Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Print publication year: 2000
  • Online publication date: May 2011

41 - Priscian of Lydia and Pseudo-Simplicius on the soul

from VI - Late Platonism
Priscian of Lydia is one of the six philosophers listed by Agathias Histories to have accompanied Damascius on his journey to the Sassanian king Chosroes I. He is credited with a work apparently written for King Chosroes, and known in Latin translation under the title Solutiones eorum de quibus dubitavit Chosroes Persarum rex. The Solutiones discusses a number of issues, including what is the nature of the human soul, the nature of sleep, how vision relates to dreams and prophecy in dreams, the solar year cause the four seasons and different climatic, and how lunar phases and lunar activity affect tidal variations zones. An undisputed work on psychology by Priscian is his so-called Metaphrasis on Theophrastus. Priscian provides a thoroughly late-Platonic interpretation of the Peripatetic material, prompted by the critical questions of Theophrastus. The doctrinal content of the Metaphrasis is best discussed in connection with a commentary on Aristotle's De anima which all manuscripts attribute to Simplicius.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online ISBN: 9781139095464
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
M. F. Burnyeat (2002) ‘De anima II.5’, Phronesis 47..

A. Cameron (1969–70) ‘Agathias on the Sassanians’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23:

A. Diller (1951) ‘A Source of the Mirabiles Auscultationes’, Classical Philology 46..

M. Esposito (1918) ‘Priscianus Lydus and Johannes Scottus’, Classical Review 32:

I. Hadot (1987a) ‘La vie et l’oeuvre de Simplicius d’après des sources grecques et arabes’, in I. Hadot (ed.), Simplicius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Actes du colloque international de Paris, 1985 [Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus, 15]. Berlin.

I. Hadot (1987b) ‘Recherches sur les fragments du commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote’, in I. Hadot (ed.), Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Berlin–NY.

I. Hadot (2002) ‘Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima (CAG XI): a Methodological Survey’, Mnemosyne 55:

Iamblichus De anima. Text, Translation and Commentary, eds. J. F. Finamore and J. M. Dillon (2002). Leiden.

A. Kamp (2001) Philosophiehistorie als Rezeptionsgeschichte. Die Reaktion auf Aristoteles’ De Anima-Noetik. Der frühe Hellenismus, Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie33. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, PA.

S. Kapetanaki and R.W. Sharples (2006) Pseudo-Aristoteles (Pseudo-Alexander), Supplementa Problematorum. Peripatoi20. Berlin–New York.

P. Moraux (ed.) (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Vol. II, Peripatoi. Philologischhistorische Studien zum Aristotelismus6. Berlin–New York.

M. Perkams (2005) ‘Priscian of Lydia, Commentator on the De anima in the Tradition of Iamblichus’, Mnemosyne 58:

T. Silverstein (1952) ‘Adelard, Aristotle, and the De natura deorum’, Classical Philology 47. 2:

A. Wilmart (1937) ‘Les réponses de Priscien le Philosophe sous le nom de Saint AugustineRevue Bénédictine 49: