I - Concepts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Christian PlatonismA History, pp. 11 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bibliography
Baltes, M. “Is the Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic beyond Being?” in Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition, ed. Joyal., M. London: Ashgate, 1997: 1–23.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. Platonist Philosophy, 80 bc to ad 250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Butler, Edward. Essays on the Metaphysics of Polytheism in Proclus. New York: Phaidra Editions, 2014.Google Scholar
Cürsgen, D. Henologie und Ontologie: Die metaphysische Prinzipienlehre des späten Neuplatonismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2007.Google Scholar
D’Ancona Costa, C. “Enadi e archai nell’ordine sovrasensible,” Rivista di storia della filosofia 2 (1992): 265–294.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. Platonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Kremer, K. “Bonum est diffusivum sui: Ein Beitrag zum Verhältnis von Neuplatonismus und Christentum,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, vol. 36/2, ed. Hasse, W. and Temporini, H.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1987: 994–1032.Google Scholar
Metry-Tresson, C. L’aporie ou l’expérience des limites de la pensée dans le Péri Archôn de Damaskios. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikulin, D. The Other Plato. The Tübingen School of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teaching. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2012.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, F. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perl, E. Ennead V 1. On the Three Primary Levels of Reality. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C., Horn, C., and Wyrwa, D. Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und Spätantike, vol. 5/2. Basel: Schwabe, 2018.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. “The Dramatis Personae of Plato’s Phaedo,” Proceedings of the British Academy 85 (1995): 3–26.Google Scholar
Van Riel, G. “Damascius,” in The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, ed. Gerson, Lloyd P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 667–696.Google Scholar
Van Riel, G. “The One, the Henads, and the Principles,” in All from One: A Guide to Proclus, ed. D’Hoine, P. and Martijn, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017: 73–97.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Augustine, , Concerning the City of God against the Pagans, trans. Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 51–96.Google Scholar
Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H., trans. Philo, vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Constas, Nicholas. Maximus the Confessor, On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: the Ambigua, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio. Origène, Traité Des Principes, vol. 2. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1978.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. Alcinous, The Handbook of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Dillon, J The Middle Platonists. London/Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977 (2nd ed. 1996).Google Scholar
Dillon, J ‘Theophrastus’ Critique of the Old Academy in the Metaphysics’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Wöhrle, G. (eds.), On the Opuscula of Theophrastus. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002, 175–87.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. Dio, idee e materia: la struttura del cosmo in Plutarco di Cheronea. Naples: D’Auria, 1995.Google Scholar
Göransson, Tryggve. Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1995.Google Scholar
Kenney, John P. Mystical Monotheism: A Study in Ancient Platonic Theology. Hanover: Brown University Press, 1991. 2nd ed. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock, 2010.Google Scholar
Koch, Hal. Pronoia und Paideusis: Studien über Origenes und sein Verhältnis zum Platonismus. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1932.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. La causalité des Formes intelligibles dans la philosophie de Plotin. Paris: Leuven University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Mosher, David L., trans. Augustine, Eighty-Three Different Questions. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Radice, R. Platonismo e creazionismo in Filone di Alessandria. Milan: Pubblicazioni del Centro di richerche di metafisica, 1989.Google Scholar
Rich, A. ‘The Platonic Ideas as the Thoughts of God’, Mnemosyne ser. 4, vol. 7 (1954): 123–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James, eds. Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 4: Tertullian, Part Fourth; Minucius Felix; Commodian; Origen, Part First and Second. New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1885.Google Scholar
