M
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Stravinsky Encyclopedia , pp. 233 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Joseph, Charles M., Stravinsky’s Ballets (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Joseph, Charles M., Stravinsky and Balanchine: A Journey of Invention (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Messiaen, Olivier, ‘Le Rythme chez Igor Stravinsky’, La Revue Musical (30 April 1939).Google Scholar
Messiaen, Olivier, Technique de mon langage musical (Paris: Alphonse Leduc, 1999 [1944]).Google Scholar
Messiaen, Olivier, The Technique of My Musical Language, trans. John Satterfield (Paris: Alphonse Leduc, 2001 [1956]).Google Scholar
Messiaen, Olivier, Traité de rythme, de couleur et d’ornithologie: en sept tomes (Paris: Alphonse Leduc, 1994–2002).Google Scholar
Samuel, Claude, Music and Color: Conversations with Claude Samuel, trans. E. Thomas Glasow (Portland: Amadeus, 1994).Google Scholar
Schellhorn, Matthew, ‘Les Noces and Trois petites Liturgies: an assessment of Stravinsky’s influence on Messiaen’, in Dingle, Christopher and Simeone, Nigel (eds.), Olivier Messiaen: Music, Art and Literature (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Kelly, Barbara L., Tradition and Style in the Works of Darius Milhaud, 1912–1939 (Ashgate: Aldershot, 2003).Google Scholar
Bradbury, Malcolm and McFarland, James, ‘The name and nature of modernism’, in Bradbury, Malcolm and McFarland, James (eds.), Modernism (London: Pelican Books, 1976).Google Scholar
Carter, Chandler, ‘Stravinsky’s “special sense”: the rhetorical use of tonality in The Rake’s Progress’, Music Theory Spectrum, 19 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druskin, Mikhail, Igor Stravinsky: His Personality, Works and Views, trans. Martin Cooper (Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Hyde, Martha M., ‘Neoclassic and anachronistic impulses in twentieth-century music’, Music Theory Spectrum, 18 (1996).Google Scholar
Levitz, Tamara, Modernist Mysteries: Perséphone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Henrietta, ‘Modernists have ruined modern music, Stravinsky says’, Musical America, 10 January 1925.Google Scholar
Schiff, David, ‘Everyone’s Rite (1939–46)’, in Danuser, Hermann and Zimmermann, Heidy (eds.), Avatar of Modernity: The Rite of Spring Reconsidered (London: Paul Sacher Foundation / Boosey & Hawkes, 2013).Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard, Music in the Early Twentieth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Taruskin, Richard, ‘Stravinsky and the subhuman’, in Defining Russia Musically (Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, Exploring Twentieth-Century Music: Tradition and Innovation (Cambridge University Press, 2003a).Google Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, ‘Stravinsky in context’, in Cross, Jonathan (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky (Cambridge University Press, 2003b), 37-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locanto, Massimiliano, ‘“A new world of chromatic harmony polyphony”: il significato della musica di Gesualdo per l’ultimo Stravinsky’, in Tortora, Daniela (ed.) Gesualdo dentro il Novecento, Atti del Convegno Internazionale di studi nel quarto centenario della scomparsa di Carlo Gesualdo principe di Venosa (1566–1613) (Naples: Edizioni del Conservatorio di Musica San Pietro a Majella, 2017), 57–88.Google Scholar
Mason, Colin, ‘Stravinsky and Gesualdo’, Tempo, new series 55–6 (Autumn–Winter 1960), 39–48.Google Scholar
Vincis, Claudia and Molin, Paolo Dal, ‘Mo(nu)mento di Carlo Gesualdo’, Acta Musicologica, 76.2 (2004), 221–51.Google Scholar
Ramuz, C. F., Souvenirs sur Igor Strawinsky, vol. XVIII of Œuvres complètes (Geneva: Slatkine, 2011).Google Scholar
Tappolet, Claude (ed.), Correspondance Ansermet–Strawinsky (1914–1967), vol. I (Geneva: Georg, 1990).Google Scholar
AutoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Stephanie, Stravinsky Dances: Re-visions Across a Century (Alton, Hampshire: Dance Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Neidhöfer, Christoph, ‘Analysearbeit im Fach Komposition/Musiktheorie über die Movements for Piano and Orchestra von Igor Strawinsky’ (thesis, Musik-Akademie der Stadt Basel, 1991).Google Scholar
Randel, Julia, ‘Dancing with Stravinsky: Balanchine, Agon, Movements for piano and orchestra, and the language of classical ballet’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 2004).Google Scholar
Berger, Arthur, ‘Problems of pitch organisation in Stravinsky’, in Boretz, B and Cone, E. T. (eds.), Perspectives on Schoenberg and Stravinsky (Princeton University Press, 1972), 123–54.Google Scholar
Boulez, Pierre, ‘Stravinsky remains’, in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, trans. Stephen Walsh (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Cone, Edward T., ‘Stravinsky: the progress of a method’, Perspectives of New Music, 1.1 (1962), 18–26.Google Scholar
Danuser, Hermann and Zimmermann, Heidy (eds.), Avatar of Modernity: The Rite of Spring Reconsidered (London: Paul Sacher Foundation / Boosey & Hawkes, 2013).Google Scholar
Forte, Allen, The Harmonic Organization of The Rite of Spring (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Horlacher, Gretchen, Building Blocks: Repetition and Continuity in the Music of Stravinsky (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Levitz, Tamara, Modernist Mysteries: Perséphone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Schenker, Heinrich, ‘Further considerations of the Urlinie: II (1926)’, in The Masterwork in Music 2, trans. William Drabkin (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph N., ‘Stravinsky the serialist’, in Cross, Jonathan (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Dmitri, A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Horlacher, Gretchen, Building Blocks: Repetition and Continuity in the Music of Stravinsky (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
van den Toorn, Pieter C., The Music of Igor Stravinsky (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
van den Toorn, Pieter C. and McGinness, John, Stravinsky and the Russian Period: Sound and Legacy of a Musical Idiom (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Levitz, Tamara, Modernist Mysteries: Perséphone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 334–6.Google Scholar
Nicolodi, Fiamma, Musica e musicisti nel ventennio fascista (Fiesole: Discanto, 1984), 295.Google Scholar
Klimovitsky, Arkady, ‘Commentary’, in Campbell, Stuart (ed.), Stravinsky, Igor. Orchestrations of ‘The Song of the Flea’ by Modest Mussorgsky, ‘The Song of the Flea’ by Ludwig van Beethoven, trans. Paul Williams (Saint Petersburg: School of Music Publishing House, The Russian Institute for the History of the Arts, 2003).Google Scholar