Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T06:56:32.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Matching Estimators

from PART IV - REGULAR ASSIGNMENT MECHANISMS: ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Guido W. Imbens
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Donald B. Rubin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Following the discussion of subclassification (i.e., blocking, or stratification) in the previous chapter, we discuss in this chapter a second general approach to estimation of treatment effects in regular designs, namely matching. As earlier, we mainly focus on average effects, although the methods readily extend to estimating other causal estimands, for example, the difference in the median or other quantiles by treatment status, or differences in variances. Many of the specific techniques in this chapter are similar to the methods discussed in Chapter 15, but the aim is different. In Chapter 15 we were interested in constructing a sample with improved balance in the covariates. Here we take the sample as given, and focus on estimating treatment effects. In this chapter we consider both methods where only the treated units are matched (and where the focus is on the effects of the treatment for the treated), and methods are matched in order to estimate the effects of the treatment for the full sample.

Matching estimators – based on direct comparisons of outcomes for observationally equivalent “matched” units that received different levels of a treatment – are among the most intuitive estimators for treatment effects. Informal assessments of causality often rely implicitly on matching: “This unemployed individual found a job because of the skills acquired in a job-training program.” Typically the case for or against such a claim is made by a comparison to an individual who did not participate in the training program but who is similar with respect to observed background characteristics. If we maintain the unconfoundedness assumption – that the probability of receipt of treatment is free of dependence on the potential outcomes, once observed pre-treatment characteristics are held constant – such comparisons between treated and control units with the same covariate values have a causal interpretation. The matching approach estimates average treatment effects by pairing such similar units and averaging the within-pair differences in observed outcomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Matching Estimators
  • Guido W. Imbens, Stanford University, California, Donald B. Rubin, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Matching Estimators
  • Guido W. Imbens, Stanford University, California, Donald B. Rubin, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Matching Estimators
  • Guido W. Imbens, Stanford University, California, Donald B. Rubin, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751.019
Available formats
×