Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:34:11.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Dave Elder-Vass
Dave Elder-Vass
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Causal Power of Social Structures
Emergence, Structure and Agency
 , pp. 206 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackroyd, Stephen and Fleetwood, Steve (eds.) 2000. Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations. London: Routledge.
Adams, Matthew 2006. ‘Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity’, Sociology 40: 511–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrne, Göran 1994. Social Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1979. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1982. ‘Morphogenesis versus structuration’, British Journal of Sociology 33: 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1996. ‘Social integration and system integration: developing the distinction’, Sociology 30: 679–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1996 [1988]. Culture and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 1998. ‘Realism and morphogenesis’, in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, pp. 356–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret 2000a. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 2000b. ‘For structure: its reality, properties and powers: a reply to Anthony King’, Sociological Review 48: 464–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 2003. Structure, Agency, and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret 2007. Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret forthcoming. ‘Routine, reflexivity and realism’.
Ball, Philip 2000. H2O: A Biography of Water. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Bedau, Mark A. 1997. ‘Weak emergence’, Philosophical Perspectives 11: 375–99.Google Scholar
Benton, Ted 1985. ‘Realism and social science’, in Edgley, R. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Radical Philosophy Reader, pp. 174–92. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Benton, Ted and Craib, Ian 2001. Philosophy of Social Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas 1971 [1966]. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Berk, Bernard B. 2006. ‘Macro–micro relationships in Durkheim's analysis of egoistic suicide’, Sociological Theory 24: 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, Ludvig 1971. General System Theory. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London:Verso.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy 1993. Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy 1998. ‘Critical realism and dialectic’, in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, pp. 575–640. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy 1998 [1979]. The Possibility of Naturalism. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Biddle, Bruce J. 1986. ‘Recent developments in role theory’, Annual Review of Sociology 12: 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1976. ‘Parameters of social structure’, in Blau, P. M. (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, pp. 220–53. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. and Schwartz, Joseph E. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blitz, David 1992. Emergent Evolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James 1999. ‘Practical reason and cultural constraint: agency in Bourdieu's theory of practice’, in Shusterman, R. (ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, pp. 129–52. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boogerd, Fred C., Bruggeman, Frank J., Richardson, Robert C., Stephan, Achim and Westerhoff, Hans V. 2005. ‘Emergence and its place in nature: a case study of biochemical networks’, Synthese 145: 131–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1990a. In Other Words. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1990b. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jacques 1999. ‘Rules, dispositions, and the Habitus’, in Shusterman, R. (ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, pp. 45–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brante, Thomas 2001. ‘Consequences of realism for sociological theory-building’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31: 167–95.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1925. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers 1993. ‘Social theory as habitus’, in Calhoun, C. J., Postone, M. and LiPuma, E. (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, pp. 212–34. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 1999. ‘“Why be normal?”: language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls’, Language in Society 28: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Walter 1967. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter 1998. Society: A Complex Adaptive System. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario 1996. Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario 1999. The Sociology–Philosophy Connection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario 2003. Emergence and Convergence. Toronto:University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1974. ‘ “Downward causation” in hierarchically organised biological systems’, in Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, pp. 179–86. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Catlin, George E. G. 1964. ‘Introduction to the translation’, in E. Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly and Trope, Yaacov 1999. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cilliers, Paul 1998. Complexity and Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ira J. 1998. ‘Anthony Giddens’, in Stones, R. (ed.), Key Sociological Thinkers. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jack and Stewart, Ian 1995. The Collapse of Chaos. New York and London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Collier, Andrew 1989. Scientific Realism and Socialist Thought. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Collier, Andrew 1994. Critical Realism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill 1998. ‘It's all in the family: intersections of gender, race, and nation’, Hypatia 13: 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall 1981. ‘On the microfoundations of macrosociology’, American Journal of Sociology 86: 984–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, Diana 2005. ‘Rethinking agency: a phenomenological approach to embodiment and agentic capacities’, Political Studies 53: 124–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corning, Peter A. 2002. ‘The emergence of “emergence”: now what?’ Emergence 4: 54–71.CrossRef
Craib, Ian 1992. Anthony Giddens. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle 1991. ‘Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Nick 2001. ‘The phenomenological habitus and its construction’, Theory and Society 30: 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, Charles 1996. Social Structure. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Crothers, Charles 2002. ‘History of social structural analysis’, in Chew, S. C. and Knottnerus, J. D. (eds.), Structure, Culture, and History, pp. 3–41. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2001. ‘Actions, reasons, and causes’, Essays on Actions and Events, pp. 3–19. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Kathryn, Joseph, Jonathan and Norrie, Alan 2005. ‘Editorial: new essays in critical realism’, New Formations 56: 7–26.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel 2003. Freedom Evolves: London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dupre, John 2001. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile 1952 [1897]. Suicide. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile 1964 [1894]. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile 1974 [1898]. ‘Individual and collective representations’, Sociology and Philosophy, pp. 1–34. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile 1984 [1893]. The Division of Labour in Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile 2001 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jason 2003. ‘Evolutionary psychology and politics’, Economy and Society 32: 280–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave 2005. ‘Emergence and the realist account of cause’, Journal of Critical Realism 4: 315–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave 2007a. ‘For emergence: refining Archer's account of social structure’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave 2007b. ‘A method for social ontology’, Journal of Critical Realism 6: 226–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave 2007c. ‘Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action’, Sociological Theory 25: 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave 2007d. ‘Re-examining Bhaskar's three ontological domains: the lessons from emergence’, in Lawson, C., Latsis, J. and Martins, N. (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology, pp. 160–76. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave 2007e. ‘Social structure and social relations’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37: 463–77.CrossRef
Elder-Vass, Dave 2008a. ‘From speech community to intersecting linguistic circles’, SociolinguistEssex. Colchester.
Elder-Vass, Dave 2008b. ‘Integrating institutional, relational, and embodied structure: an emergentist perspective’, British Journal of Sociology 59: 281–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder-Vass, Dave 2008c. ‘Searching for realism, structure and agency in actor network theory’, British Journal of Sociology 59: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder-Vass, Dave 2010a ‘The emergence of culture’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie.
Elder-Vass, Dave 2010b. ‘Realist critique without ethical naturalism or moral realism’, Journal of Critical Realism 9.
Emirbayer, Mustafa 1997. ‘Manifesto for a relational sociology’, American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmeche, Claus, Koppe, Simo and Stjernfelt, Frederik 1997. ‘Explaining emergence: towards an ontology of levels’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28: 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleetwood, Steve 2001. ‘Causal laws, functional relations and tendencies’, Review of Political Economy 13: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleetwood, Steve 2008. ‘Institutions and social structures’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38: 241–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1974. ‘Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis)’, Synthese 28: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel 2002 [1969]. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeman, Walter J. 2000. How Brains Make Up Their Minds. London:Phoenix.Google Scholar
Frisby, David 2002. Georg Simmel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, Edward and Lawson, Tony 2009. Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and His Critics. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray 1995. The Quark and the Jaguar. London:Abacus.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. Basingstoke:Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge:Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret 1990. ‘Walking together’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindis, David 2007. ‘Some building blocks for a theory of the firm as a real entity’, in Biondi, Y., Canziani, A. and Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity, pp. 266–91. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gindis, David 2009. ‘From fictions and aggregates to real entities in the theory of the firm’, Journal of Institutional Economics 5: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1983. ‘The interaction order’, American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1990 [1956]. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Jeffrey 1999. ‘Emergence as a construct: history and issues’, Emergence 1: 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribbin, John R. and Gribbin, Mary 1999. Almost Everyone's Guide to Science. London:Phoenix.Google Scholar
Groff, Ruth (ed.) 2008. Revitalizing Causality: Realism about Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. London:Routledge.
