Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2000
  • Online publication date: March 2008

4 - SYNTAX

Summary
This chapter discusses the most important syntactic constructions in Early Modern English, with particular attention to the features which underwent major changes. In the formation of noun phrases, the use of the articles becomes more systematic than in Middle English, and the possibility of using adjectives or the adjectival forms of indefinite pronouns as heads more restricted. The majority of the examples illustrating the syntactic constructions and their development are taken from the Early Modern English section of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. The most important Early Modern developments in the structure of the clause are the establishment of the subject-verb order in most statement types and the regularization of do in questions and negations. Composite sentences consist of two or more clauses. The chapter explains many interesting aspects of the structure and linking of the subordinate clauses including nominal clause, relative clause and adverbial clause.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053747
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264761
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Abbott, E. A. (1870). A Shakespearian Grammar.London: Macmillan.
Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. & Wright, S. (eds.). (1990). Papers from the Fifth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Addision, Spectator. See Spectator.
Ahlqvist, A. (ed.). (1982). Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Åkerlund, A. (1911). On the History of the Definite Tenses in English.Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.
Åkerlund, A. (1913/1914). A word on the passive definite tenses. Englische Studien 47.
Åkerlund, A. (1936/1937). I go a-fishing: an historical and geographical sketch of the a-phrase in its active significance. Studia Neophilologica 9.
Allen, C. (1986). Reconsidering the history of Like. Journal of Linguistics 22.
Altenberg, B. (1982). The Genitive v. the of Construction: a Study of Syntactic Variation in Seventeenth-Century English.Lund: CWK Gleerup.
Altenberg, B. (1984). Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38.
Ando, S. (1976). A Descriptive Syntax of Christopher Marlowe's Language.Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
Ascham, Toxophilus=Ascham, R. (1545 [1868]). Toxophilus. Arber's English Reprints 7. London: A. Murray & Son.
Austin, F. O. (1984). Double negation and the eighteenth century. In Blake, N. F.. & Jones, C. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield.
Austin, F. O. (1985). Relative which in late eighteenth-century usage: the Clift family correspondence. In Eaton, et al. (1985).
Auwera, J. (1984). More on the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 5.
Baghdikian, S. (1979). Ne in Middle English and Early Modern English. English Studies 60:. (1982). A functional perspective of the system of negation in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3.
Bald, W. (1984). Form and functions of ONE: diachronic aspects. In Bald, W. & Weinstock, H. (eds.). Medieval Studies Conference in Aachen 1983. Language and Literature.Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.
Barber, C. L. (1976). Early Modern English.London: André Deutsch.
Basset = Basset, M. (1976). Translation of More's De Tristitia. In Miller, C. H. (ed.).
Bately, J. M. (1964). Dryden's revisions in the Essay of Dramatic Poesy: the preposition at the end of the sentence and the expression of the relative. Review of English Studies ns 15.
Bately, J. M. (1965). Who and which and the grammarians of the seventeenth century. English Studies 46.
Bennett, P. A. (1980). English passives: a study in syntactic change and relational grammar. Lingua 51.
Bergeder, F. (1914). Die periphrastische Form des englischen Verbums im 17. Jahrhundert.Halle/Saale: Kaemmerer.
Berners, Froissart=Bourchier, J. (Lord Berners). (15231525 [19011903]). The Chronicle of Froissart (1523–1525). Ker, W. P. (ed.). (19011903). Tudor Translations.
Bever, T. G. & Langendoen, D. T. (1972). The interaction of speech perception and grammatical structure in the evolution of language. In Stockwell, R. P. & Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds.). Linguistic Change and Generative Theory.Essays from the University of California, Los Angeles, conference on Historical Linguistics in the Perspective of Transformational Theory, February 1969. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1992). The linguistic evolution of five written and speech- based English genres from the seventeenth to the 20th centuries. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Björling, A. (1925). The propword one in Early Modern English. Anglia Beiblatt 36.
Björling, A. (1926). Studies in the Grammar of the Early Printed English Bible Versions.Lund: Gleerupska Univ.-bokhandeln.
Blake, N. F. (1983). Shakespeare's Language: an Introduction.London: Macmillan.
Blake, N. F. (1992). Translation and the history of English. In Rissanen, et al. (1992)..
Bock, H. (1931). Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem TO-Infinitiv. Anglia 55.
Boedtker, A. T. (1911). Critical Contributions to Early English Syntax. 2nd series. Christiania: Videnskabsselskabet i Christiania.
Bøgholm, N. (1906). Bacon og Shakespeare. En sproglig sammenligningCopenhagen: Martius Truelsen.
Bolingbroke = Bolingbroke, H. (1717 [1754]). The Works of the Right Honourable Henry St John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke. Mallet, D. (ed.). (1754). London.
Breejen, B. (1937). The Genitive and its of-Equivalent in the latter half of the Eighteenth Century.Amsterdam: H.J. Paris.
Breivik, A. Hille (1994). On the progression of the progressive in early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18.
Brinton, L.J. (1988). The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles.Cambridge University Press.
Brook, G. L. (1976). The Language of Shakespeare.London: André Deutsch.
Brook, S. (1965). The Language of the Book of Common Prayer.London: André Deutsch.
Brunner, K. (19601962). Die englische Sprache: ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, III. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bullokar, W. (1586 [1980]). The Works of William Bullokar II Pamphlet for Grammar 1586. Turner, J. R. (ed.). The University of Leeds, School of English.
Bunyan = Bunyan, J. (1666, 1678). Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners and The Pilgrim's Progress from this World to that which is to come. Sharrock, R. (ed.). (1966). London: Oxford University Press.
Burchfield, R. (1987). The bare infinitive in The Winter's Tale. In Fabian, B. & Rosador, K. T. v. (eds.). Shakespeare, Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Marvin Spevack.Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.
Burchfield, R. (1990). A profile of the grammar of three sixteenth-century lives of Sir Thomas More and of an unrelated ‘drab’ prose work by Anthony Gilby. In Chaney, E. & Mack, P. (eds.). England and the Continental Renaissance: Essays in Honour of J. B. Trapp.Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
Burton = Burton, R. (1621 [1660]). The Anatomie of Melancholy. 7th edn. London: Cripps.
Butler, C. (1634 [1910]). Charles Butler's English Grammar (1634). Eichler, A. (ed.). Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Caxton, Aesop=The Fables of Aesop. (1484 [1889]). Jacobs, J. (ed.). London: David Nutt.
Chamberlain, = The Letters of John Chamberlain. McClure, N. E. (ed.). (1939). The American Philosophical Society: Memoirs 12: 1. Philadelphia.
Chapman, Bussy DAmbois=Chapman, G.. (1964). Bussy DAmbois. Brooke, N. (ed.). London: Methuen.
Christophersen, P. (1939). The Articles: a Study of their Theory and Use in English.Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Congreve, Way of the World=W. Congreve (1700). The Complete Plays of William Congreve. Davis, H. (ed.). (1967). University of Chicago Press.
Cooper, C. (1685). Grammatica linguae anglicanae. London: Benj. Tooke.
Coote, C. (1788). Elements of the Grammar of the English Language. London: Printed for the author.
Coverdale, Ecclus=Coverdale, M. (1537 [1535]). The Bible. Southwark.
Curme, G. O. (1912). A history of the English relative constructions. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 11: .
Curme, G. O. (1931). Syntax. A Grammar ofthe English Language III. Boston, MA: Heath.
Dahl, T. (1951). Linguistic Studies in some Elizabethan Writings I: an Inquiry into Aspects of the Language of Thomas Deloney.Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.
Dahl, T. (1956). Linguistic Studies in some Elizabethan Writings II: The Auxiliary ‘do'.Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.
Danchev, A. & Kytö, M. (1994). The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Davis, N. (1971). William Tyndale's English of Controversy.London: University College London
Defoe, Plague year=Defoe, D. (1722). A Journal of the Plague Year. London: E. Nutt.
Defoe, Robinson Crusoe = Defoe, D. (1719). The Life and Strange Surprising Adventures of Robinson Crusoe. London: W. Taylor.
Defoe, Roxana =D., Defoe (1724). Roxana, the Fortunate Mistress. Jack, J. (ed.). (1964). London: Oxford University Press.
Dekeyser, X. (1984). Relativizers in Early Modern English: a dynamic quantitative study. In Fisiak, (1984).
Dekeyser, X. (1986). English contact clauses revisited: a diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica Historica 7.
Dekeyser, X. (1988). Socio-historical aspects of relativization in late sixteenth century English: c. 1550–1600. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21.
Dekker, Gull's Hornbook = Dekker, T.. (1609 [1969]). The Gull's Hornbook. McKerrow, R. B. (ed.). (1969). Menston: Scolar Press
Dekker, Shoemaker's Holiday=Dekker, T. (1600). The Shoemaker's Holiday in The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker. Bowers, F. (ed.). (1962). Cambridge University Press.
Denison, D. (1985a). Why Old English had no prepositional passive. English Studies 66.
Denison, D. (1985b). The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In Eaton, et al. (1985).
Denison, D. (1985c). Some observations on ‘being teaching’. Studia Neophilologica 57/2.
Denison, D. (1990). The Old English impersonal revived. In Adamson, et al. (1990).
Denison, D. (1993a). English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions.London: Longman.
Denison, D. (1993b). Some recent changes in the English verb. In Gotti, (1993).
Deutschbein, M. (1917). System der neuenglischen Syntax.Cöthen: Otto Schulze.
Donne = Donne, J. (a1631). The Sermons of John DonnePotter, G. R. & Simpson, E. M. (eds.). (19531962). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Draat, P. F. (1903). The loss of the prefix ge- in the modern English verb and some of its consequences, II: the conjunction since. Englische Studien 32.
Draat, P. F. (1910). The adverb since. Anglia 33.
Draat, P. F. (1912a). The preposition since. Anglia 35.
Draat, P. F. (1912b). The omission of the nominative relative. Anglia 36.
Draat, P. F. (1915). The man which. Anglia 39.
Draat, P. F. (1919). The relative that. Neophilologus 4.
Dryden, Plays=Dryden, J. (16691694). The Dramatic Works. 6 vols. Summers, M. (ed.). (1968). New York: Gordian Press.
Dryden, Poems = Dryden, J. (16491700). The Poems of John Dryden. 4 vols. Kinsley, J. (ed.). (1958). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eaton, R., Fischer, O., Koopman, W. & Leek, F. (eds.). (1985). Papers from the fourth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Einenkel, E. (1912). Der Ursprung der Fügung a good one. Anglia 36.
Einenkel, E. (19031904). Das englische Indefinitum. Anglia 26: ; 27.
Einenkel, E. (1914). Nochmals zur Fügung a good one. Anglia 38.
Einenkel, E. (1916). Geschichte der englischen Sprache, II: Historische Syntax. 3rd edn. Strasbourg: Trübner.
Ellegård, A. (1953). The Auxiliary ‘do’: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Ellinger, J. (1983). Substantivsätze mit oder ohne that in der neueren englischen Literatur. Anglia 57.
Ellis, = Ellis, H. Sir (18241846). Original Letters Illustrative of English History; including numerous Royal Letters I–III. London: Richard Bentley
Elmer, W. (1981). Diachronic Grammar: the Histor y of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions.Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Elphinston, J. (1765). The Principles of the English Language Digested. 2 parts. London.
Elsness, J. (1989). The English present perfect: has it seen its best days? In Breivik, L. E., Hille, A. & Johansson, S. (eds.). Essays on English Language.Oslo: Novus.
Elyot, [Scolar Press] = Elyot, T. (1531 [1970]). The Boke Named The Governor, 1531. Menston: The Scolar Press.
Emma, R. D. (1964). Milton's Grammar.London, The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co.
Engblom, V. (1938). On the Origin and Early Development of the Auxiliary ‘do'.Lund: G. V. K. Gleerup.
Erdmann, P. (1980). On the history of subject contact clauses in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1.
Fanego, T. (1990). Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare's English I–II. Studia Neophilologica 62: ;.
Fanego, T. (1991). On the origin and history of the English syntactic type (and) none but he to marry with Nan Page. English Studies 72.
Fanego, T. (1992). Infinitive complements in Shakespeare's English.Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago.
Farquhar, A Constant Couple = Farquhar, G. (1701). In Stonehill, C. (ed.). (1967). The Complete Works of George Farquhar 1. New York: Gordian.
Fernández, F., Fuster, M. & Calvo, J. J. (1994). English Historical Linguistics 1992.Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fielding, Jonathan Wild= Fielding, H. (1743). Jonathan Wild. (1932). Everyman edition. London: Dent.
Fielding, Tom Jones =Fielding, H. (1749). The History of Tom Jones. Mutter, R. P. C. (ed.). (1984). London: Penguin English Library.
Fischer, O. & Leek, F. C. (1981). Optional vs. radical re-analysis: mechanisms of syntactic change. Lingua 55.
Fischer, O. (1983). The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19.
Fischer, O. (1987). A ‘Case’ for the Old English impersonal. In Koopman, W., Leek, F., Fischer, O. & Eaton, R. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, O. (1988). The rise of the for noun phrase to V construction: an explanation. In Nixon, G. & Honey, J. (eds.). An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang.London and New York: Routledge.
Fisiak, J. (1985). Historical Semantics, Historical Word-Formation.Berlin: Mouton.
Fisiak, J. (1995). Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fisiak, J. (ed.). (1984). Historical Syntax.Berlin: Mouton.
Frank, T. (1985). The rise of do-support in early Modern English: a reappraisal. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 10.
Franz, W. (1939). Die Sprache Shakespeares in Vers und Prosa. 3rd edn. Halle/Saale: Niemeyer.
Fridén, G. (1948). Studies on the Tenses of the English Verb from Chaucer to Shakespeare.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Fridén, G. (1957). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Studia Linguistica 11.
Fridén, G. (1959). On the use of auxiliaries to form the perfect and the pluperfect in late Middle English and early Modern English. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 196.
Fries, C. C. (1925). The periphrastic future with shall and will in Modern English. PMLA 40.
Fries, C. C. (1940). American English Grammar.New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Fries, U. (1970). Demonstrativum und bestimmter Artikel. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 69.
Fries, U. (1994). Text deixis in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Gaaf, W. (1912). The origin of would rather and some of its analogues. Englische Studien 45.
Gaaf, W. (1926). A friend of mine. Neophilologus 12.
Gaaf, W. (1929). The conversion of the indirect personal object into the subject of a passive construction. English Studies 11.
Gaaf, W. (1930a). The passive of a verb accompanied by a preposition. English Studies 12.
Gaaf, W. (1930b). Some notes on the history of the progressive form. Neophilologus 15.
Gaaf, W. (1932). The absolute genitive. English Studies 14.
Gil, A. (1619, 1621 [1972]). Logonomia anglica (1619) I–II. Danielsson, B. & Gabrielson, A. (eds.). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Goldsmith, = Goldsmith, J. (1766). The Vicar of Wakefield in Friedman, A. (ed.). (1966). Collected Works of Oliver Goldsmith, vol. IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goossens, L. (1984). The interplay of syntax and semantics in the development of the English modals. In Blake, N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development.Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield.
Gordon, I. A. (1966). The Movement of English Prose.London: Longman.
Görlach, M. (1991). Introduction to Early Modern English.Cambridge University Press.
Gotti, M. (ed.). (1993). English Diachronic Syntax.Bergamo: Guerini
Grainger, J. M. (1959). Studies in the Syntax of the King James Version.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
Gray, = Gray, T. (a1771). The Complete Poems of Thomas Gray, English, Latin and Greek. Starr, H. H. & Hendrickson, J. R. (eds.). (1966). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Greene, Frier Bacon = Greene, R. (c. 1590). The Honorable Historie of Frier Bacon, and Frier Bongay. Greg, W. W. (ed.). Oxford: Malone Society Reprints.
Halkett=, (1699). The Autobiography of Anne Lady Halkett.J. Nichols, G. (ed.). (1875). London: Camden Society, ns 13.
Hall, F. (1881). On the origin of had rather go and analogous or apparently analo gous locutions. American Journal of Philology 2.
Harvey, = Letter-book of Gabriel Harvey (15731980). Long, E.J. (ed.). (1884). London: Camden Society, ns 33.
Hausmann, R. B. (1974). The origin and development of Modern English periphrastic do. In Anderson, J. & Jones, C. (eds.). Historical Linguistics I. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Heltveit, T. (1967). Studies in English Demonstrative Pronouns: a Contribution to the History of English Morphology.Oslo: Akademisk Forlag.
Heywood, = Heywood, T. (1607). A Woman Kilde with Kindnesse. London: William Iaggard.
Hiltunen, R. (1994). On phrasal verbs in Early Modern English: notes on lexis and style. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Hope, J. (1994). The use of thou and you in Early Modern spoken English: evidence from depositions in the Durham ecclesiastical court records. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation.Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Houston, A. (1989). The English gerund: syntactic change and discourse function. In Fasold, R. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.). Language Change and Variation.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hulbert, J. R. (1947). On the origin of the grammarians' rules for the use of shall and will. PMLA 62.
Ihalainen, O. (1983). On the notion “possible grammatical change”: a look at a perfectly good change that did not quite make it. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 15.
Jack, G. (1988). The origins of the English gerund. Nowele 12.
Jacobson, S. (1981). Preverbal Adverbs and Auxiliaries: a Study of Word Order Change.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Jacobsson, B. (1951). Inversion in English with Special Reference to the Early English Period.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and other languages. De Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I: 5. Copenhagen.
Jespersen, O. (1949). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Johannisson, T. (1958). On the be and have constructions with mutative verbs. Studia Linguistica 12.
Johnson, S. (1755 [1979]). A Dictionary of the English Language … and the English Grammar. London: W. Strahern. Reprinted London: Times Books.
Jonson, B. (1640 [1954]). The English Grammar. In Percy, C. H. H. & Simpson, E. (eds.). Ben Jonson, vol VIII. The Poems. The Prose Works. Oxford University Press.
Jonson=Jonson, B. (15981633 [19251947]). Ben Jonson. 8 vols. Herford, S. H. & Simpson, P. E. (eds.). London: Oxford University Press.
Jucker, A. (1991). Between hypotaxis and parataxis. Clauses of reason in Ancrene Riwle. In Kastovsky, (1991).
Jud-Schmid, E. (1956). Der indefinite Agens von Chaucer bis Shakespeare: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘man’.Meisenheim/Glan: Hain.
Kakietek, P. (1970). May and might in Shakespeare's English. Linguistics 64.
Kakietek, P. (1972). Modal Verbs in Shakespeare's English.Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
Kakietek, P. (1976). The perfect auxiliaries in the language of Shakespeare. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 8.
Kastovsky, D. (1994). Studies in Early Modern English.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kastovsky, D. (ed.) (1991). Historical English Syntax.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8.
Keenan, E. L. (1979a). Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55.
Keenan, E. L. (1979b). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language 55.
Kellner, L. (1887). Zur Sprache Christopher Marlowes.Vienna: Verlag der K. K. Staats-oberrealschule.
Kellner, L. (1892). Historical Outlines of English Syntax.London: Macmillan.
Kemenade, A. (1987). Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English.Dordrecht: Paris.
Kemenade, A. (1989). Syntactic change and the history of English modals. Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 16.
Kemp, W. (1979). On that that that that became that which which became what. In Clyne, P. F., Hanks, W. R. & Hofbauen, C. L. (eds.). Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kisbye, T. (19711972). An Historical Outline of English Syntax, III. Aarhus: Akademisk Boghandel.
Klemola, J. & Filppula, M. (1992). Subordinating uses of and in the history of English. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.). The Structure of Language.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Knorrek, M. (1938). Der Einfluss des Rationalismus auf die englische Sprache. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der englischen Syntax im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert.Breslau: Priebatsch.
Kohonen, V. (1978). On the development of an awareness of English syntax in early (1550–1660) descriptions of word order by English grammarians, logicians and rhetoricians. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 79.
König, E. (1985). Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In Fisiak, (1985).
Kopytko, R. (1988). The impersonal use of verbs in Shakespeare's plays. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21.
Kroch, A. S. (1989). Function and grammar in the history of English: periphrastic do. In Fasold, R. W. & Schiffrin, D. (eds.). Language Change and Variation.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kroch, A. S. (1990). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1.
Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. (1992). A language in transition: the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. ICAME Journal 16.
Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. (1983). The syntactic study of early American English: the variationist at the mercy of his corpus?Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 84.
Kytö, M. & Rissanen, M. (1993). ‘By and By Enters [This] My Artificiall Foole’: searching for syntactic constructions in the Helsinki Corpus. In Rissanen, et al. (1993).
Kytö, M. (1991). Variation and diachrony, with American English in Focus. Studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/ WILL.Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Kytö, M. (1994). BE vs. HAVE with intransitives in Early Modern English. In Fernández, F., Fuster, M. & Calvo, J. J. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 1992.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kytö, M. (1996). Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. 3rd edn. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
Kytö, M. (1997). Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransi-tives from Late Middle to Modern English. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.), (1997a).
Langenfelt, G. (1933). Select Studies in Colloquial English of the Late Middle Ages.Lund: Gleerupska Univ. Bokhandeln.
Langenfelt, G. (1946). The roots of the propword one. Studier i modern språkvetenskap utgivna av Nyfilologiska Sällskapet i Stockholm 16.
Lass, R. (1987). The Shape of English: Structure and History.London & Melbourne: J. M. Dent & Sons.
Lightfoot, D. W. (1979). Principles of Diachronic Syntax.Cambridge University Press.
Lowth, R. (1775 [1979]). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. Scholars'facsimi les and reprints. New York: Delmar.
Luick, K. (1906). Beiträge zur englischen Grammatik IV: der Ursprung der Fügung a good one. Anglia 29.
Luick, K. (1913). Zur Vorgeschichte der Fügung a good one. Anglia 37.
Luick, K. (1916). Berichtigung (Zur Erörtetung über a good one). Anglia 39.
Mair, C. (1988). The transition from the impersonal to the personal use of the verb like in late Middle English and Early Modern English – some previously neglected determinants of variation. In Markus, (1988).
Markus, M. (ed.). (1988). Historical English, on the Occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th Birthday.Innsbruck: AMOE
Marlowe, = Marlowe, C. (15861593). The Complete Works of Christopher Marlowe 1–2. Bowers, F. (ed.). (1973). Cambridge University Press.
Mason, G. (1622, 1623 [1910]). Grammaire angloise. Brotanek, R. (ed.). Halle: Niemeyer.
Mätzner, E. (18801885). Englische Grammatik. 3. Aufl. Berlin: Weidmann
Meier, H. H. (1953). Der indefinite Agens im Mittelenglischen 1050–1350: die Wörter und Wendungen für ‘man’.Bern: Francke.
Millward, C. M. (1966). Pronominal case in Shakespearian imperatives. Language 42:. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987).
Milton, Paradise Lost=Milton, J. (1667 [1952]). Paradise Lost in Darbishire, H. (ed.). (1952). The Poetical Works of John Milton I-II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English Syntax III. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mitsui, T. (1958). Relative pronouns in Shakespeare's colloquial English. In Araki, K., T. Egawa, Oyama, T. & Yasui, M. (eds.). Studies in English Grammar and Linguistics: a Miscellany in Honour of Takanobu Otsuka.Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
Moessner, L. (1992). Relative constructions and functional amalgamation in Early Modern English. In Rissanen, et al (1992).
Moessner, L. (1994). Early Modern English passive constructions. In Kastovsky, (1994).
More, [1557] =More, T. (1557). The Workes of Sir Thomas More wrytten by him in the Englysh Tonge. Ed. Rastell, W.. London.
More, T. = More, T. (1963–). The Complete Works of St Thomas More 1–15. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mossé, F. (1938). Histoire de la forme périphrastique ‘^tre’ +participe présent en Germanique.Paris: Klincksieck.
Mustanoja, T. F. (1958). The English Syntactical Type ‘One the best man’ and its Occurrence in other Germanic Languages.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Mustanoja, T. F. (1959). The Middle English syntactical type his own hand(s) with his own hands, himself with reference to other similar expressions. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 60.
Mustanoja, T. F. (1960). A Middle English Syntax. I. Parts of Speech.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nagucka, R. (1980). Grammatical peculiarities of the contact-clause in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 1.
Nagucka, R. (1984). Explorations into syntactic obsoleteness: English a-X-ing and X-ing. In Fisiak, (1984).
Nakamura, F. (1988). A word on the regulation of the auxiliary do: Samuel Pepys's Diary as a test case. Mulberry 37.
Nashe, = Nashe, T.. (15891601). The Works of Thomas Nashe. 4 vols. McKerrow, R. B. & Wilson, F. P. (eds.). (1958. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nehls, D. (1974). Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen: eine struktural-funktionale Analyse.Munich: Max Hueber.
Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1989). A corpus of Early Modern Standard English in a socio-historical perspective. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 90.
Nevalainen, T. & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (1997). To Explain the Present: Studies in the changing English language in honor of Matti Rissanen.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nevalainen, T. & Rissanen, M. (1986). Do you support the do-support? Emphatic and non-emphatic do in affirmative statements in present-day spoken English. In Jacobson, S. (ed.). Papers from the the Third Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Nevalainen, T. (1987). Change from above: a morphosyntactic comparison of two Early Modern English editions of The Book of Common Prayer. In Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (ed.). Neophilologica Fennica.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nevalainen, T. (1991). ‘BUT, ‘ONLY’, ‘JUST’: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500–1900. (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 51). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nevanlinna, S. (1974). Background and history of the parenthetic as who say/saith in Old and Middle English literature. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75.
Nunnally, T. (1992). Man's son/son of man: translation, textual conditioning, and the history of the English genitive. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Ogura, M. (1990). What has happened to ‘impersonal’ constructions?Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 91.
Orr, J. (1948). The Impact of French upon English.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Otway, = Otway, T.The Works of Thomas Otway. 2 vols. (a1685 [1812]). London: F C. & J.Rivington etc.
Palander-Collin, M. (1997). A medieval case of grammaticalization: Methinks. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.). (1997b).
Partridge, A. C. (1953). Studies in the Syntax of Ben Jonson's Plays.Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes.
Partridge, A. C. (1969). Tudor to Augustan English.London: André Deutsch.
Peitsara, K. (1992). On the development of the by-agent in English. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Peitsara, K. (1993). On the development of the by-agent in English. In Rissanen, et al. (1993).
Peitsara, K. (1997). The development of reflexive strategies in English. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.) (1997b).
Pepys, = Pepys, S. (16601619 [19701983]). The Diary of Samuel Pepys 1–11. Latham, R. & Matthews, W. (eds.). London: G. Bell..
Perez, A. (1990). Time in motion: grammaticalization of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3.
Plank, F. (1984). The modals story retold. Studies in Language 8.
Poussa, P. (1992). Pragmatics of this and that. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Poutsma, H. (19041926). A Grammar of Late Modern English. 4 vols. Groningen: Noordhoff.
Priestley, J. (1762 [1970]). Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Menston: Scolar Press.
Prins, A. A. (1952). French Influence in English Phrasing.Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Puttenham, G. (1589). The Arte of English Poesie. Willock, G. D. & Walker, A. (eds.). (1970). Cambridge University Press.
Puttenham, G.Spectator= (17111714). The Spectator. 5 vols. Bond, D. F. (ed.). (1965). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language.London & New York: Longman.
Rainer, E. M. (1989). Das Perfect im Spätmittel- und Frühneuenglischen: eine Frequenz- und Funktionsanalyse anhand von Brieftexten.Innsbruck: Institut für Anglistik, University of Innsbruck.
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. & Nurmi, A. (1997). Dummies on the move: prop-ONE and affirmative DO in the 17th century. In Nevalanien, & Kahlas-Tarkka, (eds.), (1997).
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (1997). Indefinite pronouns with singular human reference. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.). (1997b).
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1991). The Noun Phrase in Early Sixteenth-Century English: a Study Based on Sir Thomas More's Writings.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1994a). The development of the compound pronouns in -body and -one in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (1994b). The position of adjectival modifiers in Late Middle English noun phrases. In Fries, et al. (eds.), (1994).
Reuter, O. (1936). On continuative relative clauses in English. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 9(3).
Reuter, O. (1937). Some notes on the origin of the relative combination the which. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 38.
Richardson, Clarissa = Richardson, T. (17471748 [1751]). Clarrisa, Or The History of a Young Lady. Everyman edition. London: Dent.
Richardson, Pamela =Richardson, T. (17391740 [1785]). Pamela, Or Virtue Rewarded … Everyman edition. London: Dent.
Rissanen, M. (1967). The Uses of ‘one’ in Old and Early Middle English.Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Rissanen, M. (1984). The choice of relative pronouns in seventeenth century American English. In Fisiak, (1984).
Rissanen, M. (1985). Periphrastic do in affirmative statements in Early American English. Journal of English Linguistics 18.
Rissanen, M. (1989). The conjunction for in Early Modern English. Nowele 14.
Rissanen, M. (1991a). Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis. In Kastovsky, (1991).
Rissanen, M. (1991b). On the history of that/zero as object clause links in English. In Aijmer, K. & Altenberg, B. (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik.London & New York: Longman.
Rissanen, M. (1993). The development of the pronominal uses of one in Middle and Early Modern English. In Rissanen, et al. (1993).
Rissanen, M. (1994). On the position of not in Early Modern English questions. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Rissanen, M. (1997). The pronominalization of one. In Rissanen, et al. (eds.), (1997b).
Rissanen, M., Ihalainen, O., Nevalainen, T. & Taavitsainen, I. (eds.). (1992). History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Heikkonen, K. (eds.). (1997a). English in Transition. Corpus- based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Heikkonen, K. (eds.). (1997b). Grammaticalization at Work. Studies of Long-term Developments in English.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Palander-Collin, M. (eds.). (1993). Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. & Palander-Collin, M. (eds.). (1993). Enter the Helsinki Corpus: Computer-Assisted Approaches to English Historical Linguistics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Romaine, S. (1980). The relative clause marker in Scots English: diffusion, complexity and style as dimensions of syntactic change. Language in Society 9.
Romaine, S. (1981). Syntactic complexity, relativization and stylistic levels in Middle Scots. Folia Linguistica Historica 1.
Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-Historical Linguistics: Its Status and Methodology.Cambridge University Press.
Romaine, S. (1984). Towards a typology of relative-clause formation strategies in Germanic. In Fisiak, (1984).
Ross, C. H. (1893). The absolute participle in Middle English and Modern English. PMLA 8.
Rydén, M. & Brorström, S. (1987). The ‘be/have’ Variation with Intransitives in English.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Rydén, M. (1966). Relative Constructions in early Sixteenth-Century English, with Special Reference to Sir Thomas Elyot.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Rydén, M. (1970). Coordination of Relative Clauses in Sixteenth-Century English.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Rydén, M. (1983). English relatives revisited. Moderna Språk 77.
Saito, T. (1961). The development of relative pronouns in modern colloquial English: a statistical survey of the development of their usage seen in British prose plays from the sixteenth century to the present time. The Scientific Reports of Mugokawa Women's University 8.
Salmon, V. (1966). Sentence structures in colloquial Shakespearian English. Transactions of the Philological Society 1965. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987).
Salmon, V. (1967). Elizabethan colloquial English in the Falstaff plays. Leeds Studies in English ns 1. Reprinted in Salmon, & Burness, (1987).
Salmon, V. & Burness, E. (eds.). (1987). Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama.Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Samuels, M. L. (1972). Linguistic Evolution with Special Reference to English.Cambridge University Press.
Scheffer, J. (1975). The Progressive in English.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Scheurwegs, G. (1964). The relative pronouns in the sixteenth century plays Roister Doister and Respublica. A frequency study. English Studies, Presented to R. W. Zandwoort on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. English Studies 45: Supplement.
Schneider, E. (1992). Who(m)? constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pro-nouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Shadwell, = Shadwell, T. (1672). Epsom-Wells. In The Complete Works of Thomas Shadwell2. Ed. Summers, M.. (1927). London: The Fortune Press (Alten).
Shakespeare, = Shakespeare, W. (a1616 [1623). The Complete Works. Original Spelling Edition. Wells, S., Taylor, G., Jowett, J. & Montgomery, W. (eds.). (1986). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sheridan, = Sheridan, R. B. (17751759). The Plays of Richard Brinsley Sheridan. Everyman edition. London: J. M. Dent & Co.
Smollett, Roderick Random =Smollett, T. (1748 [1960]). The Adventures of Roderick Random. Everyman edition.
Söderlind, J. (1951, 1958). Verb Syntax in John Dryden's Prose, 2 vols. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska Bokhandeln.
Sørensen, K. (1957). Latin influence on English syntax. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique du Copenhague 11.
Sørensen, K. (1980). From postmodification to premodification. In Jacobson, S. (ed.). Papers from the Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Sørensen, K. (1983). The growth of cataphoric personal and possessive pronouns in English. In Davenport, M., Hansen, E. & Nielsen, H. F. (eds.). Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics.Odense: Odense University Press.
Spies, H. (1897). Studien zur Geschichte des englischen Pronomens im XV. und XVI. Jahrhundert.Halle: Niemeyer.
Stahl, L. (1927). Der adnominale Genitiv und sein Ersatz im Mittelenglischen und Frühneuenglischen. Giessener Beiträge 3.
Stapleton, = Stapleton, T. (1565). A Fortresse of the Faith. Antwerp: John Laet.
StarkeyStarkey, T. (c. 1530). England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth. Ed. Cooper, J. M.. (1893). Early English Text Society, extra series.
SteeleSteele, R. (1701–22 [17601771]). Dramatic Works. London.
Stein, D. (1985a). Natürlicher syntaktischer Sprachwandel: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der englischen ‘do’-Periphrase in Fragen. München: Tudur.
Stein, D. (1985b). Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In Eaton, et al (1985).
Stein, D. (1985c). Stylistic aspects of syntactic change. Folia Linguistica Historica 6.
Stein, D. (1986). Syntactic variation and change: the case of do in questions in Early Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 7.
Stein, D. (1990). The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Aspects of the Evolution of do in English. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 47.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stein, D. & Ostade, I. Tieken-Boon (eds.). (1994). Towards a Standard English 1600–1800.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
SterneSterne, L. (a1768 [1956]). Tristram Shandy Everyman. London: Dent.
Stillingfleet, E. (1662). Origines sacrae.London: Henry Mortlock.
Stoffel, C. (1955). Had rather and analogous phrases. Taalstudie 8.
Strang, B. (1970). A History of English.London and New York: Methuen.
Strang, B. (1982). Some aspects of the history of the be +ing construction. In Anderson, J. (ed.). Language Form and Linguistic Variation: Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sugden, H. W. (1936). The Grammar of Spenser's Faerie Queene.Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Society of America
Swan, T. (1988). Sentence Adverbials in English: a Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation.Oslo: Novus.
Sweet, H. (18921898). A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Swift, Journal to Stella = Swift, J. (17121713). Journal to Stella, III. Williams, H. (ed.). (1948). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1982). Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus 66.
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1985). Do-support in the writings of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu: a change in progress. Folia Linguistica Historica 6.
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1986). Negative do in eighteenth-century English: the power of prestige. Dutch Quarterly Review 16.
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1987). The Auxiliary ‘do’ in Eighteenth-Century English: a Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach.Dordrecht: JCG Printing.
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1989). Dr Johnson and the auxiliary do. Folia Linguistica Historica 10.
Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (1990). The origin and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatization. Nowele 16.
Tottie, G. (1994). Any as an indefinite determiner in non-assertive clauses: evidence from Present-day and Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Traugott, E. C. & König, E.(1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, I.
Traugott, E. C. (1972). A History of English Syntax: a Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65.
Trnka, B. (1930). On the Syntax of the English Verb from Caxton to Dryden.Prague: Jednota Československych Matematiku a Fysiku.
Uhrström, W. (1907). Studies on the Language of Samuel Richardson.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Ukaji, M. (1973). Imperative constructions in Shakespeare. Studies in English Linguistics 2.
Ukaji, M. (1978). Imperative Sentences in Early Modern English.Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Ukaji, M. (1992). ‘I not say’: bridge phenomenon in syntactic change. In Rissanen, et al. (1992).
Vanbrugh, The Provoked Wife = Vanbrugh, J. (1726). The Provoked Wife in The Complete Works of Sir John Vanbrugh, vol. I. Dobree, B. & Webb, G. (eds.). (1925). Bloomsbury: The Nonesuch Press.
Vanneck, G. (1955). The colloquial preterite in modern American English. Word 14.
Visser, F. Th. (1946, 1952). A Syntax of the English Language of St Thomas More. 2 vols. Louvain: Librairie Universitaire.
Visser, F. Th. (19631973). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Wald, Zachrissons BoktryckeriThe Complete Works of St Thomas More 14.2. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.
Wallis, J. (1653). Joannis Wallisii grammatica linguae anglicanae. Kemp, J. A. (ed.). (1972). John Wallis' Grammar of the English Language.London: Longman.
Warner, A. (1983). Review article: D. W. Lightfoot, Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 19.
Warner, A. (1990). Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. In Adamson, et al. (1990).
Webster=Webster, J. (1623). The Works of John Webster.Lucas, F. L. (ed.). (1927). London: Chatto & Windus.
Weida, G. (1975). Der Gebrauch von ‘shall/should’ und ‘will/would’ in englischer Prosa am Ende des 16. Jahrhunderts.Augsburg: Blasaditsch GmbH.
White, J. (1761 [1969]). The English Verb: a Grammatical Essay.Menston: Scolar Press.
Wiegand, N. (1982). From discourse to syntax: for in Early English causal clauses. In Ahlqvist, (1982).
Wik, B. (1973). English Nominalizations in -ing Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects.Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Wikberg, K. (1975). Yes–no Questions and Answers in Shakespeare's Plays: a Study in Text Linguistics.Åbo: Åbo Akademi.
Wilson =Wilson, T. (1553). The Arte of Rhetorique, for the Vse of All suche as are Studious of Eloquence, sette forth in English.London: R. Grafton.
Workman, S. K. (1940). Fifteenth-Century Translation as an Influence on English Prose.Princeton University Press.
Wright, L. (1995). Middle English {-ende} and {-ing}: a possible route to gram-maticalization. In Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1995).
Wright, S. (1989a). Discourse, style and the rise of periphrastic do in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 10.
Wright, S. (1989b). On the stylistic basis of syntactic change. Folia Linguistica Historica 10.
Wright, S. (1994a). The critic and the grammarians: Joseph Addison and the prescriptivists. In Stein, & Ostade, Tieken-Boon (1994).
Wright, S. (1994b). The mystery of the modal progressive. In Kastovsky, (1994).
Wurff, W. (1989). A remarkable gap in the history of English syntax. Folia Linguistica Historica 9.
Wycherley=Wycherley, W. (a1716). The Complete Works of William Wycherley.Summers, M. (ed.). (1965). New York: Russell & Russell Inc.
Yamada, M. (1971). The syntax of the ing-forms in Thomas Kyd. The Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, University of Shimane 5.
Zimmermann, R. (1973). Structural change in the English auxiliary system on the replacement of be by have. Folia Linguistica Historica 6.