, D. (2005) ‘Ammonius’, in The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford. edu/entries/ammonius/)Google Scholar
Blowers, Paul (1992) ‘Maximus the Confessor, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Concept of “Perpetual Progress”’, Vigiliae Christianae 46: 151–71.Google Scholar
Blowers, Paul (1996) ‘Gentiles of the Soul: Maximus the Confessor on the Substructure and Transformation of the Human Passions’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 4: 57–85.Google Scholar
Blum, W. (1974) ‘Die Theodizee des Patriarchen Germanos I. von Konstantinopel’, Vigiliae Christianae 28: 295–303.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Henry (1986) ‘John Philoponus: Alexandrian Platonist?Hermes 114. 3: 314–35.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Henry (1997) ‘Iamblichus as a Commentator.Syllecta Classica 8: 1–13.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Henry J. (1971) Plotinus’ Psychology. His Doctrine of the Embodied Soul.The Hague.
Blumenthal, H. J. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Later Greek Commentaries’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung. II Kommentierung, überlieferung, Nachleben. Berlin90–106.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1988) ‘Simplicius and Others on Aristotle’s Discussions of Reason’, in Duffy, J. and Peradotto, J. (eds.), Gonimos: Neoplatonic and Byzantine Studies Presented to Leendert G. Westerink at 75. Buffalo, NY, 103–19.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1993) ‘From Ku-ru-so-wo-ko to THEOURGOS: Word to Ritual’, in Blumenthal, H. J., Soul and Intellect: Studies in Plotinus and Later Neoplatonism. Variorum (Ashgate), Study XI. London.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1996) Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity. Interpretations of the De Anima. London.
Blumenthal, H. J. (1997) ‘Iamblichus as a Commentator’, Syllecta Classica 8: 1–13.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. and Lloyd, A.C. (eds.) (1983) Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus, and Simplicius (Colloquium Liverpool, 15–16 April 1982). Liverpool.
Blumenthal, H. J. (1986) ‘John Philoponus: Alexandrian Platonist?’, Hermes 114: 314–35.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H.J. (1982) ‘The Psychology of (?) Simplicius’ Commentary on the De anima’, in Blumenthal, H.J. and Lloyd, A.C. (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in later Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus and Simplicius [Colloquium Liverpool]. Liverpool, 73–95.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H.J. (1996) Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity. Interpretations of the De anima. London.
Blumenthal, H.J. (1997) ‘Some Notes on the Text of Pseudo-Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima, III.1–5’, in Joyal, M. (ed.), Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Aldershot, 213–28.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002) ‘A Greek Parallel to Boethius’ De hypotheticis syllogismis’, Mnemosyne 55: 285–300.Google Scholar
Boer, æ., Neugebauer, O. and Pingree, D. (1962) Heliodori, ut dicitur, in Paulum Alexandrinum commentarium. Leipzig.
Boethius, . De Arithmetica, eds. Oosthout, H. and Schilling, J. (1999). CCSL XCIVA.
Boethius, . De Consolatione Philosophiae, Opuscula Theologica, ed. Moreschini, C. (2005). Münich–Leipzig.
Boethius, . De Institutione Musica, ed. Friedlein, G. (1867). Leipzig.
Boethius, . Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermeneias, ed. Meiser, K. (1877–80). Leipzig.
Boethius, . In Isagogen Porphyrii Commenta, eds. Schepss, G. and Brandt, S. (1906). CSEL XLVIII.
Bonaventure, . Commentaria in Quatuor Libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Tomus I : In Primum Librum Sententiarum. Quaracchi (1882).
Bonazzi, Mauro (2003) Academici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.
Bornert, R. (1966) Les Commentaires byzantins de la divine liturgie du VIIe au XVe s. Paris.
Bos, E.P. and Meijer, P.A. (eds.) (1992) On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy. Leiden.
Bos, E. P. and Meijer, P. A. (eds.) (1992) On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy. Leiden–New York.
Boss, G. and Seel, G. (eds.) (1987) Proclus et son influence. Actes du colloque de Neuchâtel (juin 1985), avec une introduction de F. Brunner. Zurich.
Bossier, F. (1992) ‘Le Problème des lemmes du De caelo dans la traduction latine du commentaire in de caelo de Simplicius’, in Hamesse, J. (ed.), Les Problèmes posés par l’édition critique des textes anciens et médiévaux. Louvain-la-Neuve, 361–97.Google Scholar
Bossier, F., and Steel, C. (1972) ‘Priscianus Lydus en de In de Anima van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius’, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 34: 761–882.Google Scholar
Bossier, F. (1987) ‘Traductions latines et influences du Commentaire in De Caelo in Occident (XIIIe–XIVe s.)’, in Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Actes du Colloque International de Paris (28 Sept.–1 Oct. 1985). Berlin–New York, 289–325.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, J. (2005) ‘L’authenticité de la Lettre 84 de l’empereur Julien’, Revue de philologie 79, no. 2: 231–42.Google Scholar
Bouygues, M. (1924) ‘Notes sur des traductions arabes d’auteurs grecs’, Archives de philosophie 2. 3: 1–23.Google Scholar
,Bovo of Corvey. In Boethii Consolationem, ed. Huygens, R. B. C., in Sacris Erudiri 6 (1954) 373–427.Google Scholar
Bowen, Alan C. (2002) ‘Simplicius and the Early History of Greek Planetary Theory’, Perspectives on Science 10.2: 155–67.Google Scholar
Bowersock, Glen W. (1996) ‘The Vanishing Paradigm of the Fall of Rome’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 49: 29–43.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David (2004) Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge.
Bradshaw, David (2006) ‘Time and Eternity in the Greek Fathers’, The Thomist 70: 311–66.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, D. (2004) Aristotle East and West. Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge.
Brandt, S. (1903) ‘Entstehungszeit und zeitliche Folge der Werke von Boethius’, Philologus 62 (n.F. 16): 141–54, 234–75.Google Scholar
Brauch, T. (2002) ‘Notes on the Prefects of Constantinople AD 366–369’, Byzantion 72. 1: 42–104.Google Scholar
Bregman, A. Jay (1992) ‘Synesius, the Hermetica and Gnosis’, in Wallis, T. and Bregman, J. (eds.), Neoplatonism and Gnosticism. Albany, NY, 85–98.Google Scholar
Brenk, Frederick (2002) ‘Religion under Trajan: Plutarch’s Resurrection of Osiris’, in P. A. Stadter and L. Van der Stockt (eds.), Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 AD). Leuven, 73–92.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. (1986) ‘Materials for the Biography of Johannes Scottus Eriugena’, Studi Medievali, ser. 3a, 27: 413–60.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (1995) Orphée et l’Orphisme dans l’Antiquité gréco-romaine. Aldershot.
Brisson, Luc (1991) ‘Damascius et l’Orphisme’, in Borgeaud, P. (ed.), Orphisme et Orphée, textes réunis en l’honneur de Jean Rudhardt. Geneva, 157–209.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc (2008) ‘Famille, pouvoir, politique et argent dans l’école néoplatonicienne d’Athènes’, in Hugonnard-Roche, (2008) 29–41.
Brisson, Luc (1992) ‘Le Corps ‘dionysiaque’. L’anthropogonie décrite dans le Commentaire sur le Phédon de Platon (1, par. 3–6) attribué à Olympiodore est-elle orphique?’, in Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile, Madec, Goulven and O’Brien, Denis (eds.), σοφιησ μαιητορεσ. “Chercheurs de sagesse”. Hommage à Jean Pépin. Paris, 481–99.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2006) ‘The Doctrine of the Degrees of Virtues in the Neoplatonists: an Analyis of Porphyry’s Sentence 32, its Antecedents, and its Heritage’, in Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D. (eds.), Reading Plato in Antiquity. London, 89–105.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (1998) ‘Le monde byzantin et la philosophie grecque’, in Canto-Sperber, M. (ed.), Philosophie grecque. Paris, 745–79.Google Scholar
Brock, Sebastian (1973) ‘An Early Syriac Life of Maximus the Confessor’, Analecta Bollandianda 91: 299–346.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1982) ‘From Antagonism to Assimilation: Syriac Attitudes to Greek Learning’, in Garsoïan, N., Mathews, T., Thompson, R. (eds.), East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period. Washington, DC, 17–34.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1977) ‘Greek into Syriac and Syriac into Greek’, in Journal of the Syriac Academy 3: 406–22. [Repr. in idem, Syriac Perspectives in Late Antiquity. Aldershot 1984, 1997, 1–17.]Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1989) ‘Syriac Culture in the Seventh Century’, Aram 1: 268–80.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1993) ‘The Syriac Commentary Tradition’, in Burnett, Ch. (ed.), Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. London, 3–18. [Repr. in idem From Ephrem to Romanos. Interactions between Syriac and Greek in Late Antiquity. Ashgate 1999.]Google Scholar
Brock, S. (2003) ‘Syriac Translations of Greek Popular Philosophy’, in Bruns, P. (ed.), Von Athen nach Bagdad. Zur Rezeption griechischer Philosophie von der Spätantike bis zum Islam. Bonn, 9–28.Google Scholar
Brons, Bernhard (1976) Gott und die Seienden. Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von neuplatonischer Metaphysik und christlicher Tradition bei Dionysius Areopagita. Göttingen.
Brons, Bernhard (1977) ‘Pronoia und das Verhältnis von Metaphysik und Geschichte bei Dionysius Areopagita’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 24: 166–80.Google Scholar
Brown, Eric (2006) ‘Hellenistic Cosmopolitanism’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Malden, MA, 549–60. Brown, P. (1971a) ‘The Rise and Function of the Holy Man in Late Antiquity’, Journal of Roman Studies 61: 80–101.Google Scholar
Brown, Eric (1971b) The World of Late Antiquity. New York.
Brown, Eric (1992) Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison.
Brown, Eric (2007) ‘What’s in a Name?’, in The Opening of the Oxford Centre for Late Antiquity. Oxford, England: http://www.ocla.ox.ac.uk/pdf/brown what in name.pdf.Google Scholar
Brown, P. R. L. (1980) The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Center for Hermeneutical Studies. Protocol Series of the Colloquies 34 Berkeley, CA.
Browning, R. (1997) ‘Teachers’, in Cavallo, G. (ed.), The Byzantines. Chicago, IL, 95–116.Google Scholar
Buckley, Lisa Marie Esposito (1992) ‘Ecstatic and Emanating, Providential and Unifying: A Study of the Pseudo-Dionysian and Plotinian Concepts of Eros’, Journal of Neoplatonic Studies 1: 31–61.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. W. (1997) ‘The Dates and Editions of EusebiusChronici canones and Historia ecclesiastica’, Journal of Theological Studies n. s. 48: 471–504.Google Scholar
Burns, Thomas S. (1994) Barbarians within the Gates of Rome. Indianapolis, IN.
Burnyeat, M. F. (2002) ‘De anima II.5’, Phronesis 47. 28–90.Google Scholar
Burstein, Stanley M. (1996) ‘The Classics and the American Republic’, The History Teacher 30: 29–44.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1897) ‘The Nika Riot’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 17: 92–119.Google Scholar
Busine, Aude (2005) Paroles d’Apollon: Pratiques et traditions oraculaires dans l’Antiquité tardive (IIe–VIe siècles). Leiden–Boston, MA.
Alfarabi, The Harmonization of the Two Opinions of the Two Sages: Plato the Divine and Aristotle, in Alfarabi, The Political Writings. Selected Aphorisms and Other Texts, translated and annotated by Ch. Butterworth, (2001). Ithaca–London, 116–67.
Bydén, B. (2003) Theodore Metochites’ ‘Stoicheiosis Astronomike’ and the Study of Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Early Palaiologan Byzantium. Gothenburg.
Cürsgen, Dirk (2003) ‘Die Phantasietheorie des Damascius und ihre Stellung im neuplatonischen Denken’, in Dewender, Thomas and Welt, Thomas (eds.), Imagination – Fiktion – Kreation. Das kulturschaffende Vermögen der Phantasie. Munich–Leipzig, 99–113.Google Scholar
Cürsgen, Dirk (2007) Henologie und Ontologie: die metaphysische Prinzipienlehre des späten Neuplatonismus. Würzburg.
Cacouros, M. (1998) ‘De la pensée grecque à la pensée byzantine’, in Mattéi, J.-F. (ed.), Le discours philosophique. Paris, 1362–84.Google Scholar
Caiazzo, I. (1993) ‘La discussione sull’Anima Mundi nel secolo XII’, Studi filosofici 16: 27–62.Google Scholar
Caiazzo, I. (2002) Lectures médiévales de Macrobe. Les Glosae Colonienses super Macrobium. étude et édition. Paris.Google Scholar
Calcidius, . Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus, in societatem operis coniuncto P. J. Jensen, ed. Waszink, J. H. (1962). Plato. Latinus IV. London–Leiden.
Cameron, Alan (1968) ‘Gratian’s Repudiation of the Pontifical Robe’, Journal of Roman Studies 58: 96–102.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (1969) ‘Theodosius the Great and the Regency of Stilicho’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 73: 247–80.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (1974) ‘Claudian’, in Binns, J. W. (ed.), Latin Literature of the Fourth Century. London, 134– 59.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (1982) ‘The Empress and the Poet: Paganism and Poetics at the Court of Theodosius II’, Yale Classical Studies 27: 217–89.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (1987) ‘Earthquake 400’, Chiron 17: 343–60.Google Scholar
Cameron, A., Long, J. and Sherry, L. (1993) Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Berkeley, CA.
Cameron, Alan (1971) ‘La fin de l’Académie’, in de Vogel, Dörrie, and Brunn, zum (1971) 281–90.
Cameron, Alan (1969) ‘The Last Days of the Academy at Athens’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 195: 7–29.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1969–70) ‘Agathias on the Sassanians’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23: 67–183.Google Scholar
Camplani, Alberto, and Zambon, Marco (2002) ‘Il sacrificio come problema in alcune correnti filosofiche di età imperiale’, Annali di Storia dell’esegesi 19: 59–99.Google Scholar
Capitoli sulla carità, ed. Cesera-Gastaldo, A. (1963). Rome.
Cappuyns, M. (1933) Jean Scot Erigène: sa vie, son oeuvre, sa pensée. Louvain.
Carabine, D. (2000) John Scottus Eriugena. Oxford.
Cardullo, R. L. (1986) ‘Syrianus’ Lost Commentaries on Aristotle’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 33: 112–24.Google Scholar
Cardullo, R. L. (1987) ‘Siriano di Atene nella storiografia filosofica moderna e contemporanea’, Siculorum Gymnasium, 40: 71–182.Google Scholar
Cardullo, R. L. (1993a) ‘Syrianus défenseur de Platon contre Aristote selon le témoignage d’Asclépius (‘Métaphysique’ 433,9–436,6)’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), Contre Platon. I. Le Platonisme dévoilé. Paris, 197–214.Google Scholar
Cardullo, R. L. (1993b) ‘Giamblico nel ‘Commentario alla Metafisica’ di Siriano’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Clark, E. G. (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus. Philosopher and Man of Gods. London, 173–200.Google Scholar
Cardullo, R. L. (2003) ‘Come le frecce dei Traci. … Siriano contro Aristotele a proposito di due aporie di ‘Metafisica’ B sul soprasensibile’, in Celluprica, V. (ed.), Il libro B della Metafisica di Aristotele. Atti del colloquio, Roma, 30 novembre–1 dicembre 2000. Naples, 159–225.Google Scholar
Carmina. Latin and Greek text with English translation, (ed.) and trans. Herren, M.W. (1993). Scriptores Latini Hiberniae 12. Dublin.
Categoriae vel Praedicamenta, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1961). AL 1.1–2, Bruges–Paris.
Cavallo, G. (2006) Lire à Byzance. Paris.
Chadwick, Henry (1998) ‘Orthodoxy and Heresy from the Death of Constantine to the Eve of the First Council of Ephesus’, in Cameron, A. and Garnsey, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. XIII. Cambridge, 561–600.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. (1987) ‘Philoponus the Christian Theologian’, in Sorabji, (1987) 41–56.
Chadwick, H. (1981) Boethius: The Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology, and Philosophy. Oxford.
Chiaradonna, Riccardo (2000) ‘La teoria dell’individuo in Porfirio e l’ἰδίως ποιόν stoico’, Elenchos 21.2: 303–31.Google Scholar
Chodaczek, A. (1936) De Prisciani Lydi Solutionum Capite VI, Acta Seminarii Philologici II Universitatis Ionneo-Casimirianae Leopoliensis 1. Lwów.
Cholij, R. (2002) Theodore of Stoudite. The Ordering of Holiness. Oxford.
Chuvin, Pierre (1991) Chronique des derniers païens. La disparition du paganisme dans l’Empire romain, du règne de Constantin à celui de Justinien, 2ème éd. revue et corrigée. Paris [1re éd. 1990].
Asclepius. In Corpus Hermeticum II, ed. Nock, A. D. and trans. Festugière, A.-J. M.. Collection Budé. (1946). Paris.
Collection des alchimistes grecs, ed. Berthelot, M. (1887–8). Paris, II: 75–113; III: 69–104.
Combès, Joseph (1976) ‘Négativité et procession des principes chez Damascius’, Revue des études Augustiniennes 22: 114–33 [repr. in Bertier, Brisson and Combès (1977) 119–41, and in Combès (1989) 101–29].Google Scholar
Combès, Joseph (1977) ‘Damascius et les hypothèses négatives du Parménide. Du phénomène, des simulacres, des impossibles’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 61: 185–220 [repr. in Combès (1989) 131–87].Google Scholar
Combès, Joseph (1984) ‘Damascius’, in Huisman, A. J. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes. Paris, 664–7.Google Scholar
Combès, Joseph (1987) ‘Proclus et Damascius’, in Boss, G. and Seel, G. (eds.), Proclus et son influence. Actes du colloque du Neuchâtel, juin 1985. Zürich, 221–46 [repr. in Combès (1989) 245–71].Google Scholar
Combès, Joseph (1989) études néoplatoniciennes, Grenoble [2nd edn Grenoble, 1996].
Combès, Joseph (1994) ‘Hyparxis et Hypostasis chez Damascius’, in Romano, Francesco and Taormina, Daniela P. (eds.), Hyparxis e hypostatis nel neoplatonismo. Atti del I Colloquio internazionale del Centro di ricerca sul neoplatonismo, Università degli Studi di Catania, 1–3 ottobre 1992 (Lessico intellettuale europeo, 64). Florence, 131–47.Google Scholar
Combès, Joseph (1998) ‘Note sur critique et mystique d’après Damascius, dernier diadoque de l’ école Néoplatonicienne d’Athènes (ca 462–post 538)’, Théophilyon 3/2: 279–87.Google Scholar
Commentaire sur l’évangile de Jean. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes de Jeauneau, é. (1999). Réimpression avec additions et corrections. Sources Chrétiennes 180, Paris.
Commentaire sur le Manuel d’Epictète, I: chapîtres XI–XXIX, ed. Hadot, I. (2001). Paris.
Latin translation: Commentaire sur le Peri Hermeneias d’Aristote, trad. Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Verbeke, G. (1961). Louvain–Paris.
Commentaire sur le Timée, trad. et notes par Festugière, A.-J., 5 vols. (1966–8). Paris.
Mantissa (other extracts): Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en grec et autres épîtres, ed. BadawĪ, ʿA. (1971). Beirut.
In Meteor.: Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en grec et autres épîtres, ed. BadawĪ, ʿA. (1971). Beirut.
Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en grec et autres épĪtres, ed. BadawĪ, ʿlA. (1971). Beirut. 31–42.
Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermēneias, ed. Meiser, C., 2 vols. (1877, 1880). Leipzig.
Proclus, Commentarium in Platonis ‘Parmenidem’, in Procli Philosophi Platonici Opera inedita, ed. Cousin, V. (1864). Paris. 617–1258.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. Commentary on the Book of Causes trans. P., V. A. Guagliardo O., O.P., Ch. R. Hess, and Taylor, R. (1996). Washington, DC.
Comp. Timaei: Galeni Compendium Timaei Platonis aliorumque dialogorum synopsis quae extant fragmenta ediderunt Kraus, P. et Walzer, R. (1951). London. [Kraus Reprint, Nendeln 1973.]
,Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, De virtutibus et vitiis, ed. Büttner-Wobst, T. and Roos, A. G. (1906–10). Berlin.
Contreni, J. (1977) ‘The Irish “Colony” at Laon during the Time of John Scottus’, in Roques, (1977) 59–67.
Cooper, Stephen (1995) Metaphysics and Morals in Marius Victorinus’ ‘Commentary on the Letter to the Ephesians’: A Contribution to the History of Neoplatonism and Christianity. New York.
Cooperson, M. (2005) Al-Ma’mun. Oxford.
Corcoran, Simon (2006) ‘Before Constantine’, in Lenski, Noel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge, 35–58.Google Scholar
Corollaries on Place and Time [in Phys. 601–645; 773.8–800.25], trans. Urmson, J. O. (1992).
Eriugena, John Scottus. Periphyseon, ed. Jeauneau, é. (1996–2003). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis CLXI–CLXV.
Corpus Dionysiacum I. De Divinis Nominibus. Ed. Suchla, Beate Regina (1990). Berlin.
Corpus Dionysiacum II. De Coelesti Hierarchia, De Ecclesiastica Hierarchia, De Mystica Theologia, Epistulae. Heil, Ed. Günter and Ritter, Adolf Martin (1991). Berlin.
Ammonius. Commentaire sur le Peri Hermeneias d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Verbeke, G.. Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum II (1961). Louvain–Paris.
Corsini, Eugenio (1962) Il Trattato De Divinis Nominibus dello Pseudo-Dionigi e i commenti neoplatonici al Parmenide. Turin.
Cougny, E. (ed.) (1890) Epigrammatum Anthologia Palatina cum Planudeis et Appendice nova. Graece et Latine, vol. III, Paris.
Couloubaritsis, L. (1998) Histoire de la philosophie grecque et médiévale. Paris.
Courcelle, P. (1972) ‘Verissima philosophia’, in Fontaine, J. and Kannengiesser, C. (eds.), Epektasis. Mélanges patristiques offerts à Jean Daniélou. Paris, 653–9.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. (1969) Late Latin Writers and their Greek Sources, trans. Wedeck, H. E.. Cambridge, MA.
Courcelle, P. (1948) Les lettres grecques en Occident. De Macrobe à Cassiodore. Paris.
Courcelle, P. (1967) La Consolation de Philosophie dans la tradition littéraire. Antécédents et postérité de Boèce. Paris.
Coxon, A. H. (1968) ‘The Manuscript Tradition of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics I–IV’, Classical Quarterly 18: 70–5.Google Scholar
Crouse, R. (1980) ‘Semina Rationum: St Augustine and Boethius’, Dionysius 4: 75–85.Google Scholar
Crouse, R. (1996) ‘Primordiales Causae in Eriugena’s Interpretation of Genesis: Sources and Significance’, in Riel, Steel and McEvoy, (1996) 209–20.
Crouse, R. (2002) ‘Predestination, Human Freedom and the Augustinian Theology of History in Eriugena’s De Divina Praedestinatione’, in McEvoy, and Dunne, (2002) 303–11.
Crouse, R. (2004) ‘St Augustine, Semi-Pelagianism and the Consolation of Boethius’, Dionysius 22: 95–110.Google Scholar
Curta, Florin (2002) ‘Language, Ethne, and National Gods: A Note on Julian’s Concept of Hellenism’, Ancient World 33.1: 3–19.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, M.-T. (1977) ‘Les “Solutiones ad Chosroem” de Priscianus Lydus et Jean Scot’, in Jean Scot érigène et l’histoire de la philosophie. Paris, 145–60.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina (2005) ‘Greek into Arabic: Neoplatonism in Translation’, in Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge, 10–32.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2000a) ‘La doctrine des principes: Syrianus comme source textuelle et doctrinale de Proclus. Ière partie’, in Segonds, A.-Ph. and Steel, C. (eds.), Proclus et la ‘Théologie platonicienne’. Actes du colloque international de Louvain (13–16 mai 1998). Paris, 189–225.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2000b) ‘Syrianus dans la tradition exégétique de la ‘Métaphysique’ d’Aristote. Deuxième partie: Antécédents et postérité’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.), Le Commentaire entre tradition et in ovation. Actes du colloque international de l’Institut des traditions textuelles, Paris et Villejuif, 22–25 septembre 1999. Paris, 311–27.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina (2007) ‘The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. An Introduction’ in D’Ancona, Cristina (ed.), The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Proceedings of the Meeting of the European Science Foundation Network ‘Late Antiquity and Arabic Thought. Patterns in the Constitution of European Culture’ held in Strasbourg, March 12–14, 2004 under the impulsion of the Scientific Committee of the meeting, composed by Matthias Baltes†, Michel Cacouros, Cristina D’Ancona, Tiziano Dorandi, Gerhard Endreß, Philippe Hoffmann, Henri Hugonnard Roche. Leiden–Boston, XIII–XXXVI.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (1992) ‘La doctrine de la création mediante intelligentia dans le Liber de Causis et dans ses sources’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 76: 209–33.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (1995) ‘Al-Kindī et l’auteur du Liber de Causis’, in Recherches sur le Liber de Causis. Paris.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (1998) ‘Al-KindĪ on the Subject-Matter of the First Philosophy. Direct and Indirect Sources of al-Falsafa al-ūlā’, in Aertsen, J. A. and Speer, A. (eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses … der Société Internationale pour l’étude de la Philosophie Médiévale 25. bis 30. August 1997. Berlin–New York, 841–55.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (1999) ‘Aristotelian and Neoplatonic Elements in KindĪ’s Doctrine of Knowledge’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73: 9–35.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2001) ‘Pseudo-Theology of Aristotle, Chapter I: Structure and Composition’, Oriens. Zeitschrift der internationalen Gesellschaft für Orientforschung 36: 78–112.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (ed.) (2007) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Proceedings of the Meeting of the European Science Foundation Network ‘Late Antiquity and Arabic Thought. Patterns in the Constitution of European Culture’, Strasbourg, March 12–14, 2004. Leiden–Boston.
D’Ancona, C. (2008) ‘Aristotle and Aristotelianism’, in Encyclopaedia of Islam, 3rd edn. Leiden–Boston, 153–69.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. et al. (2003) Plotino. La discesa dell’anima nei corpi (IV 8[6]). Plotiniana Arabica (pseudo-Teologia di Aristotele, capitoli I e VII: ‘Detti dl Sapiente Greco’). Padua.
d’Hoine, P., Helmig, C., Macé, C. and Van Campe, L. under the direction of Steel, C. (2002) ‘Proclus: Fifteen Years of Research (1990–2004)’, Lustrum 44. Bibliography continued on the website http://www.hiw.kuleuven.be/dwmc/Plato/Proclus.Google Scholar
Dölger, F. (1953) ‘Zur Bedeutung von ϕιλόσοϕος und ϕιλοσοϕία in byzantinischer Zeit’, in Byzanz und die Europäische Staatenwelt. Ettal; repr. 1976, 197–208.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1975) De Jamblique à Proclus. Geneva.
