Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Welch, G. Rickey and Clegg, James S. 2010. From protoplasmic theory to cellular systems biology: a 150-year reflection. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Vol. 298, Issue. 6, p. C1280.

    Elvbakken, Kari Tove and Lykknes, Annette 2016. Relationships between Academia, State and Industry in the Field of Food and Nutrition: The Norwegian Chemist Sigval Schmidt-Nielsen (1877-1956) and His Professional Roles, 1900-1950. Centaurus, Vol. 58, Issue. 4, p. 257.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: November 2009

18 - Physiology

from PART II - ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION

Summary

Among the modern life sciences, physiology trails only the evolutionary sciences in the attention it has received from historians. Lamarck, Darwin, and Mendel may be better known than the heroes of modern physiology, but names such as François Magendie (1783–1855), Johannes Müller (1801–1858), Claude Bernard (1813–1878), Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894), Ivan Pavlov (1849–1936), and Charles Sherrington (1857–1952) require little introduction for those who read more than occasionally in the history of science. Physiology may have attracted such attention because it has been widely viewed as the first of the modern biological disciplines to emerge from traditional approaches to the phenomena of life embodied in medicine and natural history. Furthermore, physiology allowed historians of science of the first generation after World War II to develop a series of narratives that reflected their broader concerns about the nature and significance of modern science and about how to write its history. If the historiography of the physical sciences in the 1950s and 1960s found its normative models in the “Scientific Revolution” of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, so, too, in those decades did historians of the life sciences locate their normative models in nineteenth-century physiology.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online ISBN: 9781139056007
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572019
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×