Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T19:47:10.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - A Brief History of the Potential Outcomes Approach to Causal Inference

from PART I - INTRODUCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Guido W. Imbens
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Donald B. Rubin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The approach to causal inference outlined in the first chapter has important antecedents in the literature. In this chapter we review some of these antecedents to put the potential outcomes approach in perspective. The two most important early developments, in quick succession in the 1920s, are the introduction of potential outcomes in randomized experiments by Neyman (Neyman, 1923, translated and reprinted in Neyman, 1990), and the introduction of randomization as the “reasoned basis” for inference by Fisher (Fisher 1935, p. 14).

Once introduced, the basic idea that causal effects are the comparisons of potential outcomes may seem so obvious that one might expect it to be a long-established tenet of scientific thought. Yet, although the seeds of the idea can be traced back at least to the eighteenth century, the formal notation for potential outcomes was not introduced until 1923 by Neyman. Even then, however, the concept of potential outcomes was used exclusively in the context of randomized experiments, not in observational studies. The same statisticians, analyzing both experimental and observational data with the goal of inferring causal effects, would regularly use the notation of potential outcomes in experimental studies but switch to a notation purely in terms of realized and observed outcomes for observational studies. It is only more recently, starting in the early seventies with the work of Donald Rubin (1974), that the language and reasoning of potential outcomes was put front and center in observational study settings, and it took another quarter century before it found widespread acceptance as a natural way to define and assess causal effects, irrespective of the setting.

Moreover, before the twentieth century there appears to have been only limited awareness of the concept of the assignment mechanism. Although by the 1930s randomized experiments were firmly established in some areas of scientific investigation, notably in agricultural experiments, there was no formal statement for a general assignment mechanism and, moreover, not even formal arguments in favor of randomization until Fisher (1925).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×