Dörrie, H. (1959) Porphyrios’ ‘Symmikta Zetemata’, Munich.
Daiber, H. (1994) ‘Hellenistisch-kaiserzeitliche Doxographie und philosophischer Synkretismus in islamischer Zeit’, in ANRW II.36.7: 4974–92.Google Scholar
Damascii successoris Dubitationes et solutiones de primis principiis, in Platonis Parmenidem, 2 vols., ed. Ruelle, Ch. ém. (1889). Paris. [repr. Brussels 1964; Amsterdam 1966].
Damascii Vitae Isidori reliquiae edidit annotationibusque instruxit, ed. Zintzen, C. (1967). Hildesheim.
Damascius, Commentaire du Parménide de Platon, 4 vols., texte établi, traduit et annoté Westerink, L. G., Combès, J. and Segonds, A. Ph. (1997–2003). Paris [=In Parm.].
Damascius, Commentaire sur le Philèbe de Platon, texte établi, traduit et annoté, Riel, G., avec l’assistance de Caroline Macé et de Jacques Follon (2008). [= In Phil.].
Damascius, Des premiers principes: apories et résolutions, Introduction, notes et traduction du grec Galpérine, M.-C. (1987), Lagrasse.
Damascius, Despre primele principii: aporii şi solutii, traducere din greaca, introducere şi note, trans. Vlad, M. (2006). (Greek–Rumanian with introd. and annot.). Bucharest.
Damascius, The Philosophical History. Text with translation and notes, ed. Athanassiadi, P. (1999). Athens.
Damascius, Traité des Premiers Principes, 3 vol., texte établi, traduit et annoté Westerink, L. G. and Combès, J. (1986–91). Paris. [Hereafter Princ. indicates the references to the text, C-W refers to the comments and notes by Combès and Westerink].
Damascius. Lectures on the Philebus Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1959). Amsterdam.
Damascius. Lectures on the Philebus, wrongly attributed to Olympiodorus. Text, translation, notes and indices, Westerink, L. G. (1959). Amsterdam. [2nd edn Amsterdam 1982].
Damian, T. (2002) Theological and Spiritual Dimensions of Icons According to St. Theodore of Studion. Lewiston.
Das Leben des Philosophen Isidoros. Wiederhergestellt, übersetzt und erklärt, ed. Asmus, J. R. (1911). Leipzig.
Davidson, H. A. (1969) ‘John Philoponus as a Source of Medieval Islamic and Jewish Proofs of Creation’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 89: 357–91.Google Scholar
Davidson, A. (1987) Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York–Oxford.
Proclus, On the Eternity of the World. De Aeternitate Mundi, eds. Lang, H. S. and Macro, A. D.. Greek text with Introduction, transl. and comm. (2002). Berkeley, CA.
De arithmetica, eds. Oosthout, H. and Schilling, J. (1999). CCSL 94A.2. Turnhout.
De consolatione philosophiae, Opuscula theologica, ed. Moreschini, C., 2nd edn (2005). Munich–Leipzig.
De divina praedestinatione liber, ed. Madec, G. (1978). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 50. Turnhout.
De divisione, ed. Magee, J. (1998). Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
De Groot, J. (1991) Aristotle and Philoponus on Light. New York.
De Haas, F. A. J. (1997) John Philoponus’ New Definition of Prime Matter: Aspects of its Background in Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Leiden.
De Haas, F. A. J. (2000) ‘Recollection and Potentiality in Philoponus’, in Kardaun, M. and Spruijt, J. (eds.), The Winged Chariot. Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L.M. de Rijk. Leiden, 165–84.Google Scholar
De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. Obertello, L. (1969). Brescia.
De institutione musica, ed. Friedlein, G. (1867). Leipzig.
De interpretatione vel Periermenias, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1965). AL 2.1, Bruges–Paris.
De la division de la nature. Introduction, traduction et notes par Bertin, F., tome 1: livre I et livre II, tome 2: livre III, tome 3: livre IV (1995–2000). Paris.
de Libera, A. (2004) ‘La philosophie à Byzance’, in his, La Philosophie médiévale, 1st edn 1993. Paris, 9–51.Google Scholar
de los Reyes Ruiz Yamuza, Emilia (1981) ‘El concepto de mito en el neoplatonismo tardio. Olimpiodoro’, in clásicos, Sociedad Española Estudios (ed.), Unidad y pluralidad en el mundo antiguo. Actas del VI Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos 2, Madrid, 407–13.Google Scholar
De Pace, A. (1996) ‘Ficino e Plutarco: storia di un equivoco’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 51: 113–35.Google Scholar
De praedestinatione liber. Dialettica e teologia all’apogeo della rinascenza carolingia. Edizione critica, traduzione e commento a Mainoldi, E. S. N. (2003). Florence.
De sophisticis elenchis, ed. Dod, G. B. (1975). AL 6.1, Leiden–Brussels.
De syllogismo categorico, ed. Thörnqvist, C. Thomsen (2008). Gothenburg.
De topicis differentiis, ed. Nikitas, D. Z. (1990). Athens–Paris–Brussels.
Deakin, Michael (1994) ‘Hypatia and Her Mathematics’, The American Mathematical Monthly 101: 234–43.Google Scholar
Degen, R. (1981) ‘Galen im Syrischen: eine übersicht über die syrische überlieferung der Werke Galens’, in Nutton, V. (ed.), Galen. Problems and Prospects. London, 131–66.Google Scholar
Dekkers, Dom (1985) ‘Maxime le Confesseur dans la tradition latine’, in Laga, Carl et al. (eds.), After Chalcedon: Studies in Theology and Church History offered to Professor Albert Van Roey for his Seventieth Birthday. Louvain, 83–97.Google Scholar
Derda, T. et al. (2007) Alexandria Auditoria of Kom el-Dikka and Late Antique Education. Journal of Juristic Papyrology, Supp. VIII. Warsaw.
DeRijk, L. M. (1964) ‘On the Chronology of Boethius’Works on Logic I, II’, Vivarium 2: 1–49, 125–62.Google Scholar
Victor, Hugh of St.. Didascalicon, ed. by Buttimer, C. H. (1939). Washington, DC.
Die arabischen Fassungen von zwei Schriften des Alexander von Aphrodisias: über die Vorsehung und über das liberum arbitrium’, ed. Ruland, H.-J. (1976). Diss. Univ. Saarbrücken.
Die Doxographie des pseudo-Ammonius. Ein Beitrag zur neuplatonischen überlieferung im Islam, ed. Rudolph, U. (1989). Stuttgart.
Ref. Haeres.: Die Doxographie des pseudo-Ammonius. Ein Beitrag zur neuplatonischen überlieferung im Islam, ed. Rudolph, U. (1989). Stuttgart.
In Metaph. Lambda (lost in Greek): Die durch Averroes erhaltenen Fragmente Alexanders zur Metaphysik des Aristoteles, untersucht und übersetzt von Freudenthal, J. mit Beiträgen zur Erläuterung des arabischen Textes von Fränkel, S. (1885). Berlin.
Die mittelalterliche übersetzung der Stoicheiosis phusike des Proclus, ed. Boese, H. (1958). Berlin.
Die pseudo-aristotelische Schrift ueber das reine Gute bekannt unter dem Namen Liber de Causis, ed. Bardenhewer, O. (1882). Freiburg im Breisgau. [Repr. Frankfurt a.M. 1961.]
Die sogenannte Theologie des Aristoteles aus arabischen Handschriften zum ersten Mal herausgegeben, ed. Dieterici, F. (1882). Leipzig. [rist. Amsterdam 1965.]
Aetius Arabus. Die Vorsokratiker in arabischer überlieferung, ed. Daiber, H. (1980). Wiesbaden.
Die Weltenstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten, Teil II: Proklos, ed. Baltes, M. (1978). Leiden. 134–64.
,Dietrich of Freiberg. Tractatus de Intellectu et Intelligibili. In Dietrich von Freiberg, Opera Omnia I. Schriften zur Intellekttheorie, ed. Mojsisch, B., with an Introduction by Flasch, K. (1977). Hamburg.
Digeser, E. (1998) ‘Lactantius, Porphyry and the Debate over Religious Toleration’, Journal of Roman Studies 88: 129–46.Google Scholar
Digeser, E. (2000) The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome. Ithaca, NY.
Digeser, E. (2002) ‘Porphyry, Julian, or Hierokles? The Anonymous Hellene in Makarios Magnês’ Apocriticus’, Journal of Theological Studies 53: 466–502.Google Scholar
Digeser, E. (2004) ‘An Oracle of Apollo at Daphne and the Great Persecution’, Classical Philology 99: 57–77.Google Scholar
Digeser, E. (2006) ‘Lactantius, Eusebius and Arnobius: Evidence for the Causes of the Great Persecution’, Studia Patristica 39: 33–46.Google Scholar
Diller, A. (1951) ‘A Source of the Mirabiles Auscultationes’, Classical Philology 46. 239–40.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) The Middle Platonists. Ithaca, NY.
Dillon, J. M. (1987) ‘Iamblichus of Chalcis (c. 240–325 AD)’, ANRW II.36.2: 862–909.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2009) ‘The Architecture of the Intelligible Universe Revealed: Syrianus’ Exegesis of the second Hypothesis of the Parmenides’, in Longo, A. (ed.), Syrianus et la métaphysique de L’Antiquité tardives. Naples, 233–45.Google Scholar
Dillon, John M. (1996) ‘Damascius on the Ineffable’, Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie 78: 120–9 [repr. in Dillon (1997a), 120–9].Google Scholar
Dillon, John M. (1997a) The Great Tradition: Further Studies in the Development of Platonism and Early Christianity (Variorum collected studies series 599). Aldershot.
Dillon, John M. (1997b) ‘Some Aspects of Damascius’ Treatment of the Concept of Dynamis’, in Dillon (1997a), 139–48.
Dillon, John M. (1998) ‘Damascius (c. 462–540)’, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, II: 771–2.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1989) ‘Tampering with the Timaeus: Ideological Emendations in Plato, with Special Reference to the Timaeus’, American Journal of Philology 110: 54–72.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1990a) The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity. Aldershot–Brookfield, CT.
Dillon, J. (1990b) ‘Review of Hadot 1987’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 110: 244–5.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1992) ‘Plotinus at Work on Platonism’, Greece and Rome 29.2: 189–204.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1996) The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, 2nd edn. with a new Afterword. London; (1st edn 1977).
Dillon, J. (1999) ‘A Case Study in Commentary’, in Most, (1999) 206–22.
Dillon, J. (1997) ‘Iamblichus’ Noera TheŌria of Aristotle’s Categories’, Syllecta Classica 8: 65–77.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1947) ‘Theurgy and its Relationship to Neoplatonism’, Journal of Roman Studies 37: 55–68.Google Scholar
Dondaine, H. F. (1953) Le Corpus Dionysien de L’Université de Paris au XIIIe siècle. Rome.
Drake, H. A. (2000) Constantine and the Bishops. Baltimore, MD.
Duclow, D. (1977) ‘Divine Nothingness and Self-Creation in John Scottus Eriugena’; repr. in Duclow (2006) 23–39.
Duclow, D. (1994) ‘Isaiah Meets the Seraph: Breaking Ranks in Dionysius and Eriugena?’ in McGinn, and Otten, (1994) 233–52.
Duclow, D. (2006) Masters of Learned Ignorance: Eriugena, Eckhart, Cusanus. Aldershot.
Duclow, D. and Dietrich, P. (2006) ‘Hell and Damnation in Eriugena’, in Duclow, (2006) 121–38.
Dutton, P. (1986) ‘Eriugena the Royal Poet’, in Allard, (1986) 51–80.
Dutton, P. (2002) ‘Eriugena’s Workshop: The Making of the Periphyseon in Rheims 875’, in McEvoy, and Dunne, (2002) 141–67.
Dutton, P. E. (1997) ‘Material Remains of the Study of the Timaeus in the Later Middle Ages’, in Lafleur, C. (ed.), with the collaboration of J. Carrier, L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle. Autour du guide de l’étudiant du ms. Ripoll 109. Actes du colloque international. Turnhout, 203–30.Google Scholar
Dvornik, F. (1931) ‘La carrière universitaire de Constantin le philosophe’, Byzantinoslavica 3: 59–67.Google Scholar
Dvornik, F. (1974) Photian and Byzantine Ecclesiastic Studies. London.
Dvornik, F. (2002) ‘John of Damascus on Human Action, the Will, and Human Freedom’, in Ierodiakonou, (2002) 63–95.
Dzielska, Maria (1995) Hypatia of Alexandria, trans. Lyra., F.Cambridge, MA.
,Theodore the Stoudite, E. Auvray, S. Theodori Studitis Parva Catechesis (1891). Paris.
‘Commentary on Priscian’s Institutione grammaticae’, in Anneli, L., ‘Early Medieval Commentary on Priscian’s Institutione grammaticae’ (2000). Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-âge Grec et Latin 71: 115–88.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies, 3 vols. Leiden.
Ebbesen, S. (1981) ‘Analyzing Syllogisms or Anonymus Aurelianensis III – The (Presumably) Earliest Extant Latin Commentary on the Prior Analytics, and its Greek Model’, Cahiers de l’Institut du moyen-âge grec et latin (Copenhagen) 37: 1–20.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1990) ‘Boethius as an Aristotelian Commentator’, in Sorabji, (1990) 373–91.
Aristoteles’ De Anima. Eine verlorene spätantike Paraphrase in arabischer und persischer überlieferung, Arabischer text nebst Kommentar, ed. Arnzen, R. (1998). Leiden.–New York–Cologne.
El. theol.: Proclus Arabus. Zwanzig Abschnitte aus der Institutio Theologica in arabischer übersetzung, ed. Endress, G. (1973). Wiesbaden–Beirut.
Elm, Susanna (2003) ‘Hellenism and Historiography: Gregory of Nazianzus and Julian in Dialogue’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 33, no. 3: 493–515.Google Scholar
Elsner, Jás (1998) Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph: The Art of the Roman Empire AD 100–450. Oxford.
Endress, G. (1987) ‘Die wissenschaftliche Literatur’, in Grundriss der Arabischen Philologie II. Literaturwissenschaft hrsg. Gätje., von H.Wiesbaden, 400–530.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1990) ‘The Defense of Reason: the Plea for Philosophy in the Religious Community’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften 6: 1–49.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1991a) ‘Mattā ibn Yūnus’, in Encyclopédie de l’Islam, 2nd edn. Leiden–Paris, VI: 844–6.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1991b) ‘La “concordance entre Platon et Aristote”, l’Aristote arabe et l’émancipation de la philosophie en Islam médiéval’, in Mojsisch, B. and Pluta, O. (eds.), Historia Philosophiae Medii Aevi. Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, PA, 237–57.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1991c) ‘Der erste Lehrer. Der arabische Aristoteles und das Konzept der Philosophie im Islam’, in Tworuschka, U. (ed.), Gottes ist der Orient. Gottes ist der Okzident. Festschrift für A. Falaturi. Cologne–Vienna, 151–81.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1992) ‘Die wissenschaftliche Literatur’, in Grundriss der Arabischen Philologie III. Supplement, hrsg. von Fischer, W.. Wiesbaden, 103–45.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1997a) ‘The Circle of al-KindĪ. Early Arabic Translations from the Greek and the Rise of Islamic Philosophy’, in Endress, G. and Kruk, R. (eds.), The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism. Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Science dedicated to H. J. Drossaart Lulofs on his ninetienth birthday. Leiden, 43–76.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1997b) ‘L’Aristote arabe. Réception, autorité et transformation du Premier Maître’, Medioevo 23: 1–42.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (2003) ‘Mathematics and Philosophy in Medieval Islam’, in Hogendijk, J. P. and Sabra, A. I. (eds.), The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives. Cambridge, MA, 121–76.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (2007) ‘Building the Library of Arabic Philosophy. Platonism and Aristotelianism in the Sources of al-KindĪ’, in D’Ancona, (2007), 319–50.
Erhardt-Siebold, E. von and Erhardt, E. (1940) Cosmology in the Annotationes in Marcianum: More Light on Eriugena’s Astronomy. Baltimore, MD.
Erismann, C. (2002) ‘Generalis Essentia: La théorie érigénienne de l’ousia et le problème des universaux’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen âge 64: 7–37.Google Scholar
Eriugena’s Commentary on the Dionysian Celestial Hierarchy, trans. Rorem, P. (2005). Toronto. (Translations of major sections of the Expositiones in Ierarchiam coelestem are appended (180– 226), as well as John’s prologue to his translation of the Dionysian corpus (174–8) and of his poem, Lumine sidereo, 179.)
Esposito, M. (1918) ‘Priscianus Lydus and Johannes Scottus’, Classical Review 32: 21–3.Google Scholar
Eusebius Werke, ed. Klostermann, E.. 3rd edn, ed. Hansen, G. C. (1991). Berlin.
Eustratius, . In Primum Aristotelis Moralium ad Nicomachum. In The Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. In the Latin Translation of Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln (d. 1253), vol. I, ed. Mercken, H. P. F. (1973). Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum VI/1.
Evangelicae praeparationis libri XV, trans. Gifford, E. H. (1903). Oxford.
Evrard, E. (1960) ‘LeMaître de Plutarque d’Athènes et les origines du néoplatonisme athénien’, in L’Antiquité Classique 29: 108–33 and 391–406.Google Scholar
Exegetical works (fragments), in Staab, K. (ed.), Pauluskommentar aus der griechischen Kirche aus Katenenhandschriften gesammelt (1933). Münster, 653–61.Google Scholar
Expositiones in ierarchiam coelestem, ed. Barbet, J. (1975). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 31. Turnholt.
Exzerpte aus Proklos’ Enneadenkommentar bei Psellos’, ed. Westerink, L.D. (1959). Byzantinische Zeitschrift 52: 1–10 [reprint in L.G. Westerink, Texts and Studies in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Literature, (1980). Amsterdam. 21–30].Google Scholar
Fabro, C. (1982) ‘The Overcoming of the Neoplatonic Triad of Being, Life, and Intellect by Saint Thomas Aquinas’, in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. Albany, 97–108.Google Scholar
Faes de Mottoni, B. (1979) Il Platonismo medioevale. Turin.
Faggini, Giuseppe and Linguiti, Alessandro (2006) ‘Damascio’, in Enciclopedia filosofica, Fondazione Centro Studi Filosofici di Gallarate, vol. III. Milan, 2512–13.Google Scholar
Faucon, P. (1985) ‘Infrastructures philosophiques de la theodicée de Jean Damascène’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 69: 361–87.Google Scholar
Faucon de Boylesve, P. (1975) Aspects néoplatoniciens de la doctrine de saint Thomas d’Aquin. Lille–Paris.
Fazzo, S. (2004) ‘Aristotelianism as a Commentary Tradition’, in Adamson, Baltussen and Stone, 2004: I, 1–19.
Fazzo, S. (1989) ‘Alexandros d’Aphrodisias. Supplément’, DPhA Suppl., 64–70.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. (1969) ‘L’ordre de lecture des dialogues de Platon aux ve-vie siècles’, Museum Helveticum, 26: 281–96.Google Scholar
Festugière, André Jean (1963) ‘Modes de composition des Commentaires de Proclus’, Museum Helveticum 20: 77–100 [repr. études de philosophie grecque, Paris, 1971, 551–74].Google Scholar
Festugière, André Jean (1971) Etudes de philosophie grecque. Paris.
Festugière, A. J. (1948) ‘Un versméconnu des Oracles Chaldaeïques dans Simplicius, In de Caelo II.I, 284a14 (375.9 ss. Heiberg)’, Symbolae Osloenses 26: 75–7.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio, (2001–6). Platonic Theology, eds. Hankins, J. and Bowen, W., English trans. Allen, M. J. B. and Warden, J., 6 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Fiey, M. (1980) Chrétiens syriaques sous les Abbassides, surtout à Bagdad (749 – 1258). Louvain.
Finamore, John F. (1988) ‘θεοι θεων: An Iamblichean Doctrine in Julian’s Against the Galilaeans’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 118: 393–401.Google Scholar
Nicolaus Damascenus De Plantis. Five Translations, eds. Lulofs, H.-J. Drosaart and Poortman, E. L. J. (1989). Amsterdam.
Flückiger, Hansueli (2005) ‘The εφεκτικοι in the Commentators’, in Brancacci, Aldo (ed.), Philosophy and Doxography in the Imperial Age. Florence, 113–29.Google Scholar
Flamant, J. (1977) Macrobe et le néo-platonisme latin, à la fin du ive siècle. études Préliminaires aux Religions Orientales dans l’Empire Romain 28. Leiden.
,Florilegium of Patmos: Un traité de vie spirituelle et morale du XIe siècle. Le florilège sacro-profane du manuscrit 6 de Patmos, ed. Sargologos, E. (1990). Thessaloniki.
Florovsky, G. (1987) The Byzantine Fathers of the Sixth to Eighth Century. Belmont, MA.
Folkerts, M. (1970) Boethius’ Geometrie II: Ein mathematisches Lehrbuch des Mittelalters. Texte und Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der exakten Wissenschaften 9. Wiesbaden.
Fornara, C. W. (1992) ‘Studies in Ammianus Marcellinus II: Ammianus’ Knowledge and Use of Greek and Latin Literature’, Historia 41: 420–38.Google Scholar
Fortin, Ernest L. (1981) ‘Christianity and Hellenism in Basil the Great’s Address Ad adulescentes’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Markus, R. A. (eds.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. Essays in Honour of A. H. Armstrong. London, 189–203.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul (1992) ‘Where Was Simplicius?Journal of Hellenic Studies 112: 143.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. (1992) ‘Where was Simplicius?Journal of Hellenic Studies 112: 143.Google Scholar
Fournier, M. (2009) ‘Eriugena’s Five Modes (Periphyseon 443a–446A)’, Heythrop Journal581–9.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth (1982) ‘The Pagan Holy Man in Late Antiquity’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 33–59.Google Scholar
Nicolaus of Damascus Nicolaus Damascenus on the Philosophy of Aristotle. Fragments of the first five books translated from the Syriac with an introduction and commentary, ed. Lulofs, H.-J. Drossaart (1965). Leiden 1965.
Frammenti di una versione siriaca di un commento di Pseudo-Olimpiodoro alle Categorie di Aristotele, ed. Furlani, G. (1916), Rivista degli studi orientali 7:131–61.
Franz, Alison (1965) ‘From Paganism to Christianity in the Temples of Athens’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 19: 187–205.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987) ‘Numenius’, ANRW II.36.2: 1034–75.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (2002) ‘John of Damascus on Human Action, the Will, and Human Freedom’, in Ierodiakonou, Katerina (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources. Oxford, 63–95.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1997) ‘Euphrates of Tyre’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle and After. London, 1–11.Google Scholar
French, R. (ed.) (1994) Ancient Natural History: Histories of Nature. London–New York.
Freudenthal, G. (1990) ‘L’Introduction arithmétique de Nicomaque de Gérase dans les traditions syriaque, arabe et hébraïque’, DPhA IV: 690–4.Google Scholar
Translation (into Latin) of Priscianus Lydus. Solutions for Chosroem (Solutiones ad Chrosroem), in Marenbon, J., From the School of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre. Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge 1981, 193–4 and ‘Solution des problèmes proposés par Chosroes: traité inédit de Priscien le philosophe’. Bibliothèque de l’é cole des Chartres 4 (1853): 248–63.
Fuhrmann, M. and Gruber, J. (eds.) (1984) Boethius. Wege der Forschung 483. Darmstadt.
Furlani, Giuseppe (1916) ‘Frammenti di una versione siriaca di un commento di Pseudo-Olimpiodoro alle Categorie di Aristotele’, Rivista degli studi orientali 7: 131–61.Google Scholar
Furlani, Giuseppe (1992) ‘Aristoteles, de interpretatione, 16a, 6–7, nach einem syrisch erhaltenen Kommentar’, Zeitschrift für Semitistik und verwandte Gebiete 1.1: 34–7.Google Scholar
Furlani, Giuseppe (1923) ‘La versione e il commento di Giorgio delle Nazioni all’Organo aristotelico’, Studi Italiani di Filologia classica 3.1: 305–33.Google Scholar
Furrer-Pilliod, C. (2000) Ὅροι καί ὑπογραϕαί. Collections alphabétiques de definitions profanes et sacrées. Vatican City.
Gätje, H. (1982) ‘Simplikios in der arabischen überlieferung’, Der Islam 59: 6–31.Google Scholar
Günther, H.-Chr. (2007) Die Uebersetzung der Elementatio Theologica des Proklos und ihre Bedeutung für den Proklostext. Leiden.
Gabrieli, G. (1924) ‘Hunáayn ibn Ishâq’, Isis 6: 282–92.Google Scholar
De Mor.: ‘Galeni Ethica’, ed. Kraus, P., Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Egypt 5 (1937) 1–51.Google Scholar
Galonnier, A. (ed.) (2003) Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs: Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac: Paris, 8–12 juin 1999. Philosophes médiévaux 44. Louvain-la-Neuve–Leuven–Paris.
Galonnier, A. (ed.) (2007) Boèce: Opuscula sacra I: Capita dogmatica (Traités II, III, IV). Philosophes médiévaux 47. Louvain-la-Neuve–Leuven–Paris.
Galpèrine, Marie-Claire (1971) ‘Damascius et la théologie négative’, in de Vogel, Dörrie and Brunn, zum (1971) 261–3.
Galpèrine, Marie-Claire (1980) ‘Le temps intégral selon Damascius’, Les études Philosophiques 3: 325–41.Google Scholar
Galpèrine, Marie-Claire (1990) ‘Damascius entre Porphyre et Jamblique’, Philosophie 26: 41–58.Google Scholar
Ganson, T. (2002) ‘A Puzzle concerning the Aristotelian Notion of a Medium of Sense-Perception’, in Fortenbaugh, W.W. and Wöhrle, G. (eds.), On the Opuscula of Theophrastus. Akten der 3. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 19.-23. Juli 1999 in Trier. Stuttgart, 65–73.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1958) Studi sul Platonismo medievale. Florence.
Gauthier, R.-A. (1954) ‘Saint Maxime le Confesseur et la psychologie de l’acte humain’, Recherches de théologie anciennne et médiévale 21: 51–100.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R.-A. and Jolif, J. Y. (1970) ‘La thème de la volonté (thelēsis): Saint Maxime’, in edem, (eds.), L’éthique à Nicomaque: Introduction, traduction et commentaire, 2 vols., vol. I, part 1, 255–66. Paris.Google Scholar
Gavray, M.-A. (2007) Simplicius lecteur du Sophiste. Contribution à l’étude de l’exégèse néoplatonicienne. études et Commentaires, 108, Paris.
