Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:55:41.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2013

Vladimir Kanovei
Affiliation:
Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Marcin Sabok
Affiliation:
Polish Academy of Sciences
Jindřich Zapletal
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagaria, J. and DiPrisco, C.A. (2009) Parameterized partition relations on the real numbers, Archive for Mathematical Logic 48, 201–226.Google Scholar
Balcar, B. and Simon, P. (1989) Disjoint refinement. In Handbook of Boolean Algebras. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 333–388.
Balcar, B., Jech, T. and Pazák, T. (2005) Complete CCC Boolean algebras, the order sequential topology, and a problem of von Neumann, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 37, 885–898.Google Scholar
Bartoszynski, T. and Judah, H. (1995) Set Theory: On the Structure ofthe Real Line. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters.
Becker, H. and Kechris, A. (1996) The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions. London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bell, J.L. (2005) Set Theory. Oxford Logic Guides 47. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blass, A. (1989) Applications of superperfect forcing and its relatives. In Set Theory and its Applications, Toronto 1987. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1401. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 18–40.CrossRef
Brendle, J., Hjorth, G. and Spinas, O. (1995) Regularity properties for dominating projective sets, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 72, 291–307.Google Scholar
Cichon, J., Morayne, M., Pawlikowski, J. and Solecki, S. (1991) Decomposing Baire functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 56, 1273–1283.Google Scholar
Clemens, J. and Zapletal, J. (2012) Dichotomies for ideals, in preparation.
Connes, A., Feldman, J. and Weiss, B. (1981) An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 1, 431–450.Google Scholar
Debs, G. (1995) Polar σ-ideals of compact sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 347, 317–338.Google Scholar
Debs, G. and Saint-Raymond, J. (1987) Ensembles boréliens d'unicité et d'unicité au sens large, Annals de l'Institut Fourier (Grenoble) 37, 217–239.Google Scholar
Doucha, M. (2013) Ph.D. thesis, Charles University.
Erdős, P. and Rado, R. (1950) A combinatorial theorem, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 25, 249–255.Google Scholar
Farah, I. and Zapletal, J. (2004) Between Maharam's and von Neumann's problems, Mathematical Research Letters 11, 673–684.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. and Moore, C. C. (1977) Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology and von Neumann algebras, Transactions ofthe American Mathematical Society 234, 289–324.Google Scholar
Foreman, M. and Magidor, M. (1995) Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76, 47–97.Google Scholar
Galvin, F. and Prikry, K. (1973) Borel sets and Ramsey's theorem, Journal of Symbolic Logic 38, 193–198.Google Scholar
Gao, S. (2009) Invariant Descriptive Set Theory. Boca Raton, CA: CRC Press.
Grigorieff, S. (1971) Combinatorics on ideals and forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic 3, 363–394.Google Scholar
Groszek, M. (1987) Combinatorics of ideals and forcing with trees, Journal of Symbolic Logic 52, 582–593.Google Scholar
Groszek, M. (1994) as an initial segment of the c degrees, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 956–976.Google Scholar
Harrington, L., Kechris, A. S. and Louveau, A. (1990) A Glimm-Effros dichotomy for Borel equivalence relations, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 3, 903–928.Google Scholar
Harrington, L., Marker, D. and Shelah, S. (1988) Borel orderings, Transactions ofthe American Mathematical Society 310, 293–302.Google Scholar
Hjorth, G. (2000) Actions by the classical Banach spaces, Journal of Symbolic Logic 65, 392–420.Google Scholar
Humke, P. D. and Preiss, D. (1985) Measures for which σ -porous sets are null, Journal ofthe London Mathematical Society 32, 236–244.Google Scholar
Ishiu, T. (2005) α-properness and Axiom A, Fundamenta Mathematicae 186, 25–37.Google Scholar
Jech, T. (2002) Set Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.
Jech, T. and Balcar, B. (2006) Weak distributivity, a problem of von Neumann, and the mystery of measurability, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12, 241–265.Google Scholar
Jossen, S. and Spinas, O. (2005) A two-dimensional tree ideal. In Logic Colloquium 2000. Lecture Notes in Logic 19. Urbana, IL: Association for Symbolic Logic, pp. 294–322.
Judah, H., Roslanowski, A. and Shelah, S. (1994) Examples for souslin forcing, Fundamenta Mathematicae 144, 23–42. Math.LO/9310224.Google Scholar
Kanamori, A. (1994) The Higher Infinite. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kanovei, V. (1999) On non-well-founded iterations of the perfect set forcing, Journal of Symbolic Logic 64, 191–207.Google Scholar
Kanovei, V. (2008) Borel Equivalence Relations. University Lecture Series 44. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Kanovei, V. and Reeken, M. (2000) New Radon-Nikodym ideals, Mathematika 47, 219–227.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. and Louveau, A. (1989) Descriptive Set Theory and the Structure of Sets of Uniqueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kechris, A. and Louveau, A. (1997) The structure of hypersmooth Borel equivalence relations, Journal of American Mathematical Society 10, 215–242.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. and Miller, B. (2004) Topics in Orbit Equivalence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1852. New York: Springer Verlag.
Kechris, A., Louveau, A. and Woodin, H. (1987) The structure of σ-ideals of compact sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 301, 263–288.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. S. (1977) On a notion of smallness for subsets of the Baire space, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 229, 191–207.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. S. (1994) Classical Descriptive Set Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.
Kellner, J. and Shelah, S. (2011) Saccharinity, Journal of Symbolic Logic 74, 1153–1183. Math.LO/0511330.Google Scholar
Klein, O. and Spinas, O. (2005) Canonical forms of Borel functions on the Milliken space, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 357, 4739–4769.Google Scholar
Lindenstrauss, J., Preiss, D. and Tišer, J. (2012) Fréchet Differentiability of Lipschitz Functions and Porous Sets in Banach Spaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies 179. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Martin, D. A. (1985) A purely inductive proof of Borel determinacy. In A., Nerode and R. A., Shore (eds), Recursion Theory. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 42. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 303–308.
Matet, P. (1988) Some filters of partitions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 53, 540–553.Google Scholar
Mathias, A. R. (1977) Happy families, Annals of Mathematical Logic 12, 59–111.Google Scholar
Mazur, K. (1991) Fσ -ideals and ω1ω1* gaps in the Boolean algebra P(ω)/I, Fundamenta Mathematicae 138, 103–111.Google Scholar
Miller, A.W. (1984) Rational perfect set forcing. In Axiomatic Set Theory. Contemporary Mathematics 31. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 143–159.CrossRef
Mycielski, J. (1964) Independent sets in topological algebras, Fundamenta Mathematicae 55, 139–147.Google Scholar
Nešetril, J. (2005) Ramsey classes and homogeneous structures, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 14, 171–189.Google Scholar
Pelant, J. and Zeleny, M. (2004) The structure of the σ-ideal of σ-porous sets, Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 45, 37–72.Google Scholar
Pestov, V. (2006) Dynamics of Infinite-Dimensional Groups. University Lecture Series 40. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Pol, R. and Zakrzewski, P. (2012) On Borel mappings and σ-ideals generated by closed sets, Advances in Mathematics 231, 651–663.Google Scholar
Prömel, H.J. and Voigt, B. (1985) Canonical forms of Borel-measurable mappings Δ :[ω]ω → R, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 40, 409–417.Google Scholar
Rajchman, A. (1922) Sur l'unicité du développement trigonométrique, Fundamenta Mathematicae 3, 287–302.Google Scholar
Rojas, D. (2006) Using determinacy to inscribe compact non-σ-porous sets into projective non-σ-porous sets, Real Analysis Exchange 32, 55–66.Google Scholar
Rosendal, C. (2005) Cofinal families of Borel equivalence relations and quasiorders, Journal of Symbolic Logic 70, 1325–1340.Google Scholar
Rosłanowski, A. (2006) n-localization property, Journal of Symbolic Logic 71, 881–902.Google Scholar
Sabok, M. (2009) σ-continuity and related forcings, Archive for Mathematical Logic 48, 449–464.Google Scholar
Sabok, M. (2012a) Forcing, games, and families of closed sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 364, 4011–4039.Google Scholar
Sabok, M. (2012b) Complexity of Ramsey null sets, Advances in Mathematics 230, 1184–1195.Google Scholar
Sabok, M. and Zapletal, J. (2011) Forcing properties of ideals of closed sets, Journal of Symbolic Logic 76, 1075–1095.Google Scholar
Shelah, S. (1998) Proper and Improper Forcing. 2nd edn. New York: Springer Verlag.
Shelah, S. and Zapletal, J. (2011) Ramsey theorems for product of finite sets with submeasures, Combinatorica 31, 225–244.Google Scholar
Silver, J. (1970) Every analytic set is Ramsey, Journal of Symbolic Logic 35, 60–64.Google Scholar
Silver, J. (1980) Counting the number of equivalence classes of Borel and coanalytic equivalence relations, Annals of Mathematical Logic 18, 1–28.Google Scholar
Solecki, S. (1994) Covering analytic sets by families of closed sets, Journal of Symbolic Logic 59, 1022–1031.Google Scholar
Solecki, S. (1999) Analytic ideals and their applications, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 99, 51–72.Google Scholar
Solecki, S. and Spinas, O. (1999) Dominating and unbounded free sets, Journal of Symbolic Logic 64, 75–80.Google Scholar
Spinas, O. (2001a) Canonical behavior of Borel functions on superperfect rectangles, Journal of Mathematical Logic 1, 173–220.Google Scholar
Spinas, O. (2001b) Ramsey and freeness properties of Polish planes, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 82, 31–63.Google Scholar
Spinas, O. (2009) Proper products, Proceedings ofthe American Mathematical Society 137, 2767–2772.Google Scholar
Steprans, J. (1993) A very discontinuous Borel function, Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 1268–1283.Google Scholar
Stern, J. (1984) On Lusin's restricted continuum problem, Annals of Mathematics 120, 7–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.D. (1976) A canonical partition relation for finite subsets of ω, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A 21, 137–146.Google Scholar
Todorcevic, S. (2010) Introduction to Ramsey Spaces. Annals of Mathematics Studies 174. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Velickovic, B. and Woodin, W. H. (1998) Complexity of the reals in inner models of set theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92, 283–295.Google Scholar
Zajícek, L. (1987/1988) Porosity and σ-porosity, Real Analysis Exchange 13, 314–350.Google Scholar
Zajícek, L. and Zeleny, M. (2005) Inscribing compact non-σ-porous sets into analytic non-σ-porous sets, Fundamenta Mathematicae 185, 19–39.Google Scholar
Zapletal, J. (2003) Isolating cardinal invariants, Journal of Mathematical Logic 3, 143–162.Google Scholar
Zapletal, J. (2004) Descriptive Set Theory and Definable Forcing. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Zapletal, J. (2008) Forcing Idealized. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zapletal, J. (2009) Preservation of P-points and definable forcing, Fundamenta Mathematicae 204, 145–154.Google Scholar
Zapletal, J. (2011) Overspill and forcing, preprint.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Vladimir Kanovei, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Marcin Sabok, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jindřich Zapletal, University of Florida
  • Book: Canonical Ramsey Theory on Polish Spaces
  • Online publication: 18 December 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208666.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Vladimir Kanovei, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Marcin Sabok, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jindřich Zapletal, University of Florida
  • Book: Canonical Ramsey Theory on Polish Spaces
  • Online publication: 18 December 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208666.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Vladimir Kanovei, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Marcin Sabok, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jindřich Zapletal, University of Florida
  • Book: Canonical Ramsey Theory on Polish Spaces
  • Online publication: 18 December 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208666.012
Available formats
×