Habermas, Jürgen 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom and Madden, Edward H. 1975. Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hartwig, Mervyn (ed.) 2007. Dictionary of Critical Realism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Heer, David M. 2003. ‘Social structure’, in Outhwaite, W. (ed.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1968. ‘Explanation in science and in history’, in Nidditch, P. H. (ed.), The Philosophy of Science, pp. 54–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1998. ‘Two basic types of scientific explanation’, in Curd, M. and Cover, J. A. (eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, pp. 685–94. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hodgson Geoffrey, M. 2006a. Economics in the Shadows of Darwin and Marx. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2006b. ‘What are institutions?’ Journal of Economic Issues 40: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2007. ‘Meanings of methodological individualism’, Journal of Economic Methodology 14: 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, John H. 1998. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Honderich, Ted (ed.) 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Horgan, Terence 2002. ‘From supervenience to superdupervenience’, in Kim, J. (ed.), Supervenience, pp. 113–44. Aldershot:Ashgate/Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1977 [1748]. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul 1997. ‘How properties emerge’, Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jary, David and Jary, Julia 2000. Collins Dictionary of Sociology. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard 2002. Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kadushin, Charles 1968. ‘Power, influence and social circles’, American Sociological Review 33: 685–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaidesoja, Tuukka 2007. ‘Exploring the concept of causal power in a critical realist tradition’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37: 63–87.Google Scholar
Kaidesoja, Tuukka 2009. ‘Bhaskar and Bunge: a comparison and evaluation of their theories of social emergence’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39: 300–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Keat, Russell and Urry, John 1975. Social Theory as Science. London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1992. ‘ “Downward causation” in emergentism and nonreductive physicalism’, in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction?, pp. 119–38. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, Jaegwon 1993. ‘The non-reductivist's troubles with mental causation’, in Heil, J. and Mele, A. R. (eds.), Mental Causation, pp. 189–210. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1997. ‘The mind-body problem: taking stock after forty years’, Nous 11: 185–207.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kim, Jaegwon 1999. ‘Making sense of emergence’, Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony 1999a. ‘Against structure: a critique of morphogenetic social theory’, Sociological Review 47: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony 1999b. ‘The impossibility of naturalism: the antinomies of Bhaskar's realism’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony 2000. ‘Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: a “practical” critique of the habitus’, Sociological Theory 18: 417–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony 2004. The Structure of Social Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
King, Anthony 2006. ‘How not to structure a social theory: a reply to a critical response’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 464–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, Anthony 2007. ‘Why I am not an individualist’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37: 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1998. ‘1953 and all that: a tale of two sciences’, in Curd, M. and Cover, J. A. (eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, pp. 971–1003. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Klee, Robert L. 1984. ‘Micro-determinism and concepts of emergence’, Philosophy of Science 51: 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laszlo, Ervin 1972. The Systems View of the World. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 1996. Aramis: Or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Tony 1997. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Tony 2003. Reorienting Economics. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewes, George Henry 1874–9. Problems of Life and Mind. London:Trubner.Google Scholar
Lloyd Morgan, C. 1923. Emergent Evolution. London:Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Lopez, Jose and Scott, John 2000. Social Structure. Buckingham:Open University Press.Google Scholar
Loyal, Steven and Barnes, Barry 2001. ‘ “Agency” as a red herring in social theory’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31: 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven 1973. Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie 2005. ‘The complexity of intersectionality’, Signs 30: 1771–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian P. 1992. ‘The rise and fall of British emergentism’, in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction?, pp. 49–93. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Manicas, Peter T. 2006. A Realist Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Simon, Herbert A. 1993 [1958]. Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marras, Ausonio 2006. ‘Emergence and reduction: reply to Kim’, Synthese 151: 561–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl 1978 [1852]. ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’, in Tucker, R. C. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader, pp. 594–617. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1978 [1859]. ‘Preface to a contribution to the critique of political economy’, in Tucker, R. C. (ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader, pp. 3–6. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mayes, G. Randolph 2005. ‘Theories of explanation’, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL: www.iep.utm.edu/explanat/
Merton, Robert K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York:The Free Press.Google Scholar
Meyering, Theo C. 2000. ‘Physicalism and downward causation in psychology and the special sciences’, Inquiry 43: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihata, Kevin 1997. ‘The persistence of “emergence”, in Eve, R. A., Horsfall, S. and Lee, M. E. (eds.), Chaos, Complexity, and Sociology, pp. 30–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart 1900. A System of Logic. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos P. 1991. Back to Sociological Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos P. 1992. ‘The interaction order and the micro-macro distinction’, Sociological Theory 10: 122–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos P. 1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong?London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos 2000. ‘The subjectivist-objectivist divide: against transcendence’, Sociology 34: 741–62.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen 2008. ‘Powers, dispositions, properties or a causal realist manifesto’, in Groff, R. (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism about Causality in Philosophy and Social Science, pp. 139–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard and Smelser, Neil J. 1987. ‘Relating the micro and macro’, in Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Münch, R. and Smelser, N. J. (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link, pp. 356–87. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest 1998 [1974]. ‘Issues in the logic of reductive explanations’, in Curd, M. and Cover, J. A. (eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, pp. 905–21. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Newman, David V. 1996. ‘Emergence and strange attractors’, Philosophy of Science 63: 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, John 2000. Structuration. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, John 2006. ‘Structuration's future?’ Journal of Critical Realism 5: 122–38.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1969. Politics and Social Structure. New York:The Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1976. ‘Social structure and the symbolic media of interchange’, in Blau, P. M. (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, pp. 94–120. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
Phoenix, Ann and Pattynama, Pamela 2006. ‘Editorial: intersectionality’, European Journal of Women's Studies 13: 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickel, Andreas 2004. ‘Systems and mechanisms: a symposium on Mario Bunge's philososphy of social science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porpora, Douglas 1998. ‘Four concepts of social structure’, in Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, pp. 339–55. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porpora, Douglas 2002. ‘Social structure: the future of a concept’, in Chew, S. C. and Knottnerus, J. D. (eds.), Structure, Culture, and History, 43–59. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Porpora, Douglas 2007. ‘On Elder-Vass: refining a refinement’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postone, Moishe, LiPuma, Edward and Calhoun, Craig J. 1993. ‘Introduction’, in Calhoun, C. J., Postone, M. and LiPuma, E. (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, pp. 1–13. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Potter, Garry 2006. ‘Reopening the wound: against God and Bhaskar’, Journal of Critical Realism 5: 92–109.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Read, Rupert J. and Richman, Kenneth A. 2007. The New Hume Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reed, Michael 2005. ‘Reflections on the “realist turn” in organization and management studies’, Journal of Management Studies 42: 1621–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven 2001. Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. London:Vintage.Google Scholar
Rose, Steven P. R. 2006. The 21st-Century Brain. London:Vintage.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand 1986 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith 2005. Social Emergence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 1992. Method in Social Science. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 2005a. ‘Class, moral worth and recognition’, Sociology 39: 947–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 2005b. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 2009. ‘Review of Making Our Way Through the World, by Margaret Archer’, Journal of Critical Realism 8: 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1997. The Mystery of Consciousness. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Sheehy, Paul 2006. The Reality of Social Groups. Aldershot:Ashgate.Google Scholar
Shilling, Chris 2005. The Body in Culture, Technology and Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam 1970 [1776]. The Wealth of Nations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas S. 1997. ‘Nonlinear dynamics and the micro-macro bridge’, in Eve, R. A., Horsfall, S. and Lee, M. E. (eds.), Chaos, Complexity, and Sociology, pp. 52–63. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sperry, Roger W. 1969. ‘A modified concept of consciousness’, Psychological Review 76: 532–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, Roger W. 1986. ‘Macro- versus micro-determinism’, Philosophy of Science 53: 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Achim 1992. ‘Emergence – a systematic view on its historical facets’, in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H. and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction?, pp. 25–48. Berlin:de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Stephan, Achim 2002. ‘Emergentism, irreducibility, and downward causation’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 65: 77–94.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2001. ‘Refusing the realism-structuration divide’, European Journal of Social Theory 4: 177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stones, Rob 2002. ‘Structuration’, Sociology 36: 222–4.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2005. Structuration Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1992. ‘Editor's Introduction’, in Bourdieu, P.Language and Symbolic Power, pp. 1–31. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Tooby, John and Cosmides, Leda 1992. ‘The psychological foundations of culture’, in Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. and Barkow, J. H. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, pp. 19–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Urry, John 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vaisey, Stephen 2009. ‘Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action’, American Journal of Sociology 114: 1675–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenberghe, F. 2005. ‘The Archers’, European Journal of Social Theory 8: 227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, Charles R. 2002. ‘The impossibility of which naturalism? A response and a reply’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, Charles R. 2007. ‘Elder-Vass's move and Giddens's call’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37: 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, Charles R. and Harré, Rom 1996. ‘Conflicting varieties of realism’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26: 313–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. 1993. ‘Bourdieu in America’, in Calhoun, C. J., Postone, M. and LiPuma, E. (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, pp. 235–62. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia 2005. ‘No one polity saturates the political space in a given territory’, Sociology 38: 1035–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walby, Sylvia 2007. ‘Complexity theory, systems theory and multiple intersecting social inequalities’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37: 449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, John W. N. 1968. ‘Methodological individualism and social tendencies’, in Brodbeck, M. (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, pp. 269–80. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weber, Max 1978 [1922]. Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max 2001 [1930]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weissman, David 2000. A Social Ontology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Westwood, Robert and Linstead, Stephen 2001. ‘Language/organization: introduction’, in Westwood, R. and Linstead, S. (eds.), The Language of Organization, pp. 1–19. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond 1976. Keywords. London: Fontana/Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2000. ‘Emergence as non-aggregativity and the biases of reductionisms’, Foundations of Science 5: 269–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2006. ‘Reductionism and its heuristics: making methodological reductionism honest’, Synthese 151: 445–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter 1958. The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira 2006. ‘Intersectionality and feminist politics’, European Journal of Women's Studies 13: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Dave Elder-Vass, Loughborough University
  • Book: The Causal Power of Social Structures
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761720.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Dave Elder-Vass, Loughborough University
  • Book: The Causal Power of Social Structures
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761720.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Dave Elder-Vass, Loughborough University
  • Book: The Causal Power of Social Structures
  • Online publication: 06 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761720.010
Available formats
×