Geanakoplos, Deno (1976) ‘Maximos the Confessor and His Influence on Eastern and Western Theology and Mysticism’, in idem, (ed.), Interaction of the ‘Sibling’ Byzantine and Western Cultures in the Middle Ages and Italian Renaissance. New Haven–London, 133–45.Google Scholar
Geerard, M. (1979) Clavis patrum Graecorum vol. III: A Cyrillo Alexandrino ad Iohannem Damascenum. Turnhout.
Geerlings, W. and Schulze, Ch. (eds.) (2002–4) Der Kommentar in Antike und Mittelalter. Beiträge zu seiner Erforschung, 2 vols. Leiden.
Geffcken, J. (1932) ‘Zur Entstehung und zum Wesen des Griechischen Wissenschaftlichen Kommentars’, Hermes 67: 397–412.Google Scholar
Geoffroy, M. (2002) ‘Le tradition arabe du περὶ νοῦ d’Alexandre d’ Aphrodise et les origines de la théorie farabienne des quatre degrés de l’intellect’, in D’Ancona, C. and Serra, G. (eds.), Aristotele e Alessandro di Afrodisia nella tradizione araba. Padua, 191–231.Google Scholar
,George the Monk, A Short Chronicle: Georgius Monachus, Chronicon, ed. Boor, C. and (rev.) Wirth, P. (1978). Stuttgart.
,Germanos I of Constantinople, A Discourse on the Holy Icons: Darrouzès, J., ‘Deux textes inédits du patriarche Germain I’, Revue des études Byzantines 45 (1987) 5–13.Google Scholar
,Germanos I of Constantinople, On Predestined Terms of Life: PG 98, 89–132 – Garton, C. and Westerink, L. G., Germanos On Predestined Terms of Life [Arethusa Monographs 7] (1979). Buffalo, NY.
,Germanos I of Constantinople, Mystical Theory and Ecclesiastical History: PG 98, 384–453 – Meyendorff, P. (trans.), St Germanus of Constantinople on the Divine Liturgy (1984). Crestwood, NY.
Gersh, S. E. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. The Latin Tradition. Edited by McInerny, Ralph. 2 vols, Publications in Medieval Studies. Notre Dame, IN.
Gersh, Stephen (1978) From Iamblichus to Eriugena. An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden.
Gersh, S. (1980) ‘Omnipresence in Eriugena. Some Reflections on Augustino-Maximian Elements in Periphyseon’, in Beierwaltes, (1980) 55–74.
Gersh, S. (1990) ‘The Structure of the Return in Eriugena’s Periphyseon’, in Beierwaltes, (1990b) 108–25.
Gersh, S. (2006) ‘Eriugena’s Fourfold Contemplation: Idealism and Arithmetic’, in Gersh, and Moran, (2006) 151–67.
Gersh, S. and Moran, D. (eds.) (2006) Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame, IN.
Gersh, S. (1978) From Iamblichus to Eriugena. An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden.
Gersh, S. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. The Latin Tradition. 2 volumes. Notre Dame, IN.
Gersh, S. (1996) Concord in Discourse. Harmonics and Semiotics in Early Medieval Platonism. Berlin–New York.
Gersh, S. (2001) ‘Berthold of Moosburg on the Content and Method of Platonic Philosophy’, in Aertsen, J. A., Emery, K. Jr., and Speer, A. (eds.), Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris in letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte. Berlin–New York493–503. [Reprinted in Reading Plato, Tracing Plato.]Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (2003) ‘Proclus’ Commentary on the Timaeus. The PrefatoryMaterial’, in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 78. London, 143–53. [Reprinted in Reading Plato, Tracing Plato.]Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (2005) Reading Plato, Tracing Plato. From Ancient Commentary to Medieval Reception. Aldershot.
Gersh, S. and Hoenen, M. J. F. M. (eds.) (2002) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages. A Doxographic Approach. Berlin–New York.
Gerson, L. P. (1997) ‘Ἐπιστροϕὴ πρὸς ἑαυτόν: History and Meaning’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 1–32.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2005) Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca, NY–London.
Giannakis, E. (1993) ‘The Structure of Abū l-Ḥusayn al-BaṣrĪ’s Copy of Aristotle’s Physics’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften 8: 251–8.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. (1969) ‘The Study of the Timaeus in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries’, Pensamiento 25: 183–94.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. (ed.) (1981) Boethius. His Life, Thought, and Influence. Oxford.
,Gilbert of Poitiers. Expositio Contra Euticen et Nestorium. In The Commentaries on Boethius, ed. Häring, N. M. (1966). Toronto.
,Gilbert of Poitiers. Expositio in De Trinitate. In The Commentaries on Boethius, ed. Häring, N.M. (1966). Toronto.
Gill, C. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford–New York.
Gillett, Andrew (2007) ‘Rome’s Fall and Europe’s Rise: A View from Late Antiquity’, The Medieval Review 07.10.12.Google Scholar
Giovanni Filopono matematico. Tra neopitagorismo e neoplatonismo. Commentario alla Introduzione Aritmetica di Nicomaco di Gerasa, ed. Giardina, G.R. (1999) (Symbolon. Studi e testi di filosofia antica e medievale 20). Catania.
Glossae divinae historiae. The Biblical Glosses of John Scottus Eriugena, eds. Contreni, J. J. and Néill, P. P. ó (1997). Tavarnuzze–Florence.
Golitsis, P. (2007) ‘Nicéphore Blemmyde Lecteur du Commentaire de Simplicius à la Physique d’Aristote’, in D’Ancona, (2007) 242–56.
Golitsis, P. (2008) Les Commentaires de Simplicius et de Jean Philopon à la Physique d’Aristote: tradition et innovation. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina. Quellen und Studien; Bd. 3. Berlin–New York.
Golitzin, Alexander (1990) ‘“On the Other Hand”: A Response to Father Paul Wesche’s Recent Article on Dionysius’, St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 34: 305–23.Google Scholar
Golitzin, Alexander (1993) ‘The Mysticism of Dionysius Areopagite: Platonist or Christian?’ Mystics Quarterly 19: 98–114.Google Scholar
Golitzin, Alexander (1994) Et Introibo ad Altare Dei: The Mystagogy of Dionysius Areopagita, with Special Reference to its Predecessors in the Eastern Christian Tradition. Thessalonica.
Golitzin, Alexander (1995) Review of Pseudo-Dionysius: A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence, by Rorem, Paul. Mystics Quarterly 21: 28–38.Google Scholar
Golitzin, Alexander (2003) ‘Suddenly, Christ: The Place of Negative Theology in the Mystagogy of Dionysius Areopagites’, in Kessler, M. and Sheppard, C. (eds.), Mystics: Presence and Aporia. Chicago, IL, 8–37.Google Scholar
Gordon, Richard (1990a) ‘Religion in the Roman Empire: The Civic Compromise and Its Limits’, in Beard and North (1990) 235–55. (1990b) ‘The Veil of Power: Emperors, Sacrificers and Benefactors’, in Beard and North (1990) 201–34. Goulet, R. (2000) ‘Prohérésius le païen et quelques remarques sur la chronologie d’Eunape de Sardes’, Antiquíté tardive 8: 209–22.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. and Aouad, M. (1989) ‘Alexandros d’Aphrodias’, DPhA I: 125–39.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile, Madec, Goulven and O’Brien, Denis (eds.) (1992) Sophiès Maiètores: Chercheurs de sagesse. Hommage à Jean Pépin. Paris.
Grant, Robert M. (1988) Greek Apologists of the Second Century. Philadelphia, PA.
Green, R. P. H. (1985) ‘Still Waters Run Deep: A New Study of the Professors of Bordeaux’, Classical Quarterly 35: 491–506.Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. (1995) ‘Proba’s Cento: Its Date, Purpose and Reception’, Classical Quarterly 45, no. 2: 551–63.Google Scholar
Gregory, T. (1955) Anima Mundi. La filosofia di Guglielmo di Conches e la scuola di Chartres. Florence.
Gregory, T. (1958) Platonismo medievale. Studi e ricerche. Rome.
Gregory, T. (1961) ‘Platone e Aristotele nello Speculum di Enrico Bate di Malines. Note in margine a una recente edizione’, Studi Medievali serie 3.2: 302–19.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (1997–8) ‘Boethius 1925–1998 I, II’, Lustrum 39: 307–83; 40: 199–259.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (2006) Kommentar zu Boethius, De consolatione philosophiae. Texte und Kommentare 9, 2nd edn. Berlin–New York.
Gudeman, A. and Kroll, W. (1916) ‘Ioannes Philoponus’, RE IX, 2: 1764–95.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dmitri (1998) Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Greco–Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ’Abbāsid Society (2nd–4th/8th–10th Centuries). London.
Gutas, D. (1998) Greek Thought, Arabic Culture. The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ’Abbāsid Society (2nd–4th/8th–10th centuries). London.
Gutas, D. (1983) ‘Paul the Persian on the Classification of the Parts of Aristotle’s Philosophy: a Milestone between Alexandria and Bagdad’, Der Islam 60: 231–67.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1985) ‘The Starting Point of Philosophical Studies in Alexandrian and Arabic Aristotelianism’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P., and Long, A. A. (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work. New Brunswick, NJ, 115–23.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1988) Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Works. Leiden–New York–Cologne–Copenhagen.
Gutas, D. (1994) ‘Pre-Plotinian Philosophy in Arabic (other than Platonism and Aristotelianism): A Review of the Sources’, in ANRW II.36.7: 4939–73.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1999) ‘The ‘Alexandria to Baghdad’ Complex of Narratives. A Contribution to the Study of Philosophical and Medical Historiography among the Arabs’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 10: 155–93.
Gutas, D. (2006) ‘The Greek and Persian Background of Early Arabic Encyclopedism’, in Endress, G. (ed.), Organizing Knowledge. Encyclopaedic Activities in the Pre-Eighteenth Century IslamicWorld. Leiden, 91–101.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962–81) A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. Cambridge.
Hägg, T. (1975) Photios als Vermittler antiker Literatur. Uppsala.
Hällström, Gunnar (1994) ‘The Closing of the Neoplatonic School in A.D. 529: An Additional Aspect’, in Castrén, Paavo (ed.), Post-Herulian Athens. Aspects of Life and Culture in Athens A.D. 267–529. Helsinki, 141–60.Google Scholar
Hällström, G. (1994) ‘The Closing of the Neoplatonic School in A.D. 529: An Additional Aspect’, in Castrén, Paavo (ed.), Post-Herulian Athens. Aspects of Life and Culture in Athens A.D. 267–529. Helsinki, 141–65.Google Scholar
Hällström, G.A. (1994) ‘The Closing of the Neoplatonic School in A.D. 529: an Additional Aspect’, in Castrén, P. (ed.), Post-Herulian Athens. Aspects of Life and Culture in Athens A.D. 267–529. Helsinki, 141–60.Google Scholar
Hüttig, A. (1990) Macrobius im Mittelalter. Ein Beitrag zur Rezeptionsgeschichte der Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis. Frankfurt am Main–New York.
Haas, Christopher (1997) Alexandria in Late Antiquity. Baltimore, MD.
Haas, C. (1997) Alexandria in Late Antiquity. Topography and Social Conflict. Baltimore–London.
Hadot, Ilsetraut (1990) ‘The Life and Work of Simplicius in Greek and Arabic Sources’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. Ithaca, NY, 275–303.Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut (2004) Studies on the Neoplatonist Hierocles, trans. Chase., John MichaelPhiladelphia, PA.
Hadot, P. (1960) ‘Citations de Porphyre chez Augustin. à propos d’un ouvrage récent’, Revue des études Augustiniennes 6: 205–44.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1987) ‘La division néoplatonicienne des écrits d’Aristote’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung Paul Moraux gewidmet, II. Berlin, 249–85.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1991) ‘The Role of the Commentaries on Aristotle in the Teaching of Philosophy According to the Prefaces of the Neoplatonic Commentaries on the “Categories”’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Aristotle and the Later Tradition. Oxford, 175–89.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1979) ‘Les divisions des parties de la philosophie dans l’Antiquité’, Museum Helveticum, 36: 201–23.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1978) Le Problème du néoplatonisme alexandrin. Hiéroclès et Simplicius. Paris.
Hadot, Ilsetraut (1996) Simplicius, Commentaire sur le Manuel d’Epictète, introduction et édition critique du texte grec. Leiden.
Hadot, Ilsetraut (2005) Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique. Contribution à l’histoire de l’éducation et de la culture dans l’Antiquité, seconde édition revue et considérablement augmentée. Paris.
Hadot, I. (1987a) Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Berlin–New York.
Hadot, I. (1987b) ‘Recherches sur les fragments du commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote’, in Hadot, (1987a) 225–45.
Hadot, I. (1990) ‘The Life and Works of Simplicius in Greek and Arabic Sources’, in Sorabji (1990) 275–303.
Hadot, I. (1996) Commentaire sur le Manuel d’Epictète (introduction et édition critique du texte grec). (Philosophia Antiqua vol. 66.) Leiden.
Hadot, I. (1997) ‘Le Commentaire philosophique continu dans l’Antiquité’, Antiquité Tardive 5: 169–76.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2001a) Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristote, Chapître 1. Leiden.
Hadot, I. (2001b) ‘Simplikios’, Der Neue Pauly vol. 11. Stuttgart, 578–80.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2002a) ‘Der fortlaufende philosophische Kommentar’, in Geerlings, W. and Schulz, C. (eds.), Der Kommentar in Antike und Mittelalter. Beiträge zu seiner Erforschung. Leiden, 184–99.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2002b) ‘Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima (CAG XI): A Methodological Study’, Mnemosyne 50.2: 159–99.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2003) ‘Der philosophische Unterrichtsbetrieb in der romischen Kaiserzeit’, Rheinisches Museum 146.1: 49–71.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2004) ‘“Simplicius”, in Cat., p. 1,3–3,17 Kalbfleisch. An Important Contribution to the History of the Ancient Commentary’, Rheinisches Museum 147.3–4: 408–20.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. and Hoffmann, Ph. (eds.) (1990) Simplicius. Commentaire sur les catégories. Fascicule 1: Introduction, première partie (p. 1–9,3 Kalbfleisch), traduction commentée. Leiden.
Hadot, P. (2004) Apprendre à philosopher dans l’antiquité: l’enseignement du ‘Manuel’ d’Epictète et son commentaire néoplatonicien. Paris.
Hadot, I. (1987) ‘The Life and Work of Simplicius in Greek and Arabic Sources’, in Sorabji, (1990) 275–303.
Hadot, I. (1982) ‘La doctrine de Simplicius sur l’âme raisonnable humaine dans le Commentaire sur le Manuel d’épictète’, in Blumenthal, H.J. and Lloyd, A.C. (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism. Liverpool, 46–71.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1987a) ‘La vie et l’oeuvre de Simplicius d’après des sources grecques et arabes’, in Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Actes du colloque international de Paris, 1985 [Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus, 15]. Berlin, 3–39.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1987b) ‘Recherches sur les fragments du commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote’, in Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Berlin–NY, 225–45.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1997) ‘Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens: sensation (αἴσθησις), sensation commune (κοινὴ αἴσησις), sensibles communs (κοινὰ αἰσθητά) et conscience de soi (συναίσθησις)’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8. 33–86.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2002) ‘Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima (CAG XI): a Methodological Survey’, Mnemosyne 55: 159–99.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1959) ‘Un fragment du commentaire perdu de Boèce sur les Catégories d’Aristote dans le codex Bernensis 363’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 26, 11–27. (Repr. in Hadot (1999) 383–410.)Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1971) Marius Victorinus: Recherches sur sa vie et ses oeuvres. Paris.
Hadot, P. (1999) Plotin, Porphyre: études néoplatoniciennes. Paris.
Hadot, P. (1963) ‘La distinction de l’être et de l’étant dans le De hebdomadibus de Boèce’, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 2: Die Metaphysik im Mittelalter. Berlin, 147–53.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1970) ‘Forma essendi. Interprétation philologique et interprétation philosophique d’une formule de Boèce’, Les études classiques 38: 143–56.Google Scholar
Haehling, Raban von (1982) ‘Heiden im griechischen Osten des 5. Jahrhunderts nach Christus’, Römische Quartalschrift für Christliche Altertumskunde und Kirchengeschichte 77: 52–85.Google Scholar
Hainthaler, T. (1975) ‘John Philoponus, Philosopher and Theologian in Alexandria’, in Grillmeier, Aloys and Bowden, John (eds.), Christ in Christian Tradition. Westminster, John Knox, 107–46.Google Scholar
Hainthaler, T. (1990) ‘Johannes Philoponos, Philosoph und Theologe in Alexandria’, in Grillmeier, A. (ed.), Jesus der Christus im Glauben der Kirche, II.4. Freiburg, 109–49.Google Scholar
Hall, J. J. (1971) ‘“Planets” in Simplicius De Caelo 471,1 ff.’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 91: 138–9.Google Scholar
Halleux, Robert (1974) Le problème des métaux dans la science antique. Paris.
Hammerschmidt, E. (1955) ‘Einige philosophische-theologische Grundbegriffe bei Leontios von Byzanz, Johannes von Damaskus und Theodor Abu Qurra’, Ostkirchliche Studien 4: 147–54.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. (1997) ‘Aquinas, Pseudo-Denys, Proclus and Isaiah VI.6’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen âge 64: 59–93.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. (1998) ‘Augustinian Immediacy and Dionysian Mediation in John Colet, Edmund Spenser, Richard Hooker and the Cardinal de Bérulle’, in Courcelles, D., Augustinus in der Neuzeit. Turnhout, 125–60.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. (2002) ‘Secundum rei vim vel secundum cognoscentium facultatem: Knower and Known in the Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius and the Proslogion of Anselm’, in Inglis, (2002) 126–50.
Hankey, W. (2004) ‘Participatio divini luminis, Aquinas’ Doctrine of the Agent Intellect: Our Capacity for Contemplation’, Dionysius 22: 149–78.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. (2008) ‘Misrepresenting Neoplatonism in Contemporary Christian Dionysian Polemic: Eriugena and Nicholas of Cusa versus Vladimir Lossky and Jean-Luc Marion’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82.4: 683–703.Google Scholar
Hardy, B. Carmon (1968) ‘The Emperor Julian and His School Law’, Church History 37.2: 131–43.Google Scholar
Harl, Wolfgang (1997) Arcadius Apis Imperator: Synesios von Kyrene und sein Beitrag zum Herrscherideal der Spätantike. Stuttgart.
Harnack, Adolph von (1916) ‘Porphyrius, Gegen die Christen. 15 Bücher; Zeugnisse, Fragmente, und Referate’, Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Harrington, Michael (2001) ‘Anastasius the Librarian’s Readings of the Greek Scholia on the Pseudo-Dionysian Corpus’, Studia Patristica 36: 119–25.Google Scholar
Harrington, L. M. (1998) ‘Unusquisque in suo sensu abundet: Human Perspective in Eriugena’s Periphyseon’, Dionysius 16: 123–40.Google Scholar
Harrington, L. M. (2004) A Thirteenth-Century Textbook of Mystical Theology at the University of Paris. The Mystical Theology of Dionysius the Areopagite in Eriugena’s Latin Translation with the Scholia translated by Anastasius the Librarian and Excerpts from Eriugena’s Periphyseon. Paris–Leuven–Dudley, MA.
Harrington, L. M. (2005) ‘The Drunken Epibolē of Plotinus and its Reappearance in the Work of Dionysius the Areopagite’, Dionysius 23: 117–38.Google Scholar
Hasnaoui, A. (1994) ‘Alexandre d’Aphrodisias vs Jean Philopon: notes sur quelques traités d’Alexandre “perdus” en grec, conservés en arabe’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4: 53–109.Google Scholar
Hasnaoui, A. (1997) ‘Deux textes en arabe sur les preuves platoniciennes de l’immortalité de l’ âme’, Medioevo 23: 395–408.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Ronald F. (1969) Hierarchy and the Definition of Order in the Letters of Pseudo-Dionysius. The Hague.
Heather, P. (1988) ‘The Anti-Scythian Tirade of Synesius’ De regno’, Phoenix 42. 2: 152–72.Google Scholar
Heather, P. (1991) Goths and Romans, 332–489. Oxford.
Heather, P. (1998) ‘Themistius: A Political Philosopher’, in Whitby, Mary (ed.), The Propaganda of Power: the Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Leiden–Boston, MA, 125–50.Google Scholar
Heather, P. (2005) The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford.
Heiberg, J. L. (1916) ‘Nyplatoniske Kommentarer til Platons Phaidon’, Nordiske tidsskrift for filologi 4th series, 5: 15–21.Google Scholar
Heilman, A. (2007) Boethius’ Musiktheorie und das Quadrivium. Göttingen.
Hein, Ch. (1985) Definition und Einteilung der Philosophie. Von der spätantiken Einleitungsliteratur zur arabischen Enzyklopädie. Frankfurt–Bern–New York.
Heliodori, ut dicitur, in Paulum Alexandrinum commentarium, eds. Boer, æ., Neugebauer, O. and Pingree, D. (1962). Leipzig.
Henrichs, A. (1968) ‘Philosophy, the Handmaiden of Theology’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 9: 437–50.Google Scholar
Henry, R. (1934) ‘Proclus et la vocabulaire technique de Photius’, Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 13: 615–27.Google Scholar
Herren, M. (1986) ‘The Commentary on Martianus Attributed to John Scottus: Its Hiberno-Latin Background’, in Allard, (1986) 265–86.
Herren, M. (ed. and trans.) (1993) Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Carmina. Dublin.
Hinds, M. (1993) Miḥna, in Encyclopédie de l’Islam, 2nd edn. Paris–Leiden, VII.Google Scholar
Hitherto Unknown Arabic Extracts from Proclus’ Stoikeiosis theologike and Stoikeiosis physike’, ed. Pines, S., in The Collected Works of Shlomo Pines, II. Studies in Arabic Versions of Greek Texts and in Medieval Science (1986). Leiden–Jerusalem, 287–93.Google Scholar
Hoenen, M. J. F. M. and Nauta, L. (eds.) (1997) Boethius in the Middle Ages. Latin and Vernacular Traditions of the Consolatio Philosophiae. Leiden–New York.
Hoffmann, Philippe (1987) ‘Simplicius’ Polemics’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P.H. (1992–3) ‘Théologies et mystiques de la Grèce hellénistique et de la fin de l’Antiquité’, Annuaire de l’é cole Pratique des Hautes études. Section des Sciences Religieuses 101: 241–7.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Philippe (1994) ‘Damascius’, in Goulet, Richard (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. II. Paris, 541–93.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Philippe (1997) ‘L’expression de l’indicible dans le néoplatonisme grec de Plotin à Damascius’, in Lévy, C. and Pernot, L. (eds.), Dire l’évidence (philosophie et rhétorique antiques). Paris, 335–90.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (1987a) ‘Aspects de la polémique de Simplicius contre Philopon’, in Hadot, (1987a) 183–221.
Hoffmann, P. (1987b) ‘Simplicius’ Polemics’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. London, 57–83.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (2000a) ‘Les Catégories aristotéliciennes pote et pou d’après le commentaire de Simplicius. Méthode d’exégèse et aspects doctrinaux’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.), Le commentaire entre tradition et innovation. Paris, 355–76.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (2000b) ‘Bibliothèques et formes du livres à la fin de l’Antiquité. Le témoignage de la littérature néoplatonicienne des Ve et VIe siècles’, in Pratto, G. (ed.), I Manoscritti greci tra riflessione e debattito. Florence, 601–32.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. (2006) ‘What was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Blackwells Companions to Philosophy. Malden, MA–Oxford, 597–622.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Ph. (1987) ‘Simplicius’ Polemics. Some Aspects of Simplicius’ Polemical Writings against John Philoponus: from Invective to a Reaffirmation of the Transcendency of the Heavens’, in Sorabji, (1987) 57–83.
Holum, K. (1982) Theodosian Empresses. Berkeley, CA.
Homily of John Scot, the Translator of the Hierarchy of Dionysius. Trans. O’Meara, J. J., in O’Meara, J. J., Eriugena (1988). Oxford. 158–76.Google Scholar
Hornus, J. M. (1990) ‘La philosophie grecque de 415–750’, in Fløistad, G. (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy. A New Survey, 6/2. Dordrecht, 605–38.Google Scholar
Hornus, J.-M. (1970) ‘Le corpus dionysien en syriaque’, La Parole de l’Orient 1: 69–93.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (1993) ‘Priscian of Lydia as Evidence for Iamblichus’, in Blumenthal, H.J. and Clark, E.G., (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus. Philosopher and Man of Gods. London, 5–13.Google Scholar
Huby, P. and Gutas, D. (1999) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary 4: Psychology. Philosophia Antiqua 81. Leiden.
Hugonnard-Roche, Henri (ed.) (2008) L’enseignement supérieur dans les mondes antiques et médiévaux (Textes et traditions, 16). Paris.
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1989) ‘L’Organon. Tradition syriaque et arabe’, DPhA 1: 502–28.Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1993) ‘Remarques sur la tradition arabe de l’Organon d’après le manuscrit Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, ar. 2346’, in Burnett, Ch. (ed.), Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. London, 19–28.Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1994) ‘Les traductions syriaques de l’Isagoge de Porphyre et la constitution du corpus syriaque de logique’, Revue d’Histoire des Textes 24: 293–312. [Repr. in idem, La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque.études sur la transmission des textes de l’Organon et leur interprétation philosophique. Paris, 2004, 79–122.]Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1997a) ‘Note sur Sergius de Rešʿainā, traducteur du grec en syriaque et commentateur d’Aristote’, in Endress, G., Kruk, R. (eds.), The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism, Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences dedicated to H. J. Drossaart Lulofs on his Ninetieth Birthday. Leiden, 121–43 [Repr. in idem, La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque, Paris, 2004, 123–42.]Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1997b) ‘Les Catégories d’Aristote comme introduction à la philosophie dans un commentaire de Sergius de Rešʿainā’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 339–63. [Repr. in idem, La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque, Paris, 2004, 143–64.]Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2004) ‘éthique et politique au premier âge de la tradition syriaque’, Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 57: 99–119.Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2007) ‘Le corpus philosophique syriaque aux VIe–VIIe siècles’, in D’Ancona, (2007), 279–91.
Hunger, H. (1978) Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner, 2 vols. Munich.
Hunger, H. (1989) Schreiben und Lesen in Byzanz. Die byzantinische Buchkultur. Munich.
Hunger, H. (1993) ‘Philosophie. Byzanz’, in Lexikon des Mittelalters, 6. Munich, 2092–2100.Google Scholar
Hunink, Vincent (2004) ‘Plutarch and Apuleius’, in Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works. Leiden–Boston, MA, 251–60.Google Scholar
Iamblichus, . On the Pythagorean Life, trans. Clark, Gillian (1989). Liverpool.
