Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2002
  • Online publication date: February 2013

8 - Deductive–nomological explanation

from III - Explanation
Summary

The empiricist legacy

The modern empiricist approach to the connection between causation and explanation was shaped by Hume's critique of the relation between cause and effect. As was already noted in the Introduction, the logical empiricists took Hume to have offered a reductive account of causation, and in particular one that frees talk about causation from any commitments to a necessary link between cause and effect. Within science, Carnap stressed, “causality means nothing but a functional dependency of a certain sort” (1928: 264). The functional dependency is between two states of a system, and it can be called a “causal law” if the two states are in temporal proximity, and one precedes the other in time. Schlick expressed this idea succinctly by pointing out that:

the difference between a mere temporal sequence and a causal sequence is the regularity, the uniformity of the latter. If C is regularly followed by E, then C is the cause of E; if E only ‘happens’ to follow C now and then, the sequence is called mere chance.

(1932: 239)

Any further attempt to show that there was a necessary ”tie” between two causally connected events, or a “kind of glue” that holds them together, was taken to have been proved futile by Hume, who maintained that “it was impossible to discover any ‘impression’ of the causal nexus” (Schlick 1932: 246).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Causation and Explanation
  • Online ISBN: 9781844653317
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653317
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×