Tolan, Daniel J. ‘The Impact of the Ὁμοούσιον on the Divine Ideas’, in Pavlos, P. G., Janby, L. F., Emilsson, E. K., and Tollefsen, T. T. (eds.), Platonism and Christian Thought in Late Antiquity. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Tolan, Daniel J.‘Origen’s Refutation of the Divine Ideas in Περὶ Ἀρχῶν II.2.6 as the Emergence of “Neoplatonism”’, Studia Patristica, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Athanasius, and Didymus, . Works on the Spirit. Translated by Mark DelCogliano, Andrew Radde-Gallwitz, and Lewis Ayres. Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Balás, David L. Metousia Theou: Man’s Participation in God’s Perfections According to Saint Gregory of Nyssa, Studia Anselmiana 55. Rome: Herder & Herder, 1966.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Presence and Thought: An Essay on the Religious Philosophy of Gregory of Nyssa. Translated by Mark Sebanc. San Francisco: Ignatius, 1995.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michel René. The Power of God: Δύναμις in Gregory of Nyssa’s Trinitarian Theology. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barrett, Jordan P. Divine Simplicity: A Biblical and Trinitarian Account. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2017.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier F. “Quosdam Platonicorum Libros: The Platonic Readings of Augustine in Milan.” Vigiliae Christianae 43 (1989): 248–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, John. “Logos and Trinity: Patterns of Platonist Influence on early Christianity.” In The Philosophy in Christianity, edited by Vesey, Godfrey, 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. “Origen’s Doctrine of the Trinity and Some Later Neoplatonic Theories.” In Neoplatonism and Christian Thought, Studies in Neoplatonism: Ancient and Modern 3, edited by O’Meara, Dominic, 19-23. Albany: SUNY Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Drecoll, Volker Henning. “Is Porphyry the Source Used by Marius Victorinus?” In Plato’s Parmenides and its Heritage, vol. 2: Reception in Patristics, Gnostic, and Christian Neoplatonic Texts, Writings from the Greco-Roman World Supplements 3, edited by Turner, John D. and Corrigan, Kevin, 65–80. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature Publications, 2010.Google Scholar
Duby, Stephen. Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark J. “Origen’s Platonism: Questions and Caveats.” Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 12 (2008): 20–38.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. Christian Philosophy: An Introduction. Translated by Maurer, Armand. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1993.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. P. C. The Search for a Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy, 318–381. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 1988.Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf von. History of Dogma, vols. 4 and 5. Translated by Neil Buchanan. New York: Dover, 1961.Google Scholar
Hart, David Bentley. The Hidden and the Manifest: Essays in Theology and Metaphysics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar
Ivanka, Endre von. “Vom Platonismus zur Theorie der Mystik: Zur Erkenntnislehre Gregors von Nyssa.” Scholastik 11 (1936): 163–195.Google Scholar
Knapp, Georg Christian. Lectures on Christian Theology, vol. 1. Translated by Leonard Woods, 1st ed. New York: G. & C. & H. Carvill, 1831.Google Scholar
Lilla, Salvatore R. C. “The Neoplatonic Hypostases and the Christian Trinity.” In Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Essays Presented to John Whittaker, edited by Joyal, Mark, 127–189. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. St John Damascene: Tradition and Originality in Byzantine Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Majercik, Ruth. “A Reminiscence of the ‘Chaldean Oracles’ at Gregory of Nazianzus, Or. 29,2: ΟΙΟΝ ΚΡΑΤΗΡ ΤΙΣ ΥΠΕΡΕΡΡΥΗ.” Vigiliae Christianae 52 (1998): 286–292.Google Scholar
Moore, William and Wilson, Henry Austin, trans. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. 5: Gregory of Nyssa: Dogmatic Treatises, etc. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. “Olympiodorus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, edited by Gerson, Lloyd P., 697–710. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Origen, . Commentary on the Gospels of John. Books 13–32. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. Fathers of the Church Series, 89. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. “The Appropriation of the Philosophical Concept of God as a Dogmatic Problem of Early Christian Theology.” In Basic Questions in Theology: Collected Essays, vol. 2, translated by George H. Kehm, 119–183. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971.Google Scholar
Petau, Denis. Dogmata theologica, vol. 2: primum de praedestione, postea de Trinitate. Paris: Le Vivès, 1865–1867.Google Scholar
Plotinus., The Enneads. Edited and translated by Gerson, Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Proclus, . The Elements of Theology. Edited and translated by Dodds, E. R., 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Gregory of Nyssa’s Doctrinal Works: A Literary Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. “Pseudo-Dionysius, the Parmenides, and the Problem of Contradiction.” In Plato’s Parmenides and its Heritage, vol. 2: Reception in Patristic, Gnostic, and Christian Neoplatonic Texts, edited by Turner, John D. and Corrigan, Kevin, 243–254. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2010.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew, ed. The Cambridge Edition of Early Christian Writings, Volume One: God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ricken, Friedo. “Das Homoousios von Nikaia als Krisis des altchristlichen Platonismus.” In Zur Frühgeschichte der Christologie: Ihre biblischen Anfänge und die Lehrformel von Nikaia, Quaestiones Disputatae 51, edited by Welte, Bernhard, 74–99. Freiburg, Basel, Vienna: Herder, 1971.Google Scholar
Rist, John. “Basil’s ‘Neoplatonism’: Its Background and Nature.” In Basil of Caesarea: Christian, Humanist, Ascetic, vol. 1, edited by Fedwick, Paul Jonathan, 137–220. Toronto: PIMS, 1981.Google Scholar
Saint Augustine., The City of God against the Pagans. Translated by R. W. Dyson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Saint Augustine., Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Saint Basil of Caesarea., Against Eunomius. Translated by Mark Delcogliano and Andrew Radde-Gallwitz. Fathers of the Church Series. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Soskice, Janet M. “Athens and Jerusalem, Alexandria and Edessa: Is There a Metaphysics of Scripture?” International Journal of Systematic Theology 8 (2006): 149–162.Google Scholar
Turner, John D. “The Platonizing Sethian Treatises, Marius Victorinus’s Philosophical Sources, and Pre-Plotinian Parmenides Commentaries.” In Plato’s Parmenides and its Heritage, vol. 1: History and Interpretation from the Old Academy to Later Platonism and Gnosticism, edited by Turner, John D. and Corrigan, Kevin, 131–172. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature Publications, 2010.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. Arius: Heresy and Tradition. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Bechtle, G. “Categories and Conversion.” In Religion and Philosophy in the Platonic and Neoplatonic Traditions, ed. Corrigan, K. and Turner, J. D., 107–120. Sankt Augustin:Akademia, 2012.Google Scholar
Blowers, P. M. “Doctrine of Creation.” In Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies, ed. Harvey, Susan Ashbrook and Hunter, David G., 906–922. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry, trans. Saint Augustine: Confessions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. Love, Friendship, Beauty, and the Good: Plato, Aristotle and the Later Tradition. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2019.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. and Turner, J. D.. Plotinus, Ennead VI. 8: On the Voluntary and the Free Will of the One. Las Vegas, Zurich, Athens: Parmenides Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Crosson, F. “Structure and Meaning in Augustine’s Confessions.” In The Augustinian Tradition, ed. Matthews, G., 32–37. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. ‘Origen’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/origen/. 2018.Google Scholar
Fowler, Harold N., trans. PlatoVII: Theaetetus and Sophist. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
JPS Hebrew–English Tanakh: The Traditional Hebrew Text and The New JPS Translation. Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society, 1999.Google Scholar
Lear, J. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. “Plotinus on the Making of Matter: The Identity of Darkness, Part III.” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6, no. 1 (2012): 72–76.Google Scholar
Petty, Robert.The Fragments of Numenius of Apamea. London: The Prometheus Trust, 2012.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. Eros and Psyche: Studies in Plato, Plotinus and Origen. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Divine Providence: Two Problems.” Classical Quarterly 31, no. 1 (1982): 198–211.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2001.Google Scholar
Vaggione, R. P. Eunomius of Cyzicus and the Nicene Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. “Does Plotinus Present a Philosophical Account of Creation?” Review of Metaphysics 67 (2013): 55–105.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Aquinas, Thomas. In librum beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus expositio. Edited by Pera, Ceslas. Rome, Turin: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Metaphysica. Edited by Jaeger, Werner. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980 (1957).Google Scholar
Augustinus, . De civitate Dei. Œuvres de saint Augustin, La cité de Dieu, Livres VI–X. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1959.Google Scholar
Augustinus, De Trinitate. Œuvres de saint Augustin, La Trinité, Livres I–VII. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1959.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Epistolae, Patrologia Latina 33. Edited by Migne, Jacques-Paul. Paris, 1863.Google Scholar
Boethius, . In Isagogen Porphyrii Commenta, ed. Secunda. Edited by Brandt, Samuel. Vienna, Leipzig: Tempsky, 1906.Google Scholar
Boethius, The Theological Tractates: The Consolation of Philosophy. Edited and translated by Stewart, Hugh Fraser, Rand, Edward Kennard, and Tester, S. Jim. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. Au-delà de l’image. Une archéologie du visuel au Moyen Age, Ve–XVIe siècle. Paris: Seuil, 2008.Google Scholar
Cassiodorus, . Epiphani historia ecclesiastica tripartite. Edited by Jakob, Walter and Hanslik, Rudolph. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempski, 1952.Google Scholar
Denys l’Aréopagite [Dionysius the Areopagite], . De coelesti hierarchia. La Hiérarchie Céleste. Edited by Heil, Gunther and translated by de Gandillac, Maurice. Paris: le Cerf, 1970.Google Scholar
Denys l’Aréopagite [Dionysius the Areopagite], De divinis nominibus, Les Noms divins. Edited and translated by Ysabel de, Andia. Paris: le Cerf, 2016.Google Scholar