Iamblichus De anima. Text, Translation and Commentary, eds. Finamore, J. F. and Dillon, J. M. (2002). Leiden.
Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) (2002) Byzantine Philosophy and Its Ancient Sources. Oxford.
Ierodiakonou, K. (2005) ‘La réception byzantine des Catégories d’Aristote’, in Bruun, O. and Corti, K. (eds.), Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris, 307–39.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. and Bydén, B. (2008) ‘Byzantine Philosophy’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ≪http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/byzantine-philosophy/Philosophy≫.Google Scholar
On the Principles of the Universe (lost in Greek): Syriac: ‘Il trattato di Sergio di Rēsh’aynā sull’universo’, ed. Furlani, G., Rivista trimestrale di studi filosofici e religiosi 4 (1923) 1–22Google Scholar
Imbach, R. (1978) ‘Le (néo)-platonisme médiéval. Proclus latin et l’école dominicaine allemande’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie, 3me série, 110: 427–48.Google Scholar
Impellizzeri, S. (1969) ‘L’umanesimo bizantino del IX ecolo e la genesi della Biblioteca di Fozio’, Studi bizantini e neoellenici 6/7 (16/17): 9–69.Google Scholar
Syrianus, In Aristotelis ‘Metaphysica’ commentaria, ed. Usener, H., Reimer, G. (1870). Berlin. [Berolini-Novi Eboraci, 1961].
Syrianus, In Aristotelis ‘Metaphysica’ commentaria, ed. Kroll, W., Reimer, G. (1902). Berlin (CAG vi, 1).
In Categorias, ed. Kalbfleisch, C. (1907). CAG VIII.
In De anima, ed. Hayduck, M. (1882). CAG XI.
In De caelo, ed. Heiberg, J. L. (1884). CAG VII.
Syrianus, In Hermogenem commentaria, I–II, ed. Rabe, H. (1892–3). Leipzig.
In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta, ed. Brandt, S. (1906). CSEL 48.1. Vienna–Leipzig.
In Physika, ed. Diels, H. (1882, 1895). CAG Ix and X.
Alexandrinus, Hermias, In Platonis ‘Phaedrum’ scholia, ed. Couvreur, P. (1901). Paris. [Hildesheim, 1971, with an index verborum by C. Zintzen.]
Inge, W. R. (1929) The Philosophy of Plotinus, 3rd edn. 2 vols. London.
Inglis, J. (ed.) (2002) Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Tradition in Islam, Judaism and Christianity. Richmond, UK.
Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos, ed. Thörnqvist, C. Thomsen (2008). Gothenburg.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis Categorias commentarium, ed. Busse, A. (1898). CAG XIII.1.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis Analytica Priora commentaria, ed. Wallies, M. (1905). CAG XIII.2.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora commentaria cum Anonymo in librum II, ed. Wallies, M. (1909). CAG XIII.3.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis Meteorologicorum librum primum commentarium, ed. Hayduck, M. (1901). CAG XIV.1.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis libros De Generatione et Corruptione commentaria, ed. Vitelli, H. (1897). CAG XIV.2.
,Ioannes Philoponus (Michael Ephesius) In libros De Generatione Animalium commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M. (1903). CAG XIV.3.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis De Anima libros commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M. (1897). CAG XV.
,Ioannes PhiloponusIn Aristotelis Physicorum libros commentaria, ed. Vitelli, H. (1887–8). CAG XVI–XVII.
,Ioannes PhiloponusDe aeternitate mundi contra Proclum, ed. Rabe, H. (1899). Leipzig.
,Ioannes PhiloponusOpuscula monophysitica, ed. and trans. Sanda, A. (1930). Beirut.
,Ioannes PhiloponusDe Paschate Tractatus’, ed. Walter, C. (1899). Commentationes Philologae Ienenses 6: 195–229.Google Scholar
,Ioannes PhiloponusTonika parangelmata, ed. Dindorf, W. (1825). Leipzig.
Ioannes Philoponus: De aeternitate mundi contra Proclum, ed. Rabe, H. (1899). Leipzig. [reprint Hildesheim 1963].
Ioannis Philoponi (olim Ammonii) in Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium, ed. Busse, A. (1898). CAG XIII.1.
Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora Commentaria cum Anonymo in Librum II, ed. Wallies, M. (1909). CAG XIII.3.
Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Analytica Priora Commentaria, ed. Wallies, M. (1905). CAG XIII.2.
Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis De Anima Libros Commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M. (1897). CAG XV. Berlin 1897.
Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Libros De Generatione et Corruptione Commentaria, ed. Vitelli, H. (1897). CAG XIV.2.
Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Meteorologicorum Librum Primum Commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M. (1901). CAG XIV.1.
Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Physicorum Libros I–III et V–VIII Commentaria, ed. Vitelli, H. (1887–8). CAG XVI–XVII.
,Iohannes PhiloponusDe vocabulis quae diversum significatum exhibent secundum differentiam accentus, ed. Daly, L.W. (1983). Philadelphia, PA.
Isaac, J. (1953) Le Peri Hermeneias en Occident de Boèce à saint Thomas. Histoire littéraire d’un traité d’Aristote. Paris.
Ivanka, Endre von (1940) ‘Der Aufbau der Schrift “De divinis nominibus” des Ps.-Dionysius’, Scholastik 15 (1940): 386–99. (Reprinted in Ivanka (1964) 228–42.)Google Scholar
Ivanka, Endre von (1949) ‘La signification historique du “Corpus Areopagiticum”’, Recherches de science religieuse 36: 5–24.Google Scholar
Ivanka, Endre von (1950) ‘But et date de la composition du “Corpus Areopagiticum”’, Actes du 6e congrès international d’études byzantines I. Paris, 239–40.Google Scholar
Ivanka, Endre von (1956) ‘Zum Problem des christlichen Neuplatonismus I: Was heisst eigentlich “Christlicher Neuplatonismus”? II: Inwieweit ist Pseudo-Dionysios Areopagita Neuplatoniker?’, Scholastik 31: 31–40, 384–403. (Reprinted in Ivanka (1964) 43–54.)Google Scholar
Ivanka, Endre von (1964) Plato Christianus. übernahme und Ungestaltung des Platonismus durch die Väter. Einsiedeln.
Jackson, Robin (1995) ‘Late Platonist Poetics. Olympiodorus and the Myth of Plato’s Gorgias’, in Abbenes, J. G. J.. Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld. Amsterdam, 275–99.Google Scholar
,Jean PhiloponCommentaire sur le ‘De Anima’ d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Verbeke, G. (1966) (Corpus Latinum commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum III). Louvain–Paris.
,Jean PhiloponTraité de l’astrolabe, ed. and trans. Segonds, A. (1981). Paris.
,Jean PhiloponLa Création du monde, trans. Rosset, M. C. and Congourdeau, M. H. (2004). Paris.
Jeauneau, Edouard (1987) études érigéniennes. Paris.
Jeauneau, . In idem, , Quatre thèmes érigéniens. Conférence Albert-le-Grand 1974 (1978). Paris. 91–166.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1969) Jean Scot. Homélie sur le Prologue de Jean. Paris.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1979) ‘Jean Scot érigène et le grec’; repr. in Jeauneau (1987) 87–132.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1983) ‘Pseudo-Dionysius, Gregory of Nyssa, and Maximus the Confessor in the Works of John Scottus Eriugena’; repr. in Jeauneau (1987) 175–87.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1987) études érigéniennes. Paris.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1991) ‘The Neoplatonic Themes of Processio and Reditus in Eriugena’, Dionysius 15: 3–29.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1996a) Periphyseon Liber primus. Turnhout.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1996b) ‘Artifex Scriptura’, in Riel, , Steel, , McEvoy, (1996) 351–65.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (1997) Periphyseon Liber secundus. Turnhout.
Jeauneau, é. (ed.) (2000) Periphyseon Liber quartus. Turnhout.
Jeauneau, é. (1960) ‘Macrobe source du platonisme chartrain’, Studi Medievali, 3me série, 1: 3–24.Google Scholar
Jeauneau, é. (1975) ‘L’Héritage de la philosophie antique durant le haut moyen āge’, Settimane di studio del Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo 22 (Spoleto): 17–54.Google Scholar
,Joannes PhiloponusDe opificio mundi libri VII, ed. Reichardt, G. (1897). Leipzig.
,Johannes PhiloponosDe aeternitate mundi–über die Ewigkeit der Welt 1–5. Griechisch–Deutsch, ed. and trans. Scholten, C. (2009). Turnhout.
,Johannes PhiloponosDe opificio mundi – über die Erschaffung der Welt. Griechisch-Deutsch, ed. and trans. Scholten, C., 3 vols. (1997). Freiburg.
,Johannes Philoponos, Grammatikos von Alexandrien, Christliche Naturwissenschaft in Ausklang der Antike, Vorlaüfer der modernen Physik, Wissenschaft und Bibel. Ausgewählte Schriften, trans. Böhm, W. (1967). Munich.
,John of Damascus, Opera: PG 94–96 – Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, ed. Kotter, B. P., 6 vols. (1969–2006). PTS.
,John of Damascus, Elementary Introduction: Die Schriften, 1 (1969). PTS 7, 19–26.
,John of Damascus, Philosophical Chapters (Dialectica): Die Schriften, 1 (1969). PTS7.
,John of Damascus, Richter, G. (trans.), Johannes von Damaskos, Philosophische Kapitel (1982). Stuttgart.
,John of Damascus, Accurate Exposition of the Orthodox Faith: Die Schriften, 2 (1973). PTS12.
,John of Damascus, Salmond, S. D. F. (trans.), Exposition of the Orthodox Faith [Post Nicene Fathers 9] (1898). Aberdeen.
,John of Damascus, Apologetic Orations against the Calumniators of the Holy Icons: Die Schriften, 3 (1975). PTS17.
,John of Damascus, Louth, A. (trans.), Three Treatises on the Divine Images (2003). Crestwood, NY.
,John of Damascus, Against Manichaeans: Die Schriften, 4 (1981). PTS 22, 333–98.
,John of Damascus, On Heresies: Die Schriften, 4 (1981). PTS 22, 19–67.
,John of Salisbury. Metalogicon, ed. Hall, J. B. with the assistance of K. S. B. Keats-Rohan (1991). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis XCVIII.
Jones, John D. (1977) ‘The Character of the Negative (Mystical) Theology for Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 51: 66–74.Google Scholar
Jones, John D. (1980a) ‘The Ontological Difference for St. Thomas and Pseudo-Dionysius’, Dionysius 4: 119–32.Google Scholar
Jones, John D. (1980b) Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. The Divine Names and Mystical Theology. Translated from the Greek with an Introductory Study. Milwaukee.
Jones, John D. (1982) ‘A Non-Entitative Understanding of Being and Unity: Heidegger and Neoplatonism’, Dionysius 6: 94–110.Google Scholar
Jones, John D. (2005) ‘An Absolutely Simple God? Frameworks for Reading Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite’, The Thomist 69: 371–406.Google Scholar
Kaegi, W. E. (1967) ‘Domestic Military Problems of Julian the Apostate’, Byzantinische Forschungen 2: 247–64.Google Scholar
Kaegi, W. E. (1981) ‘Constantine’s and Julian’s Strategies of Strategic Surprise against the Persians’, Athenaeum 69: 209–13.Google Scholar
Kaegi, W. E. (1992) Byzantium and the Early Islamic Conquests. Cambridge.
Kaldellis, A. (2008) Hellenism in Byzantium. The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge.
Kamp, A. (2001) Philosophiehistorie als Rezeptionsgeschichte. Die Reaktion auf Aristoteles’ De Anima-Noetik. Der frühe Hellenismus, Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 33. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, PA.
Kapetanaki, S. and Sharples, R.W. (2006) Pseudo-Aristoteles (Pseudo-Alexander), Supplementa Problematorum. Peripatoi 20. Berlin–New York.
Kapriev, G. (2002) ‘Gibt es eine byzantinische Philosophie?’, Ostkirchliche Studien 51: 3–28.Google Scholar
Kapriev, G. (2005) Philosophie im Byzanz. Würzburg.
Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle’s Philosophy from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.
Karamanolis, G. E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.
Karayiannis, Vasilios (1993) Maxime le Confesseur: essence et energies de Dieu. Paris.
Karpozilos, A. (2002) Byzantinoi Historikoi kai Chronografoi, 2. Athens.
Karren, Steward Lloyd (1978) Near Eastern Culture and Hellenic Paedeia in Damascius’ Life of Isidore. Madison. WI.
Katsaros, V. (1988) Ioannes Kastamonites. Thessaloniki.
Katsaros, V. (1993) ‘Leo the Mathematician, his Literary Presence in Byzantium during the 9th Century’, in Butzer, P. and Lohrmann, O. (eds.), Science inWestern and Eastern Civilization in Carolingian Times. Basle, 383–98.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, C. (2002) ‘The Philosophical Importance of Grammar for Eriugena’, in McEvoy, , and Dunne, (2002) 61–76.
Kavanagh, C. (2005) ‘The Influence of Maximus the Confessor on Eriugena’s Treatment of Aristotle’s Categories’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70: 567–96.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. P. and Wahrton Epstein, A. (1985) Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Berkeley, CA.
Kazhdan, A. P. et al. (eds.) (1991) The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, 3 vols. New York–Oxford.
Kazhdan, A. P. with Sherry, L. and Angelidi, C. (1999) A History of Byzantine Literature, 650–850. Athens.
Kennedy, George A. (1983) Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton, NJ.
Kennedy, H. (1981) The Early Abbasid Caliphate. London.
Klibansky, R. (1982 [1939]) The Continuity of the Platonic Tradition during the Middle Ages. With a New Preface and Four Supplementary Chapters. Millwood, NJ.
Klingner, F. (1921) De Boethii consolatione philosophiae. Philologische Untersuchungen 27. Berlin.
Hermeias von Alexandrien, Kommentar zu Platons ‘Phaidros’. übersetzt und eingeleitet von Bernard, H. (1997). Tübingen.
Kotter, B. (1959) Die überlieferung der Pege Gnoseos des hl. Johannes von Damaskos. Ettal.
Kotzia-Panteli, P. (1996) ‘On Arethas of Caesarea’s Scholia on Porphyry’s Isagoge and Aristotle’s Categories’, Hellenika (Thessaloniki) 46: 396–410.Google Scholar
Kougeas, S. (1913) Ho Kaisareias Arethas kai to ergon autou. Athens.
Kraemer, J. L. (1965) ‘A Lost Passage from Philoponus’ Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 85: 318–27.Google Scholar
Kraemer, J. (1992) Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam. The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age. 2nd revised edn. Leiden–New York–Cologne.
Kraemer, J. L. (1965) ‘A Lost Passage from Philoponus Contra Aristotelem in Arabic Translation (Simpl. De caelo 1, 3, 270b5–11)’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 75: 318–27.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1987) ‘Proclus as a Reader of Plato and Plotinus and his Influence in the Middle Ages and in the Renaissance’, in Pépin, J. and Saffrey, H. D. (eds.), Proclus. Lecteur et interprète des anciens. Colloque International du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Paris, 191–211.Google Scholar
Kroll, Wilhelm (1901) ‘Damaskios (2)’, in Pauly’s Realencyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, neue Bearbeitung, unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher Fachgenossen, hrsg. von Wissowa, G., vol. IV, Stuttgart; repr. 1958 (IV/2) coll. 2039–42.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. (1999) ‘Review of P. Huby, C. Steel, J.O. Urmson, P. Lautner, On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception and Simplicius On Aristotle On the Soul 2.5–12, Ithaca 1997’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review. URL http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/99/99–10-18.html.Google Scholar
al-FārābĪ. L’armonia delle opinioni dei due sapienti, il divino Platone e Aristotele, Introduzione, testo arabo, traduzione e commento di Bonadeo, C. Martini, prefazione di Endress, G. (2008). Pisa.
Lévy, Antoine (2006) Le créé et l’incréé: Maxime Le Confesseur et Thomas d’Aquin. Paris.
La Mystagogie de saint Maxime le Confesseur: Introduction, texte critique, traduction française et grecque, ed. Sotiropoulos, Charalampos (2001). Athens.
Proclus le Philosophe, Commentaire sur le Parménide, suivi d’un commentaire anonyme sur les VII dernières hypothèses, traduit pour la première fois en franccedil;ais et accompagné de notes, d’une table analytique des paragraphes, et d’une traduction de Damascius, Chaignet, A.-Ed. (1903), in La vie d’Isidore ou Histoire de la philosophie, t. III. Paris [repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1962, 241–371].
Lamberz, E. (1987) ‘Proklos und die Form des philosophischen Kommentars’, in Pépin, J. and Saffrey, H. D. (eds.), Proclus, Lecteur et Interprète des anciens. Paris, 1–20.Google Scholar
Lameer, J. (1997) ‘From Alexandria to Bagdad: Reflections on the Genesis of a Problematical Tradition’, in Endress, G. and Kruk, R. (eds.), The Ancient Traditions in Christian and Islamic Hellenism: Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences dedicated to H.J. Drossaart Lulofs on his Ninetieth BirthdayLeiden, 181–91.Google Scholar
Lamza, L. (1975) Patriarch Germanos I von Konstantinopel. Würzburg.
Lane Fox, R. (2005) ‘Harran, the Sabians and the Late Platonist ‘Movers’’, in Smith, Andrew (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Essays in Honour of Peter Brown. Swansea, 231–44.Google Scholar
Lang, Uwe Michael (2001) John Philoponus and the Controversies over Chalcedon in the Sixth Century: A Study and Translation of The Arbiter. Leuven.
Langhade, J. (1981) ‘Grammaire, logique. études linguistiques chez al-FārābĪ’, Historiographia Linguistica 8: 365–77.Google Scholar
Langhade, J. (1985) ‘Mentalité grammarienne et mentalité logicienne au IVe siècle’, Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik 15: 104–17.Google Scholar
Larchet, Jean-Claude (1996) La divinization de l’homme selon sainte Maxime Le Confesseur. Paris.
Larsen, B. Dalsgaard (1975) ‘La Place de Jamblique dans la philosophie antique tardive’, in Dörrie, H. (ed.), De Jamblique à Proclus. Vandoeuvres–Geneva, 1–34.Google Scholar
Lautner, P. (2000) ‘Plutarch’s Views on phantasia and Koinē Aisthēsis’, in Ancient Philosophy 20: 425–46.Google Scholar
Lautner, P. (1992) ‘Philoponus, in De Anima III: Quest for an Author’, Classical Quarterly 42: 510–22.Google Scholar
Lautner, P. (1994) ‘Rival Theories of Self-awareness in Late Neoplatonism’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 39: 107–16.Google Scholar
Eriugena, John Scotus. Le Commentaire érigénien sur Martianus Capella (De Nuptiis, lib. I) d’aprés le manuscrit d’Oxford (Bod. Libr. Auct. T.2.19 fol. 1–31). Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes de Jeauneau, é.. In idem, Quatre thèmes érigéniens. Conférence Albert-le-Grand 1974 (1978). Paris, 91–166.
‘Commentary on meter ix of Book III of the Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius’, in Hubert, S., ‘Le commentaire inédit de Jean Scot érigène au métre IX du livre III du De consolatione Philosophiae de Boèce’ (1952). Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique 47: 44–122.Google Scholar
Translation (into Latin) of Gregory of Nyssa, De hominis opificio, in Cappuyns, M., ‘Le De imagine de Grégoire de Nysse traduit par Jean Scot Erigè’. Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale 32 (1965) 205–62.Google Scholar
Magnes, Macarius. Le Monogénès, 2 vols., ed. and trans. Goulet, R. (2003). Paris.
Lebon, Joseph (1930) ‘Le Pseudo-Denys l’Aréopagite et Sévère d’Antioche’, Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique 26: 880–915.Google Scholar
Lebreton, J. (1906) ‘Le traité de l’âme de sainte Grégoire le Thaumaturge’, Bulletin de Litérature ecclésiastique 8: 73–88.Google Scholar
Lemerle, P. (1971) Le premier humanisme byzantin. Paris.
Lemerle, P. (1977) ‘“Le gouvernement des philosophes”. Notes et remarques sur l’enseignement, les études, la culture’, in idem, Cinq études sur le XIe siècle byzantin. Paris, 195–248.Google Scholar
Lemerle, P. (1986) Byzantine Humanism. The First Phase. Notes and Remarks on Education and Culture in Byzantium from its Origins to the 10th Century, transl. by Lindsay, H. A. and Moffatt, A.. Canberra.
Lenski, Noel (2002) Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century AD. Berkeley, CA.
Lenski, Noel (2004) ‘Valens and the Monks: Cudgeling and Conscription as a Means of Social Control’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 58: 93–117.Google Scholar
Lenski, Noel (2006) ‘The Reign of Constantine’, in idem, (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge, 59–90.Google Scholar
,Leo the Philosopher, in Westerink, L. G., ‘Leo the Philosopher: Job and Other Poems’, Illinois Classical Studies 11 (1986) 193–222.Google Scholar
Leonardi, C. (1977) ‘Glosse eriugeniane e Marziano Capella in codice leidense’, in Roques, (1977) 171–82.
Lernould, A. (2001) Physique et Théologie: Lecture du Timée de Platon par Proclus. Villeneuve d’Ascq (Nord).
Letrouit, Jean (1990) ‘Datation d’Olympiodore l’Alchimiste’, Emerita 58: 289–92.Google Scholar
Eriugena, John Scottus. Periphyseon, Liber de Causis, ed. Pattin, A., In Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28/1 (1966) 90–209.Google Scholar
Libera, A. (1984) Introduction à la mystique rhénane d’Albert le Grand à Maître Eckhart. Paris.
Libera, A. (1990) Albert le Grand et la philosophie. Paris.
Libera, A. (1996) La Querelle des universaux. De Platon à la fin du Moyen âge. Paris.
Liebeschütz, H. (1973) ‘The Place of the Martianus Glossae in the Development of Eriugena’s Thought’, in O’Meara, and Bieler, (1973) 49–58.
Limberis, Vasiliki (2000) ‘Religion as the Cipher for Identity: The Cases of Emperor Julian, Libanius and Gregory Nazianzus’, Harvard Theological Review 93.4: 373–400.Google Scholar
Linguiti, Alessandro (1990) L’ultimo platonismo greco. Principi e Conoscenza (Accademia Toscana di scienze e lettere La Colombaria. Studi 112). Florence.
Littlewood, A. R. (ed.) (1995) Originality in Byzantine Literature, Art, and Music. Oxford.
Lloyd, A.C. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford.
Lloyd, Anthony C. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism, Oxford (2nd edn, 1998).
Lloyd, A. C. (1967) ‘Simplicius’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. New York, 7.448.Google Scholar
Lohr, C. (1986) ‘The Pseudo-Aristotelian Liber de Causis and Latin Theories of Science in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, in Kraye, J., Ryan, W. F. and Schmitt, C. B. (eds.), Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages. The Theology and Other Texts. London, 53–62.Google Scholar
Longo, A. (2001a) ‘Gli scolî di Ermia e un passo controverso del ‘Fedro’ di Platone (Phaedr. 269e1–270c5)’, Phronesis 46: 73–92.Google Scholar
Longo, A. (2001b) ‘Le sostanze intermedie e le dimostrazioni astronomiche nel prologo del Commento di Siriano sui libri M e N della ‘Metafisica’ di Aristotele’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 12: 85–124.Google Scholar
Longo, A. (2004) ‘Siriano e i precedenti pre-aristotelici del principio della contraddizione’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 15: 81–97.Google Scholar
Longo, A. (2005) Siriano e i principi della scienza. Naples.
Longo, A. (2008) Syrianus et la métaphysique de l’Antiquité tardive. Actes du Colloque international de l’Université de Genève, 29 septembre–1er octobre 2006. Naples.
Calvo, Zamora, María, José (2003) ‘Los últimos representantes del neoplatonismo pagano: Damascio y Simplicio’, in Sola, Aurelia Ruiz and Gonzáles, Carlos Pérez (eds.), Cristianismo y paganismo: ruptura y continuidad. XVI Jornadas de Filología Clásica de las Universidades de Castilla y León, Burgos, 11 al 15 de noviembre de 2002. (Congresos y cursos. Universidad Burgos 24.)Burgos, 259–70.Google Scholar
Lossky, Vladimir (1930) ‘La notion des “analogies” chez Denys le Pseudo-Aréopagite’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen age 5: 279–309.Google Scholar
Lossky, Vladimir (1939) ‘La théologie négative dans la doctrine de Denys l’Aréopagite’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 28: 204–21.Google Scholar
Lottin, O. (1931) ‘L’analyse de l’acte humain chez St Jean Damascène’, Revue Thomiste 36: 631–61.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew (1996) Maximus the Confessor. London.
Louth, Andrew (1989) Denys the Areopagite. London.
Louth, A. (2002) St John Damascene. Tradition and Originality in Byzantine Theology. Oxford.
Louth, A. (2006) ‘Photios as a Theologian’, in Jeffreys, E. (ed.), Byzantine Style, Religion and Civilization. In Honour of Sir Steven Runciman. Cambridge, 206–23.Google Scholar
Lucchetta, G.A. (1978) Una fisica senza matematica: Democrito, Aristotele, Filopono. Trento.
Lucentini, P. (2007) Platonismo, ermetismo, eresia nel medioevo. Introduzione di L. Sturlese. Louvain-la-Neuve.
Lumpe, Adolf (1995) ‘Stephanos von Alexandria’, in Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon, vol. x: coll. 1406–9.Google Scholar
Luna, C. (2000a) ‘La doctrine des principes: Syrianus comme source textuelle et doctrinale de Proclus. IIème partie: Analyse des textes’, in Segonds, A.-Ph. and Steel, C. (eds.), Proclus et la ‘Théologie platonicienne’, Actes du colloque international de Louvain (13–16 mai 1998). Paris, 227–78.Google Scholar
Luna, C. (2000b) ‘Syrianus dans la tradition exégétique de la ‘Métaphysique’ d’Aristote. Première partie: Syrianus entre Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Asclépius’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.), Le Commentaire entre tradition et innovation. Actes du colloque international de l’Institut des traditions textuelles, Paris et Villejuif, 22–25 septembre 1999. Paris, 301–9.Google Scholar
Luna, C. (2001) Trois études sur la tradition des commentaires anciens à la ‘Métaphysique’ d’Aristote. Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
Luna, Concetta (2001) Review of Thiel (1999) Mnemosyne 54: 482–504.Google Scholar
Luna, C. (2001a) Simplicius. Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristote, Chapîtres 2–4 (Traduction par Philippe Hoffmann, avec la collaboration de I. Hadot et P. Hadot. Commentaire par Concetta Luna). Paris.
Luna, C. (2001c) Review of Thiel 1999, Mnemosyne 54.4: 482–504.Google Scholar
Luna, C. (2001) ‘Review of R. Thiel, Simplicius und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen, Stuttgart 1999’, Mnemosyne 54: 482–504.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (ed.) (1939) Iohannis Scotti. Annotationes in Marcianum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lycos, Kimon (1994) ‘Olympiodorus on Pleasure and the Good in Plato’s Gorgias’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 183–205.Google Scholar
Lyon, B. (1972) The Origins of the Middle Ages: Pirenne’s Challenge to Gibbon. New York.
Müller, J. (2000) ‘Syrianus and the Concept of Mathematical Number’, in Bechtle, G. and O’Meara, D. J. (eds.), La Philosophie des mathématiques de l’Antiquité tardive. Actes du colloque international, Fribourg, Suisse, 24–26 septembre 1998. Fribourg. 71–84.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. (1969) ‘Die neuplatonischen Aristoteles kommentatoren über die Ursachen der Pseudepigraphie’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 112: 120–6.Google Scholar
al-FārābĪ, Abū Naṣr, Mabādi’ ārā’ ahl al-madĪna al-fāḍila, a revised text with introduction, translation and commentary by Walzer, R., ed. Endress, G. (1998). Chicago. [1st edn Oxford 1985].
MacCoull, L. S. B. (1995) ‘A New Look at the Career of John Philoponus’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 3: 47–60.Google Scholar
MacCoull, L.S.B. (1995) ‘A New Look at the Career of John Philoponus’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 3.1: 47–60.Google Scholar
MacIsaac, D. G. (2002) ‘Projection and Time in Proclus’, in Inglis, (2002) 83–105.
Macrobius, . Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis, ed. Willis, J. (1970). Leipzig.
Madec, G. (1976) ‘Jean Scot et les Pères Latins’, Revue des études Augustiniennes 22: 134–42; repr. in Madec (1988) 54–62.Google Scholar
Madec, G. (1977) ‘L’Augustinisme de Jean Scot dans le “De Predestinatione”’, in Roques, (1977) 183–90.
Madec, G. (1986) ‘Jean Scot et ses auteurs’, in Allard, (1986) 143–86; repr. in Madec (1988) 9–52.
Madec, G. (1988) Jean Scot et ses auteurs: annotationes érigéniennes. Paris.
Madelung, W. (1974) ‘The Origins of the Controversy concerning the Creation of the Koran’, in Barral, J. M. (ed.), Orientalia Hispanica sive studia F. M. Pareja octogenario dicata, 1. Leiden, 504–25.Google Scholar
Madigan, A. (1986) ‘Syrianus and Asclepius on Forms and Intermediates in Plato and Aristotle’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 24: 149–71.Google Scholar
Magee, John (1989) Boethius on Signification and Mind. Leiden–New York–Copenhagen–Cologne.
Magee, J. (1989) Boethius on Signification and Mind. Philosophia Antiqua 52. Leiden–New York–Copenhagen–Cologne.
Magee, J. (ed.) (1998) Boethius, De divisione. Philosophia Antiqua 77. Leiden–Boston–Cologne.Google Scholar
Magee, J. (2003) ‘Boethius’ Anapestic Dimeters (Acatalectic), with Regard to the Structure and Argument of the Consolatio’, in Galonnier, (2003). 147–69.
Magee, J. (2005) ‘Boethius’ Consolatio and the Theme of Roman Liberty’, Phoenix 59: 348–64.Google Scholar
Magee, J. (2007) ‘Boethius, Last of the Romans’, Carmina Philosophiae 16. 1–22.Google Scholar
Magee, J. (2010) ‘On the Composition and Sources of Boethius’ Second Peri Hermeneias Commentary’, Vivarium 48: 7–54.Google Scholar
Mahdi, M. (1967) ‘Alfarabi against Philoponus’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 26: 233–60.Google Scholar
Mahdi, M. (1970) ‘Language and Logic in Classical Islam’, in Grunebaum, G. E. (ed.), Logic in Classical Islamic Culture. Wiesbaden, 51–83.Google Scholar
Mainoldi, E. (2002) ‘Su alcune fonti ispiratrici della teologia e dell’escatologia del De Divina Predestinatione Liber di Giovanii Scoto Eriugena’, in McEvoy, and Dunne, (2002) 313–29.
Majcherek, G. (2007) ‘The Late Roman Auditoria of Alexandria: An Archaeological Overview’, in Derda, et al. (2007) 11–50.
Malingrey, A.-M. (1961) “Philosophia”. étude d’un groupe de mots dans la littérature grecque des Présocratiques au IVe siècle après J.-C. Paris.
,(Arabic): ’A. BadawĪ, Manṭiq Arisṭū. I-III. Dār al-kutub al-miṣriyya (1948–52). Cairo, III: 1021–68.
Mango, Cyril (2000) ‘The TriumphalWay of Constantinople and the Golden Gate’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 54: 173–88.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994) Prolegomena. Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Leiden.
Marenbon, John (2003) Boethius. Oxford.
Marenbon, J. (2003) Boethius. Oxford.
Marenbon, J. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge.
Marenbon, J. (1980) ‘John Scottus and the Categoriae decem’, in Beierwaltes, (1980) 117–34.
Marenbon, J. (1993/2000) ‘Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, before c.1150 AD’; revised and repr. in Marenbon (2000) Aristotelian Logic, Platonism, and the Context of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West. Aldershot, 77–127.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2007) Medieval Philosophy. An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London.
Margoliouth, S. (1905) ‘The Discussion Between Abū Bišr Mattā and Abū Sa’Īd al-SĪrāfĪ on the Merits of Logic and Grammar’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1905): 79–110.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc (1977) L’idole et la distance. Paris. English translation The Idol and Distance. Carlson, Tr. Thomas A. (2001). New York.
Markus, Robert A. (2000) ‘“Tempora Christiana” Revisited’, in Dodaro, R. and Lawless, G. (eds.), Augustine and His Critics: Essays in Honour of Gerald Bonner. London–New York, 201–13.Google Scholar
Matsoukas, N. (1994) Historia tes Byzantines philosophias. Thessaloniki.
Matthews, John (1976) Western Aristocracies and Imperial Court, AD 364–425. Oxford.
Maximi Confessoris Ambigua ad Iohannem: iuxta Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Latinam Interpretationem, ed. Jeauneau, Edouard (1988). CCSG 18.
Maximi Confessoris Ambigua ad Thomam una cum Epistula secunda ad eundem, ed. Jansenns, Bart (2002). CCSG 48.
Maximi Confessoris Liber asceticus, ed. Deun, Peter (2000). CCSG 40.
Maximi Confessoris Opera exegetica duo, ed. Deun, Peter (1991). CCSG 23.
Maximi confessoris Quaestiones ad Thalassium, ed. Laga, Carl and Steel, Carlos (1980, 1990). CCSG 7 and 22 (includes translation by Eriugena).
Maximi Confessoris Quaestiones et dubia, ed. DeClerck, José (1982). CCSG 10.
Maximus Confessor: Selected Writings, trans. Berthold, George (1985). New York.
Maximus the Confessor, trans. Louth, Andrew (1998). London and New York.
McEvoy, J. and Dunne, M. (eds.) (2002) History and Eschatology in John Scottus Eriugena and His Time. Leuven.
McGinn, B. (1977) ‘The Negative Element in the Anthropology of John the Scot’, in Roques, (1977) 315–25.
McGinn, B. (1996) ‘The Originality of Eriugena’s Spiritual Exegesis’, in Riel, , Steel, and McEvoy, (1996) 55–80.
McGinn, B. (2002) ‘Eriugena Confronts the End: Reflections on Johannes Scottus’s Place in Carolingian Eschatology’, in McEvoy, and Dunne, (2002) 3–29.
McGinn, B. and Otten, W. (eds.) (1994) Eriugena: East and West. Notre Dame, IN.
McLynn, Neil (1994) Ambrose of Milan: Church and Court in a Christian Capital. Berkeley, CA.
,Meletius the Monk, A Brief Essay on Human Nature: PG 64, 1076–1309 J. A. Cramer, Anecdota Graeca e codd. manuscriptis bibliothecarum Oxoniensium, 3 (Oxford 1836; repr. Amsterdam 1963) 5–157.
Mensching, E. (1965) ‘Zur Calcidius-überlieferung’, Vigiliae Christianae 19: 42–56.Google Scholar
Meredith, A. (1980) ‘Porphyry and Julian Against the Christians’, ANRW II.23.2: 1119–49.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John (1989) Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions: The Church 450–680 A.D. Crestwood, NY.
Meyendorff, J. (1974/83) Byzantine Theology. Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes. New York.
Meyerhof, M. (1930) ‘Von Alexandrien nach Bagdad. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des philosophischen und medizinischen Unterrichts bei den Arabern’, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaft, Phil.–Hist. Klasse 23: 389–429.Google Scholar
Meyerhof, M. (1932) ‘Johannes Grammatikos (Philoponos) von Alexandrien und die arabische Medizin’, Mitteilungen des deutschen Instituts für ägyptische Altertumskunde in Kairo 2: 1–21.Google Scholar
Meyerhof, M. (1926) ‘New Light on Ḥunayn ibn Isἥāq and his Period’, Isis 8: 685–724.
,Michel le SyrienChronique, ed. and trans. Chabot, J.B., 4 vols. (1900–10). Paris.
Minio-Paluello, L. (1974) ‘Moerbeke, William of’, in Dictionary of Scientific Biography IX.Google Scholar
Minnis, A., Scott, A. B. and Wallace, D. (eds.) (1991) Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism c. 1100–c. 1375. The Commentary-Tradition. Revised edition. Oxford.
Mojsisch, B. (1984) ‘Causa essentialis bei Dietrich von Freiberg und Meister Eckhart’, in Flasch, K. (ed.), with collaboration by Brunner, F., et al. Von Meister Dietrich zu Meister Eckhart.Hamburg, 106–14.Google Scholar
Molac, Philippe (2001) ‘L’Image de Julien l’Apostat chez Saint Grégoire de Nazianze’, Bulletin de Littérature Ecclesiastique 102. 1: 39–48.Google Scholar
Moorhead, J. (1992) Theoderic in Italy. Oxford.
Moran, D. (1989) The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena. A Study of Idealism in the Middle Ages. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1974) ‘La critique d’authenticité chez les commentateurs grecs d’Aristote’, in Mansel, Mélanges. Ankara.
Moraux, P. (ed.) (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Vol. II, Peripatoi. Philologischhistorische Studien zum Aristotelismus 6. Berlin–New York.
Moreschini, Claudio (1990) ‘L’esegesi del Fedro e il Medioplatonismo’, Koinonia 14: 29–39.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1992) ‘Alcuni aspetti degli ‘Scholia in Phaedrum’ di Ermia Alessandrino’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Madec, G. and O’Brien, D. (eds.), SOPHIHS MAIHTORES. Chercheurs de sagesse. Hommage à J. Pépin, Paris, 451–60.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1996a) ‘Motivi esegetici e filosofici negli ‘Scholia in Phaedrum’ di Ermia Alessandrino’, Cassiodorus 20: 110–15.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1996b) ‘La “teologia” e l’esegesi del “Fedro” di Platone secondo Ermia Alessandrino’, in Funghi, M. S. (ed.), ODOI DIZHSIOS. Le vie della ricerca. Studi in onore di F. Adorno. Florence, 361–9.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (2003) Varia Boethiana. Naples.
Most, G. (ed.) (1999) Commentaries – Kommentare, Aporemata 4. Göttingen.
Mueller-Jourdan, Pascal (2005) Typologie spatio-temporelle de l’Ecclesia byzantine: La Mystagogie de Maxime le Confesseur dans la culture philosophique de l’Antiquité tardive. Leiden–Boston, MA.
Murray, Gilbert (1946) ‘Greece and England’, in idem, (ed.), Greek Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Napoli, Valerio (2005) ‘Conoscibilità e inconoscibilità dell’ Uno nella lettura di Damascio della Repubblica di Platone’, Pan 23: 183–208.Google Scholar
Napoli, Valerio (2008) Epekeina tou henos. Il principio totalmente ineffabile tra dialettica ed esegesi in Damasco. Symbolon. Studi e testi di filosofia antica e medievale 33. Catania–Palermo.Google Scholar
Nardi, B. (1958) Saggi sull’aristotelismo padovano dal secolo XIV al XVI. Florence, 365–442.
Nash-Marshall, S. (2000) Participation and the Good: A Study in Boethian Metaphysics. New York.
Nasr, S. H. (1996a) ‘The Meaning and Concept of Philosophy in Islam’, in Nasr, S. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.), History of Islamic Philosophy I–II. London–New York, 21–6.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. (1996b) ‘The Qur’ān and HadĪth as Source and Inspiration of Islamic Philosophy’, in Nasr, S. H. and Leaman, O. (eds.), History of Islamic Philosophy I–II. London–New York, 27–39.Google Scholar
Neil, Bronwen and Allen, Pauline (2003) The Life of Maximus the Confessor, Recension 3. Strathfield.
Nellas, Panayiotis (1987) Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person. Crestwood, NY.
,Nemesius of Emesa. Nemesii episcopi Premnon Physicon sive Peri PhyseŌs AnthrŌpou liber ab Alfano in Latinum translatus, ed. Burkhard, C. J. (1917) Leipzig.
,Nemesius of Emesa. De natura hominis. Traduction de Burgundio de Pise, eds. Verbeke, G. and Moncho, J. R.. Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum Supplement I (1975). Leiden.
,Nemesius of Emesa. De Coniecturis, eds. Koch, J. and Bormann, K. (1972). Nicolai de CusaOpera Omnia III. Hamburg.
Neoplatonic Saints: The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by their Students, trans. Edwards, M. (2000). (Translated Texts for Historians 35), Liverpool [My quotations use this translation, with some changes.]
Ničev, Alexandre (1978) ‘Olympiodore et la catharsis tragique d’Aristote’, in Livrea, Enrico and Privitera, Aurelio G. (eds.), Studi in onore di Anthos Ardizzoni 2. Roma, 639–59.Google Scholar
,Nicholas I Mystikos, Minor works: Nicholas I, Patriarch of Constantinople, Miscellaneous Writings, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1981). CFHB 20. Washington, DC.
,Nicholas I Mystikos, Letters: Nicholas I, Patriarch of Constantinople, Letters, ed. Jenkins, R. J. H. and Westerink, L. G. (1973). CFHB 6. Washington, DC.
,Nicholas of Cusa. De Docta Ignorantia, ed. Klibansky, R.. Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis I (1932). Hamburg.
Nicholson, O. (1994) ‘The Pagan Churches of Maximinus Daia and Julian the Apostate’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 45: 1–10.Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. (2006) ‘Philo’s Contribution to Contemporary Alexandrian Metaphysics’, in Brakke, David et al. (eds.), Beyond Reception: Mutual Influences between Antique Religion, Judaism and Early Christianity. Frankfurt, 35–55.Google Scholar
,Nikephoros, Mondzain-Baudinet, M.-J. (trans.), Nicéphore, Discours contre les iconoclastes (1989). Paris.
,Nikephoros, Critical Examination and Rejection of the False Definition of the Apostates … who Refuse the Redemptive Economy of the Divine Word: Nicephori Patriarchae Constantinopolitani Refutatio et Eversio Definitionis Synodalis Anni 815, ed. Featherstone, J. M. (1997). CCSG 33.
,Nikephoros, Refutation and Rebuttal of the Discourses of Eusebius and Epiphanides: Pitra, J. B., Spicilegium Solesmense, 1 (1852). Paris. repr. Graz 1962, 371–503
,Nikephoros, Pitra, J. B., Spicilegium Solesmense, 4 (1858). Paris. repr. Graz 1963, 292–380.
,Nikephoros, Against those who Dare to Impiously call Idol the Resemblance of God: Pitra (1858) 233–91.
,Nikephoros, On Dreams: Libro dei sogni, ed. Guidorizzi, G. (1980). Naples.
,Nikephoros, Elucidation of the Testimony of Magnes: Pitra (1852) 302–35.
,Nikephoros, A Short History and Chronography: Nicephori archiepiscopi Constantinopolitani opuscula historica, ed. Boor, C. (1880). Leipzig. repr. 1975.
,Nikephoros, Testimonies of the Fathers: Pitra (1852) 336–70.
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Prolegomena to Philosophy: Davidis Prolegomena et in Porphyrii Isagogen Commentarium, ed. Busse, A. (1904). CAG 18.2.
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Prolegomena and Scholia to Porphyry’s Introduction, ed. Busse, A. (1904). CAG 18.2.
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Homilies: Nicétas le Paphlagonien, Sept homélies inédites, ed. Lebrun, F. (1997). Leuven.
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Treatise on the End of the World/Letter on the End of the World, in Westerink, L. G., ‘Nicetas the Paphlagonian on the End of the World’, in Essays in Memory of Basil Laourdas (1975). Thessaloniki. 177–95; repr. in Westerink (1980) 357–75.Google Scholar
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Encomium of GregoryNazianzen: The Encomium of GregoryNazianzen by Nicetas the Paphlagonian, ed. Rizzo, J. J. (1976). Subsidia hagiographica 58, Brussels.
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Commentary on Psalms, in Dorival, G., ‘Le Commentaire sur les Psaumes de Nicétas David (début du 10e siècle)’, Revue des études byzantines 39 (1981) 251–300.Google Scholar
,Niketas David Paphlagon, Letters: Arethae Archiepiscopi Caesariensis scripta minora, 2, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1970). Leipzig, 149–82.
,Niketas Magistros, Letters: Westerink, L. G., Nicétas Magistros, Lettres d’un exilé (928–946) (1973). Paris.
Nikolaou, T. (1977) ‘Grundlegende Gedanken über die Byzantinische Philosophie’, Byzantina (Thessaloniki) 9: 169–86.Google Scholar
Nock, A. D. (1930) ‘A diis electa: A Chapter in the Religious History of the Third Century’, Harvard Theological Review 23: 251–74.Google Scholar
Nock, A. D. (1947) ‘The Emperor’s Divine Comes’, Journal of Roman Studies 37: 102–16.Google Scholar
Norvin, William (1915) Olympiodoros fra Alexandria og hans commentar til Platons Phaidon. Copenhagen.
Nuffelen, Peter (2002) ‘Deux fausses lettres de Julien l’Apostat (La lettre aux juifs, Ep. 51 [Wright ed.], et la lettre à Arsacius Ep. 84 [Bidez ed.])’, Vigiliae Christianae 56: 131–50.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1969) Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge.
O’Daly, G. (1991) The Poetry of Boethius. London.
O’Meara, D. J. (2003) Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford.
O’Meara, D.J. (1986) ‘Le problème de la métaphysique dans l’antiquité tardive’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie 33: 3–22.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D.J. (1989) Pythagoras Revived. Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford.
O’Meara, Dominic J. (1999a) ‘Epicurus Neoplatonicus’, in Fuhrer, Therese and Erler, Michael, (eds.), Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike. Akten der 1. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 22.-25. September 1997 in Trier. Philosophie der Antike. Veröffentlichungen der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung 9. Stuttgart, 83–91.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. (1999b) ‘Lectures néoplatoniciennes du Philèbe de Platon’, in Dixsaut, Monique (ed.), La fêlure du plaisir. Etudes sur le Philèbe de Platon. Vol. II: Contextes. Paris, 191–201.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. (2006) ‘Patterns of Perfection in Damascius’ Life of Isidore’, Phronesis 51: 74–90.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. (2003) Platonopolis. Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford.
O’Meara, D. J. (1989) Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. New York–Oxford.
O’Meara, D. J. (2004) ‘Simplicius on the Place of the Philosopher in the City (in Epict. Chap. 32)’, Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 57: 89–98.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. J. (2006) ‘Patterns of Perfection in Damascius’ Life of Isidore’, Phronesis 51.1: 74–90.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic (1997) ‘Evêques et philosophes-rois: philosophie politique néoplatonicienne chez le Pseudo-Denys’, in Andia, Y. (ed.), Denys l’Aréopagite et sa postérité en Orient et en Occident. Paris, 75–88. (Reprinted in The Structure of Being and the Search for the Good, XIX).Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic (1992) Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. Leiden.
O’Meara, J. J. and Bieler, L. (1973) The Mind of Eriugena. Dublin.
O’Meara, D. J. (1991) ‘Philosophy’, in Kazhdan, (1991) III: 1658–61.
O’Meara, D. (1981) ‘The Concept of Natura in John Scottus Eriugena (De divisione naturae, Book I)’, Vivarium 19: 126–42.Google Scholar
O’Néill, P. (1986) ‘The Old-Irish Words in Eriugena’s Biblical Glosses’, in Allard, (1986) 287–97.
Obertello, L. (1974) Severino Boezio, 2 vols. Genoa.
Oehler, K. (1964) ‘Aristotle in Byzantium’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 5: 133–45.Google Scholar
Oehler, K. (1969) Antike Philosophie und byzantinisches Mittelalter. Munich.
Oehler, K. (1990) ‘Die Byzantinische Philosophie’, in Fløistad, G. (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy. A New Survey, 6/2. Philosophy and Science in the Middle Ages. Dordrecht, 639–49.Google Scholar
Of the Ineffable: Aporetics of the Notion of an Absolute Principle in Damascius’, trans. Franke, W. (2004) in Arion 12.1: 19–39 [English translation of Princ. I, 4.13–22.19].Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. A. (1936) ‘Review of De Prisciani Lydi Solutionum Capite VI by Aline Chodaczek’, The Classical Weekly 30.Google Scholar
Olympiodori in Aristotelis Meteora commentaria, ed. Stüve, G. (1900). CAG XII.2.
Olympiodori in Platonis Gorgiam commentaria, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1970). Leipzig.
Olympiodori philosophi in Platonis Phaedonem commentaria, ed. Norvin, W. (1913). Leipzig [reprint: Hildesheim 1968].
Olympiodori prolegomena et in Categorias, ed. Busse, A. (1902). CAG XII.1.
Olympiodorus, . Commentary on Plato’s Gorgias, trans. Jackson, Robin, Lycos, Kimon and Tarrant, Harold (1998). Leiden.
,Olympiodorus: Commentary on Plato’s Gorgias, Translated with full notes by Jackson, Robin, et al. (1998). Leiden.
Olympiodorus. Commentary on Plato’s Gorgias, trans. Jackson, R., Lycos, K. and Tarrant, H. (1998). Leiden.
Olympiodorus. Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, ed. Westerink, L.G. (1956). Amsterdam.
Tyre, Porphyry of. On Abstinence from Killing Animals, trans. Clark, Gillian (2000). London.
On Aristotle Categories, trans. Cohen, S. M. and Matthews, G. B. (1992). London–Ithaca, NY.
On Aristotle On Coming-to-be and Perishing 1.1–5, trans. Williams, C. J. F. (1999). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle On Coming-to-be and Perishing 1.6–2.4, trans. Williams, C. J. F. (1999). London–Ithaca, NY.
In De Gen. Corr. (Arabic): On Aristotle On Coming-to-Be and Perishing 2.2–5, trans. Gannagé, E. (2005). Duckworth, London 2005.
On Aristotle On the Intellect (de Anima 3.4–8), trans. Charlton, W. (1991). London–Ithaca.
On Aristotle On the Soul 2.1–6, trans. Charlton, W. (2005). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle On the Soul 2.7–12, trans. Charlton, W. (2005). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–8, trans. Charlton, W. (2000). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle On the Void [in Phys. 645–693], trans. Urmson, J.O. (1994), in Lettinck, P., Philoponus on Aristotle Physics 5–8 and J.O. Urmson, o.c.).
On Aristotle Physics 2, trans. Lacey, A. R. (1993). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle Physics 3, trans. Edwards, M. J. (1994). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle Physics 5–8 with Simplicius, On Aristotle on the Void, trans. Lettinck, P. and Urmson, J. O. (1994). London–Ithaca, NY.
On Aristotle’s Categories 1–4, trans. Chase, M. (2003).
On Aristotle’s Categories 5–6, trans. Haas, F. J. A. and Fleet, B. (2001).
On Aristotle’s Categories 7–8, trans. Fleet, B. (2001).
On Aristotle’s Categories 9–15, trans. Gaskin, R. (2000).
On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 1–8, trans. Blank, D. (1996). London–Ithaca, NY
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 1.1–4, trans. Hankinson, R. J. (2002).
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 1.10–12, trans. Hankinson, R. J. (2006).
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 1.5–9, trans. Hankinson, R. J. (2004).
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 2.1–9, trans. Mueller, I. (2004).
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 2.10–14, trans. Mueller, I. (2005).
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 3.1–6, trans. Mueller, I. (2008).
On Aristotle’s On the Heavens 3.7–4.6, trans. Mueller, I. (2008).
On Aristotle’s Physics 1.5–9, trans. Baltussen, H. (2011).
On Aristotle’s Physics 2, trans. Fleet, B. (1997).
On Aristotle’s Physics 3, trans. Urmson, J. O. (2002).
On Aristotle’s Physics 4.1–5 [in Phys. 519.3–600.36] and 10–14 [in Phys. 694.30–773.7], trans. Urmson, J.O. (1992).
On Aristotle’s Physics 4.1–5 and 10–14, trans. Urmson, J. O. (1992).
On Aristotle’s Physics 5, trans. Urmson, J. O. (1997).
On Aristotle’s Physics 6, trans. Konstan, D. (1989).
On Aristotle’s Physics 7, trans. Hagen, C. (1994).
On Aristotle’s Physics 8.6–10, trans. McKirahan, R. (2000).
On Epictetus’ Handbook 1.1–26, trans. Brennan, T. and Brittain, C. (2002).
On Epictetus’ Handbook 27–53, trans. Brittain, C. and Brennan, T. (2002).
Ammonius: On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9 with Boethius: On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9, trans. (Ammonius), D. Blank and Kretzmann, N. (Boethius) (1998). London–Ithaca
Confessor, Maximus the. On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ, trans. Blowers, Paul M. and Wilken, Robert Louis (2003). Crestwood, NY.
On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ: Selected Writings from St. Maximus the Confessor, trans. Blowers, Paul and Wilken, Robert Louis (2003). Crestwood, NY.
On the Golden Verses (?): Ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib. Proclus’ Commentary on the Pythagorean Verses, ed. Linley, N. (1984). Buffalo–New York.
Eriugena, John Scotus. Opera quae supersunt omnia, (ed.) Floss, H. J. (1853). In. Migne, J. P. (ed.) Patrologia Latina, vol. 122, coll. 439–1022. Paris.Google Scholar
Opitz, H.-G. (ed.) (1934) Urkunden zur Geschichte des Arianischen Streites. Berlin, 319–28.
Opsomer, J. (2000) ‘Proclus on Demiurgy and Procession. A Neoplatonic Reading of the Timaeus’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus. London, 113–43.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2001) ‘Proclus vs. Plotinus on Matter (De Mal. Subs. 30–7)’, Phronesis 46.2: 154–88.Google Scholar
Oracles chaldaïques, texte et traduction par Places, é. Des (1971). Paris.
Osborn, Eric (2005) Clement of Alexandria. Cambridge.
Pépin, J. and Saffrey, H.D. (1987) Proclus. Lecteur et interprète des anciens. Actes du colloque international du CNRS Paris (2–4 octobre 1985). Paris.
Pépin, J. and P., Saffrey (eds.) (1987) Proclus. Lecteur et interprète des Anciens. Paris.
Pépin, Jean (1956) ‘Univers dionysien et univers augustinien’, Recherches de philosophie 2 (Aspects de la dialectique): 179–224.Google Scholar
Thémistius. Paraphrase de la Métaphysique d’Aristote (livre Lambda), trans. Brague, R. (1999). Paris.
Parmenides usque ad finem primae hypothesis nec non Procli Commentarium in Parmenidem, pars ultima adhuc inedita interprete G. de Moerbeka, eds. Klibansky, R. et Labowsky, C. (1953) London. [Reprint Nendelm / Liechtenstein 1962.]
Patrologia Graeca, vol. 4, 90 and 91, ed. Migne, J.-P. (1860). Scripta saeculi VII Vitam Maximi Confessoris illustrantia, eds. Allen, P. and Neil, B. (1999). CCSG 39
Pearson, Birgir A. (1986) ‘Earliest Christianity in Egypt: Some Observations’, in Pearson, Birgir A. and Goehring, James E. (eds.), The Roots of Egyptian Christianity. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Pelikan, J. (1974) The Spirit of Eastern Christendom, 600–1700. Chicago, IL.
Penella, Robert J. (2000) The Private Orations of Themistius. Berkeley, CA.
Perczel, I. (2000) ‘Sergius of Reshaina’s Syriac Translation of the Dionysian Corpus. Some Preliminary Remarks’, in Baffioni, C. (ed.), La diffusione dell’ eredità classica nell’ età tardoantica e medievale. Filologia, storia, dottrina.Alexandria, 79–94.Google Scholar
Periphyseon (De divisione naturae). Liber primus, Liber secundus, Liber tertius. Latin text and English translation by Sheldon-Williams, I. P., with the collaboration of L. Bieler. Liber Quartus. Latin text edited by Jeauneau, é. with Zier, M. A.; English translation by O’Meara, J. J. and Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (1968, 1972, 1981, 1995). Scriptores Latini Hiberniae 7, 9, 11 & 13. Dublin.
Periphyseon. The Division of Nature, trans. Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (Books I–III); revised by O’Meara, John J. (IV–V) (1987). Montreacute;al.
Periphyseon: Editionem nouam a suppositiciis quidem additamentis purgatam, ditatam uero appendice in qua uicissitudines operis synoptice exhibentur. Liber primus, Liber secundus, Liber tertius, Liber quartus, Liber quintus, ed. Jeauneau, é. (1996–2003). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 161, 162, 163, 164, 165. Turnhout.
Perkams, M. and Piccione, R.M. (eds.) (2006) Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik. Akten der Konferenz in Jena am 18.-20. September 2003. Leiden.
Perkams, M. (2003) ‘Doppelte Entelecheia: das Menschenbild in “Simplikios”, Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ “De anima”, Elenchos 24: 57–91.Google Scholar
Perkams, M. (2005) ‘Priscian of Lydia, Commentator on the De anima in the Tradition of Iamblichus’, Mnemosyne 58: 510–30.Google Scholar
Perkams, M. (2008) Selbstbewusstsein in der Spätantike. Die neuplatonischen Kommentare zu Aristoteles’ “De anima”, Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 85. Berlin.
Perl, Eric D. (1994a) ‘Hierarchy and Participation in Dionysius the Areopagite and Greek Neoplatonism’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68: 15–30.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric D. (1994b) ‘Symbol, Sacrament, and Hierarchy in Saint Dionysios the Areopagite’, Greek Orthodox Theological Review 30: 311–65.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric D. (1997) ‘The Metaphysics of Love in Dionysius the Areopagite’, Journal of Neoplatonic Studies 6: 45–73.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric D. (2002) ‘Signifying Nothing: Being as Sign in Neoplatonism and Derrida’ in Harris, R. Baine (ed.), Neoplatonism and Contemporary Thought. Part 2. Albany, NY, 125–51.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric D. (2003) ‘Pseudo-Dionysius’, in Gracia, Jorge J. E. and Noone, Timothy B. (eds,), A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Oxford, 540–90.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric D. (2007) Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Albany, NY.
Perl, E. (1994a) ‘Metaphysics and Christology in Maximus the Confessor and Eriugena’, in McGinn, and Otten, (1994) 253–70.
Perl, E. (1994b) ‘Hierarchy and Participation in Dionysius the Areopagite and Greek Neoplatonism’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68.1: 15–29.Google Scholar
Peters, E. F. (1968) Aristoteles Arabus. The Oriental Translations and Commentaries on the Aristotelian Corpus. Leiden.
Philip, J. A. (1959) ‘The Biographical Tradition: Pythagoras’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 90: 185–94.Google Scholar
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8, trans. McKirahan, R.D. (2008).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2, trans. Goldin, O. (2009)
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Meteorology 1.1–4, trans. Kupreeva, I. (2008).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On Coming-to-Be and Perishing 1.1–5, trans. Williams, C. J. F. (1999).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On Coming-to-Be and Perishing 1.6–2.4, trans. Williams, C. J. F. (1999).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On Coming-to-Be and Perishing 2.5–11, trans. Kupreeva, I. (2005).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Soul 1.1–2, trans. Eijk, Ph. J. (2005).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Soul 1.3–5, trans. Eijk, Ph. J. (2006).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Soul 2.1–6, trans. Charlton, W. (2005).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Soul 2.7–12, trans. Charlton, W. (2005).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–8, trans. Charlton, W. (2000a).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Soul 3.9–13 with Stephanus, On Aristotle On Interpretation, trans. Charlton, W. (2000b).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle On the Intellect (De Anima 3.4–8), trans. Charlton, W. with the assistance of Bossier, F. (1991).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Physics 1.1–3, trans. Osborne, C. (2006).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Physics 2, trans. Lacey, A. R. (1993).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Physics 3, trans. Edwards, M. J. (1994).
,PhiloponusCorollaries on Place and Void with Simplicius, Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World, trans. Furley, D. and Wildberg, C. (1991).
,PhiloponusOn Aristotle Physics 5–8 with Simplicius, On Aristotle on the Void, trans. Lettinck, P. and Urmson, J. O. (1994).
,PhiloponusAgainst Proclus On the Eternity of the World 1–5, trans. Share, M. (2005).
,PhiloponusAgainst Proclus On the Eternity of the World 6–8, trans. Share, M. (2005).
,PhiloponusAgainst Proclus On the Eternity of the World 9–11, trans. Share, M. (2009).
,PhiloponusAgainst Proclus On the Eternity of the World 12–18, trans. Wilberding, J. (2006).
,PhiloponusAgainst Aristotle On the Eternity of the World, trans. Wildberg, C. (1987).
,Philoponus. Against Proclus on the Eternity of the World, trans. Wilberding, J. (2006). London.
Philoponus, . Commentaire sur le De Anima d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Verbeke, G. (1966). Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum III. Louvain–Paris.
,Photios, Bibliotheca: Henry, R., Photius, Bibliothèque, 8 vols. (1959–77). Paris.
,Photios, Lexicon: Photii patriarchae lexicon (A–M), ed. Theodoridis, C., 2 vols. (1982–98). Berlin
,Photios, Photii patriarchae Lexicon, ed. Neiber, S. A. (1864–5). Leiden.
,Photios, Photiou Lekseon Synagoge, ed. Porson, R. (1822). Cambridge.
,Photios, Amphilochia: Epistulae et Amphilochia, ed. Laourdas, B. and Westerink, L. G., 6 vols. (1983–8). Leipzig.
,Photios, Homilies: Photiou Homiliai, ed. Laourdas, B. (1959). Thessaloniki.
,Photios, Mango, C. (trans.), The Homilies of Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople (1958). Cambridge, MA.
,Photios, Commentaries in Matthaeus, John, Epistles: Reuss, J., Matthäus-Kommentare aus der griechischen Kirche (1957). Berlin. 270–337
,Photios, Reuss, J., Johannes-Kommentare aus der griechischen Kirche (1966). Berlin. 359–412
,Photios, Staab, K., Pauluskommentar aus der griechischen Kirche aus Katenenhandschriften gesammelt (1933). Münster, 470–652.
,Photios, Account on the Recent Upshooting of the Manichaeans: Wolska-Conus, W., ‘Récit abrégé de la récente réapparition des Manichéens’, Travaux et mémoires 4 (1970) 121–73.Google Scholar
,Photios, Letters: see Amphilochia; White, D. Stratoudaki, Patriarch Photios of Constantinople. His Life, Scholarly Contributions and Correspondence together with a Translation of Fifty-two of his Letters (1981). Brookline, MA.
Pines, S. (1972) ‘An Arabic Summary of a Lost Work of John Philoponus’, Israel Oriental Studies 2: 320–52.Google Scholar
Pirenne, Henri (1939) Mohammed and Charlemagne. New York.
Plotiniana Arabica ad codicum fidem anglice vertit Lewis, G., in Plotini Opera II, Enneades IV–V ediderunt P. Henry et H.-R. Schwyzer (1959). Paris.ndash;Louvain.
Plotiniana Arabica ad codicum fidem anglice vertit Lewis, G., in Plotini Opera II, Enneades IV–V, ediderunt Henry, P. et Schwyzer, H.-R. (1959). Paris.ndash;Louvain.
Plotinus, . The Six Enneads, trans. Mackenna, Stephen and Page, B. S. (2004). Whitefish, MT.
,Plutarch of Chaeronea, Cap. ex inim. ut. (Syriac): A Tract of Plutarch On the Advantage to be Derived from One’s Enemies (De capienda ex inimicis utilitate). The Syriac Version edited from a ms. from Mount Sinai, ed. Nestle, E. (1894). London [Repr. Gorgias Press, 2006].
Plutarco di Atene. L’Uno, l’Anima, le Forme. Saggio introduttivo, Fonti, Traduzione e Commento, Taormina, D. P. (1989). Catania.
Podskalsky, G. (1977) Theologie und Philosophie in Byzanz. Der Streit um die theologische Methodik in der spätbyzantinischen Geistesgeschichte (14/15. Jh.), seine systematischen Grundlagen und seine historische Entwicklung [Byzantinisches Archiv 15]. Munich.
Podskalsky, G. (2003) Von Photios zu Bessarion. Der Vorrang humanistisch geprägter Theologie in Byzanz und deren bleibende Bedeutung. Wiesbaden.
Porphyrii Isagoge, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1966). AL 1.6, Bruges–Paris.
Possekel, U. (1998) ‘Der “Rat der Theano”. Eine Pythagoreische Spruchsammlung in syrischer übersetzung’, Le Muséon 111: 7–36.Google Scholar
Préaux, J. (1977) ‘Jean Scot et Martin de Laon en face du De nuptiis de Martianus Capella’, in Roques, (1977) 161–70.
Praechter, K. (1909) ‘Die griechischen Aristoteleskommentare’, Byzantinische Zeitscrift 18: 516–38 (English translation in Sorabji (1990) 31–54).Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1926) ‘Das Schriftenverzeichnis des Neuplatonikers Syrianos bei Suidas’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 26: 253–64.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1932) ‘Syrianos’, in RE IV coll. 1728–75.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1912) ‘Christlich-neuplatonische Beziehungen’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 21: 1–27.Google Scholar
Praechter, Karl (1904) Review of Olympiodori Prolegomena et in Categorias commentarium. CAG XII.1. Berlin. Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 166: 374–91.
Praechter, K. (1927) ‘Simplikios’, RE IIIA. 1, 204–213, no. 10.Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1910) ‘Richtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus’, in Genethliakon C. Robert. Berlin, 103–56Google Scholar
Praechter, K. (1931) ‘Anonymi Logica et Quadrivium’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 31: 82–90.Google Scholar
Pratsch, T. (1998) Theodoros Studites (759–826), zwischen Dogma und Pragma. Frankfurt.
Preston, Rebecca (2001) ‘Roman Questions, Greek Answers: Plutarch and the Construction of Identity’, in Goldhill, Simon (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge, 86–122.Google Scholar
Prisciani Lydi quae extant Metaphrasis in Theophrastum et Solutionum ad Chosroem liber, ed. Bywater, I. (1886). CAG Supplementum Aristotelicum 1.2.
,Priscianus. On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception, with ‘Simplicius’ On Aristotle on the Soul 2.5–12, trans. Huby, Pamela and Steel, Carlos (1997). London.
Procli diadochi Hypotyposis astronomicarum positionum, ed. Manutius, C. (1909). Leipzig. [reprint 1974].
Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii, ed. Kroll, W., 2 vols. (1899–2001). Leipzig [Reprint Amsterdam 1965.]
Procli Diadochi In Platonis Timaeum commentaria, ed. Diehl, E. (1903–6). Leipzig [reprint Amsterdam 1965].
Procli Diadochi in primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii, ed. Friedlein, G. (1873). Leipzig. 1873 [reprint Hildesheim 1967].
Procli Diadochi Lycii institutio physica, ed. Ritzenfeld, A. (1912). Leipzig.
Procli Diadochi tria opuscula (De providentia, libertate, malo) Latine Guilelmo de Moerbeka vertente et graece ex Isaacii Sebastocratoris aliorumque scriptis collecta, ed. Boese, H. (1960). Berlin.
Procli hymni accedunt hymnorum fragmenta; epigrammata, scholia, fontium et locorum similium apparatus, indices, ed. Vogt, E. (1957). Wiesbaden.
Procli philosophi Platonici opera inedita, ed. Cousin, V., 2nd edn. (1864). Paris. [First edition 1820–7.] [Reprint of the Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, Hildesheim 1961 and 2002; reprint of the whole work, Frankfurt am Main 1962, 617–1244.]
Procli: In Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria I–III. Steel, Ed. C. et al. (2007–9). Oxford.
Proclus, . Commentaire sur le Parménide de Platon. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Steel, C., vols. I–II (1982, 1985). Leuven–Leiden.
Proclus, . Elementatio Theologica, translata a Guillelmo de Morbecca, ed. Boese, H. (1987). Leuven.
Proclus Diadochus. Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, critical text and indices by Westerink, L. G. (1954). Amsterdam.
Marinus. Proclus ou sur le Bonheur, texte établi et traduit par Saffrey, H. D. et Segonds, A.-Ph. (2001). Paris.
Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, trans. by Morrow, G. R. and Dillon, J. M. (1987). Princeton, NJ.
Proclus’ Hymns: Essays, Translations, Commentary, ed. Berg, R.M. den (2001). Leiden.
Proclus. Alcibiades I, trans. O’Neill, W., 2nd edn. (1971). The.Hague. [First edition 1964.]
Proclus. Commentaire sur le Parménide de Platon, Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, éd. critique par Steel, C. (1982–5) Leuven.
Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, eds. and trans. Tarrant, H., Runia, D.T., Share, M. and Baltzly, D., 4 vols. (2007–9). Cambridge.
Proclus. Elementatio theologica, translata a Guillelmo de Morbecca, hrsg. Boese, von H. (1987). Leuven.
Proclus. On Providence, trans. by Steel, C. (2007). London.
Proclus. On the Eternity of the World (de Aeternitate mundi), Greek text with introduction, translation and commentary by Lang, H. S. and Macro, A. D., argument I translated from the Arabic by McGinnis, J. (2001). Berkeley, CA.
Proclus. On the Existence of Evils, trans. Opsomer, by J. and Steel, C. (2003). London.
Proclus. The Elements of Theology, ed. and trans. by Dodds, E. R., 2nd edn (1963) Oxford. [First edition 1933.]
Proclus. Trois études sur la providence, texte établi et trad. par Isaac, D., 3 vols. avec une note additionelle par C. Steel (1977–82). Paris.
Proclus: Commentaire sur la République, trad. par Festugière, A.-J., 3 vols. (1970) Paris.
Proclus: Platonic Theology, trans. Taylor, by Th. (1816). Kew Gardens, (NY). [Reprint, Selene Books, 1995.]
Proclus: Théologie platonicienne, texte établi et traduit par Saffrey, H. D. et Westerink, L.G., 6 vols. (1968–97). Paris.
Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon, eds. Westerink, L. G., Trouillard, J. and Segonds, A. Ph. (1990). Paris.
,Psellos Michael, Chronography: Renauld, é.. Michel Psellos, Chronographie ou histoire d’un siècle de Byzance (976–1077), 2 vols. (1926–8). ed. and French trans. Paris; repr. 1967.
,Psellos Michael, Ad Xifilinum: Criscuolo, U.. Michele Psello, Epistola a Giovanni Xifilino (1990a). Hellenica et byzantina neapolitana 14 Naples.
,Psellos Michael, Opuscula philosophica: Michaelis Pselli Philosophica Minora, 1. Opuscula logica, physica, allegorica, alia, ed. Duffy, J. (1992). Stuttgart.
,Psellos Michael, 2. Opuscula psychologica, theologica, daemonologica, ed. O’Meara, D. J. (1989). Leipzig.
,Pseudo-Johannes PhiloponusExpositiones in omnes XIV Aristotelis Libros Metaphysicos. übersetzt von Franciscus Patritius. Neudruck der ersten Ausgabe Ferrara 1583, ed. Lohr, Ch. (1991) CAG. (Versiones Latinae temporis resuscitatarum litterarum 2). Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt.
,Pseudo-Maximus, Useful Selections from Various Poets, Ecclesiastical Writers and Ancient Philosophers: Florilège sacro-profane du Pseudo-Maxime, ed. Sargologos, E. (2001). Thessaloniki.
,Pseudo-Maximus, Ps.-Maximus Confessor. Erste kritische Edition einer Redaktion des sacro-profanen Florilegiums Loci communes, ed. Ihm, S. (2001). Stuttgart.
Puxley, D. (2006) ‘The Role of the Human in the Procession and Return of the Cosmos from Plotinus to Eriugena’, Dionysius 24: 175–208.Google Scholar
Translation (into Latin) of Maximus the Confessor. Quaestiones ad Thalassium una cum latina interpretatione Ioannis Scotti Eriugenae, ed. Laga, C., and Steel, C. (1980, 1990). Vol. I. Quaestiones I–LV; Vol. II. Quaestiones LVI–LXV. CCSG 7 and 22.
Quicherat, J. (1853) ‘Solution des problèmes proposés par Chosroès. Traité inédit de Priscien le Philosophe’, Bibliothèque de l’école des Chartes 3.4: 248–63.Google Scholar
Tābit b. Qurra’s arabische übersetzung der Ἀριθμητικὴ εἰσαγωγή des Nikomachos von Gerasa, ed. Kutsch, W. (1958). Beirut.
Ramón Guerrero, R. (1990) ‘Al-Farabi lógico: su exposición de la Isagogé de Porfirio’, Revista de Filosofia 3: 45–67.Google Scholar
Rapp, Claudia (2005) Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity: The Nature of Christian Leadership in an Age of Transition. Berkeley, CA.
Rasā’il al-KindĪ al-falsafiyya, ḥaqqaqahā wa-ahrajahā maʿa muqaddima …RĪda, M. ’A. Abū, al-’arabĪ, Dār al-fikr, I–II (1950–3). Cairo.
Rashed, M. (1997) ‘A “New” Text of Alexander on the Soul’s Motion’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle and After. London.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2008) Alexandre d’Aphrodise, Commentaire perdu à la Physique d’Aristote (livres IV–VIII). Berlin.
Rashed, M. (2000) ‘Traces d’un Commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique a Byzance?’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 84: 275–84.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2002) ‘Nicolas d’Otrante, Guillaume de Moerbeke et la “Collection philosophique”’, Studi medievali 43: 693–717.Google Scholar
,Ratramnus of Corbie. Liber de Anima ad Odonem Bellovacensem, ed. Lambot, C. (1952). Analecta Mediaevalia Namurcensia 2. Namur–Lille.
Raven, W. (2003) ‘De mundo. Tradition syriaque et arabe’, in DPhA Suppl. Paris, 481–3.Google Scholar
Reiss, E. (1982) Boethius. Boston, MA.
Relihan, J.C. (2007) The Prisoner’s Philosophy: Life and Death in Boethius’s Consolation. Notre Dame, IN.
Renaud, François (2006) ‘Rhétorique philosophique et fondement de la dialectique: le commentaire du ‘Gorgias’ par Olympiodore’, Philosophie antique 6: 137–61.Google Scholar
Renaud, François (2007) ‘La Conoscenza di sé nell’Alcibiade I e nel commento di Olimpiodoro’, in Migliori, Maurizio, Valditara, Linda M. Napolitano and Fermani, Arianna (eds.), Interiorità e anima. La psychè in Platone. Milan, 225–44.Google Scholar
Renaud, François (2008) ‘Tradition et critique: lecture jumelée de Platon et Aristote chez Olympiodore’, Laval théologique et philosophique, 64.1 (février 2008), Le commentaire philosophique (I): 89– 104.Google Scholar
Renczes, Philipp Gabriel (2003) Agir de Dieu et liberté de l’homme: recherches sur l’anthropologie théologique de saint Maxime le Confesseur. Paris.
Renehan, R. (1984) ‘Meletius’ Chapter on the Eyes: An Unidentified Source’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38: 159–68.Google Scholar
Rey, A.-L. (2004) ‘Les Erotapokriseis dans le monde byzantin’, in Volgers, A. and Zamagni, C. (eds.), Erotapokriseis. Early Christian Question-and-Answer Literature in Context. Leuven, 165–80.Google Scholar
Richard, M. (1950) ‘Apo phŌnēs’, Byzantion 20: 191–222.
Richard, M. (1958) ‘Anastase le Sinaïte, l’Hodegos et le monothélisme’, Revue des études Byzantines 46: 29–42; repr. in Richard (1977) III: Study 63.Google Scholar
Richard, M. (1967–8) ‘Les véritables “Questions et Réponses” d’Anastase le Sinaïte’, Bulletin de l’Institut de Recherche et d’Histoire des Textes 15: 39–56; repr. in Richard (1977) III: Study 64.Google Scholar
Richard, M. (1977) Opera minora, 3 vols. Turnhout.
Richter, G. (1964) Die Dialektik des Johannes von Damaskos. Eine Untersuchung des Textes nach seinen Quellen und seiner Bedeutung. Ettal.
Riel, G., Steel, C. and J., McEvoy (eds.) (1996) Iohannes Scottus Eriugena, The Bible and Hermeneutics. Leuven.
Riet, S. (1991) ‘à propos de la biographie de Simplicius’, Revue Philosophique de Louvain 89: 506–14.Google Scholar
al-FārābĪ, Risāla fĪ l-’aql, ed. Bouyges, M. (1938). Imprimerie Catholiquem, Beirut. [2nd edn 1983.]
On Government (Arabic): Risālat Tāmistiyus ilā Yūliyān al-Mālik fĪ l-siyāasa wa-tadbĪr al-mamlaka, ed. Sālim, M. SalĪm (1970). Cairo.
Rist, J. M. (1965) ‘Hypatia’, Phoenix 19. 3: 214–25.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. (1966) ‘A Note on Eros and Agape in Pseudo-Dionysius’, Vigiliae Christianae 20: 235–43.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. (1985) Platonism and its Christian Heritage. London.
Rokéah, David (2002) Justin Martyr and the Jews. Leiden.
Roland-Gosselin, M.-D. (1926) Le De Ente et Essentia de s. Thomas d’Aquin. Texte établi d’après les manuscrits parisiens. Kain.
Romano, F. (1993) ‘La défense de Platon contre Aristote par les néoplatoniciens’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), Contre Platon, I. Le Platonisme dévoilé. Paris, 175–95.Google Scholar
Ronchey, Silvia (2001) ‘Hypatia the Intellectual’, in Fraschetti, Augusto (ed.), Roman Women. Chicago, IL, 160–89.Google Scholar
Roques, René (1947) ‘Le primat du transcendant dans la purification de l’intelligence selon le Pseudo-Denys’, Revue d’ascétique et de mystique 23: 142–70.Google Scholar
Roques, René (1949) ‘Note sur la notion de Theologia chez le Pseudo-Denys l’Aréopagite’, Revue d’ascétique et de mystique 25: 200–12.Google Scholar
Roques, René (1954a) ‘De l’implication des méthodes théologiques chez le Pseudo-Denys’, Revue d’ascétique et de mystique 30: 268–74.Google Scholar
Roques, René (1954b) L’univers dionysien. Structure hiérarchique du monde selon le Pseudo-Denys. Paris.
Roques, René (1957) ‘Symbolisme et théologie négative chez le Pseudo-Denys’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 1: 97–112.Google Scholar
Roques, René (1961) ‘A propos des sources du Pseudo-Denys’, Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 56: 449–64.Google Scholar
Roques, René (1962) Structures théologiques de la gnose à Richard de Saint-Victor. Paris.
Roques, R. (1973) ‘Traduction ou interprétation? Brèves remarques sur Jean Scot traducteur de Denys’, in O’Meara, and Bieler, (1973) 59–76.
Roques, R. (ed.) (1977) Jean Scot Erigène et l’histoire de la philosophie. Paris.
Rorem, Paul (1984) Biblical and Liturgical Symbols within the Pseudo-Dionysian Synthesis. Toronto.
Rorem, Paul (1993) Pseudo-Dionysius. A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence. Oxford.
Rorem, Paul and Lamoreaux, John C. (1998) John of Scythopolis and the Dionysian Corpus: Annotating the Areopagite. Oxford.
Rorem, P. (2005) Eriugena’s Commentary on the Dionysian Celestial Hierarchy. Toronto.
Rosenthal, F. (1942) ‘Al-KindĪ als Literat’, Orientalia 2: 262–88.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, F. (1975) The Classical Heritage in Islam. London.
Rosenthal, F. and Walzer, R. (eds.) (1943) Alfarabius De Platonis Philosophia. London. [Reprint, Nendeln–Liechtenstein, 1973.]
Roskam, Geert (2002) ‘A Paideia for the Ruler: Plutarch’s Dream of Collaboration between Philosopher and Ruler’, in Stadter, P. A. and Stockt, L. (eds.), Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power. Leuven, 175–90.Google Scholar
Roueché, Mossman (1974) ‘Byzantine Philosophical Texts of the Seventh Century’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 23: 61–76.Google Scholar
Roueché, Mossman (1980) ‘A Middle Byzantine Handbook of Logic Terminology’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 29: 71–98.Google Scholar
Roueché, Mossman (1990) ‘The Definitions of Philosophy and a New Fragment of Stephanus the Philosopher’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 40: 107–28.Google Scholar
Roueché, M. (1974) ‘Byzantine Philosophical Texts of the Seventh Century’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 23: 61–76.Google Scholar
Roueché, M. (1980) ‘A Middle Byzantine Handbook of Logic Terminology’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 29: 71–98.Google Scholar
Roueché, M. (1990) ‘The Definitions of Philosophy and a New Fragment of Stephanus the Philosopher’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 40: 107–28.Google Scholar
Rougé, Jean (1990) ‘La politique de Cyrille d’Alexandrie et la meurtre d’Hypatie’, Cristianesimo nella storia 11: 485–504.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Philip (1994) Basil of Caesarea, Transformation of the Classical Heritage; 20. Berkeley, CA.
Russell, Norman (2004) The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford.
Rutledge, Dom Denys (1964) Cosmic Theology. The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy of Pseudo-Denys: An Introduction. New York.
Sabra, A. I. (1969) ‘Simplicius’s Proof of Euclid’s Parallels Postulate’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 32: 1–24.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. (1981) ‘Les Néoplatoniciens et les Oracles chaldaïques’, études Augustiniennes 27: 209–25.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. and Westerink, L. G. (1968) Proclus. Théologie platonicienne, tom.i. Paris, xxxv ff.
Saffrey, D. (1990) Recherches sur le néoplatonisme après Plotin. Paris.
Saffrey, D. (1992). ‘Accorder entre elles les traditions théologiques: une charactéristique du néoplatonisme Athénien’, in Bos, E. P. and Meijer, A. (eds.), On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy, Leiden–New York–Cologne, 35–50.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.D. (1990) Recherches sur le Néoplatonisme après Plotin. Paris.
Saffrey, H.D. (2000) Le Néoplatonisme après Plotin. Paris.
Saffrey, Henri Dominique (1984) ‘Quelques aspects de la spiritualité des philosophes Néoplatoniciens: de Jamblique à Proclus et Damascius’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 68: 169–82.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique (1986) ‘Neoplatonist Spirituality II. From Iamblichus to Proclus and Damascius’, Classical Mediterranean Spirituality: Egyptian, Greek, Roman (World Spirituality 15). London, 250–65.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique (1992) ‘Le thème du malheur des temps chez les derniers philosophes néoplatoniciens’, in: Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile, Madec, Goulven and O’Brien, Denis (eds.), σοφιησ μαιητορεσ ‘Chercheurs de sagesse’. Hommage à Jean Pépin. Paris, 421–31.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri Dominique (2000a) Le Néoplatonisme après Plotin. Paris.
Saffrey, Henri Dominique (2000b) ‘Héliodore d’Alexandrie’, in Goulet, Richard (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques III. Paris, 534–5.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. (1992) ‘Accorder entre elles les traditions théologiques: une caractéristique du néoplatonisme Athénien’, in Bos, E. P. and Mejer, P. A. (eds.), On Proclus and His Influence in Medieval Philosophy. Leiden, 35–50.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. (1954) ‘Le chrétien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l’école d’Alexandrie au VIe siècle’, Revue des études grecques 67: 396–410.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. (1966) ‘Un lien objectif entre le Pseudo-Denys et Proclus’, Studia Patristica 9: 98–105.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. (1982) ‘New Objective Links between the Pseudo-Dionysius and Proclus’, in O’Meara, Dominic (ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. Albany, NY, 64–74.Google Scholar
Sainte-Croix, G. E.M. (1954) ‘Aspects of the “Great” Persecution’, Harvard Theological Review 47: 75–113.Google Scholar
Sakkos, S. (1964) Peri Anastasion Sinaiton. Thessaloniki.
Saller, R. (1982) Personal Patronage under the Early Empire. Cambridge.
Salzman, Michele Renée (2002) The Making of a Christian Aristocracy. Cambridge, MA.
Sambursky, S. (1962) The Physical World of Late Antiquity. London.
Samir, Kh. (1986) ‘Les versions arabes de Némésius de Homs’, in Pavan, M. and Cozzoli, U. (eds.), L’eredità classica nelle lingue orientali. Rome, 99–151.Google Scholar
Sanders, K. R. (2002) ‘Much Ado About “Nothing”: mêden and to mê on in Parmenides’, Apeiron 25.2: 87–104.Google Scholar
Savvidis, K. (1997) Die Lehre von der Vergöttlichung des Menschen bei Maximus dem Bekenner und ihre Rezeption bei Gregor Palamas. S. Ottilien.
Schäfer, Christian (2006) The Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite: An Introduction to the Structure and the Content of the Treatise ‘On the Divine Names’. Leiden.
Schaeder, H. (1962) ‘Die Christianisierung der aristotelischen Logik in der byzantinischen Theologie repräsentiert durch Johannes von Damaskus und Gregor Palamas’, Theologia (Athens) 33: 1–21.Google Scholar
Schamp, J. (1987) Photios historien des lettres. La Bibliothèque et ses notices biographiques. Paris.
Schamp, J. (1996a) ‘Photios aristotélisant? Remarques critiques’, in Billerbeck, M. and Schamp, J. (eds.), καινοτομία. Die Erneuerung der griechischen Tradition. Fribourg, 1–17.Google Scholar
Schamp, J. (1996b) ‘La “localization” chez Photios. Traduction commentée de Questions à Amphilochios 145’, in Motte, A. and Denooz, J. (eds.), Aristotelica Secunda. Mélanges offerts à Chr. Rutten. Liège, 265–79.Google Scholar
Scheible, H. (1972) Die Gedichte in der Consolatio Philosophiae des Boethius. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften n.F. 46. Heidelberg.
Schibli, Hermann S. (2002) Hierocles of Alexandria. Oxford.
Schicker, Rudolf (1993) ‘Einheit, Scheidung und Erkenntnis im Urteil des Neuplatonikers Damaskios’, in Albertini, T. (ed.), Verum et Factum. Beiträge zur Geistesgeschichte und Philosophie des Renaissance zum 60. Geburtstag von Stephan Otto, Frankfurt am Main, 83–96.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kohl, V. (1965) Die neuplatonische Seelenlehre in der Consolatio Philosophiae des Boethius. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 16. Meisenheim am Glan.
Schmitt, C.B. (1969) ‘Some Notes on Jacobus Dalechampius and His Translation of Theophrastus (Manuscript: BN.Lat. 11,857)’, Gesnerus 26: 36–53.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C.B. (1976) ‘Priscianus Lydus’, in Cranz, F.E. and Kristeller, P.O. (eds.), Catalogus translationum et commentariorum. Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries. Washington DC, 75–82.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2002) ‘Leucippus, Democritus and the ou mallon Principle: An Examination of Theophrastus Phys. Op. Fr. 8’, Phronesis 47.3: 253–63.Google Scholar
Scholten, C. (1996) Antike Naturphilosophie und christliche Kosmologie in der Schrift ‘De opificio mundi’ des Johannes Philoponos. Berlin–New York.
Schrimpf, G. (1966) Die Axiomenschrift des Boethius (De hebdomadibus) als philosophisches Lehrbuch des Mittelalters. Leiden.
Schultze, B. (1972a) ‘Byzantinisch-patristische Anthropologie. Johannes von Damaskus und Photios’, Orientalia Christiana Periodica 38: 172–94.Google Scholar
Schultze, B. (1972b) ‘Das Weltbild des Patriarchen Photios nach seinen Homilien’, Kairos 15: 101–15.Google Scholar
Scotti Muth, N. (1993) Proclo negli ultimi quarant’ anni: Bibliografia ragionata della letteratura primaria e secondaria riguardante il pensiero procliano e i suoi influssi storici (anni 1949–1992), introduction by Beierwaltes, W.. Milan.
Scriptores Historiae Augustae, trans. Magie, David (1967). Cambridge, MA.
Segonds, A.-Ph. and Steel, C. (eds.) (2000) Proclus et la Théologie platonicienne. Actes du colloque international de Louvain (13–16 mai 1998) en l’honneur de Saffrey et L.G. Westerink. Leuven–Paris.
Semmelroth, Otto (1949). ‘Erlösung und Erlöser im System des Ps.-Dionysius Areopagite’, Scholastik 24: 367–403.Google Scholar
Semmelroth, Otto (1950a) ‘Gottes überwesentliche Einheit. Zur Gotteslehre des Ps.-Dionysius Areopagita’, Scholastik 25: 209–34.Google Scholar
Semmelroth, Otto (1950b) ‘Gottes geeinte Vielheit. Zur Gotteslehre des Ps.-Dionysius Areopagita’, Scholastik 25: 389–403.Google Scholar
Semmelroth, Otto (1952) ‘Die Theologia symbolike des Ps.-Dionysius Areopagita’, Scholastik 27: 1–11.Google Scholar
Semmelroth, Otto (1953) ‘Gottes ausstrahlendes Licht. Zur Schöpfungs- und Offenbarungslehre des Ps.-Dionysius Areopagita’, Scholastik 28: 481–503.Google Scholar
Semmelroth, Otto (1954) ‘Die Lehre des Ps.-Dionysius Areopagita vom Aufstieg der Kreatur zum göttlichen Licht’, Scholastik 29: 24–52.Google Scholar
Sermones duo in constitutionem hominis secundum imaginem Dei necnon opuscula adversus Monotheletas, ed. Uthemann, K.-H. (1985). CCSG 12.
Sezgin, F. et al. (eds.) (2000) Proclus Arabus and the Liber de Causis (Burûklûs ’inda l-’Arab wa-kitâb al-îdâh fî l-khayr al-mahd). Frankfurt am Main.
Sezgin, F. (1970) Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums, vol. III. Leiden, 157–60.
Sharples, R.W. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias. Scholasticism and innovation’, ANRW II.36.2: 1176–1243. Berlin-New York.Google Scholar
Shaw, Gregory (1999) ‘Eros and Arithmos: Pythagorean Theurgy in Iamblichus and Plotinus’, Ancient Philosophy 19. 1: 121–43.Google Scholar
Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (1964–5) ‘The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy of Pseudo-Dionysius’, Downside Review 82: 293–302; Downside Review 83: 20–31.Google Scholar
Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (1972) ‘Henads and Angels: Proclus and the ps.-Dionysius’, Studia Patristica 11. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sheldon-Williams, I. (1967) ‘Johannes Scottus Eriugena’, in Armstrong, (1967) 518–33.
Sheppard, A. (1982) ‘Monad and Dyad as Cosmic Principles in Syrianus’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Lloyd, A. C. (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatinism. Syrianus, Proclus and Simplicius. Papers and Discussions of a Colloquium held at Liverpool, 15–16 April 1982. Liverpool, 1–17.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (1980) Studies on the Fifth and Sixth Essays of Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic. Göttingen.
Sheppard, A. (1982) ‘Proclus’ Attitude to Theurgy’, Classical Quarterly 32: 212–24.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (1987) ‘Proclus’ Philosophical Method of Exegesis, the Use of Aristotle and the Stoics in the Commentary on the Cratylus’, in Pépin, and Saffrey, (1987) 137–51.
Sherwood, Polycarp (1952) An Annotated Date-List of the Works of Maximus the Confessor. Rome.
Sherwood, P. (1952) ‘Sergius of Reshaina and the Syriac Versions of the Pseudo-Denis’, Sacriserudiri 4: 174–84.Google Scholar
Shiel, J. (1990) ‘Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle’, in Sorabji, (1990) 349–72.
Shiel, J. (1958) ‘Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle’, Medieval and Renaissance Studies 4: 217–44.Google Scholar
Siclari, A. (1977) ‘Il pensiero filosofico di Giovanni di Damasco nella critica’, Aevum 51: 349–83.Google Scholar
Siclari, A. (1978) Giovanni di Damasco. La funzione della “Dialectica”. Perugia.
Sider, D. (2005) The Fragments of Anaxagoras. 2nd edn, Sankt Augustin.
Sider, D. (2006) ‘Simplicius’, in Borchert, D. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2nd edn Detroit, MI, 9: 34–6.Google Scholar
Silverstein, T. (1952) ‘Adelard, Aristotle, and the De natura deorum’, Classical Philology 47. 2: 82–6.Google Scholar
Silvestre, H. (1963) ‘Note sur la survie de Macrobe au moyen âge’, Classica et Mediaevalia 24: 170–80.Google Scholar
,Simokattes Theophylaktos, Universal History: ed. Boor, C. and (rev.) Wirth, P. (1972). Stuttgart.
Simokattes Theophylaktos, M. and Whitby, M. (trans.), The History of Theophylact Simocatta (1986). Oxford.
,Simokattes Theophylaktos, On Predestined Terms of Life: Garton, C. and Westerink, L. G., Theophylactus Simocates On Predestined Terms of Life [Arethusa Monographs 6] (1978). Buffalo, NY.
,Simokattes Theophylaktos, Quaestiones naturales: ed. Positano, L. Massa (1965). Naples.
,Simokattes Theophylaktos, Letters: ed. Zanetto, I. (1985). Leipzig.
Simplicii in libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria, ed. Hayduck, Michael (1882). CAG XI.
,Simplicius. Commentaire sur le Manuel d’é pictète. Introduction et édition critique du texte grec par Ilsetraut Hadot (1996). Leiden.
,Simplicius. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 1.1–2.4, trans. Lautner, P., and Urmson, J. O. (1995). Ithaca, NY.
,Simplicius. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.1–5, trans. Blumenthal, H. J. (2000). London–Ithaca, NY.
Simplicius, . Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Pattin, A. with the collaboration of W. Stuyven (1971, 1975). Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum v/1–2. Louvain–Paris.
‘Simplicius’ Commentary on Definitions, Postulates and Axioms in Euclids Elementa I, extant in Abu al-Abbas an-Nayrizis, ed. Arnzen, Rüdiger (2002).
‘Simplicius’ On Aristotle on the Soul 2.5–12, trans. Huby, P. M. (2002).
‘Simplicius’ On Aristotle on the Soul 3.1–5, trans. Blumenthal, H. J. (2000).
‘Simplicius’ On Aristotle’s On the soul 1.1–2.4, trans. Urmson, J. O. (2002).
Siorvanes, Lucas (1989) Proclus. London.
Siorvanes, L. (1996) Proclus. Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science. New Haven, CT.
Siriano esegeta di Aristotele I. Frammenti e Testimonianze dei Commentari all’ ‘Organon’, ed. Cardullo, R. L. (1995). Florence.
Siriano esegeta di Aristotele II. Frammenti e testimonianze del Commentario alla ‘Fisica’, ed. Cardullo, R. L. (2000). Catania.
Skinner, Alexander (2008) ‘The Early Development of the Senate of Constantinople’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 32. 2: 128–48.Google Scholar
Skowronski, Leopoldus (1884) De auctoris Heerenii et Olympiodori Alexandrini scholis cum universis tum iis singulis quae ad vitam Platonis spectant capita selecta. Bratislava.
Smith, A. (1987) ‘Porphyrian Studies since 1913’, ANRW II.36.2: 717–73.Google Scholar
Smith, Rowland (1995) Julian’s Gods. Religion and Philosophy in the Thought and Action of Julian the Apostate. New York.
Smith, A. (ed.) (2005) The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Essays in Honour of Peter Brown. Swansea.
Smith, A. (ed.) (1993) Porphyrii Philosophi Fragmenta. Stuttgart–Leipzig.
Snee, Rochelle (1998) ‘Gregory Nazianzen’s Anastasia Church: Arianism, the Goths, and Hagiography’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 52: 157–86.Google Scholar
Sophronius, . Logos eis to hagion baptisma, Analekta Hierosolumitikēs Stachulogias, ed. Papadopoulos-Kerameus, A. (1898). St.Petersburg.
Sorabji, R. (2005a) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200 – 600 AD. Ithaca, NY.
Sorabji, R. (2005b) ‘Divine Names and Sordid Deals in Ammonius’ Alexandria’, in Smith, Andrew (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Swansea, 203–14.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1990a) Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and their Influence. London–Ithaca, NY.
Sorabji, R. (1990b) ‘Infinite Power Impressed, the Transformation of Aristotle’s Physics and Theology’, in Sorabji (1990a) 181–98.
Sorabji, R. (2005b) The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 A.D. A Sourcebook. Vol. I: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion), Vol. II: Physics, Vol. III: Logic andMetaphysics. London–Ithaca, NY.
Sorabji, Richard (1988) Matter, Space and Motion. Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. London.
Sorabji, Richard (2004) The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 AD. A Sourcebook, 3 volumes, London.
Sorabji, Richard (2004) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD. A Sourcebook, vol. I, Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). London.
Sorabji, R. (1983) Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London.
Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space and Motion. London.
Sorabji, R. (1996) ‘Simplicius’, Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd edn, Oxford, 1409–10.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2004) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD. A Sourcebook, 3 vols. London.
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (1987) Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. London–Ithaca,NY.
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (2004) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD. A Sourcebook, 3 vols. London.
Sorabji, Richard (2000) Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford.
Sourdel, D. (1962) ‘La politique religieuse du calife ’abbaside al-Ma’mūn’, Revue des études Islamiques 30: 27–48.Google Scholar
Spearritt, Placid (1970) ‘The Soul’s Participation in God according to Pseudo-Dionysius’, Downside Review 83: 378–92.Google Scholar
Speca, A. (2001) Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Philosophia Antiqua 87. Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
St. Maximus the Confessor’s Questions and Doubts, trans. Prassas, Despina (2010). Dekalb, IL.
St. Maximus the Confessor: The Ascetic Life, The Four Centuries on Charity, trans. Sherwood, Polycarp (1955). Westminster, MD.
Stead, G. C. (1964) ‘The Platonism of Arius’, Journal of Theological Studies 15: 16–34.Google Scholar
Stead, G. C. (1994) ‘Arius in Modern Research’, Journal of Theological Studies 45: 24–37.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2003) ‘Why Should We Prefer Plato’s Timaeus to Aristotle’s Physics? Proclus’ Critique of Aristotle’s Causal Explanation of the Physical World’, in Sharples, R. W. and Sheppard, A. (eds.), Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Timaeus, ed. London, 175–87.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2005a) ‘Proclus’ Defence of the Timaeus Against Aristotle’s Objections. A Reconstruction of a Lost Polemical Treatise’, in Leinkauf, Th. and Steel, C. (eds.), Plato’s Timaeus and the Foundations of Cosmology in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Leuven, 163–93.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2005b) ‘Theology as First Philosophy. The Neoplatonic Concept of Metaphysics’, Quaestio: annuario di storia della metafisica 5: 3–21.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2006) ‘Neoplatonism’ and ‘Proclus’ in Borchert, D. M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edn. Detroit, MI, vol. 6, col. 546–557; vol. 8, col. 40–44.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2008) ‘Proclus on the Mirror as Metaphor of Participation’, in Smet, D., Sebti, M. et Callataÿ, G. (eds.), Miroir et savoir. La transmission d’un thème platonicien, des Alexandrins à la philosophie arabo-musulmane. Leuven, 79–96.Google Scholar
Steel, C.Ammonius, ed. Minniti-Colonna, M., Zacaria Scholastico. Ammonio (1973). Naples.
Steel, C.Vita Severi, ed. and trans. Kugener, M. A. (1904). Patrologia Orientalis II.
Steel, Carlos (1978) The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke academie voor wetenschappen, letteren en schone kunsten van België. Klasse der letteren 85. Brussels.
Steel, C. G. (1978) The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren Jaargang 40, Nr. 85. Brussels.
Steel, C. (1997) ‘Proclus et Denys: De l’existence du mal’, in Andia, Y. (ed.), Denys L’Aréopagite et sa postérité en Orient et en Occident. Paris, 89–116.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (1997) ‘Das neue Interesse für den Platonismus am Ende des 13. Jahrhunderts’, in Kobush, T. and Mojsisch, B. (eds.), Platon in der abendländischen Geistesgeschichte. Neue Forschungen zum Platonismus. Darmstadt, 120–33.Google Scholar
Steinschneider, M. (1889–96 [1960]) Die arabische übersetzungen aus dem Grieschischen, Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt. Graz. [Reprints from Beihefte zum Centralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, Zeitschrift für Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medizin.]
,Stethatos Niketas, Discourse on the Soul: in Opuscules et Lettres, ed. Darrouz, J.ès (1961). SC 81.
,Stethatos Niketas, Life of Symeon the New Theologian: Hausherr, I., Un grand mystique byzantin. Vie de Syméon le Nouveau Théologien par Nicétas Stéthatos [Orientalia Christiana 12] (1928). Rome.
Stevens, A. (1990) Postérité de l’être: Simplicius interprète de Parménide. Brussels.
Stiglmayr, Joseph (1928) ‘Der sogenannte Dionysius Areopagita und Severus von Antiochien’, Scholastik 3: 161–89.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1995) ‘Cicero and Greek Philosophy’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 53–61.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, G. (1990) ‘Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq al-IbāadĪ’, in Encyclopédie de l’Islam, 2nd edn. Vol. III. Leiden–Paris, col. 578.Google Scholar
Sturlese, L. (1987) ‘Il dibattito sul Proclo latino nel Medioevo fra l’Università di Parigi e lo Studium di Colonia’, in Boss, G. and Seel, G. (eds.), Proclus et son influence. Actes du Colloque de Neuchâtel, juin 1985. Zürich, 261–85.Google Scholar
Suchla, Beate Regina (1980) ‘Die sogenannten Maximus-Scholien des Corpus Dionysiacum Areopagiticum’, Nachrichten von der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 3: 31–66.Google Scholar
Suchla, Beate Regina (1984) ‘Die überlieferung des Prologs des Johannes von Skythopolis zum griechischen Corpus Dionysiacum Areopagiticum’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 4: 176–88.Google Scholar
Suchla, Beate Regina (1985) ‘Eine Redaktion des griechischen Corpus Dionysiacum Areopagiticum im Umkreis des Johannes von Skythopolis, des Verfassers von Prolog und Scholien’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen 4: 177–93.Google Scholar
Suidae Lexicon, ed. Adler, A. (1928–38). Leipzig.
Petri Abaelardi Opera Theologica III. Theologia ‘Summi Boni’, Theologia ‘Scholarium’, eds. Buytaert, E. M. and Mews, C. (1987). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis xiii. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Super Librum de Causis Expositio, ed. Saffrey, H.-D. (1954). Fribourg–Louvain.
Sweeney, E. (1994) ‘Three Notions of resolutio and the Structure of Reasoning in Aquinas’, The Thomist 58.2: 197–241.Google Scholar
Sweeney, L. (1962) ‘John Damascene’s Infinite Sea of Essence’, Studia Patristica 6: 248–63.Google Scholar
Sweeney, L. J. (1959) ‘Doctrine of Creation in the Liber de Causis’, in O’Neil, C. J. (ed.), An étienne Gilson Tribute. Milwaukee, 274–89.Google Scholar
,Symeon the New Theologian, Catéchéses, eds. Krivocheine, B. and Paramelle, J., 3 vols. (1963–5). SC 96, 104, 113.
,Symeon the New Theologian, Chapitres théologiques, gnostiques et pratiques, ed. Darrouzès, J. (1996). SC 51bis, 40–186.
,Symeon the New Theologian, Hymnes, eds. Koder, J. and Paramelle, J., 3 vols. (1969–73). SC 156, 174, 196
,Symeon the New Theologian, Kambylis, A., Symeon Neos Theologos, Hymnen [Supplementa Byzantina 3] (1976). Berlin.
,Symeon the New Theologian, Traités théologiques et éthiques, 2 vols., ed. Darrouzès, J. (1966–7). SC 122, 129.
Syrianus, . On Aristotle Metaphysics 13–14, trans. Dillon, John and O’Meara, Dominic (2007). London.
Syrianus: On Aristotle Metaphysics 13–14, an English translation by Dillon, J. and O’Meara, D (eds.) (2008). London.
Syrianus: On Aristotle Metaphysics 3–4, an English translation by Dillon, J. and O’Meara, D. (eds.) (2006). London.
Törönen, Melchisedec (2007) Union and Distinction in the Thought of St. Maximus the Confessor. Oxford.
Taisbak, C. M. (1981) ‘The Date of Anonymous Heiberg, Anonymi logica et quadrivium’, Cahiers du Moyen-âge Grec et Latin 39: 97–102.Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P. (1993) ‘Dynamiques de l’écriture et processus cognitif dans le néoplatonisme: Jamblique, Plutarque d’Athènes, Priscien de Lydie et Proclus’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), Le platonisme dévoilé, vol. I. Paris215–45.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1987) ‘Syrianus and Pseudo-Alexander’s Commentary on Metaph. E–N’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung Paul Moraux gewidmet, II. Berlin, 215–232.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1987) ‘The Text of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics’, in Hadot, (1987a): 246–66.
Tarán, L. (1978) Anonymous Commentary on Aristotle’s “De Interpretatione”. Meisenheim.
Tardieu, M. (1990) Les paysages reliques. Routes et haltes syriennes d’Isidore à Simplicius. Bibliothèque de l’école des hautes études. Section des sciences religieuses 94, Leuven.
Tardieu, M. (1987), ‘Les calendriers en usage à Harran d’apres les sources arabes et le commentaire de Simplicius à la Physique d’Aristote’, in Hadot, (1987a): 40–57.
Tardieu, M. (1986) ‘Sabiens coraniques et Sabiens de Harran’, Journal Asiatique 274: 1–44.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D. (2006) Reading Plato in Antiquity. London.
Tarrant, Harold (1997a) ‘Restoring Olympiodorus’ Syllogistic’, Ancient Philosophy 17: 411–24.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold (1997b) ‘Olympiodorus and the Surrender of Paganism’, in Byzantinische Forschungen, 24, Garland, L. (ed.), Conformity and Non-conformity in Byzantium, 181–92.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold (1998) ‘Olympiodorus and History. The Texts and Sixth Century A.D. History’, in Hillard, Tom W. (ed.), Ancient History in a Modern University. Proceedings of a conference held at Macquarie University, 8–13 July, 1993. Grand Rapids, MI, 417–25.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold (2007) ‘Olympiodorus and Proclus on the Climax of the Alcibiades’, International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1: 3–29.Google Scholar
Tatakis, B. (1949) La Philosophie Byzantine. Paris.
Tatakis, B. (1967) Meletemata christianikes philosophias. Athens.
Tatakis, B. (1969) ‘La philosophie grecque patristique et byzantine’, in Histoire de la Philosophie, 1 [Encyclopédie de la Pléiade 26]. Paris, 936–1005.Google Scholar
Tatakis, B. (2003) Byzantine Philosophy, trans. with introduction by Moutafakis, N. J.. Indianapolis, IN.
Tatakis, B. (2007) Christian Philosophy in the Patristic and Byzantine Tradition, ed. by Dragas, G.. Rollinsford, NH.
Taub, L. C. (2003) Ancient Meteorology. London–New York.
Temkin, O. (1962) ‘Byzantine Medicine: Tradition and Empiricism’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 16: 97–115.Google Scholar
Teologia platonica, a cura di Casaglia, M.Linguiti, A. (2007). Turin.
On Intellect: ‘Texte arabe du περὶ νοῦ d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise’, ed. Finnegan, J. in Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 33 (1956), 157–202Google Scholar
Textes inédits transmis par l’Ambr. Q 74 sup. Alexandre d’Aphrodise et Olympiodore d’Alexandrie, ed. Rashed, M. (1997), in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 84: 219–38. [Also see M. Rashed (2007) L’héritage aristotélicien. Paris, 159–78].
Textus Byzantinos ad Iconomachiam Pertinentes, in usum academicum, ed. Hennephof, H. (1969) Leiden.
Proclus, Théologie platonicienne, I. Texte établi et traduit par Saffrey, H. D. and Westerink, L. G. (1968). Paris.
The Arabic Text of Alfarabi’s Against John the Grammarian’, ed. Mahdi, M. (1972), in
The Chaldean Oracles: Text, Translation and Commentary, Majercik, R. (1989). Leiden.
The Church, the Liturgy, and the Soul of Man: The Mystagogia of St. Maximus the Confessor, trans. Stead, Julian (1982). Still River, MA.
The Disputation with Pyrrhus of Our Father among the Saints Maximus the Confessor, trans. Farrell, Joseph (1990). South Canaan, PA.
Caesarea, Eusebius of. The Ecclesiastical History, 2 vols., trans. Lake, Kirsopp (1926). Vol. Cambridge, MA. Reprint, 2001.
The Fihrist of al-Nadîm. A tenth-century survey of Muslim Culture, ed. Dodge, B. (1970). New York.
The Fihrist of al-Nadām. A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture, ed. and trans. Dodge, B., vols. I–II (1970). New York–London.
The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, vol. II, Damascius, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1977). Amsterdam–Oxford–New York.
The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, vol. I, Olympiodorus, ed. Westerink, L. G. (1976). Amsterdam–Oxford–New York.
The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, vol. II: Damascius, [= In Phaed. I, II], ed. Westerink, L. G. (1977). Amsterdam–Oxford–New York.
The Philokalia: The Complete Text, vol. II, trans. Palmer, G. E. H., Sherrard, Philip and Ware, Kallistos (1981). London and Boston, MA.
The Proof of the Gospel, being the Demonstratio evangelica of Eusebius of Caesarea, 2 vols., trans. Ferrar, W. J. (1920). London.
The Voice of the Eagle. Homily on the Prologue to the Gospel of St. John, trans. Bamford, C. (1990). Great Barrington, MA.
Imperator, Julianus. The Works of the Emperor Julian, 3 vols., trans. Wright, Wilmer Cave (1990). Cambridge, MA.
De virtute (Syriac): Themistii Orationes, eds. Schenkl, H. and Downey, G. (1965–74). I–III. Leipzig, III: 7–71.
In An. Post. (Latin version of the Arabic lost version): ‘Themistius’ Paraphrasis of the Posterior Analytics in Gerard of Cremona’s Translation’, ed. O’Donnel, R. (1958). Mediaeval Studies 20: 239–315.Google Scholar
,Theodore of Raithu, Preparation: in Diekamp, F., Analecta patristica (1938). Rome. 173–222.
,Theodore the Stoudite, Roth, C. (trans.), St Theodore the Stoudite on the Holy Icons (1981). New York.
,Theodore the Stoudite, The Great Catechism: Cozza-Luzi, J., Nova Patrum Bibliotheca, 9/2; 10/1 (1888–1905). Rome
,Theodore the Stoudite, Papadopoulos-Kerameus, A., Theodoros Studites, Megale Katechesis (1904). St. Petersburg.
,Theodore the Stoudite, Cozza-Luzi, J., Nova Patrum Bibliotheca, 9/1 (1888). Rome.
,Theodore the Stoudite, Mohr, A.-M. (trans.), Petites Catéchèses (1993). Paris.
,Theodore the Stoudite, Letters: Theodori Studitae Epistulae, 2 vols., ed. Fatouros, G. (1992). CFHB 31.
,Theodore the Stoudite, Constas, N. P., Saint Theodore the Studite. The Testament (1991). Washington, DC.
Thiel, R. von. (1999) Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen. Mainz.
Thiel, R. (1999) ‘Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen’, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz. Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, no. 8.Google Scholar
,Thierry of Chartres. De Sex Dierum Operibus, in Commentaries on Boethius by Thierry of Chartres and his School, ed. Häring, N.M. (1971). Toronto.
,Thierry of Chartres. Lectiones in Boethii De Trinitate. In Commentaries on Boethius by Thierry of Chartres and his School, ed. Häring, N. M. (1971). Toronto.
Thomas, D. (ed.) (2001) Syrian Christians under Islam. The First Thousand Years. Leiden–Boston–Cologne.
Thunberg, Lars (1965) Microcosm and Mediator: The Theological Anthropology of Maximus the Confessor. Lund.
‘Le Liber de Causis. édition établie à l’aide de 90 manuscrits avec introduction et notes’, ed. Pattin, A., Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28 (1966), 90–203.
Tinnefeld, F. (1996) ‘Schicksal und Vorherbestimmung im Denken der Byzantiner’, Zeitschrift des Mediävistenverbandes 1: 21–42.Google Scholar
Aristides, Aelius. To Rome, trans. Oliver, J. H. (1953). Philadelphia, PA.
Topica, ed. Minio-Paluello, L. (1969). AL 5.1–2, Brussels–Paris.
Tornau, C. (2007) ‘Bemerkungen zu Stephanos von Alexandria, Plotin und Plutarch von Athens’, Elenchos 28: 105–27.Google Scholar
Tornau, C. (2000) ‘Die Prinzipienlehre des Moderatos von Gades. Zu Simplikios in Ph. 230,34– 231,24 Diels’, Rheinisches Museum 143 (2): 197–220.Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. (1977) ‘Ist die “Philosophiae consolatio” des Boethius zum vorgesehenen Abschluss gelangt?’, Vigiliae Christianae 31: 148–54. (Repr. in Fuhrmann and Gruber (1984) 311–19.)Google Scholar
Trabattoni, Franco (1985) ‘Per una biografia di Damascio’, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 40: 179–201.Google Scholar
Trabattoni, Franco (2002) ‘Filosofia e dialettica in Damascio’, in Barbanti, Maria, Giardina, Giovanna R. and Manganaro, Paolo (eds.), HenŌsis kai philia. Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano. Catania, 477–94.Google Scholar
Travis, J. (1984) In Defence of the Faith. The Theology of Patriarch Nikephoros of Constantinople. Brookline, MA.
Treadgold, Warren (1997) A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford, CA.
Treadgold, W. (1979) ‘The Revival of Byzantine Learning and the Revival of the Byzantine State’, American Historical Journal 84: 1251–66.Google Scholar
Treadgold, W. (1980) The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photius. Washington, DC.
Treatise on Divine Predestination, trans. Brennan, M. (1998). Notre Dame, IN.
Treiger, A. (2005) ‘New Evidence on the Arabic Versions of the Corpus Dionysiacum’, Le Muséon 118: 219–40.Google Scholar
Trizio, M. (2007) ‘Byzantine Philosophy as a Contemporary Historiographical Project’, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 74: 247–94.Google Scholar
Troncarelli, F. (2005) Cogitatio mentis: L’eredità di Boezio nell’Alto Medioevo. Storie e Testi 16. Naples.
Troncarelli, F. (1981) Tradizione perdute. La “Consolatio philosophiae” nell’alto Medioevo. Padova.
Trouillard, Jean (1972) ‘La notion de dunamis chez Damascius’, Revue des études grecques 85: 353–63.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1955) ‘Le Cosmos du Pseudo-Denys’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie, Série 3. 51–7.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1977) ‘La notion d’ “analyse” chez érigène’, in Roques, (1977) 349–56.
Trouillard, J. (1981) ‘Procession néoplatonicienne et création judeo-chrétienne’, in idem, (ed.), Néoplatonisme, mélanges offerts à Jean Trouillard. Fontenay-aux-Roses, 1–30.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1983a) ‘La ‘Virtus Gnostica’ selon Jean Scot érigène’, Revue de théologie et de philosophie 115: 331–54.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1983b) ‘érigène et la naissance du sens’, in Blume, H.-D. and Mann, F. (eds.), Platonismus und Christentum. Festschrift für Heinrich Dörrie. Munster, 267–76.Google Scholar
Troupeau, G. (1984) ‘Un épitomé arabe du ‘De contingentia mundi’ de Jean Philopon’, in Lucchesi, E. and Saffrey, H.D. (eds.), Mémorial A.J. Festugière. Geneva, 77–88.Google Scholar
Troupeau, G. (1991) ‘Le rôle des syriaques dans la transmission et l’exploitation du patrimoine philosophique et scientifique grec’, Arabica 38: 1–10.Google Scholar
Tsigaras, G. (1988) ‘Philosophisches Instrumentarium der Christologie von Theodoros Studites über die Darstellung des menschgeworden Logos’, Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum 20: 268–77.Google Scholar
Tsirpanlis, A. (1967–8) ‘The Anthropology of Saint John of Damascus’, Theologia (Athens) 38: 533–48; 39: 68–106.Google Scholar
Turner, H. J. M. (1990) St Symeon, the New Theologian and Spiritual Fatherhood. Amsterdam.
Tutti i commenti a Marziano Capella. Testo latino a fronte, (ed.) Ramelli, I. (2006). Milan.
Ullmann, M. (1970) Die Medizin im Islam. Leiden–Cologne.
Usener, H. (1877) Anecdoton Holderi: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte Roms in ostgothischer Zeit. Bonn. Repr. Hildesheim and New York, (1969).
Uthemann, K. H. (1986) ‘Sprache und Sein bei Anastasios Sinaites’, Studia Patristica 18.1: 221–31.Google Scholar
Völker, Walther (1958) Kontemplation und Ekstase bei Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita. Wiesbaden.
Vallat, Ph. (2004) Farabi et l’école d’Alexandrie. De prémisses de la connaissance à la philosophie politique. Paris.
van den Berg, R.M. (2008) Proclus’ Commentary on the Cratylus in Context. Ancient Theories of Language and Naming. Leiden.
van den Daele, Albert (1941) Indices Pseudo-Dionysiani. Louvain.
Van Der Horst, Pieter W. (1998) ‘Plato’s Fear as a Topic in Early Christian Apologetics’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 6.1: 1–13.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd (1999) ‘Le plaisir est-il la réplétion d’un manque? La définition du plaisir (Philèbe 32a–36c) et la physiologie des plaisirs faux (42c–44a)’, in Dixsaut, Monique (ed.), La fêlure du plaisir. Etudes sur le Philèbe de Platon. Vol. I: Commentaires. Paris, 299–314.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd (2000) Pleasure and the Good Life. Plato, Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. Philosophia antiqua 85. Leiden.
Van Riel, Gerd (2001) ‘Les hénades de Proclus sont-elles composées de limite et d’illimité?’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 85: 417–32.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd (2002) ‘“N’essayons pas de compter l’intelligible sur les doigts”. Damascius et les principes de la limite et de l’illimité’, Philosophie antique 2: 199–219.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd (2009) ‘Proclus on Matter and Physical Necessity’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism. Leiden, 231–57.Google Scholar
Van Riet, S. (1965) ‘Fragments de l’original grec du “De intellectu” de Philopon dans une compilation de Sophonias’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 63: 5–40.Google Scholar
Van Roey, A. (1979) ‘Fragments antiariens de Jean Philopon’, Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica 10: 237–50.Google Scholar
Van Roey, A. (1980) ‘Les fragments trithéites de Jean Philopon’, Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica 11: 135–63.Google Scholar
Van Roey, A. (1984) ‘Un traité cononite contra la doctrine de Jean Philopon sur la résurrection’, in Antidoron. Hulde aan M. Geerard. Wetteren, 123–39.Google Scholar
Vanderspoel, John (1995) Themistius and the Imperial Court: Oratory, Civic Duty, and Paideia from Constantius to Theodosius. Ann Arbor, MI.
Vanneste, Jean (1959) Le Mystère de Dieu. Essai sur la structure rationnelle de la doctrine mystique du Pseudo-Denys l’Aréopagite. Louvain.
Verbeke, G. (1981) ‘Aristotle’s Metaphysics Viewed by the Ancient Greek Commentators’, in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Studies in Aristotle. Washington, DC, 107–27.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1975) ‘Simplicius’, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. XII.440–3.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1982) ‘Some Later Neoplatonic Views on Divine Creation and the Eternity of the World’, in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought. Norfolk, VA, 45–53.Google Scholar
Verrycken, Koenraad (1990) ‘The Development of Philoponus’ Thought and Its Chronology’, in Sorabji, (1990) 233–74.
Verrycken, K. (1990) ‘The Metaphysics of Ammonius Son of Hermeias’, in Sorabji (1990a) 199–231.
Verrycken, K. (1991) ‘La psychogonie platonicienne dans l’oeuvre de Philopon’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 75: 211–34.Google Scholar
Verrycken, K. (1997a) ‘Johannes Philoponos’, in Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum XVIII. Stuttgart, 534–53.Google Scholar
Verrycken, K. (1997b) ‘Philoponus’ Interpretation of Plato’s Cosmogony’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 269–318.Google Scholar
Verrycken, K. (20001) ‘La Métaphysique d’Ammonius chez Zacharie de Mytilène’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 85: 241–66.Google Scholar
Viano, Cristina (1995) ‘Olympiodore l’Alchimiste et les Présocratiques. Une doxographie de l’unité (De arte sacra, 2. 18–27)’, in Kahn, Didier and Matton, Sylvain (eds.), Alchimie. Art, histoire et mythes. Actes du 1er colloque international de la Société d’étude de l’Histoire de l’Alchimie (Paris, Collège de France, 14–16 mars 1991). Paris–Milan, 95–150.Google Scholar
Viano, Cristina (2002) ‘Le Commentaire d’Olympiodore au livre IV des Météorologiques d’Aristote’, in Viano, Cristina (ed.), Aristoteles chemicus. Il IV libro dei ‘Meteorologica’ nella tradizione antica e medievale. Sankt Augustin, 59–79.Google Scholar
Viano, Cristina (2006) La matière des choses. Le livre IV des Météorologiques d’Aristote et son interprétation par Olympiodore, avec le texte grec révisé et une traduction inédite de son Commentaire au Livre IV. Paris.
Vidov, B. (1985) St Theodore the Studite. Toronto.
Visser, A. J. (1952) Nikephoros und der Bilderstreit. The Hague.
Vlad, Marilena (2004) ‘De principiis: de l’aporétique de l’Un à aporétique de l’Ineffable’, ChŌra. Revue d’études anciennes et médiévales 2: 125–48.Google Scholar
Vogel, Cornelia J., Dörrie, Heinrich and zum Brunn, Emilie (eds.) (1971) Le Néoplatonisme. Actes du colloque international du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Royaumont, 9–13 juin 1969. Paris.
Vogel, C. J. (1981) ‘Greek Cosmic Love and the Christian Love of God. Boethius, Dionysius the Areopagite and the Author of the Fourth Gospel’, Vigiliae Christianae 35: 57–81.Google Scholar
Waithe, Mary Ellen (1996) ‘Finding Bits and Pieces of Hypatia’, in McAlister, Linda L. (ed.), Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers. Bloomington, IN, 4–15.Google Scholar
Walker, Joel Thomas (2002) ‘The Limits of Late Antiquity: Philosophy between Rome and Iran’, Ancient World 33. 1: 45–69.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2002) ‘The Limits of Late Antiquity: Philosophy between Rome and Iran’, Ancient World 33: 45–69.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1949) ‘New Light on Galen’s Moral Philosophy’, Classical Quarterly 43: 82–96. [Reprint in idem, Greek into Arabic. Essays in Islamic Philosophy. Oxford, 1963, 142–63.]Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1950) ‘The Rise of Islamic Philosophy’, Oriens 3: 1–19.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, Brian (2005) The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization. Oxford.
Warnon, Jean (1967) ‘Le commentaire attribué à Héliodore sur les εἰσαγωγικά de Paul d’Alexandrie’, in Hofinger, M., Maniet, A. and Mogenet, J. (eds.), Recherches de philologie et de linguistique. Louvain, 197–217.Google Scholar
Watts, E. J. (2005) ‘Where To Live the Philosophical Life in the Sixth Century?Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 45. 3: 285–315.Google Scholar
Watts, E. J. (2006) City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley, CA.
Watts, E. (2005) ‘Winning the Intracommunal Dialogues: Zacharias Scholasticus’ Life of Severus’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 13.4, 437–64.Google Scholar
Watts, E. (2006) City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley, CA.
Watts, Edward (2005) ‘Where to Live the Philosophical Life in the Sixth Century? Damascius, Simplicius, and the Return from Persia’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 45: 285–315.Google Scholar
Watts, E.J. (2006) City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria. Berkeley, CA.
Wear, Sarah Klitenic, and Dillon, John (2007) Dionysius the Areopagite and the Neoplatonic Tradition: Despoiling the Hellenes. Aldershot.
Weber, W. (1936) ‘Hadrian’, in Cook, S., Adcock, F. and Charlesworth, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. XI: The Imperial Peace AD 70–192. Cambridge, 133–4.Google Scholar
Weems, Mason Locke (1918) A History of the Life and Death, Virtues and Exploits of General George Washington, repr. J. B. Lippincott.
Weigel, Richard D. (1984) ‘The “Commemorative” Coins of Antoninus Pius Reexamined’, in Heckel, W. and Sulivan, R. (eds.), Ancient Coins of the Graeco-Roman World: The Nickle Numismatic Papers. Waterloo, ON, 187–200.Google Scholar
Werline, Rodney (1999) ‘The Transformation of Pauline Arguments in Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho’, The Harvard Theological Review 29. 1: 79–93.Google Scholar
Westerink, L.G. (ed.) (1990) Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon, traduit par Trouillard, J. avec la collaboration de Segonds, A.Ph.. Paris.
Westerink, L. G. (1990) ‘The Alexandrian Commentators and the Introductions to their Commentaries’, in Sorabji (1990a) 325–49.
Westerink, Leendert Gerrit (1971) ‘Damascius, commentateur de Platon’, in de Vogel, Dörrie and Brunn, zum (1971) 253–60 [repr. in Westerink (1980) 271–8].
Westerink, Leendert Gerrit (1980) Texts and Studies in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Literature. Collected Papers. Amsterdam.
Westerink, Leendert Gerrit (1964) ‘Philosophy and Medicine in Late Antiquity’, Janus 51: 169–77.Google Scholar
Westerink, Leendert Gerrit (1971) ‘Ein astrologisches Kolleg aus dem Jahre 564’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 64: 6–21.Google Scholar
Westerink, Leendert Gerrit (1990) ‘The Alexandrian Commentators and the Introductions to their Commentaries’, in: Sorabji, Richard (ed.), Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and their Influence. London, 325–48. [Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. Amsterdam, 1962: X–XXXII].Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (1962) Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. Amsterdam.
Westerink, L. G. (1961) ‘Elias on the Prior Analytics’, Mnemosyne IV. 14: 126–39.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (1973) ‘Proclus on Plato’s Three Proofs of Immortality’, in Zetesis. Liber amicorum De Strycker, Antwerp–Utrecht, 296–306.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (1980) Texts and Studies in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Literature. Amsterdam.
Westerink, L. G. (1973) ‘Proclus on Plato’s Three Proofs of Immortality’, in Zetesis: Album Amicorum door vrienden en collega’s aangeboden aan Prof. E. De Strycker. Antwerp–Utrecht, 296–306.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (1975) ‘The Historical Background of Proclus’ Doctrine of the αὐθυπόστατα’, in: Dörrie, H. (ed.), De Jamblique à Proclus. Genève, 193–230 [reprint in Studies in Platonism and Patristic Thought (Variorum reprints), London. 1984, XVI].Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (1971) ‘Parmenides, Fr. 8, 5,’ in idem, God Time Being. Two Studies in the Transcendental Tradition in Greek Philosophy. Symbolae Osloenses, Suppl. vol. 23. Oslo, 16–32.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (1991) ‘Arethas and the “Collection philosophique”’, in Harlfinger, D. and Prato, G. (eds.), Paleografia e codicologia greca, I. Alessandria, 513–21.Google Scholar
Wicher, H. B. (1986) ‘Nemesius Emesenus’, in Cranz, F. E., Brown, V. and Kristeller, P. O. (eds.), Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum. Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries. Annotated Lists and Guides 6. Washington DC, 31–72.Google Scholar
Wiesner, J. (1989) ‘Theophrast und der Beginn des Archereferats von Simplikios’ Physikkommentar’, Hermes 117: 288–303.Google Scholar
Wiessner, G. (1972) ‘Zur Handschriftenüberlieferung der syrischen Fassung des Corpus Dionysiacum’, Nachrichten d. Akad. d. Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-Hist. Kl. 165–216.Google Scholar
Wildberg, Christian (1990) ‘Three Neoplatonic Introductions to Philosophy: Ammonius, David and Elias’, Hermathena 149: 33–51.Google Scholar
Wildberg, Christian (2005) ‘Philosophy in the Age of Justinian’, in Maas, Michael (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge, 316–40.Google Scholar
Wildberg, Christian (2007), ‘Olympiodorus’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Electronic resource, Stanford University Palo Alto. CA.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. (1993) ‘Simplicius und das Zitat. Zur überlieferung des Anführungszeichens’, in Berger, F. (ed.), Symbolae Berolinenses. Für Dieter Harlfinger. Amsterdam, 187–99.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. (1998) ‘Simplicius’, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy vol. VIII. London, 788–91.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. (2007) ‘Simplicius’, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (online article).Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. (1987) ‘Prolegomena to the Study of Philoponus’ “Contra Aristotelem”’, in Sorabji, (1987) 197–209.
Wildberg, C. (1988) John Philoponus’ Criticism of Aristotle’s Theory of Aether. Berlin–New York.
Wilken, Robert Louis (1980) ‘The Jews and Christian Apologetics after Theodosius I Cunctos populos’, The Harvard Theological Review 73. 3/4: 451–71.Google Scholar
Wilken, Robert (1995) ‘Maximus the Confessor on the Affections in Historical Perspective’, in Wimbush, V. L. and Valantasis, R. (eds.), Ascetism. Oxford, 412–23.Google Scholar
,William of Conches. Guillelmi de Conchis. Glosae super Boetium, ed. Nauta, L. (1999). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis CLVII.
,William of Conches. Glosae super Macrobium, in ‘The Doctrine of the Trinity in Guillaume de Conches’ Glosses on Macrobius’, ed. Rodnite-Lemay, H. (1972). Diss. Columbia University.
,William of Conches. Guillelmi de Conchis. Glosae super Platonem, ed. Jeauneau, é. (2003). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis CCIII.
,William of Conches. Philosophia Mundi, ed. Maurach, G. with the assistance of H. Telle (1980). Pretoria.
Williams, Daniel H. (1992) ‘The Anti-Arian Campaigns of Hilary of Poitiers and the “Liber contra Auxentium”’, Church History 61. 1: 7–22.Google Scholar
Williams, Daniel H. (1995) Ambrose of Milan and the End of the Nicene–Arian Conflicts. New York.
Williams, R. D. (1985) Arius: Heresy and Tradition. London.
Williams, S. and Friell, G. (1995) Theodosius: The Empire at Bay. New Haven, CT.
Wilmart, A. (1937) ‘Les réponses de Priscien le Philosophe sous le nom de Saint AugustineRevue Bénédictine 49: 3–12.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. G. (1983) Scholars in Byzantium. London.
Wolff, M. (1971) Fallgesetz und Massebegriff. Zwei wissenschaftshistorische Untersuchungen zur Kosmologie des Johannes Philoponus. Berlin.
Wolff, M. (1978) Geschichte der Impetustheorie. Untersuchungen zum Ursprung der klassischen Mechanik. Frankfurt.
Wolfram, Herwig (1997) The Roman Empire and its Germanic Peoples. Berkeley, CA.
Wolska-Connus, W. (1989) ‘Stéphanos d’Athènes et Stéphanos d’Alexandrie: essai d’identification et de biographie’, Revue des études Byzantines 47: 5–89.Google Scholar
XVIII Arg. De aet. mundi: Al-Aflāṭūniyya al-muḥdata ’inda l-’Arab, Maktabat al-nahḍa al-miṣriyya, ed. BadawĪ, ʿA. (1955). Cairo, 32–42.
Yavetz, Ido (2003) ‘On Simplicius’ Testimony Regarding Eudoxan Lunar Theory’, Science in Context 16.3: 319–29.Google Scholar
Young, J. L., Latham, J. D., Serjeant, R. B. (eds.) (1990) Religion, Learning and Science in the ’Abbāsid Period. Cambridge.
Yousif, E.-I. (1997) Les Philosophes et traducteurs syriaques. D’Athènes à Bagdad. Paris–Montreal.
,Zacharias of Chalkedon, On Time: Oehler, K., ‘Zacharias von Chalkedon, über die Zeit’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 50 (1957) 31–8; also in Oehler (1969a) 300–8.Google Scholar
Zambon, M. (2003) ‘Aristotelis Platonisque sententias in unam revocare concordiam. Il progetto filosofico boeziano e le sue fonti’, Medioevo 28: 17–49.Google Scholar
Zeigler, K. (1941) ‘Photios’, in Realencyclopädie der Altertumswissenschaft 20: 667–727.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1905) Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy, trans. Alleyne, S. F. and Abbott., E.London.
Zhivov, V.M. (1987) ‘The Mystagogia of Maximus the Confessor and the Development of the Byzantine Theory of the Image’, St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 31: 349–76.Google Scholar
Zier, M. (1992) ‘The Growth of an Idea’, in Westra, H. (ed.), From Athens to Chartres. Neoplatonism and Medieval Thought. Studies in Honour of édouard Jeauneau. Leiden, 71–83.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, F. W. (1986) ‘The Origins of the so-called Theology of Aristotle’, in Kraye, J., Ryan, W. F. and Schmitt, C.-B. (eds.), Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages: The ‘Theology’ and Other Texts. London, 110–240.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, F. W. (1994) ‘Proclus Arabus Rides Again’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4: 9–51.Google Scholar
Zografidis, G. (1997) Byzantine philosophia tes eikonas. Mia anagnose tou Ioanne Damaskenou. Athens.
Zografidis, G. (1999) ‘Aristotle and John of Damascus: The First Unmoved Mover and God-Creator’, in Pentzopoulou-Valalas., T. (ed.), Aristotle on Metaphysics. Thessaloniki, 201–21.Google Scholar
Zonta, M. (1991) ‘Nemesiana Syriaca: New Fragments from the Missing Syriac Version of the De Natura Hominis’, Journal of Syriac Studies 36: 223–58.Google Scholar
Zunjic, S. (1994) ‘The Definition of Philosophy in the Dialectica of John Damascene’, in Boudouris, K. (ed.), Philosophy and Orthodoxy. Athens, 298–323.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Lloyd Gerson, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194846.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Lloyd Gerson, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194846.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Lloyd Gerson, University of Toronto
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194846.024
Available formats
×