II - History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Christian PlatonismA History, pp. 141 - 352Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bibliography
Cudworth, R. True Intellectual System of the Universe. Edited by Birch, T.. London: Priestly, 1820.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. ‘Nicene Theology and the Second God’. Studia Patristica 40 (2006): 191–5.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J.‘Socrates and the Early Church’. In Socrates from Antiquity to the Enlightenment, ed. Trapp, M., 127–42. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J.‘Why did Constantine Label Arius a Porphyrian?’ L’Antiquité Classique 82 (2013): 239–47.Google Scholar
Gavrilyuk, P. The Suffering of the Impassible God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gunton, C. The One, the Three and the Many. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Leone Ebreo, , The Philosophy of Love. Translated by F. Friedeberg-Seeley and J. H. Barnes. London: Soncino, 1937.Google Scholar
Masterson, M. ‘Authoritative Obscenity in Iamblichus and Arnobius’. Journal of Early Christian Studies 22 (2014): 373–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, G. ‘Stones, Wood and Woven Papyrus: Porphyry’s On Statues’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 135 (2015), 78–94.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. ‘Allegoresis and Etymology’. In Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices, ed. Grafton, A. and Most, G. W., 52–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
O’Brien, S. C. The Demiurge in Ancient Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Bigg, Charles. The Christian Platonists of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Blosser, Benjamin P. Become Like the Angels: Origen’s Doctrine of the Soul. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. “Origen.” In Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, edited by Armstrong, A. H., 182–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd, ed. The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hägg, H. F. Clement of Alexandria and the Beginnings of Christian Apophaticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnack, Adolf. History of Dogma. Translated by Neil Buchanan. London: Williams and Norgate, 1897.Google Scholar
Kamesar, Adam, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Philo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. “Ancient Apophatic Theology,” In Gnosticism and Later Platonism. Themes, Figures, and Texts, edited by Turner, John D. and Majercik, Ruth, 259–275. Atlanta: SBL Symposium Series 12, 2000.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. Contemplation and Classical Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. Mystical Monotheism: A Study in Ancient Platonic Theology. Hanover and London: Brown University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. The Mysticism of Saint Augustine: Rereading the Confessions. London: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, J. P. “The Platonism of the Tripartite Tractate.” In Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, edited by Wallis, R. T. and Bregman, J., 187–206. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
King, Karen L. The Secret Revelation of John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut. History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Introduction to the New Testament. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar
Lewis, Thomas A. Why Philosophy Matters for the Study of Religion & Vice Versa. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lilla, S. Clement of Alexandria: A Study in Christian Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter W. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Meredith, Andrew. “Gregory of Nyssa.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, edited by Gerson, Lloyd, vol. I, 471–481. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Minns, Denis. “Justin Martyr.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, edited by Gerson, Lloyd, 261–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric. Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Gregory of Nyssa’s Doctrinal Works: A Literary Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Rorem, Paul. Pseudo-Dionysius. A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1993.Google Scholar
Scott, Mark S. M. Journey Back to God: Origen on the Problem of Evil. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Shaw, Gregory. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Aertsen, Jan A. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor to Francisco Suárez. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales., Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica, 4 vols. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–48.Google Scholar
Avicenna Latinus: Liber de Anima seu Sextus de Naturalibus I–III, ed. Simone, Van Riet. Leiden: Brill, 1972.Google Scholar
Avicenna Latinus: Liber de Anima seu Sextus de Naturalibus IV–V, ed. Simone, Van Riet. Leiden: Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos. ‘The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas’ Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism’. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 64 (1997): 95–126.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos‘Pluralism de formes ou dualism de substances? La pensée pré-thomiste touchant la nature de l’âme’. Revue philosophique de Louvain 67 (1969): 30–73.Google Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos‘Was There Ever a First Averroism?’ In Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert, ed. Aertsen, Jan A. and Speer, Andreas. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Bertolacci, Amos. ‘A Community of Translators: The Latin Medieval Versions of Avicenna’s Book of the Cure’. In Communities of Learning: Networks and the Shaping of Intellectual Identity in Europe 1100–1500, ed. Mews, Constant J. and Crossley, John N., 37–54. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar
Bertolacci, Amos.‘On the Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics before Albertus Magnus: An Attempt at Periodization’. In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics, ed. Hasse, Dag Nikolaus and Bertolacci, Amos, 197–223. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. The Soul-Body Problem at Paris. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. ‘Una questione disputata di Ugo di St Cher sull’anima edizione e studio dottrinale’. Studia Antyczne I Mediewistyczne 37 (2004): 127–84.Google Scholar
Burrell, David and Isabelle, Moulin. ‘Albert, Aquinas and Dionysius’. Modern Theology 24, no. 4 (2008): 633–49.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A. ‘Introduction of Aristotelian Learning to Oxford’. Proceedings of the British Academy 29 (1943): 229–81, 264–5.Google Scholar
Callus, Daniel A.‘The Powers of the Soul: An Early Unpublished Text’. Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 19 (1952): 131–70.Google Scholar
Dales, Richard C. The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, Richard C.‘The Understanding of Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy by the Early Scholastics’. In The Intellectual Climate of the Early University: Essays in Honor of Otto Gründler, ed. van Deusen, Nancy, 141–50. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 1997.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina, ‘Greek into Arabic: Neoplatonism in Translation’. In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, ed. Adamson, Peter and Taylor, Richard, 10–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina‘The Liber de causis’. In Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. Gersh, Stephen, 137–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina‘The Origins of Islamic Philosophy’. In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, ed. Gerson, Lloyd P., 869–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina‘The Textual Tradition of the Graeco-Arabic Plotinus’. In The Letter Before the Spirit: The Importance of Text Traditions for the Study of the Reception of Aristotle, ed. van Oppenraaii, Aafke M. I., 37–71. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Cristina‘The Theology Attributed to Aristotle: Sources, Structure, Influence’. In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, ed. Schmidtke, Sabine and El-Rouayheb, Khaled, 8–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Dauphinias, Michael et al., eds. Aquinas the Augustinian. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
