Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:17:34.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Chenyang Li
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Franklin Perkins
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Ames, Roger T. 2011. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Hong Kong and Honolulu: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press and the University of Hawai’i PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Roger T., and Hall, David L. 2001. Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i PressGoogle Scholar
Ames, Roger T., and Hall, David L. 2003. Dao De Jing: Making This Life Significant: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine BooksGoogle Scholar
Angle, Stephen C. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Angle, Stephen C., and Slote, Michael (eds.) 2013. Virtue Ethics and Confucianism. New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 1979. “Glosses on Reality: Chu Hsi as Interpreted by Ch’en Ch’un.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 1993. “Master Chu’s Self-Realization: The Role of Ch’eng,” Philosophy East and West 43.1: 3964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 1994. All under Heaven: Transforming Paradigms in Confucian–Christian Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 1998a. Concerning Creativity: A Comparison of Chu Hsi, Whitehead, and Neville. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 1998b. Transformations of the Confucian Way. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 2004. “Boston Confucianism: The Third Wave of Global Confucianism,” in Shu-Hsien, Liu, Berthrong, John, and Swidler, Leonard (eds.), Confucianism in Dialogue Today: West, Christianity & Judaism. Philadelphia: Ecumenical Press, pp. 2647Google Scholar
Berthrong, John H. 2008. Expanding Process: Exploring Philosophical and Theological Transformations in China and the West. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Berthrong, John H., and Berthrong, Evelyn Nagai 2000. Confucianism: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel 2010. “The Wider Significance of Naturalism: A Genealogical Essay,” in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 2354Google Scholar
Billioud, Sébastien 2012. Thinking through Confucian Modernity: A Study of Mou Zongsan’s Metaphysics. Leiden and Boston: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bol, Peter K. 1992. “This Culture of Ours”: Intellectual Transition in T’ang and Sung China. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bol, Peter K. 2008. Neo-Confucianism in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia CenterGoogle Scholar
Chan, Alan 2012. “Laozi,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/laoziGoogle Scholar
Chan, Wing-cheuk 2000. “Leibniz and the Chinese Philosophy of Nature,” Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 33: 210–23Google Scholar
Chan, Wing-cheuk 2011. “Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi on Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s philosophies of Qi: A critical reflection,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10.1: 8598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Wing-tsit 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Chen, Lai 陳來 2005. Songming Lixue 宋明理学 (Song–Ming Neo-Confucianism), 2nd edition. Shanghai: East China Normal University PressGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Yi 程頤 and Cheng, Hao 程顥1981. Er Cheng ji, Henan Chengshi yishu 二程集·河南程氏遺書 (Collected Works of the Cheng Brothers: Surviving Works). Beijing: Zhonghua shujuGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Yishan 程宜山 1986. Zhongguo gudai yuanqi xueshuo 中國古代元氣學說 (The Ancient Chinese Theory of Yuanqi). Wuhan: Hubei Renmin ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text (CBETA). 2011 version. Taibei: CBETAGoogle Scholar
Ching, Julia 1977. “Buddhist Emptiness and the Christian God,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 45.5: 1126Google Scholar
Ching, Julia 1979. “God and the World: Chu Hsi and Whitehead,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 275–95Google Scholar
Ching, Julia 2000. The Religious Thought of Chu Hsi. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Mario, Garfield, Jay, and Tillemans, Tom J. F. (eds.) 2009. Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
De Caro, Mario, and Macarthur, David 2010a. “Introduction: Science, Naturalism, and the Problem of Normativity,” in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.119Google Scholar
De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.) 2010b. Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
De Caro, Mario, and Voltolini, Alberto 2010. “Is Liberal Naturalism Possible?”, in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.) Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 6986Google Scholar