Denys l’Aréopagite [Dionysius the Areopagite] De mystica theologia. La théologie mystique. Edited and translated by Ysabel de, Andia. Paris: le Cerf, 2016.Google Scholar
Dionysius Areopagita, . Corpus Dionysiacum I. Edited by Suchla, Beate Regina. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Areopagita, Dionysius Corpus Dionysiacum II. Edited by Heil, Gunther and Ritter, Adolf Martin. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar
Areopagita, Dionysius On the Divine Names and the Mystical Theology. Translated by Clarence Edwin. London, New York: Macmillan, 1920.Google Scholar
Areopagita, Dionysius Opera Omnia, Patrologia Graeca 3. Edited by Migne, Jacques-Paul. Paris, 1857.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. ‘Ad intellectum ratiocinatio: Three Procline logics, The Divine Names of Pseudo-Dionysius, Eriugena’s Periphyseon and Boethius’ Consolatio Philosophiae’. Studia Patristica 29 (1997): 244–51.Google Scholar
Harrington, Michael L., ed. and trans. A Thirteenth-Century Textbook of Mystical Theology at the University of Paris. The Mystical Theology of Dionysius the Areopagite in Eriugena’s Latin Translation with the Scholia Translated by Anastasius the Librarian and Excerpts from Eriugena’s Periphyseon. Paris-Leuven-Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2004.Google Scholar
Jean Scot, [John Scotus Eriugena]. Homélie sur le Prologue de Jean. Edited by Jeauneau, Edouard. Paris: le Cerf, 1969.Google Scholar
Iohannes Scoti, [John Scotus Eriugena]. Expositiones in ierarchiam coelestem. Edited by Barbet, Jeanne. Turnhout: Brepols, 1975.Google Scholar
Johannes Scottus seu Eriugena, [John Scotus Eriugena]. Periphyseon I. Edited by Jeauneau, Edouard. Turnhout: Brepols, 1996.Google Scholar
Johannes Scottus seu Eriugena, Periphyseon II. Edited by Jeauneau, Edouard. Turnhout: Brepols, 1997.Google Scholar
Johannes Scottus seu Eriugena, Periphyseon (Division of Nature). Translated by J. O’Meara. Montreal, Washington: Bellarmin, Dumbarton Oaks, 1987.Google Scholar
Le Bouzec, Yves. ‘L’hypotypose: un essai de définition formelle’. L’information grammaticale 92 (2002): 3–7.Google Scholar
Pépin, Jean. ‘Les modes de l’enseignement théologique dans la Théologie Platonicienne’. In Proclus et la théologie platonicienne, edited by Segonds, Alain-Philippe and Steel, Carlos, 1–14. Leuven, Paris: Leuven University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Proclus, . Théologie Platonicienne. Edited by Saffrey, Henri-Dominique and Westerink Gerrit, Leender. Paris: les Belles Lettres, 2017 (1968).Google Scholar
Roques, René. ‘Les “théologies” dionysiennes: notions, fonctions et implications’. In Structures théologiques. De la gnose à Richard de Saint-Victor, 135–63. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.Google Scholar
Rorem, Paul. Eriugena’s Commentary on the Dionysian Celestial Hierarchy. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
Saffrey, Henri-Dominique. ‘Theology as Science (3rd–6th centuries’). Studia Patristica 29 (1997): 321–39.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Aertsen, Jan. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals. The Case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Aristotle., Metaphysics, Books I–IX, translated by Hugh Tredennick. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996, 1933.Google Scholar
Davison, Andrew. Participation in God: A Study in Christian Doctrine and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. La nozione metafisica di partecipazione secondo S. Tommaso d’Aquino. 3rd ed. Turin: Societa ed. Internazionale, 1963.Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio.“Participation.” www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/participation.Google Scholar
Geiger, L.-B. La participation dans la philosophie de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Montréal: Institut d’Etudes Médiévales, 1952.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. “Aquinas and the Platonists,” in The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach, ed. Gersh, Stephen and Hoenen, Maarten. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002.Google Scholar
Milbank, John. Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D., ed. Sancti Thomae de Aquino, Super librum De causis exposition. Fribourg: Societé Philosophique, 1954.Google Scholar
Schindler, David C. “What’s the Difference? On the Metaphysics of Participation in a Christian Context,” The Saint Anselm Journal 3, no. 1 (2005): 1–27.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. The God of Faith and Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar
St. Thomas Aquinas., An Exposition of the “On the Hebdomads” of Boethius, introduction and translation by Janice L. Schultz and Edward A. Synan. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Te Velde, Rudi A. “Aquinas’s Aristotelian Science of Metaphysics and its Revised Platonism,” Nova et Vetera 13, no. 3 (2015): 743–64.Google Scholar
Te Velde, Rudi A. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas: Commentary on the Book of Causes, translated by Vincent A. Guagliardo, O.P., Charles R. Hess, O.P., and Richard C. Taylor. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. “Thomas Aquinas and Participation,” in Studies in Medieval Philosophy, ed. Wippel, J.. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1987: 117–58.Google Scholar