de Boer, Sander. The Science of the Soul: The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle’s De anima c. 1260–1360. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Henri F. Le corpus Dionysien de l’Université de Paris au XIII siècle. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e letteratura, 1953.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin. ‘The History of the Problem of the Summa’. Franciscan Studies 7 (1947): 26–41, 274–312.Google Scholar
Doucet, Victorin.‘Prolegomena in librum III necnon in libros I et II Summa Fratris Alexandri’. In Alexandri de Hales Summa Theologica. Quaracchi: Collegio S Bonaventurae, 1948.Google Scholar
Dronke, Peter, ed. A History of Twelfth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Endress, Gerard. ‘Building the Library of Arabic Philosophy: Platonism and Aristotelianism in the Sources of Al-Kindi’. In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists, ed. D’Ancona, Cristina, 319–50. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Even-Ezra, Ayelet. ‘The Summa Halensis: A Text in Context’. In The Summa Halensis: Sources and Doctrines, ed. Schumacher, Lydia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Finan, Thomas and Twomey, Vincent, eds. The Relationship Between Neoplatonism and Christianity. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Gannagé, Emma. ‘The Rise of Falsafa: Al-Kindi (d. 873), On First Philosophy’. In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy, ed. Schmidtke, Sabine and El-Rouayheb, Khaled, 30–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. ‘The First Principles of Latin Neoplatonism: Augustine, Macrobius, Boethius’. Vivarium 50, no. 2 (2012): 113–38.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen.From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen.Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, vol. 2: The Latin Tradition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. ‘Les sources Greco-arabes de l’augustinisme avicennisant’. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen age 4 (1929): 5–107.Google Scholar
Gössmann, Elisabeth. Metaphysik und Heilsgeschichte: Eine theologische Untersuchung der Summa Halensis (Alexander von Hales). Munich: Max Hueber, 1964.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. ‘Aquinas, Plato and Neoplatonism’. In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, ed. Davies, Brian, 55–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hasse, Dag. N. Avicenna’s De Anima in the Latin West. London: The Warburg Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, George E. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard, ed. Three Treatises on Man. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
O’Daly, Gerard. Platonism Pagan and Christian: Studies in Plotinus and Augustine. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Fran. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Otten, Willemien. ‘Christianity’s Content: (Neo)Platonism in the Middle Ages, Its Theoretical and Theological Appeal’. Numen 63, nos. 2–3 (2016): 245–70.Google Scholar
Porro, Pasquale. ‘The University of Paris in the Thirteenth Century: Proclus and the Liber de causis’. In Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. Gersh, Stephen, 264–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W. The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. ‘The Knowledge of Plato’s Philosophy in the Islamic World’. Islamic Culture 13, no. 4 (1940): 387–422.Google Scholar
Saint John Damascene, De fide orthodoxa: Versions of Burgundio and Cerbanus. Ed. Buytaert, Eligius M.. St Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute, 1955.Google Scholar
Salman, O.P., Dominique, H., ‘Jean de La Rochelle et les débuts de l’Averroisme Latin’. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age (1947–8): 133–44.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. Early Franciscan Theology: Between Authority and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Senocak, Neslihan. The Poor and the Perfect: The Rise of Learning in the Franciscan Order 1209–1310. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Spatz, Nancy. ‘Approaches and Attitudes to a New Theology Textbook: The Sentences of Peter Lombard’. In The Intellectual Climate of the Early University, 27–52. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
Quinn, Patrick. Aquinas, Platonism and the Knowledge of God. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1996.Google Scholar
Southern, Richard. Platonism, Scholastic Method and the School of Chartres. Reading: Reading University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Théry, Gabriel. ‘L’authenticité du De spiritu et anima dans Saint Thomas et Albert le Grand’. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 10 (1921): 373–7.Google Scholar
Turner, Denys. The Darkness of God: Negativity and Christian Mysticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wiznovsky, Robert. ‘Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition’. In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, ed. Adamson, Peter, 92–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Aeneas of Gaza: Theophrastus with Zacharias of Mytilene: Ammonius. Translated by Sebastian Gertz, John Dillon, and Donald Russell. Ancient Commentators on Aristotle. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.Google Scholar
Gregory Palamas., Défence des saints hésychastes I–II. Introduction, critical text, translation, and notes by Meyendorff, Jean. Louvain: Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 1959.Google Scholar
Gregory Palamas., The One Hundred and Fifty Chapters. Critical edition, translation, and study by Sinkewicz, Robert E.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1988.Google Scholar
Gregory Palamas., The Triads: Book One. Translated by Robin Amis. Wellington, Somerset: Praxis Institute Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gregory Palamas., The Triads. Translated with an introduction by John Meyendorff. Classics of Western Spirituality. London: Paulist Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa., In hexaemeron. Gregorii Nysseni Opera (GNO) iv.i. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa., Oratio catechetica. Gregorii Nysseni Opera (GNO) iii.iv. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Hainthaler, T. ‘John Philoponus, Philosopher and Theologian in Alexandria’. In Christ in Christian Tradition, ed. Grillmeier, Aloys with Hainthaler, Theresia vol. 2, part 4. London: Mowbray, 1996.Google Scholar
Koch, Hugo. ‘Proclus als Quelle des Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vow Bösen’, Philologus 54 (1895): 438–54.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. The Origins of the Christian Mystical Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew.‘Platonism from Maximos the Confessor to the Palaiologian Period’. In The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium, ed. Kaldellis, A. and Siniossoglou, N., 325–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Maximus the Confessor., On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: The Ambigua. Edited and translated by Constas, Nicholas. Cambridge, MA and London: Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, 2014.Google Scholar
Maximus the Confessor., Selected Writings. Translation and notes by Berthold, George C.. New York: Paulist Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John. Christ in Eastern Christian Thought. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John. Patrologiae cursus completus, series graeca, Maximus the Confessor vols. 90–1. Ed. Migne, J. P.. Paris: 1860; republished Turnhout: Brepols, 1983.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John. A Study of Gregory Palamas. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric D. Theophany. The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Philoponus., De aeternitate mundi contra Proclum. Edited by Rabe, Hugo. Bibliotheca Teubneriana. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1963.Google Scholar
Philoponus., In Aristotelis categorias commentaria. Edited by Busse., Adolfus Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XIII. Berlin: Berolini, 1898.Google Scholar
Philoponus., In Aristotelis de anima libros commentaria. Edited by Hayduck., Michael Commentaria in Aristoteles Graeca XV. Berlin: Berolini, 1897.Google Scholar
Philoponus., In Aristotelis physicorum libros tres priores commentaria. Edited by Vitelli, Hieronymus Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XVI. Berlin: Berolini, 1887.Google Scholar
Procli In Platonis Parmenidem commentaria I–III. Edited by Steel, Carlos. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007–9.Google Scholar
Proclus., The Elements of Theology. Translation, introduction, and commentary by Dodds, Eric R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963, reprinted 2004.Google Scholar
Proclus., On the Existence of Evils. Translated by Jan Opsomer and Carlos Steel. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, . De coelesti hierarchia, De ecclesiastica hierarchia, De mystica theologia, Epistulae. Ed. Heil, Günter und Ritter., Adolf Martin Corpus Dionysiacum II. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, De divinis nominibus. Edited by Suchla, Beate R.. Corpus Dionysiacum I. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Russell, Norman. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Christian. The Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Stiglmayr, Joseph, ‘Der Neuplatoniker Proclus als Vorlage des sogenannten Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Übel’. Historisches Jahrbuch 16 (1895): 253–73, 721–48.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein Theodor. Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein Theodor. The Christocentric Cosmology of St Maximus the Confessor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein Theodor. ‘The Doctrine of Creation according to Dionysius the Areopagite’. In Grapta poikila II, Saints and Heroes. Papers and Monographs of the Finnish Institute at Athens, vol. XIV Helsinki: Foundation of the Finnish Institute at Athens, 2008, 75–89.Google Scholar
Verrycken, Koenraad. ‘John Philoponus’. In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, ed. Gerson, Lloyd P., 733–755. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Allen, Michael J. B. “Marsilio Ficino on Plato, the Neoplatonists and the Christian Doctrine of the Trinity.” Renaissance Quarterly 37 (1984): 555–584. Reprinted in his Plato’s Third Eye.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. Plato’s Third Eye. Studies in Marsilio Ficino’s Metaphysics and its Sources. Aldershot: Variorum, 1995.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Ratio omnium divinissima. Plato’s Epinomis, Prophecy and Marsilio Ficino.” In Epinomide. Studi sull’opera e la sua ricezione. Edited by Francesca Alesse and Franco Ferrari with Maria Cristina Dalfino, 469–490. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2012.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. “Sending Archedemus. Ficino, Plato’s Second Letter, and Its Four Epistolary Mysteries.” In Sol et Homo. Mensch und Natur in der Renaissance. Festschrift E. Kessler. Edited by Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina, Pirner-Pareschi, Helga, and Ricklin, Thomas, 413–428. Munich: Fink, 2008.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. Synoptic Art. Marsilio Ficino on the History of Platonic Interpretation. Florence: Olschki, 1998.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentaire sur le Banquet de Platon, De l’Amour. Edited and translated by Laurens, Pierre. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2002.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentaries on Plato: Parmenides. 2 vols. Edited and translated by Vanhaelen, Maude. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Commentary on Plotinus. 2 vols. (to date). Edited and translated by Gersh, Stephen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. De Christiana Religione. Edited by Bartolucci, Guido. Pisa: Istituto Nazionale di Studi sul Rinascimento, 2019.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. On Dionysius the Areopagite. 2 vols. Edited and translated by Allen, Michael J. B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Opera et quae hactenus extitere et quae in lucem nunc primum prodiere omnia. 2 vols. Basel: Heinrich Petri, 1576 [= Opera Omnia]. Photographic reprint Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1959; and later and Lucca: Société Marsile Ficin, n.d.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio. Platonic Theology. 6 vols. Edited by Hankins, James and translated by Michael J. B. Allen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001–2006.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. “The Timaeus as Intertext in Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on the ‘Third Ennead’ of Plotinus.” In Lectures Médiévales et Renaissantes du Timée de Platon. Edited by Bakhouche, Béatrice and Galonnier, Alain, preface by Pierre Caye, 229–250. Leuven and Paris: Peeters, 2016.Google Scholar
Hankins, James. “Marsilio Ficino on Reminiscentia and the Transmigration of Souls.” Rinascimento 2, no. 45 (2005): 3–17.Google Scholar
Ogren, Brian. “Circularity, the Soul-Vehicle, and the Renaissance Rebirth of Reincarnation. Marsilio Ficino and Isaac Abarbanel on the Possibility of Transmigration.” Accademia 6 (2004): 63–94.Google Scholar
Plethon, Georgios Gemistos. Magika Logia tōn apo Zōroastrou magōn … Oracles chaldaïques, recension de Georges Gémiste Pléthon. Edited by Tambrun-Krasker, Brigitte. Athens: Academy of Athens, 1995.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel P. The Ancient Theology. Studies in Christian Platonism from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Anon. The Book of the Perfect Life: Theologia Deutsch – Theologia Germanica. Edited by Blamires, David. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Anzulewicz, Henryk. ‘Zum Einfluss des Albertus Magnus auf Heymericus de Campo im Compendium divinorum’. In Heymericus de Campo. Philosophie und Theologie im 15. Jahrhundert, edited by Reinhardt, Klaus, 83–112. Regensburg: Roderer, 2009.Google Scholar
Baur, Ludwig. Cusanus-Texte, III. Marginalien. 1. Nicolaus Cusanus und Ps. Dionysius im Lichte der Zitate und Randbemerkungen des Cusanus. Heidelberg: Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1941.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner. ‘“Centrum tocius vite.” Zur Bedeutung von Proklos’ “Theologia Platonis” im Denken des Cusanus’. In Proclus et la Théologie platonicienne, edited by Segonds, Alain-Philippe and Steel, Carlos, 629–51. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner. Denken des Einen. Studien zur neuplatonischen Philosophie und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1995.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner. Platonismus im Christentum. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1998.Google Scholar
Böhme, Jacob. Aurora (Morgen Röte im auffgang, 1612) and Fundamental Report (Gründlicher Bericht, Mysterium Pansophicum, 1620). Edited by Weeks, Andrew, Bonheim, Günther, and Spang, Michael. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Böhme, Jacob. Theosophia revelata. Edited by Ueberfeld, Johann Wilhelm. S. l. [The Netherlands], 1730.Google Scholar
Karl, Bormann, ed. Cusanus-Texte, III. Marginalien, 2. Proclus latinus: Die Exzerpte und Randnoten des Nikolaus von Kues zu den lateinischen Übersetzungen der Proclus-Schriften, 2.2 Expositio in Parmenidem Platonis. Heidelberg: Winter Universitätsverlag, 1986.Google Scholar
Bosch, Gabriele. Reformatorisches Denken und frühneuzeitliches Philosophieren: Eine vergleichende Studie zu Martin Luther und Valentin Weigel. Marburg: Tectum, 2000.Google Scholar
Brink, Claudia, Martin, Lucinda, and Muratori, Cecilia, eds. Light in Darkness: The Mystical Philosophy of Jacob Böhme. Dresden: Sandstein, 2019.Google Scholar
Bussi, Giovanni Andrea. Prefazioni alle edizioni di Sweynheym e Pannartz prototipografi romani, edited by Miglio, Massimo. Milan: Il Profilo, 1978.Google Scholar
Calma, Dragos. ‘Du néoplatonisme au réalisme et retour, parcours latins du Liber de causis aux XIIIe–XVIe siècles’. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 54 (2012): 217–76.Google Scholar
Calma, Dragos and Ruedi, Imbach. ‘Heymeric de Campo, auteur d’un traité de métaphysique. Étude et édition partielle du Colliget principiorum’. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 80 (2013): 277–423.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Leipzig: Teubner, 1927.Google Scholar
Colberg, Ehregott Daniel. Das Platonisch-Hermetische Christentum. Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1710. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Colberg, Ehregott Daniel. De origine et progressu haeresium et errorum in ecclesia specimen historicum. Schneeberg: Weidner, 1694.Google Scholar
Colomer, Eusebio. Nikolaus von Kues und Raimund Llull. Aus Handschriften der Kueser Bibliothek. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1961.Google Scholar
D’Amico, Claudia. ‘Plato and Platonic Tradition in the Philosophy of Nicholas of Cusa’. In Brill’s Companion to German Platonism, edited by Kim, Alan, 15–42. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Dionysius the Areopagite, . The Divine Names. In The Complete Works, translated by Colm Luibheid. New York: Paulist Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ernst, Germana. Tommaso Campanella: The Book and the Body of Nature. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Fast, Heinold, ed. Der linke Flügel der Reformation. Glaubenszeugnisse der Täufer, Spiritualisten, Schwärmer und Antitrinitarier. Bremen: Schünemann Verlag, 1962.Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt. ‘Wissen oder Wissen des Nicht-Wissens. Nikolaus von Kues gegen Johannes Wenck’. In Kampfplätze der Philosophie. Große Kontroversen von Augustin bis Voltaire, 227–42. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2008.Google Scholar
Forshaw, Peter, ed. Lux in tenebris: The Visual and the Symbolic in Western Esotericisms. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio. ‘Cusano e i platonici italiani del Quattrocento’. In Nicolò da Cusa. Relazioni tenute al convegno interuniversitario di Bressanone nel 1960, 75–100. Florence: Sansoni, 1962.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. ‘Nicholas of Cusa’. In Interpreting Proclus. From Antiquity to the Renaissance, edited by Gersh, Stephen, 318–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gilly, Carlos. ‘“Theophrastia sancta” – Paracelsianism as a Religion in Conflict with the Established Churches’. In Paracelsus: The Man and His Reputation, His Ideas and Their Transformation, edited by Grell, Ole Peter, 151–85. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob and Wilhelm., Deutsches Wörterbuch, 16 vols. in 32. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1854–1961.Google Scholar
Hamann, Florian. Das Siegel der Ewigkeit. Universalwissenschaft und Konziliarismus bei Heymericus de Campo. Münster: Aschendorff, 2006.Google Scholar
Hannak, Kristine. Geist=reiche Critik. Hermetik und Mystik und das Werden der Aufklärung in spiritualistischer Literatur der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Hannak, Kristine.‘Theologie als Theosophie, oder: Hermes Trismegistos und die Wiedergeburt des radikalen Pietismus um 1700’. Pietismus und Neuzeit 34 (2008): 135–6.Google Scholar
Haubst, Rudolf. ‘Albert, wie Cusanus ihn sah’. In Albertus Magnus Doctor universalis (1280–1980), edited by Meyer, Gerbert and Zimmermann, Albert, 167–94. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
Haubst, Rudolf.‘Die Thomas- und Proklos-Exzerpte des “Nicolaus Treverensis” in Codicillus Strassburg 84’. Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 1 (1961): 17–51.Google Scholar
Haubst, Rudolf. Studien zu Nikolaus von Kues und Johannes Wenck. Aus Handschriften der Vatikanischen Bibliothek. Münster: Aschendorff, 1955.Google Scholar
de Campo, Heymericus. Ars demonstrativa. Edited by Cavigioli, Jean-Daniel. In Heymericus de Campo: Opera selecta, edited by Imbach, Ruedi and Ladner, Pascal. Fribourg: Universitätsverlag, 2001.Google Scholar
de Campo, Heymericus.De sigillo eternitatis. Edited by Imbach, Ruedi and Ladner, Pascal. In Heymericus de Campo. Opera selecta, edited by Imbach, Ruedi and Ladner, Pascal. Fribourg: Universitätsverlag, 2001.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, Johannes. ‘Das Platon-Bild bei Nikolaus von Kues’. In Nicolò Cusano agli inizi del mondo moderno, 113–35. Florence: Sansoni, 1970.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M. ‘Thomismus, Skotismus und Albertismus. Das Entstehen und die Bedeutung von philosophischen Schulen im späten Mittelalter’. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 2 (1997): 81–103.Google Scholar
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M.‘Via antiqua and via moderna in the Fifteenth Century: Doctrinal, Institutional, and Church Political Factors in the Wegestreit’. In The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700, edited by Friedman, Russell L. and Nielsen, Lauge O., 9–36. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Honecker, Martin. Nikolaus von Cues und die griechische Sprache. Heidelberg: Winter’s Universitätsbuchandlung, 1938.Google Scholar
Imbach, Ruedi. ‘Primum principium. Anmerkungen zum Wandel in der Auslegung der Bedeutung und Funktion des Satzes vom zu vermeidenden Widerspruch bei Thomas von Aquin, Nikolaus von Autrécourt, Heymericus de Campo und Nikolaus von Kues’. In Die Logik des Transzendentalen, edited by Pickavé, Martin, 600–16. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar
Johannes de Nova Domo., Capitulum de universali reali, edited by Wels, Henryk. In Aristotelisches Wissen und Glauben im 15. Jahrhundert. Amsterdam: Grüner Publishing Company, 2004.Google Scholar
Johannes de Nova Domo., De esse et essentia, edited by Meersseman, Gilles. In Geschichte des Albertismus, vol. 1: Die Pariser Anfänge des Kölner Albertismus. Paris: R. Haloua, 1933.Google Scholar
Wenck, Johannes. De ignota litteratura, edited by Hopkins, Jasper. In Nicholas of Cusa’s Debate with John Wenck. A Translation and an Appraisal of ‘De ignota litteratura’ and ‘Apologia doctae ignorantiae’. Minneapolis: Banning Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Wenck, JohannesQuaestiones super Hebdomades. In Mainz, Wissenschaftliche Stadtbibliothek, Hs. I 610, ff. 46r–71r.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Zénon. Les querelles doctrinales à Paris. Nominalistes et réalistes aux confins du XIVe et du XVe siècle. Bergamo: Lubrina, 1988.Google Scholar
Klibansky, Raymond. The Continuity of the Platonic Tradition during the Middle Ages. 3rd ed. Munich: Kraus-Thomson, 1983.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. Mystiques, spirituels, alchimistes du XVIe siècle allemand. Schwenckfeld, Franck, Weigel, Paracelse. Paris: Colin, 1955.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill. ‘Moral Philosophy’. In Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, edited by Charles, B. Schmitt, Skinner, Quentin, Kessler, Eckhard, and Kraye, Jill, 303–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kühlmann, Wilhelm. ‘Das haeretische Potential des Paracelsismus, gesehen im Licht seiner Gegner’. In Heterodoxie in der Frühen Neuzeit, edited by Laufhütte, Hartmut and Titzmann, Michael, 217–42. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2006.Google Scholar
Kühlmann, Wilhelm.‘Paracelsismus und Haeresie. Zwei Briefe der Söhne Valentin Weigels aus dem Jahre 1596’. Wolfenbütteler Barock-Nachrichten 18 (1991): 24–60.Google Scholar
Kuhnekath, Klaus D. Die Philosophie des Johannes Wenck im Vergleich zu den Lehren des Nikolaus von Kues, diss. Cologne: 1975.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Brauns, Sicco. Weisheit in der Weltgeschichte. Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barock und Aufklärung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2004.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, R. Emmet. ‘The Radical Reformation’. In The Cambridge History of Christianity, edited by Po-Chia Hsia, R., 37–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, R. Emmet. ‘Spiritualism: Schwenckfeld and Franck and their Early Modern Resonances’. In A Companion to Anabaptism and Spiritualism 1521–1700, edited by Roth, John and Stayer, James M., 119–61. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, Stephan. Die Präsenz des Vergessenen. Zur Rezeption der Philosophie des Nicolaus Cusanus vom 15. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert. Aschendorff: Münster, 1989.Google Scholar
Meister Eckhart, . Selected Writings. Edited by Davies, Oliver. London: Penguin, 1994.Google Scholar
Meliadò, Mario. ‘Axiomatic Wisdom: Boethius’ De hebdomadibus and the Liber de causis in Late-Medieval Albertism’. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 55 (2013): 71–131.Google Scholar
Meliadò, Mario. Sapienza peripatetica. Eimerico di Campo e i percorsi del tardo albertismo. Münster: Aschendorff, 2018.Google Scholar
de Cusa, Nicolaus. Apologia doctae ignorantiae. Edited by Klibansky, Raymond. Hamburg: Meiner, 2007.Google Scholar
de Cusa, Nicolaus De beryllo. Edited by Senger, Hans Gerhard and Bormann, Karl. Hamburg: Meiner, 1988.Google Scholar
de Cusa, Nicolaus De docta ignorantia. Edited by Hoffmann, Ernst and Klibansky, Raymond. Leipzig: Meiner, 1932.Google Scholar
Paracelsus (Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim)., De mineralibus liber. In Sämtliche Werke, edited by Sudhoff, Karl. Munich and Berlin: Oldenburg, 1922–33, vol. 3.Google Scholar
Paracelsus (Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim)., Essential Theoretical Writings. Edited by Weeks, Andrew. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Plotinus., Enneads. Edited by Gerson, Lloyd P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard Henry. The Third Force in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar
Ruocco, Ilario. Il Platone latino. Il Parmenide: Giorgio di Trebisonda e il cardinale Cusano. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2003.Google Scholar
Rusconi, Cecilia and Reinhardt, Klaus. ‘Die dem Cusanus zugeschriebenen Glossen zu den Theoremata totius universi fundamentaliter doctrinalia des Heymericus de Campo’, in Heymericus de Campo. Philosophie und Theologie im 15. Jahrhundert, edited by Reinhardt, Klaus, 58–74. Regensburg: Roderer, 2009.Google Scholar
Santinello, Giovanni. ‘Glosse di mano del Cusano alla Repubblica di Platone’. Rinascimento 9 (1969): 117–145.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. ‘Das Geheimnis des Anfangs: Einige spekulative Betrachtungen im Hinblick auf Jakob Böhme’. In Gott, Natur, Mensch in der Sicht Jakob Böhmes und seiner Rezeption, edited by Garewicz, Jan and Haas, Alois M., 113–27. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1995.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Philosophia perennis: Historical Outlines of Western Spirituality in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
Senger, Hans Gerhard. ‘Aristotelismus vs. Platonismus. Zur Konkurrenz von zwei Archetypen der Philosophie im Spätmittelalter’. In Aristotelisches Erbe im arabisch-lateinischen Mittelalter, edited by Zimmermann, Albert, 53–80. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1986.Google Scholar
Senger, Hans Gerhard‘Die Präferenz für Ps.-Dionysius bei Nikolaus Cusanus und seinem italienischen Umfeld’. In Die Dionysius-Rezeption im Mittelalter, edited by Boiadjiev, Tzotcho, Kapriev, Georgi, and Speer, Andreas, 505–39. Turnhout: Brepols, 2000.Google Scholar
Senger, Hans Gerhard, ed. Cusanus-Texte, III. Marginalien, 2. Proclus Latinus: Die Exzerpte und Randnoten des Nikolaus von Kues zu den lateinischen Übersetzungen der Proclus-Schriften, 2.1 Theologia Platonis. Elementatio theologica. Heidelberg: Winter Universitätsverlag, 1986.Google Scholar
Shantz, Douglas H. ‘Valentin Weigel’. In Protestants and Mysticism in Reformation Europe, edited by Rittgers, Ronald K. and Evener, Vincent, 243–64. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc. ‘Bien, cercles et hebdomades: forms et raisonnement chez Boèce et Proclus’. In Boèce ou la chaîne des savoirs. Actes du colloque internationale de la fondation Singer-Polignac, edited by Galonnier, Alain, 55–110. Louvain and Paris: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar
Thurner, Martin, ed. Nicolaus Cusanus zwischen Deutschland und Italien. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Vassányi, Miklós. Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, Friedrich. ‘Pythagorische Lehrsätze’. In Offenbarung und Episteme: Die Wirkung Jakob Böhmes im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, edited by Kühlmann, Wilhelm and Vollhardt, Friedrich, 363–83. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Weeks, Andrew. Boehme: An Intellectual Biography of the Seventeenth-Century Philosopher and Mystic. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Weeks, Andrew. Paracelsus: Speculative Theory and the Crisis of the Early Reformation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Weeks, Andrew. Valentin Weigel (1533–1588): German Religious Dissenter, Speculative Theorist, and Advocate of Tolerance. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Weigel, Valentin. Sämtliche Schriften, edited by Pfefferl, Horst. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1996–, in particular vol. 2, De luce et caligine divina; De vita beata; vol. 3, Gnothi seauton; vol. 8, Der güldene Griff; vol. 9, Seligmachende Erkenntnis Gottes; vol. 11, Viererlei Auslegung von der Schöpfung.Google Scholar
Wollgast, Siegfried. Philosophie in Deutschland zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung 1550–1650. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Zeller, Rosemarie. ‘Böhme-Rezeption am Hof von Christian August von Pflaz-Sulzbach’. In Offenbarung und Episteme. Die Wirkung Jakob Böhmes im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, edited by Kühlmann, Wilhelm and Vollhardt, Friedrich, 125–41. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Ziebart, Meredith K. Nicolaus Cusanus on Faith and the Intellect. A Case Study in 15th-Century Fides-Ratio Controversy. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Berkeley, George. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Edited by Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E.. 9 vols. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1948–1957.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Coudert, Allison P. and Corse, Taylor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. A Sermon Preached before the Honourable House of Commons at Westminster, March 31, 1647. Cambridge: Roger Daniel, 1647.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London: Richard Royston, 1678.Google Scholar
Daniel, Stephen H. “Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39, no. 2 (2001): 239–258.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jack. “Leibniz: The Last Great Christian Platonist.” In Brill’s Companion to German Platonism, edited by Kim, Alan, 43–75. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. 13 vols. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1964–1974.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Edited by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–1985.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. III: The Correspondence. Edited by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Dominiak, Paul Anthony. Richard Hooker: The Architecture of Participation. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2019.Google Scholar
Fennema, Scott. “George Berkeley and Jonathan Edwards on Idealism: Considering an Old Question in Light of New Evidence.” Intellectual History Review 29, no. 2 (2019): 265–290.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210–1685. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd. Platonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Green, Garth W. The Aporia of Inner Sense: The Self-Knowledge of Reason and the Critique of Metaphysics in Kant. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Hedley, Douglas. “Gods and Giants: Cudworth’s Platonic Metaphysics and his Ancient Theology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25, no. 5 (2017): 932–953.Google Scholar
Hedley, Douglas and Hutton, Sarah, eds. Platonism at the Origins of Modernity: Studies on Platonism and Early Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Henry, John. “Henry More.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/henry-more/. Accessed 31 January 2020.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. “The Cambridge Platonists.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/cambridge-platonists/. Accessed 31 January 2020.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah.“Lady Anne Conway.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/conway/. Accessed 31 January 2020.Google Scholar
Janowski, Zbigniew. Augustinian-Cartesian Index: Texts and Commentary. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Jonik, Michael. “Mind and Matter in Early America: The Berkeley–Johnson Correspondence.” The Pluralist 11, no. 1 (2016): 39–48.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World.” In Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, edited by Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf, 375–416. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Leech, David. “Defining ‘Cambridge Platonism’.” In The Cambridge Platonism Sourcebook, edited by Douglas Hedley, David Leech, et al., www.cambridge-platonism.divinity.cam.ac.uk/about-the-cambridge-platonists/defining-cambridge-platonism. Accessed 31 January 2020.Google Scholar
Leech, David. The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern Atheism. Leuven: Peeters, 2013.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. New Essays on Human Knowledge. Translated and edited by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Theodicy. Translated by E. M. Huggard and edited by Austin Farrar. Chicago: Open Court, 1990.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. The Battle of the Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. “Epicureanism and Early Modern Naturalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2011): 647–664.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice. “Kant’s ‘I Think’ versus Descartes’ ‘I am a Thing that Thinks’.” In Kant and the Early Moderns, edited by Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Beatrice, 32–40. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Look, Brandon C. “Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/leibniz/. Accessed 31 January 2020.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicholas. The Search after Truth. Translated by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. On Descartes’ Passive Thought: The Myth of Cartesian Dualism. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, Anna and Cartwright, Sophie, eds. A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
McClymond, Michael J. and McDermott, Gerald R.. The Theology of Jonathan Edwards. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neo-Platonism in Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43, no. 4 (1982): 665–671.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia. “Descartes’ Debt to Teresa of Ávila, or Why we Should Work on Women in the History of Philosophy.” Philosophical Studies 174 (2017): 2539–2555.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia. “The Platonism at the Core of Leibniz’s Philosophy.” In Platonism at the Origins of Modernity: Studies on Platonism and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Hedley, Douglas and Hutton, Sarah, 225–238. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Michaud, Derek A. Reason Turned into Sense: John Smith on Spiritual Sensation. Leuven: Peeters, 2017.Google Scholar
More, Henry. An Antidote Against Atheisme, Or an Appeal to the Natural Faculties of Man, whether there be not a God. London: Roger Daniel, 1653.Google Scholar
Niederbacher, Bruno. “The Human Soul: Augustine’s Case for Soul-Body Dualism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, 2nd ed., edited by Stump, Eleonore and Kretzmann, Norman, 125–141. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. “Eternal Truths and the Laws of Nature: The Theological Foundations of Descartes’ Philosophy of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46, no. 3 (1985): 349–362.Google Scholar
Plato., Sophist. Greek text with English translation by Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Plotinus., Enneads. Greek text with English translation by A. H. Armstrong. 7 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968–1988.Google Scholar
Proclus., In Platonis Timaeum Commentarii. Edited by Diehl, E.. 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner, 1903–1906.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad. “Nicolas Malebranche.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/malebranche/. Accessed 31 January 2020.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Lydia. Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
Ward, Richard. The Life of Henry More. Edited by Hutton, Sarah, Courtney, Cecil, Courtney, Michelle, Crocker, Robert, and Hall, A. Rupert. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
Wenz, Peter S. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37, no. 3 (1976): 537–546.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Antognazza, M. R. Leibniz: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Baldwin, A., and Hutton, S., eds. Platonism and the English Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner. Differenz, Negation, Identität: Die reflexive Bewegung der Hegelschen Dialektik, in Identität und Differenz. Frankfurt: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann, 1980.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, Werner. Platonismus and Idealismus. Frankfurt: Verlag Vittorio Kostermann, 2004.Google Scholar
Benz, Ernst. Mystical Sources of German Romanticism. Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Aids to Reflection. Edited by Beer, J.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Collected Letters, Volume 1. Edited by Griggs, Earl Leslie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Griggs, Earl Leslie Collected Letters, Volume 3. Edited by Griggs, Earl Leslie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Griggs, Earl Leslie The Complete Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Volume V. Edited by Shedd, William Greenough Thayer and Harding, A. H.. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1856.Google Scholar
Griggs, Earl Leslie The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Volume 1: 1794–1804. Edited by Coburn, Kathleen. New York: Pantheon Books, 1957.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Volume 5: 1827–1834. Edited by Coburn, Kathleen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Davidson, Graham. ‘“A Track Pursuing No Untrod Before”: Wordsworth, Plato and the Cambridge Platonists’. In Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy, edited by Hedley, D. and Leech, D., 215–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael. The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Grierson, H. J. C. The Background of English Literature and Other Collected Essays & Addresses. London: Chatto & Windus, 1925.Google Scholar
