Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power
- 2 Racial categorization and censuses
- 3 Ethnic categorizations in censuses: comparative observations from Israel, Canada, and the United States
- 4 Language categories in censuses: backward- or forward-looking?
- 5 Resistance to identity categorization in France
- 6 On counting, categorizing, and violence in Burundi and Rwanda
- 7 Identity counts: the Soviet legacy and the census in Uzbekistan
- Index
- References
7 - Identity counts: the Soviet legacy and the census in Uzbekistan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power
- 2 Racial categorization and censuses
- 3 Ethnic categorizations in censuses: comparative observations from Israel, Canada, and the United States
- 4 Language categories in censuses: backward- or forward-looking?
- 5 Resistance to identity categorization in France
- 6 On counting, categorizing, and violence in Burundi and Rwanda
- 7 Identity counts: the Soviet legacy and the census in Uzbekistan
- Index
- References
Summary
Nations … are not out there to be counted; they are a function of social, political, and economic processes.
David AbramsonIdentity matters in so far as perceived ties and interactions between people, appearance, speech, place of residence, and behavior are all observable and classifiable differences. How social difference is constructed and the meanings attributed to those constructions are the basis for abstract, often overlapping and contradictory systems of classification such as kinship, language, race, ethnicity, and religion. As the chapters in this volume show, the names of these abstract systems are incorporated into the language of censuses whose manifest function is to count the state's citizens for a range of purposes including taxation, electoral districting, military conscription, affirmative action programs, and the selection of official languages. These studies also demonstrate that the census is a highly politicized project whose particular forms of interrogation and categorization are subject to contestation and manipulation. The census claims to represent collectivities in the form of social identity and, thereby, sets the terms for this very politicking.
My objective for this chapter is to show that in the case of Uzbekistan, such political possibilities were and are predicated on national difference. Soviet nationality policies, aided by such official state practices as census-taking and the application of census results in reinforcing citizenship and territoriality, have given birth to a political culture organized along the lines of national difference. This is not to say that post-Soviet “cultures” are nationally based.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Census and IdentityThe Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses, pp. 176 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
References
Abramson, David 1998, From Soviet to Mahalla: Community and Transition in Post-Soviet Uzbekistan, Ph. D. dissertation, Indiana University
Anderson, Benedict 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, 2nd edn, London: Verso
Appadurai, Arjun 1996, “Number in the Colonial Imagination,” in Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 114–135
1991, “Some Thoughts on the Making of the Uzbek Nation,”Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 32: 79–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, Ingeborg 1992, “Kraevedenia” and Uzbek National Consciousness, Papers on Inner Asia, No. 20, Bloomington, Indiana: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies
Becker, Seymour 1973, “National Consciousness and the Politics of the Bukhara People's Conciliar Republic,” in Edward Allworth (ed.), The Nationality Question in Soviet Central Asia, New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 159–67
Bremmer, Ian and Ray, Taras (eds.) 1993, Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States, Cambridge University Press
1994, “Nationhood and the National Question in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Eurasia: An Institutionalist Account,”Theory and Society 23(1): 47–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, Patricia 1995, “The Legacy of the Soviet Political System and the Prospects for Developing Civil Society in Central Asia,” in Vladimir Tismaneanu (ed.), Political Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, Armonk, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 292–317
Cohn, Bernard 1987, “The Census, Social Structure, and Objectification in South Asia,” An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 224–54
Colas, Dominique 1997, Civil Society and Fanaticism: Conjoined Histories, translated by Amy Jacobs, Stanford: Stanford University Press
Fierman, William (ed.) 1991, Soviet Central Asia: The Failed Transformation, Boulder, Col.: Westview Press
1996, “Uzbekistan's Tajiks: A Case of Repressed Identity?”, Central Asia Monitor 6: 17–19Google Scholar
Fragner, Bert 1994, “The Nationalization of the Uzbeks and Tajiks,” in Edward Allworth (ed.), Muslim Communities Reemerge: Historical Perspectives on Nationality, Politics, and Opposition in the Former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 13–32
Geertz, Clifford 1973, Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz, New York: Basic Books
1987, “Muslim Tombs and Ethnic Folklore: Charters for Hui Identity,”The Journal of Asian Studies 46(3): 495–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995, “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State,”American Ethnologist 22(2): 375–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Richard 1985, “On Having a Culture: Nationalism and the Preservation of Quebec's Patrimoine,” in George W. Stocking (ed.), Objects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material Culture, History of Anthropology, Vol. 3, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 192–217
Hannerz, Ulf 1992, Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning, New York: Columbia University Press
1997, “The Soviet Union as a Work-in-Progress: Ethnographers and the Category Nationality in the 1926, 1937, and 1939 Censuses,”Slavic Review 56(2): 251–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Francine 2000, “Toward an Empire of Nations: Border-Making and the Formation of Soviet National Identities,”The Russian Review 59: 201–26CrossRef
1987, “The Meaning and Measurement of Ethnicity in Malaysia: An Analysis of Census Classifications,”The Journal of Asian Studies 46(3): 555–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenbach, Henry 1995, “Post-Soviet Crisis and Disorder in Transcaucasia: The Search for Regional Security and Stability,” in Vladimir Tismaneanu (ed.), Political Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, Armonk, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 337–68
Khalid, Adeeb 1998, The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia, Berkeley: University of California Press
Kocaoglu, Timur 1973, “The Existence of a Bukharan Nationality in the Recent Past,” in Edward Allworth (ed.), The Nationality Question in Soviet Central Asia, New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 151–8
Komatsu, Hisao 1989, “The Evolution of Group Identity among Bukharan Intellectuals in 1911–1928: An Overview,” The Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 47:115–44
Masov, Rakhim 1991, Istoriia Topornogo Razdeleniia, Dushanbe: Irfon
1996, Interethnic Relations in the Republic of Uzbekistan, Central Asia Monitor 6: 20–6Google Scholar
Olcott, Martha Brill 1990, “Central Asia: The Reformers Challenge a Traditional Society,” in Lubomyr Hajda and Mark Beissinger (eds.), The Nationalities Factor in Soviet Politics and Society, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 253–80
1995, “The Creation of Soviet Central Asia: The 1924 National Delimitation,”Central Asian Survey 14(2): 225–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeberlein-Engel, John 1994, Identity in Central Asia: Construction and Contention in the Conceptions of “Özbek,” “Tâjik,” “Muslim,” “Samarqandi,” and Other Groups, Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University
Shahrani, M. Nazif 1994, “Islam and the Political Culture of ‘Scientific Atheism’ in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Future Predicament,” Islamic Studies 33(2–3): 139–59
Shils, Edward 1963, “On the Comparative Study of the New States,” in Clifford Geertz (ed.), Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa, New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 1–26
Silver, Brian 1986, “The Ethnic and Language Dimensions in Russian and Soviet Censuses,” in Ralph Clem (ed.), Research Guide to the Russian and Soviet Censuses, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 70–97
1994, “The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism,”Slavic Review 53(2): 414–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Graham, Vivien Law, Andrew Wilson, Annette Bohr, and Edward Allworth 1998, Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stalin, Joseph 1934 [1913], Marxism and the National and Colonial Question, New York: International Publishers
Subtelny, Maria Eva 1994, “The Symbiosis of Turk and Tajik,” in Beatrice Manz (ed.), Central Asia in Historical Perspective, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 45–61
Sukhareva, O. A. 1958, K istorii gorodov Bukharskogo khanstva, Tashkent: Uzbekistan SSR Fanlar Akademiasi
Tishkov, Valerii 1997, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in and after the Soviet Union: The Mind Aflame, London: Sage Publications
1993, “Cultural Politics in an Age of Statistics: Numbers, Nations, and the Making of Basque Identity,”American Ethnologist 20(4): 818–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998, “Transnationalism, Nationalism, Citizenship, and Property: Eastern Europe since 1989,”American Ethnologist 25(2): 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1960, “Ethnicity and National Integration in West Africa,”Cahiers d'Etude Africaines 3: 129–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by