Deguchi, Yasuo, Garfield, Jay, and Priest, Graham 2008. “The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism,” Philosophy East and West 58: 395402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John 1998. The Essential Dewey. Vol. I. Edited by Hickman, Larry and Alexander, Thomas. Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
Ding, Weixiang 丁為祥 2000. Xu qi xiangji: Zhang Zai zhexue tixi ji qi dingwei 虛氣相即 – 張載哲學體系及其定位 (Emptiness and Qi: Zhang Zai’s Philosophical System and Its Evaluation). Beijing: Renmin chubansheGoogle Scholar
Edelglass, William, and Garfield, Jay (eds.) 2009. Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edman, Irwin 1936. The Works of Plato. New York: Tudor Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Fang, Thomé H. 1981. Chinese Philosophy: Its Spirit and Its Development. Taibei: Linking PressGoogle Scholar
Fang, Xudong 2003. “Contemporary Chinese Studies of Zhuzi in Mainland China,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 3.1: 121–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferré, Frederick 1996. Being and Value: Toward a Constructive Postmodern Metaphysics. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Ferré, Frederick 1998. Knowing and Value: Toward a Constructive Postmodern Epistemology. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Ferré, Frederick 2001. Living and Value: Toward a Constructive Postmodern Ethics. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Hermann 1974. “A Thought Pattern in Heraclitus,” in Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.), The Presocratics. Princeton University Press, pp.204–18Google Scholar
Fraser, Chris 2002. “Mohism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at www.plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/mohismGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Chris 2005. “Mohist Canons,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 edition), at www.plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/mohist–canonsGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Chris 2011a. “Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10: 127–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Chris 2011b. “Mohism and Motivation,” in Fraser, Chris, Robins, Dan, and O’Leary, Timothy (eds.), Ethics in Early China. Hong Kong University Press, 7390Google Scholar
Fraser, Chris 2012. “Mohism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 edition), at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/mohismGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Chris 2013. “Distinctions, Judgment, and Reasoning in Classical Chinese Thought,” History and Philosophy of Logic 34.1: 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Chris, Robins, Dan, and O’Leary, Timothy (eds.) 2011. Ethics in Early China. Hong Kong University PressGoogle Scholar
Fung, Yulan 馮友蘭 2000. Fung Yulan Xuanji 馮友蘭選集, Vol. I. Beijing: Peking University PressGoogle Scholar
Gao, Heng 高亨1998. Zhouyi Dachuan Jinzhu 周易大傳今注 (Contemporary Annotations of the Zhouyi). Jinan: Qilu ShusheGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. Chu Hsi and the Ta-hsüeh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Daniel K. (trans). 1990. Learning to Be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations of Master Chu, Arranged Topically. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Daniel K. 2003. Zhu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary, and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Garfield, Jay 2002. Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-cultural Interpretation. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Graham, Angus 1989. Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, IL: Open Court PressGoogle Scholar
Graham, Angus 1992. Two Chinese Philosophers: The Metaphysics of the Brothers Ch’eng. La Salle, IL: Open Court (originally published London: Lund Humpries, 1958)Google Scholar
Graham, Daniel 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy (Part I). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Peter N. 2002. Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Guangqi 顧廣圻 1996. Hanfeizi jijie 韩非子集解 (Hanfeizi: Collected Explanations). Shanghai Guji PressGoogle Scholar
Guo, Qingfan 郭慶藩 (ed.) 1961. Zhuangzi jishi 莊子集釋 (Collected Explanations of the Zhuangzi). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Guo, Qingfan 郭慶藩 (ed.) 1978. Zhuangzi jishi 莊子集釋 (Collected Explanations of the Zhuangzi). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. I. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking Through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, David L., and Ames, Roger T. 1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Chad 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles 1979. “‘Emptiness’ and Fullness in Asiatic and Western Thought,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 411–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Ning 何寧 1998. Huainanzi Jishi 淮南子集釋. Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
He, Zuoxiu 何祚庥 1997. “Has the theory of primordial qi really influenced the formation of the concept of ‘field’ in contemporary physics?” 元氣學說是否真的影響到近代物理學“場”的觀念的形成? Philosophical Investigations zhexue yanjiu, 4: 60–5Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1962. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Henderson, John B. 1984. The Development and Decline of Chinese Cosmology. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Henricks, Robert G. 2000. Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching: A Translation of the Startling New Documents Found at Guodian. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Hershock, Peter D. 2006. Buddhism in the Public Sphere: Reorienting Global Interdependence. New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Richard (trans.) 1952. Aristotle. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Hung, William (ed.) 1986. Mozi Yinde 墨子引得 (A Concordance to Mozi). Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series, Supplement No 21 (reprint). Shanghai Guji PressGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Qing 2013. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Translated by Ryden, Edmund and edited by Bell, Daniel A. and Fan, Ruiping. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Jiao, Xun 焦循 1987. Mengzi zhengyi 孟子正義 (Mengzi: Corrected Meaning). 2 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Jin, Chunfeng 金春峰 1998. Zhuxi zhexue sixiang 朱熹哲學思想 (Zhu Xi’s Philosophical Thought). Taibei: Dongda Tushu GongsiGoogle Scholar
Jing, Haifeng 景海峰 1991. Xiong Shili 熊十力. Taibei: Dongda Tushu GongsiGoogle Scholar
Jullien, François 1995. The Propensity of Things: Towards a History of Efficacy in China. Translated by Lloyd, Janet. New York: Zone BooksGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Charles 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1997. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, with Selected Writings from the Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Hatfield, Gary. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantor, Hans-Rudolf 2009. “Zhiyi’s Great Calming and Contemplation: Contemplating Mental Activity as the Inconceivable Realm,” in Edelglass, William and Garfield, Jay(eds.), Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings, pp. 334–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasoff, Ira 1984. The Thought of Chang Tsai. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Keightley, David N. 1988. “Shang Divination and Metaphysics,” Philosophy East and West 38.4: 367– 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon 1993. “The Nonreductivist’s Trouble with Mental Causation,” in Kim, Jaegwon, Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press, pp. 336–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Myeong-seok 2014. “Is There No Distinction between Reason and Emotion in Mengzi?”, Philosophy East and West 64.1: 4981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Yung Sik 2000. The Natural Philosophy of Chu Hsi, 1130–1200. Philadephia: Memoirs of the American Philosophic SocietyGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1974. “Natural Change in Heraclitus,” in Mourelatos, A. P. D. (ed.), The Pre-Socratics. Princeton University Press, pp. 189–96Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd edition. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblock, John, and Riegel, Jeffrey. 2000. The Annals of Lü Buwei: A Complete Translation and Study. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kong, Yingda 1985. Zhouyi zhengyi 周易正義 (Correct Interpretation of Zhouyi) (7.32a), in Yuan, Ruan 阮元 (ed.), Shisan jing zhushu 十三經注疏 (The Thirteen Classics with Annotations and Sub-commentaries), Vol. I. Taibei: Yiwen yinshuguan, pp. 1–215Google Scholar
Kwan, Tze-wan, Multi-function Character Database, at http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/lexi-mfGoogle Scholar
Lau, D. C. 1982. Lao-Tzu. Hong Kong: Chinese University PressGoogle Scholar
Legge, James 1885. Li Chi: Book of Rites. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Legge, James 1960. The Chinese Classics, 5 vols. University of Hong Kong PressGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1896. New Essays on Human Understanding. New York: Macmillan BooksGoogle Scholar
Levey, Matthew A. 1991. “Chu Hsi as a ‘Neo-Confucian’: Chu Hsi’s Critique of Heterodoxy, Heresy, and the ‘Confucian’ Tradition.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Levey, Matthew A. 1994. “The Clan and the Tree: Inconsistent Images of Human Nature in Chu Hsi’s Settled Discourse,” Journal of Sung–Yüan Studies 24: 101–43Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang 2014. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Liji 1992. Hong Kong: Institute of Chinese Studies, Chinese University of Hong KongGoogle Scholar
Li, Jingde 黎靖德 (ed.) 1990. Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類. Beijing: Zhonghua shujuGoogle Scholar
Li, Ling 李零 1995. Sunzi guben yanjiu《孙子》古本研究 (Research on Ancient Text Sunzi). Beijing: Peking University PressGoogle Scholar
Li, Qingliang 李清良 2010. “Lun Ma Yifu dui Xiong Shili Xin weishi lun zhi yingxiang 論馬一浮對熊十力《新唯識論》之影響(The Influence of Ma Yifu on Xiong Shili’s Xin weishi lun), Taiwan Dong-Ya wenming yanjiu xuekan 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 7.1: 201–32Google Scholar
Li, Runsheng 李润生 2007. Zhonglun yidu 中論异读 (Alternate Reading of Zhonglun). Beijing: Chinese BookstoreGoogle Scholar
Liang, Tao 梁涛 2004. “Zhu Xi dui ‘Shendu’ de wudu ji qi zai jingxue quanshi zhong de yiyi 朱熹對‘慎獨’的誤讀及其在經學詮釋中的意義” (Zhuxi’s Misreading of ‘shendu’ and its Significance for Hermeneutics in Classical Studies), Zhexueyanjiu 哲学研究 3: 4854Google Scholar
Liao, Minghuo 廖明活 1999. Jingying Huiyuan sixiang shuyao 净影慧远思想述要. Taibei: Xuesheng ShujuGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chen-kuo 2014. “The Uncompromising Quest for Genuine Buddhism: Lü Cheng’s Critique of Original Enlightenment,” in Makeham, John (ed.), Transforming Consciousness: Yogācāra Thought in Modern China. Oxford University Press, pp. 343–74Google Scholar
Linck, Gudula 2001. Yin und Yang: Die Suche nach Ganzheit im chinesischen Denken. Munich: Verlag C. H. BeckGoogle Scholar
Liu, Baonan 劉寶楠 1990. Lunyu zhengyi 論語正義 (Lunyu: Corrected Meanings). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Liu, D. and Hu, H. 2000. The Selection of Sex Antiques Collected by China Sex Museum. Hong Kong: Wenhui PressGoogle Scholar
Liu, JeeLoo 2014a. “Chinese Qi-Naturalism and Liberal Naturalism.” Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 1.1: 5986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, JeeLoo 2014b. “Was There Something in Nothingness? The Debate on the Primordial State between Daoism and Neo-Confucianism,” in Liu, JeeLoo and Berger, Douglas (eds.), Nothingness in Asian Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 181–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Xiaogan 劉笑敢 2006. Laozi gujin 老子古今 (Laozi Past and Present). Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Liu, Zhao (ed.) 2003. Guodian Chujian Jiaoshi 郭店楚簡校釋 (The Guodian Bamboo Slips: Annotations and Explanations). Fuzhou: Fujian People’s PressGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. and Sivin, Nathan 2003. The Way and the Word. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Lou, Yulie and Shi, Jun (eds.) 1983. Zhongguo Fojiao sixiang ziliao xuanbian 中国佛教思想资料选编 (Selected Materials of Chinese Buddhist Thought), Vol. II, Part 2. Beijing: Zhonghua BookstoreGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Victor 1990. Alfred North Whitehead, The Man and His Work, Vol. II, 1910–1947. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Luo, Qinshun 羅欽順 1990. Kunzhiji 困知記 (Knowledge Acquired through Adversity) (1528). Bejing: Zhonghua BooksGoogle Scholar
Luo, Zhixi 罗志希 2010. Kexue yu Xuanxue 科学与玄学 (Science and Xuanxue). Beijing: The Commercial PressGoogle Scholar
Macarthur, David 2010. “Taking the Human Sciences Seriously,” in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 123–41Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
McKirahan, Richard D. Jr. 1994. Philosophy before Socrates. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan 2011. “Varieties of Methodological Naturalism,” in Gordon, Bruce L. and Dembski, William A. (eds.), The Nature of Nature: Explaining the Role of Naturalism in Science. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, pp. 8294Google Scholar
Mair, Victor (trans.) 1994. Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i PressGoogle Scholar
Makeham, John 1994. Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Makeham, John 2003. Transmitters and Creators: Chinese Commentators and Commentaries on the Analects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia CenterGoogle Scholar
Makeham, John (ed.) 2014. Transforming Consciousness: Yogācāra Thought in Modern China. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makeham, John 2015. New Treatise on the Uniqueness of Consciousness. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel 1923–4. “Essai sur le don: Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaiques,” L’annee sociologique, seconde série: 30–186, available at http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/mauss_marcel/socio_et_anthropo/2_essai_sur_le_don/essai_sur_le_don.htmlGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Thomas A. 1977. Escape from Predicament: Neo-Confucianism and China’s Evolving Political Culture. New York: Columbia University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Thomas A. 2005. A Cloud across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash between Chinese and Western Political Theories Today. Hong Kong: The Chinese University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, James 2013a. “Authenticity, Sincerity and Spontaneity: The Mutual Implication of Nature and Religion in China and the West,” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25: 283307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, James 2013b. “Nature, Impersonality and Absence in the Theology of Highest Clarity Daoism,” in Diller, Jeanine and Kasher, Asa (eds.), Models of God and Alternate Ultimate Realities. New York: Springer, 669–80Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, Hans-Georg 2007. Dao De Jing. Chicago: Open CourtGoogle Scholar
Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三 1981. Foxing yu Bore 佛性與般若 (Buddha-nature and Prajña). Taibei: Xuesheng ShujuGoogle Scholar
Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三 1999. Xinti yu xingti 心體與性體 (The Fundamental State of the Heart/Mind and the Fundamental State of Human Nature). Shanghai Guji ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Munro, Donald J. 1988. Images of Human Nature: A Sung Portrait. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Donald J. 2005. A Chinese Ethics for the New Century: The Ch’ien Mu Lectures in History and Culture, and Other Essays on Science and Confucian Ethics. Hong Kong: The Chinese University PressGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?Philosophical Review, 83.4: 435–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Joseph 1994. The Shorter Science and Civilization in China (abridged by Ronan, Colin A.), Vol. IV. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Neville, Robert 1982. “Process and the Neo-Confucian Cosmos,” in Neville, , The Tao and the Daimon. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 147–70Google Scholar
Neville, Robert 1995. The Cosmology of Freedom, new edn. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Neville, Robert 2000. Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-Modern World. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Niu, Bingzhan 牛兵占 (ed.) 1993. Huangdi Neijing 黃帝內經. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Science and Technology PressGoogle Scholar
Nylan, Michael, and Loewe, Michael 2010. China’s Early Empires: A Re-appraisal. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Odin, Steve 1982. Process Metaphysics and Hua-Yen Buddhism: A Critical Study of Cumulative Penetration vs. Interpenetration. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Palsson, Gisli, Szerszynski, Bronislaw, Sorlin, Sverker, Marks, John, Avril, Bernard, Crumley, Carole, Hackmann, Heide, Holm, Poul, Ingram, John, Kirman, Alan, Pardo, Mercedes Buendıa, and Weehuizen, Rifka 2013. “Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the Social Sciences and Humanities in Global Environmental Change Research,” Environmental Science & Policy 28: 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, Pu 龐樸 1998. “Kong–Meng zhi jian: Guodian Chu jian de sixiangshi diwei 孔孟之間:郭店楚簡的思想地位” (Between Confucius and Mencius: The Place in the History of Thought of the Chu Strips Found at Guodian),” Zhongguo shehui kexue 中國社會科學 5:8895Google Scholar
Papineau, David 2009. “Naturalism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalismGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Franklin 2014. Heaven and Earth Are Not Humane: The Problem of Evil in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
Pfister, Lauren 2008. “Philosophical Explorations of the Transformative Dimension in Chinese Culture,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35.4: 663–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Huw 2011. “Naturalism without Representationalism,” in Price, , Naturalism without Mirrors. Oxford University Press, pp. 184–99Google Scholar
Priest, Graham 2002. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham 2005. Towards Non-being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puett, Michael 2005. “The Offering of Food and the Creation of Order: The Practice of Sacrifice in Early China,” in Sterckx, Roel (ed.), Of Tripod and Palate: Food, Politics, and Religion in Traditional China. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 7595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puett, Michael 2010a. “The Haunted World of Humanity: Ritual Theory from Early China,” in Molina, J. Michelle, Swearer, Donald K., and McGarry, Susan Lloyd (eds.), Rethinking the Human. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions, pp. 95111Google Scholar
Puett, Michael 2010b. “Ritualization as Domestication: Ritual Theory from Classical China,” in Michaels, Axel, Mishra, Anand, Dolce, Lucia, Raz, Gil, and Triplett, Katja (eds.), Ritual Dynamics and the Science of Ritual, Vol. I, Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 365–76Google Scholar
Puett, Michael 2014a. “Ritual Disjunctions: Ghosts, Philosophy, and Anthropology,” in Das, Veena, Jackson, Michael, Kleinman, Arthur, and Singh, Bhrigupati (eds.), The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 218–33Google Scholar
Puett, Michael 2014b. “Sages, Creation, and the End of History in the Huainanzi,” in Queen, Sarah A. and Puett, Michael (eds.), The Huainanzi and Textual Production in Early China. Leiden: Brill, pp. 269–90Google Scholar
Qian, Mu 錢 穆 1971. Zhuzi xinxuean 朱子新學案 (A New Study of Zhu Xi), 5 vols. Taibei: Sanmin shujuGoogle Scholar
Qian, Mu 錢 穆 2002. Zhuzixue tigang 朱子學提綱 (Outline of Master Zhu’s Learning). Beijing: Sanlian shudianGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, R. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn: Friedrich CohenGoogle Scholar
Robinet, Isabelle 1999. “The Diverse Interpretations of the Laozi,” in Csikszentmihalyi, Mark and Ivanhoe, Philip J. (eds.), Reigious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 127–60Google Scholar
Ruan, Yuan 阮元 (ed.) 1985. Shisan jing zhushu 十三經注疏 (The Thirteen Classics with Annotations and Sub-commentaries). Taibei: Yiwen yinshuguanGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1992 (first published 1913). Theory of Knowledge, the 1913 Manuscript. First paperback edition. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1949. Situations III. Paris: GallimardGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Tim S. 2003. “Metaphysics and Morals,” in “Presidential Address, APA Eastern Division, December 20, 2003,” reprinted in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 173–92Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan 2007. ‘Monism,’ in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/monismGoogle Scholar
Schmidthausen, Lambert 1987. Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy. Tokyo: The International Institute of Buddhist StudiesGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin 1973. “On the Absence of Reductionism in Chinese Thought,” reprinted in Schwartz, , China and Other Matters, pp.8197. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: BelknapCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, Adam, Weller, Robert, Puett, Michael, and Simon, Bennett 2008. Ritual and its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1963. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man,” in Sellars, , Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, pp. 1–40Google Scholar
Shen, Vincent 1996. “Harmony among Humans, Nature and God: A Comprehensive Vision of Optimal Harmony,” Inter-Religio 30: 4662Google Scholar
Shen, Vincent 2004. Generosity to the Other. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong PressGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry 2004. “The Charm of Naturalism,” in De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.), 2008. Naturalism in Question, 1st paperback edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 2135Google Scholar
Stubenberg, Leopold 2010. “Neutral Monism,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/neutral-monismGoogle Scholar
Sun, Xidan 孫希旦1988. Liji jijie 禮記集解 (The Record of Ritual: Collected Explanations). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Sun, Yirang 孫詒讓 2001. Mozi xiangu 墨子閒詁 (Leisurely Notes on the Mozi). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Swartz, Norman 2009. “Laws of Nature,” in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at www.iep.utm.edu/lawofnatGoogle Scholar
Takakuso, Junjirō, and Watanabe, Kaigyoku (eds.) 1924–34. Taishō shinshū daizokyō 大正新修大藏經. Tokyo: Issaikyō Kankō KaiGoogle Scholar
Tang, Junyi 唐君毅 1956. “Chang Tsai’s Theory of Mind and Its Metaphysical Basis,” Philosophy East and West 6.2: 113–36Google Scholar
Tang, Junyi 1988. Zhongxi zhexue sixiang zhi bijiao lunwenji 中西哲學思想之比較論文集 (Collected Essays on Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Thoughts). Taibei: Xuesheng ShujuGoogle Scholar
Tang, Junyi 1991. Tang Junyi quanji 唐君毅全集 (The Complete Works of Tang Junyi). 4 vols. Taibei: Xuesheng shujuGoogle Scholar
Tillemans, T. F. 2009. “How Do Mādhyamikas Think? Notes on Jay Garfield, Graham Priest, and Paraconsistency”, in D’Amato, Mario, Garfied, Jay, and Tillemans, Tom J. F. (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 83101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland 1982. Utilitarian Confucianism: Ch’en Liang’s Challenge to Chu Hsi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland 1992a. Confucian Discourse and Chu Hsi’s Ascendancy. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland 1992b. “A New Direction in Confucian Scholarship: Approaches to Examining the Differences between Neo-Confucianism and Tao-hsüeh,” Philosophy East and West 42.3: 455–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Lik Kuen 1974. “The Concept of Time in Whitehead and the I Ching,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 1: 373–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Lik Kuen 1979. “Whitehead and Chinese Philosophy from the Vantage Point of the I Ching,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 297321Google Scholar
Tucker, John Allen 1998. Ito Jinsai’s Gomo Jigi and the Philosophical Definition of Early Modern Japan. Boston: E. J. BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, John Allen 2003. “Chen Beixi, Lu Xinshan and Early Tokugawa (1600–1867) Philosophical Lexicography,” Philosophy East and West, 43.4: 683706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, John Allen (ed. and trans.) 2006. Ogyu Sorai’s Philosophical Masterworks: The Bendo and Benmei. Honolulu: Association of Asian Studies and the University of Hawai’i PressGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter 2007. “Metaphysics,” in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysicsGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Hans Ulrich and Dux, Günter 2010. Concepts of Nature: A Chinese–European Cross-cultural Perspective. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Fuzhi 王夫之 1967. Zhangzi Zheng Meng zhu 張子正蒙注 (Commentary on Zhang Zai’s “Rectifying the Youth”), 1685–90. Taibei: Shijie ShujuGoogle Scholar
Wang, Fuzhi 王夫之 1970. Zhangzi Zheng Meng zhu 張子正蒙注 (Commentary on Zhang Zai’s “Rectifying the Youth”). Taibei: Guangwen ShujuGoogle Scholar
Wang, Haicheng 王海成 2009. “Zhang Zai Taixu yiyi bianxi 張載太虛意義辨析” (The Analysis of the Meaning of Zhang Zai’s Taixu), Tangdu Journal 25.2: 8891Google Scholar
Wang, Tingxiang 王廷相 1974. Wang Tingxiang zhexue xuanji 王廷相哲學選集 (The Selected Philosophical Works of Wang Tingxiang). Taibei: Heluo Tushu ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xianqian 王先謙 1988. Xunzi jijie 荀子集解 (Xunzi: Collected Explanations). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xinzhan 王心湛 1936. Heguanzi jijie 鹖冠子集解 (Heguanzi: Collected Explanations). Shanghai: Guangyi PressGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yunwu 王雲五 1972. Zhouli jinzhu jinyi 周禮今注今譯 (Rituals of Zhou: Contemporary Notes and Translation). Taibei: Taiwan Commercial PressGoogle Scholar
Walsh, W. H. 1963. Metaphysics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Weaver, Warren 1948. “Science and Complexity,” American Scientist 36.4: 536–44Google ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, A. N. 1920. Concept of Nature. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1922.The Principle of Relativity with Application to Physical Science. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1925. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Natural Knoledge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1926. Religion in the Making. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1933. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1938. Modes of Thought. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. 1978. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Edited by Griffin, David Ray and Sherburne, Donald W.. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Wilhem, Richard and Baynes, Cary F. 1977. The I Ching or Book of Changes. The Wilhem, Richard translation rendered into English by Baynes, Cary F.. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Wittenborn, Allen (trans.) 1991. Further Reflections on Things at Hand: A Reader, Chu Hsi. Lanham, MD: University Press of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Wong, David B. 1991. “Is There a Distinction between Reason and Emotion in Mencius?Philosophy East and West 41.1: 3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, David B. 2002. “Reasons and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi,” in Liu, Xiusheng and Ivanhoe, Philip J. (eds.), Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, pp. 187220Google Scholar
Worster, Donald 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd edition. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Xiong, Shili 熊十力 1935. “Jiangci 講詞,” Shili lunxueyu jilüe 十力論學語輯略, in Xiong, , Xiong Shili quanji 熊十力全集 (The Complete Writings of Xiong Shili). Wuhan: Hubei jiaoyu chubanshe, 2001, Vol. II, p. 253Google Scholar
Xiong, Shili 熊十力 1958. Tiyonglun 體用論 (A Treatise on Substance and Function). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
Xiong, Shili 熊十力 1961. Qiankunyan 乾坤衍 (The Extension of Qian and Kun). Shanghai Shudian ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Xiong, Shili 熊十力 2001. Xiong Shili quanji 熊十力全集 (The Complete Writings of Xiong Shili). Wuhan: Hubei jiaoyu chubansheGoogle Scholar
Xu, Fuhong 許富宏 2008. Gui Guzi jishi 鬼谷子集釋 (Guiguzi: Collected Explanations). Beijing: Chinese PressGoogle Scholar
Yang, Lihua 楊立華 2005. “Qiben yu shenhua: Zhang Zai bentilun jiangou de zaikao氣本與神化:張載本體論建構的再考” (Qi as Fundamental State and Transformations with Unpredictability: A Reinvestigation of Zhang Zai’s Ontological Structure),” Zhexuemen: Beida Journal of Philosophy 6.2, at www.phil.pku.edu.cn/zxm/show.php?id=230Google Scholar
Yang, Lihua 楊立華 2008. Qiben yu shenhua: Zhang zhexue xueshu lun 氣本與神化:張載哲學述論 (Qi as Fundamental State and Transformations with Unpredictability: A Treatise on Zhang Zai’s Philosophy). Beijing University ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Yi, Desheng 易德生 2003. “Zhongguo gudai yuanqilun dui jindai wuli de yinxiang yu qishi 中國古代元氣論對近現代物理的影響與啟示” (Some Impacts and Inspirations the Chinese Ancient Theory of Primordial Qi has on Contemporary Physics),” Xinjiang sheke luntan (Xinjiang Social Sciences Discourse) 6: 5861Google Scholar
Yu, Dunkang, 余敦康 2006. Zhouyi xiandai jiedu 周易現代解讀 (Contemporary Reading of the Zhouyi). Beijing: Huaxia PressGoogle Scholar
Yu, Jiyuan 1999. “The Language of Being: Between Aristotle and Chinese Philosophy,” International Philosophical Quarterly 39.4: 439–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Jiyuan 2003. The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Dordrecht, London, and Boston: Kluwer Academic PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Jiyuan 2011. “Is Chinese Cosmology Metaphysics? A Greek–Chinese Comparative Study,” Journal of East–West Thought 1.1: 137–50Google Scholar
Yu, Weidong, Jin, Xu, and Zhang, Lin 2009. “Morality and Nature: The Essential Difference between the Dao of Chinese Philosophy and the Metaphysics in Western Philosophy,” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4.3: 360–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Yingshi 余英時 2003. Zhuxi de lishi shijie: Songdai shidafu zhengzhi wenhua de yanjiu 朱熹的歷史世界—宋代士大夫政治文化的研究 (The Historical World of Zhu Xi : Investigations into the Political Culture of the Song Gentry). Taibei: Yunchen wenhuaGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Chunhai 曾春海 2001. Zhuxi zhexue luncong 朱熹哲學論叢 (A Discussion of Zhu Xi’s Philosophy). Taibei: Wenjin chubansheGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Dainian 張岱年 1958. Zhongguo Zhexue Dagang 中國哲學大綱 (Outline of Chinese Philosophy). Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu ChubansheGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Xichen 章錫琛 (ed.)1978. Zhang Zai ji 張載集 (Collected Writings of Zhang Zai). Beijing: Zhonghua shujuGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zai 1979. Zhangzi quanshu 張子全書 (Complete Works of Zhang Zai). Taibei: Shangwu YinshuguanGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zai 1998. Zheng Meng, using the text given with collected commentaries compiled by Wang Zhishu 王植註 under the title Zheng Meng chuyi 正蒙初義, collected in Zhaopeng, Zhong 鍾肇鵬, ed., Xu Baiziquanshu 續百子全書, 25 vols. Beijing tushuguan chubansheGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zai 2006. Zhang Zai ji 張載集 (Collected Works of Zhang Zai). Beijing: Zhonghua shujuGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Zongxiang 張宗祥 1956. Yue jue shu jiaozhu 越絕書校註 (Annotations on the Book of Yue). Beijing: Shangwu PressGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Dunhua 趙敦華 2006. “Metaphysics in China and in the West: Common Origin and Later Divergence,” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1: 2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xi 朱熹 2002. Zhuzi quanshu 朱子全書 (The Complete Works of Zhuxi) (ed. Jieren, Zhu 朱傑人, Zuozhi, Yan 嚴佐之, and Yongxiang, Liu 劉永翔), 27 vols. Shanghai and Nanjing: Shanghai guji chubanshe and Anhui jiaoyu chubansheGoogle Scholar
Ziporyn, Brook 2000. Evil and/or/as the Good: Omnicentrism, Intersubjectivity, and Value Paradox in Tiantai Buddhist Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Ziporyn, Brook 2009a. “The Deluded Mind as World and Truth” in Edelglass, William and Garfield, Jay(eds.), Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings, pp. 238–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziporyn, Brook (trans.) 2009b. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett PublishingGoogle Scholar
Ziporyn, Brook 2012. Ironies of Oneness and Difference: Coherence in Early Chinese Thought; Prolegomena to the Study of Li. Albany: State University of New York PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works cited
  • Edited by Chenyang Li, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Franklin Perkins, DePaul University, Chicago
  • Book: Chinese Metaphysics and its Problems
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145180.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works cited
  • Edited by Chenyang Li, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Franklin Perkins, DePaul University, Chicago
  • Book: Chinese Metaphysics and its Problems
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145180.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works cited
  • Edited by Chenyang Li, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Franklin Perkins, DePaul University, Chicago
  • Book: Chinese Metaphysics and its Problems
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145180.014
Available formats
×