Gusdorf, Georges. Naissance de la Conscience Romantique au Siècle des Lumières. Paris: Payot, 1976.Google Scholar
Hammermeister, Kai. The German Aesthetic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hampton, Alexander J. B. Romanticism and the Re-Invention of Modern Religion: The Reconciliation of German Idealism and Platonic Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Harding, Anthony John. The Reception of Myth in English Romantic Poetry. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Edited by Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion. Herder und die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.Google Scholar
Lamb, Charles. The Complete Works in Prose and Verse of Charles Lamb. London: Chatto & Windus, 1875.Google Scholar
Larissy, Edward. ‘Blake and Platonism’. In Platonism and the English Imagination, edited by Hutton, Sarah and Baldwin, Anna, 186–98. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gotfried Wilhelm. New Essays on the Human Understanding. London: MacMillan & Co., 1896.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gotfried Wilhelm. Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1923.Google Scholar
Mayer, Paola. Jena Romanticism and Its Appropriation of Jakob Böhme: Theosophy, Hagiography, Literature. Montreal: McGill University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christa. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. Essays Critical and Historical, Volume 1. London: Longmans, Green and Company, 1872.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Thomas. Romantic Idealism and Roman Catholicism: Schelling and the Theologians. Paris: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. The Case for The Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. The Enlightenment: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ryan, Chris. Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Religion: The Death of God and the Oriental Renaissance. Leuven: Peeters, 2010.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von. Philosophie und Religion. Tübingen: J. G. Cotta, 1804.Google Scholar
Shaffer, E. ‘Kubla Khan’ and ‘The Fall of Jerusalem’. The Mythological School in Biblical Criticism and Secular Literature, 1770–1880. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. ‘Platonism in English Poetry’. In English Literature and the Classics, 25–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Whichcote, Benjamin. Select Sermons of Benjamin Whichcote. Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1977.Google Scholar
Williamson, George S. The Longing for Myth in Germany: Religion and Aesthetic Culture from Romanticism to Nietzsche. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Ahonen, Marke. “Plato on Madness and Mental Disorders.” In Mental Disorders in Ancient Philosophy, 35–67. Cham: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
Barney, Rachel. “Eros and Necessity in the Ascent from the Cave.” Ancient Philosophy 28, no. 2 (2008): 357–372.Google Scholar
Barrett, William. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1962.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. “The Painter of Modern Life.” In The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, translated and edited by Mayne, Jonathan, 1–34. London and New York: Phaidon, 1970.Google Scholar
Bigger, Charles P. Between Chora and the Good: Metaphor’s Metaphysical Neighborhood. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Billault, Alain. “La folie poétique: remarques sur les conceptions grecques de l’inspiration.” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 4 (2002): 18–35.Google Scholar
Böhme, Jacob, Sämtliche Schriften. Edited by Peuckert, Will-Eric. 11 vols. Stuttgart: Günter Holzboog, 1957.Google Scholar
Bornstein, George. “W.B. Yeats’ Poetry of Aging.” In Sewanee Review 120, no. 1 (2012): 46–61.Google Scholar
Brown, Nahum J. and Simmons, Aaron, eds. Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert F. The Later Philosophy of Schelling: The Influence of Jacob Böhme on the works of 1809–1815. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Burns, Dylan. “Proclus and the Theurgic Liturgy of Pseudo-Dionysius.” Dionysius 22 (2004): 111–132.Google Scholar
Calonne, David Stephen. The Spiritual Imagination of the Beats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Caputo, John. “Abyssus Abyssum Invocat: a Response to Kearney.” In A Passion for the Impossible: John D. Caputo in Focus, edited by Dooley, Mark, 123–127. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Caputo, John. Mystical Elements in Heidegger’s Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
De Vries, Hent. Philosophy and the Turn to Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, “Plato and the Simulacrum.” Translated by Rosalind Krauss. October 27 (1983): 45–56.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. On the Name, edited by Derrida, Jacques and Dutoit, Thomas. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dewincklear, D. “La question de l’initiation dans le mythe de la caverne.” Revue de philosophie ancienne 11, no. 2 (1993): 159–175.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Faivre, Antoine. Theosophy, Imagination, Tradition: Studies in Western Esotericism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard. “The Order Question: Climbing the Ladder of Love in Plato’s Symposium.” Ancient Philosophy 30, no. 1 (2010): 57–72.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Theatrum philosophicum.” In Sur G. Deleuze, Différence et Répétition, 885–908. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1968.Google Scholar
Franke, William W. “Apophasis and the Turn of Philosophy to Religion: From Neoplatonic Negative Theology to Postmodern Negation of Theology.” International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 60, no. 1/3 (2006): 61–76.Google Scholar
Franke, William W. On What Cannot Be Said: Apophatic Discourses in Philosophy, Religion, Literature, and the Arts, vols. 1 & 2. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fried, Gregory. “Back to the Cave: A Platonic Rejoinder to Heideggerian Postmodernism.” In Heidegger and the Greeks: Interpretive Essays. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Hans-Joachim. Der Ungrund der Freiheit im Denken von Böhme, Schelling und Heidegger. Stuttgart and Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2009.Google Scholar
Fritz, Kurt van. “The Philosophical Passage in the Seventh Platonic Letter and the Problem of Plato’s ‘Esoteric Philosophy.’” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, edited by Anton, John P. and Kustas, George L., 408–447. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Robert C. Spiritual, but Not Religious. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gentzke, Joshua Levi Ian. “Imaginal Renaissance: Desire, Corporeality, and Rebirth in the Work of Jacob Böhme.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 2016.Google Scholar
Gentzke, Joshua Levi Ian. “Imagining the Image of God: Corporeal Envisioning in the Theosophy of Jacob Böhme.” In Lux in Tenebris: The Visual and the Symbolic in Western Esotericism, edited by Forshaw, Peter J., 103–129. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen, ed. Plotinus’ Legacy: The Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jill. “Eros in Plato’s Timaeus.” Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9, no. 2 (2005): 255–278.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris: Editions Albion Michael, 2002.Google Scholar
Hägg, Henny Fiskå. Clement of Alexandria and the Beginnings of Christian Apophaticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hampton, Alexander. Romanticism and the Re-Invention of Modern Religion: The Reconciliation of German Idealism and Platonic Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, Wouter J. Esotericism in the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, Wouter J. “Forbidden Knowledge.” Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 5, no. 2 (2005): 225–254.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. “Jean-Luc Marion’s Dionysian Neoplatonism.” In Perspectives sur le néoplatonisme. International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, Actes du colloque de 2006, ed. Achard, Martin, Hankey, Wayne, Narbonne, Jean-Marc, Collection Zêtêsis, 267–280. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2009.Google Scholar
Hedley, Douglas and Hutton, Sarah, eds. Platonism at the Origins of Modernity: Studies on Platonism and Early Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.Google Scholar
Hoelzl, Michael and Ward, Graham, eds. The New Visibility of Religion: Studies in Religion and Cultural Hermeneutics. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Huss, Boaz. “Spirituality: The Emergence of a New Cultural Category and Its Challenge to the Religious and the Secular.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 29 (2014): 47–60.Google Scholar
Hyland, Drew A. “First of All Came Chaos,” in Heidegger and the Greeks, edited by Hyland, Drew A. and Manoussakis, John Panteleimon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hyland, Drew A. Questioning Platonism: Continental Interpretations of Plato. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Jackson, Pamela, Lethem, Jonathan, and Davis, Erik, eds. The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2011.Google Scholar
Jones, Tamsin A. Genealogy of Marion’s Philosophy of Religion: Apparent Darkness. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Joyce, James. Finnegans Wake. Edited by Rose, Danis and O’Hanlon, John. Cornwall: Houyhnhnm, 2010.Google Scholar
Kearney, Richard. “Khora or God?” In A Passion for the Impossible: John D. Caputo in Focus, edited by Dooley, Mark, 107–122. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kripal, Jeffrey J. Mutants & Mystics: Science Fiction, Superhero Comics, and the Paranormal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kripal, Jeffrey J.“Reality Against Society: William Blake, Antinomianism, and American Counterculture.” Common Knowledge 13, no. 1 (2007): 102–104.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Lambert, Gregg. Return Statements: The Return of Religion in Contemporary Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Erotic Phenomenon. Translated by Lewis, Stephen E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Idol and the Distance. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Marquet, Jean-François. Liberté et existence: Étude sur la formation de la philosopie de Schelling. Paris: Gallimard, 1973.Google Scholar
Martín-Velasco, María José and García Blanco, María José, eds. Greek Philosophy and Mystery Cults. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
McGinn, Bernard. Meister Eckhart and the Beguine Mystics: Hadewijch of Brabant, Mechthild of Magdeburg, and Marguerite Porete. New York: Continuum, 1994.Google Scholar
McGrath, S. J. The Dark Ground of Spirit: Schelling and the Unconscious. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
McGrath, S.J. Thinking Nature: An Essay in Negative Ecology. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. M. E. “Reason and Eros in the Ascent Passage of the Symposium.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, volume I, edited by Anton, John P. and Kustas, G. L., 285–302. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Mortley, Raoul. “Negative Theology and Abstraction in Plotinus.” The American Journal of Philology 96, no. 4 (1975): 363–377.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Narbonne, J. M. Hénologie, ontologie et Ereignis (Plotin-Proclus-Heidegger). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2001.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Nietzsche Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Edited by Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1968.Google Scholar
Ohashi, Ryôsuke. “Der Ungrund und das System.” In F. W. J. Schelling: Über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit, edited by Pieper, Annemarie and Höffe, Otfried, 235–252. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Paslick, Robert. “The Ontological Context of Gadamer’s Fusion: Böhme, Heidegger, and Non-Duality.” Man and World 18 (1985): 405–422.Google Scholar
Peperzak, Adriaan Theodoor. Platonic Transformations: With and After Hegel, Heidegger, and Levinas. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.Google Scholar
Plato., Plato: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus [and] Epistles. Translated by Robert Gregg Bury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Pruitt, Raymond D. and Pruitt, Virginia D., “W.B. Yeats on Old Age, Death, and Immortality.” Colby Library Quarterly 24, no. 1 (1988): 36–49.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius., Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. Edited by Luibheid, Colm and Rorem, Paul. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius., The Dionysian Mystical Theology. Translated by Rorem, Paul. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2015.Google Scholar
Richardson, William. Heidegger: Through Thought to Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley. The Ancients and the Moderns: Rethinking Modernity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. Chorology: On Beginning in Plato’s Timaeus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. “Secluded Nature: The Point of Schelling’s Reinscription of the Timaeus,” Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy 8 (1999): 71–85.Google Scholar
Sandbeck, Lars. “God as Immanent Transcendence in Mark C. Taylor and John D. Caputo.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal of Theology 65, no. 1 (2011): 18–38.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Michael. Dharma Lion: A Biography of Allen Ginsberg. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schürmann, Reiner. Broken Hegemonies. Translated by Reginald Lilly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sells, Michael. Mystical Languages of Unsaying. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shaw, Gregory. “Neoplatonic Theurgy and Dionysius the Areopagite.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 7, no. 4 (1999): 573–599.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, 2015.Google Scholar
Sheffield, Frisbee C. C. Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stang, Charles M. Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite: “No Longer I.” New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tanke, Joseph J. Foucault’s Philosophy of Art: A Genealogy of Modernity. London and New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Tibet, David. Sing Omega: Collected Lyrics and Writings from 2013–1983. (No location given: The Spheres), 2015.Google Scholar
Tritten, Tyler. “On Matter: Schelling’s Anti-Platonic Reading of the Timaeus.” The Official Journal of the North American Schelling Society, 93–114.Google Scholar
Turner, Denys. The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tyson, Paul. “Transcendence and Epistemology: Exploring Truth via Post-Secular Christian Platonism.” Modern Theology 24, no. 2 (2008): 245–270.Google Scholar
Versluis, Arthur. Platonic Mysticism: Contemplative Science, Philosophy, Literature, and Art. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Vicaire, Paul. “Les Grecs et le mystère de l’inspiration poétique.” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 1 (1963): 68–85.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Elliot R. Alef, Mem, Tau: Kabbalistic Musings on Time, Truth, and Death. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Elliot R. Language, Eros, Being: Kabbalistic Hermeneutics and Poetic Imagination. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine H. Postmodern Platos: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Strauss, Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar