Skip to main content
  • Print publication year: 2000
  • Online publication date: May 2011

41 - Priscian of Lydia and Pseudo-Simplicius on the soul

from VI - Late Platonism
Priscian of Lydia is one of the six philosophers listed by Agathias Histories to have accompanied Damascius on his journey to the Sassanian king Chosroes I. He is credited with a work apparently written for King Chosroes, and known in Latin translation under the title Solutiones eorum de quibus dubitavit Chosroes Persarum rex. The Solutiones discusses a number of issues, including what is the nature of the human soul, the nature of sleep, how vision relates to dreams and prophecy in dreams, the solar year cause the four seasons and different climatic, and how lunar phases and lunar activity affect tidal variations zones. An undisputed work on psychology by Priscian is his so-called Metaphrasis on Theophrastus. Priscian provides a thoroughly late-Platonic interpretation of the Peripatetic material, prompted by the critical questions of Theophrastus. The doctrinal content of the Metaphrasis is best discussed in connection with a commentary on Aristotle's De anima which all manuscripts attribute to Simplicius.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity
  • Online ISBN: 9781139095464
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Athanassiadi P. (1993) ‘Persecution and Response in Late Paganism: the Evidence of Damascius’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 103:
Baltussen H. (2008) Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius. The Methodology of a Commentator. London.
Barbotin E. (1954) La théorie aristotélicienne de l’intellect d’après Théophraste. Louvain.
Blumenthal H.J. (1982) ‘The Psychology of (?) Simplicius’ Commentary on the De anima’, in Blumenthal H.J. and Lloyd A.C. (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in later Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus and Simplicius [Colloquium Liverpool]. Liverpool.
Blumenthal H.J. (1996) Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity. Interpretations of the De anima. London.
Blumenthal H.J. (1997) ‘Some Notes on the Text of Pseudo-Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima, III.1–5’, in Joyal M. (ed.), Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Aldershot.
Bossier F., and Steel C. (1972) ‘Priscianus Lydus en de In de Anima van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius’, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 34:
Burnyeat M. F. (2002) ‘De anima II.5’, Phronesis 47..
Cameron A. (1969–70) ‘Agathias on the Sassanians’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23:
Cappuyns M. (1933) Jean Scot érigène: sa vie, son oeuvre, sa penseé. Louvain.
Chodaczek A. (1936) De Prisciani Lydi Solutionum Capite VI, Acta Seminarii Philologici II Universitatis Ionneo-Casimirianae Leopoliensis 1. Lwów.
d’Alverny M.-T. (1977) ‘Les “Solutiones ad Chosroem” de Priscianus Lydus et Jean Scot’, in Jean Scot érigène et l’histoire de la philosophie. Paris.
Dörrie H. (1959) Porphyrios’ ‘Symmikta Zetemata’, Munich.
De Haas F. A. J. (2000) ‘Recollection and Potentiality in Philoponus’, in Kardaun M. and Spruijt J. (eds.), The Winged Chariot. Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L.M. de Rijk. Leiden.
Diller A. (1951) ‘A Source of the Mirabiles Auscultationes’, Classical Philology 46..
Esposito M. (1918) ‘Priscianus Lydus and Johannes Scottus’, Classical Review 32:
French R. (ed.) (1994) Ancient Natural History: Histories of Nature. London–New York.
Ganson T. (2002) ‘A Puzzle concerning the Aristotelian Notion of a Medium of Sense-Perception’, in Fortenbaugh W.W. and Wöhrle G. (eds.), On the Opuscula of Theophrastus. Akten der 3. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 19.-23. Juli 1999 in Trier. Stuttgart.
Gersh S. E. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. The Latin Tradition. Edited by McInerny Ralph. 2 vols, Publications in Medieval Studies. Notre Dame, IN.
Hällström G.A. (1994) ‘The Closing of the Neoplatonic School in A.D. 529: an Additional Aspect’, in Castrén P. (ed.), Post-Herulian Athens. Aspects of Life and Culture in Athens A.D. 267–529. Helsinki.
Hadot I. (1978) Le problème du Néoplatonisme alexandrin: Hiérocles et Simplicius. Paris.
Hadot I. (1982) ‘La doctrine de Simplicius sur l’âme raisonnable humaine dans le Commentaire sur le Manuel d’épictète’, in Blumenthal H.J. and Lloyd A.C. (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism. Liverpool.
Hadot I. (1987a) ‘La vie et l’oeuvre de Simplicius d’après des sources grecques et arabes’, in Hadot I. (ed.), Simplicius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Actes du colloque international de Paris, 1985 [Peripatoi. Philologisch-historische Studien zum Aristotelismus, 15]. Berlin.
Hadot I. (1987b) ‘Recherches sur les fragments du commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique d’Aristote’, in Hadot I. (ed.), Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Berlin–NY.
Hadot I. (1997) ‘Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens: sensation (αἴσθησις), sensation commune (κοινὴ αἴσησις), sensibles communs (κοινὰ αἰσθητά) et conscience de soi (συναίσθησις)’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8..
Hadot I. (2002) ‘Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima (CAG XI): a Methodological Survey’, Mnemosyne 55:
Huby P. (1993) ‘Priscian of Lydia as Evidence for Iamblichus’, in Blumenthal H.J. and Clark E.G., (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus. Philosopher and Man of Gods. London.
Huby P. and Gutas D. (1999) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary 4: Psychology. Philosophia Antiqua 81. Leiden.
Iamblichus De anima. Text, Translation and Commentary, eds. Finamore J. F. and Dillon J. M. (2002). Leiden.
Kamp A. (2001) Philosophiehistorie als Rezeptionsgeschichte. Die Reaktion auf Aristoteles’ De Anima-Noetik. Der frühe Hellenismus, Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 33. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, PA.
Kapetanaki S. and Sharples R.W. (2006) Pseudo-Aristoteles (Pseudo-Alexander), Supplementa Problematorum. Peripatoi 20. Berlin–New York.
Kupreeva I. (1999) ‘Review of P. Huby, C. Steel, J.O. Urmson, P. Lautner, On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception and Simplicius On Aristotle On the Soul 2.5–12, Ithaca 1997’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review. URL–10-18.html.
Lameer J. (1997) ‘From Alexandria to Bagdad: Reflections on the Genesis of a Problematical Tradition’, in Endress G. and Kruk R. (eds.), The Ancient Traditions in Christian and Islamic Hellenism: Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences dedicated to H.J. Drossaart Lulofs on his Ninetieth BirthdayLeiden.
Lane Fox R. (2005) ‘Harran, the Sabians and the Late Platonist “Movers”’, in Smith A. (ed.), The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Swansea.
Lautner P. (1992) ‘Philoponus, in De Anima III: Quest for an Author’, Classical Quarterly 42:
Lautner P. (1994) ‘Rival Theories of Self-awareness in Late Neoplatonism’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 39:
Luna C. (2001) ‘Review of R. Thiel, Simplicius und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen, Stuttgart 1999’, Mnemosyne 54:
Moraux P. (ed.) (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Vol. II, Peripatoi. Philologischhistorische Studien zum Aristotelismus 6. Berlin–New York.
Oldfather W. A. (1936) ‘Review of De Prisciani Lydi Solutionum Capite VI by Aline Chodaczek’, The Classical Weekly 30.
Perkams M. (2003) ‘Doppelte Entelecheia: das Menschenbild in “Simplikios”, Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ “De anima”, Elenchos 24:
Perkams M. (2005) ‘Priscian of Lydia, Commentator on the De anima in the Tradition of Iamblichus’, Mnemosyne 58:
Perkams M. (2008) Selbstbewusstsein in der Spätantike. Die neuplatonischen Kommentare zu Aristoteles’ “De anima”, Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 85. Berlin.
Prisciani Lydi quae extant Metaphrasis in Theophrastum et Solutionum ad Chosroem liber, ed. Bywater I. (1886). CAG Supplementum Aristotelicum 1.2.
. On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception, with ‘Simplicius’ On Aristotle on the Soul 2.5–12, trans. Huby Pamela and Steel Carlos (1997). London.
Quicherat J. (1853) ‘Solution des problèmes proposés par Chosroès. Traité inédit de Priscien le Philosophe’, Bibliothèque de l’école des Chartes 3.4:
Rashed M. (2000) ‘Traces d’un Commentaire de Simplicius sur la Métaphysique a Byzance?’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 84:
Schmitt C.B. (1969) ‘Some Notes on Jacobus Dalechampius and His Translation of Theophrastus (Manuscript: BN.Lat. 11,857)’, Gesnerus 26:
Schmitt C.B. (1976) ‘Priscianus Lydus’, in Cranz F.E. and Kristeller P.O. (eds.), Catalogus translationum et commentariorum. Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries. Washington DC.
Sharples R.W. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias. Scholasticism and innovation’, ANRW II.36.2: Berlin-New York.
Silverstein T. (1952) ‘Adelard, Aristotle, and the De natura deorum’, Classical Philology 47. 2:
Simplicii in libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria, ed. Hayduck Michael (1882). CAG XI.
. Commentaire sur le Manuel d’é pictète. Introduction et édition critique du texte grec par Ilsetraut Hadot (1996). Leiden.
. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 1.1–2.4, trans. Lautner P., and Urmson J. O. (1995). Ithaca, NY.
. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.1–5, trans. Blumenthal H. J. (2000). London–Ithaca, NY.
Steel C. G. (1978) The Changing Self: A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren Jaargang 40, Nr. 85. Brussels.
Tardieu M. (1986) ‘Sabiens coraniques et Sabiens de Harran’, Journal Asiatique 274:
Taub L. C. (2003) Ancient Meteorology. London–New York.
Thiel R. (1999) ‘Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen’, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz. Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, no. 8.
Westerink L. G. (1973) ‘Proclus on Plato’s Three Proofs of Immortality’, in Zetesis. Liber amicorum De Strycker, Antwerp–Utrecht.
Wilmart A. (1937) ‘Les réponses de Priscien le Philosophe sous le nom de Saint AugustineRevue Bénédictine 49: