Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:01:45.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Plain Radiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2017

J. Christian Fox
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Manthey, DE, Storrow, AB, Milbourn, J, Wagner, BJ: Ultrasound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies. Ann Emerg Med 1996;287–9.Google Scholar
Peterson, JJ, Bancroft, LW, Kransdorf, MJ: Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(3):557–62.Google Scholar
Hendey, G, Chally, M, Stewart, V: Selective radiography in 100 patients with suspected shoulder dislocation. J Emerg Med 2006;31(1):23–8.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, CR, Freeland, P: Inability to fully extend the injured elbow: an indicator of significant injury. Arch Emerg Med 1991; 8:253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabiner, JE, Khine, H, Avner, JR, et al.: Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of elbow fractures in children. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61(1):917.Google Scholar
Hall-Craggs, MA, Shorvon, PJ: Assessment of the radial head-capitellum view and the dorsal fat-pad sign in acute elbow trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, WA, Siegel, MJ: Elbow fat pads with new signs and extended differential diagnosis. Radiology 1977;124:659.Google Scholar
Byrdie, A, Raby, N: Early MRI in the management of clinical scaphoid fracture. Brit J Rad 2003;76:296300.Google Scholar
Waeckerle, JF: A prospective study identifying the sensitivity of radiographic findings and the efficacy of clinical findings in carpal navicular fractures. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Brenner, DJ, Hall, EJ: Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (22):2277–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, RH, Hawkins, RA, Katz, RD: Bacterial osteomyelitis: findings on plain radiography, CT, MR, and scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:365–70.Google Scholar
Haapamaki, VV, Kiuru, MJ, Koskinen, SK: Ankle and foot injuries: analysis of MDCT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183 (3):615–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mustonen, AO, Koskinen, SK, Kiuru, MJ: Acute knee trauma: analysis of multidetector computed tomography findings and comparison with conventional radiography. Acta Radiol 2005;46 (8):866–74.Google Scholar
Wicky, S, Blaser, PF, Blanc, CH, et al.: Comparison between standard radiography and spiral CT with 3D reconstruction in the evaluation, classification and management of tibial plateau fractures. Eur Radiol 2000;10 (8):1227–32.Google Scholar
Gupta, RT, Wadhwa, RP, Learch, TJ, Herwick, SM: Lisfranc injury: imaging findings for this important but often-missed diagnosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2008;37 (3):115–26.Google Scholar
McConnell, T, Creevy, W, Tornetta, P III: Stress examination of supination external rotation-type fibular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86 -A(10):2171–8.Google Scholar

References

Klompas, M: Does this patient have an acute thoracic aortic dissection? JAMA 2002;287:2262–72.Google Scholar
Felson, B, Felson, H: Localization of intrathoracic lesions by means of the postero-anterior roentgenogram: the silhouette sign. Radiology 1950;55:363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsh, MM, Sloan, H: Blunt chest trauma. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1977.Google Scholar
Harris, RD, Harris, JH Jr.: The prevalence and significance of missed scapular fractures in blunt chest trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151(4):747–50.Google Scholar

References

Ahn, SH, Mayo-Smith, WW, Murphy, BL, et al.: Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 2002;225:159–64.Google Scholar
Anyanwu, AC, Moalypour, SM: Are abdominal radiographs still overutilised in the assessment of acute abdominal pain? A district general hospital audit. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998;43:267–70.Google Scholar
Flak, B, Rowley, A: Acute abdomen: plain film utilization and analysis. Can Assoc Radiol J 1993;44(6):423–8.Google Scholar
Gupta, K, Bhandari, RK, Chander, R: Comparative study of plain film abdomen and ultrasound in non-traumatic acute abdomen. Ind J Radiol Imaging 2005;15:109–15.Google Scholar
Kellow, ZS, MacInnes, M, Kurzencwyg, D, et al.: The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient. Radiology 2008;248:887–93.Google Scholar
Laméris, W, van Randen, A, Van Es, HW, et al.: Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. British Med J 2009;339(7711):2933.Google Scholar
MacKersie, AB, Lane, MJ, Gerhardt, RT, et al.: Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series. Radiology 2005;237:114–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otero, HJ, Ondategui-Parra, S, Erturk, SM, et al.: Imaging utilization in the management of appendicitis and its impact on hospital charges. Emerg Radiol 2008;15:23–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Rao, PM, Rhea, JT, Rao, JA, Conn, AK: Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis: diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:325–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoker, J, van Randen, A, Lameris, W, Boermeester, MA: Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology 2009;253(1):3146.Google Scholar
van Randen, A, Lameris, W, Luitse, JSK, et al.: The role of plain radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29(6):582–9.Google Scholar

References

Grossman, MD, Reilly, PM, Gillett, T, et al.: National survey of the incidence of C-spine injury and approach to C-spine clearance in U.S. trauma centers. J Trauma 1999;47:684–91.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, J, Walters, N, Levy, PD: An evidence-based approach to radiographic assessment of cervical spine injuries in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2008;68(1):7287.Google Scholar
Daffner, RH, Sciulli, RL, Rodriguez, A, Protetch, J: Imaging for evaluation of suspected C-spine trauma: a 2-year analysis. Injury 2006;37:652–8.Google Scholar
Nelson, DW, Martin, MJ, Martin, ND, Beekley, A: Evaluation of the risk of noncontiguous fractures of the spine in blunt trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;75(1):135–9.Google Scholar
Trafton, PG: Spinal cord injuries. Surg Clin North Am 1982;62:6172.Google Scholar
Bagley, LJ: Imaging of spinal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 2006;44:112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freemyer, B, Knopp, R, Piche, J, et al.: Comparison of five-view and three-view C-spine series in the evaluation of patients with cervical trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18(8):818–21.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology (ACR) Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging: Suspected cervical spine trauma. Reston, VA: ACR, 2012.Google Scholar
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, et al.: The Canadian C-spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286(15):1841–8.Google Scholar
Stiell, IG, Clement, CM, Grimshaw, J, et al.: Implementation of the Canadian C-spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2009;339:b41–6.Google Scholar
Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, et al.: Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343(2):94–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viccellio, P, Simon, H, Pressman, BD, et al.: NEXUS group: a prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):E20.Google Scholar
Stiell, IG, Clement, CM, McKnight, RD, et al.: The Canadian C-spine Rule versus the NEXUS Low-risk Criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003;349(26):2510–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, JC, Tepas, JJ, Mollitt, DL, Pieper, P: Pediatric cervical spine injuries: defining the disease. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36(2):373.Google Scholar
Pieretti-Vanmarcke, R, Velmahos, GC, Nance, ML, et al.: Clinical clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients younger than 3 years: a multi-center study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 2009;67(3):543–9; discussion 549–50.Google Scholar
Pang, D, Wilberger, JE: Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities in children. J Neurosurg 1982;57(1):114–29.Google Scholar
Yucesoy, K, Yuksel, KZ: SCIWORA in MRI era. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110(5):429.Google Scholar
Pang, D: Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in children, 2 decades later [review]. Neurosurgery 2004;55(6):1325–42; discussion 1342–3.Google Scholar
Davis, JW, Phreaner, DL, Hoyt, DB, Mackersie, RC: The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1993;34(3):342–6.Google Scholar
Gale, SC, Gracias, VH, Reilly, PM, Schwab, CW: The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma 2005; 59:1121–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Woodring, JH, Lee, C: Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma. J Trauma 1993;34:32–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, JF, Akkinepalli, R: Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 2005;58:902.Google Scholar
Blackmore, CC, Ramsey, SD, Mann, FA, Deyo, RA: Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1999;212:117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Como, J, Diaz, J, Dunham, C, et al.: Practice management guidelines for identifying cervical spine injuries following trauma: update from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines Committee. J Trauma 2009;67:651–9.Google Scholar
American College of Surgeons: Advanced trauma life support student course manual, 9th ed., 2012.Google Scholar
Hanson, JA, Blackmore, CC, Mann, FA, Wilson, AJ: Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:713–18.Google Scholar

References

O’Connor, E, Walsham, J: Indications for thoracolumbar imaging in blunt trauma patients: a review of current literature. Emerg Med Australas EMA 2009;21(2):94101.Google Scholar
Hsu, JM, Joseph, T, Ellis, AM: Thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma patients: guidelines for diagnosis and imaging. Injury 2003;34(6):426–33.Google Scholar
Ballock, RT, Mackersie, R, Abitbol, JJ, et al.: Can burst fractures be predicted from plain radiographs? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74(1):147–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Dai, L-Y, Wang, X-Y, Jiang, L-S, et al.: Plain radiography versus computed tomography scans in the diagnosis and management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 2008;33(16):E548–52.Google Scholar
Inaba, K, Munera, F, McKenney, M, et al.: Visceral torso computed tomography for clearance of the thoracolumbar spine in trauma: a review of the literature. J Trauma 2006;60(4):915–20.Google Scholar
Sheridan, R, Peralta, R, Rhea, J, et al.: Reformatted visceral protocol helical computed tomographic scanning allows conventional radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine to be eliminated in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. J Trauma 2003;55(4):665–9.Google Scholar
Duane, TM, Tan, BB, Golay, D, et al.: Blunt trauma and the role of routine pelvic radiographs: a prospective analysis. J Trauma 2002;53(3):463–8.Google Scholar
Kessel, B, Sevi, R, Jeroukhimov, I, et al.: Is routine portable pelvic x-ray in stable multiple trauma patients always justified in a high technology era? Injury 2007;38(5):559–63.Google Scholar
Spaniolas, K, Cheng, JD, Gestring, ML, et al.: Ground level falls are associated with significant mortality in elderly patients. J Trauma 2010;69(4):821–5.Google Scholar
Steele, MT, Norvell, JG: Pelvis Injuries. In: Tintinalli, J (ed.), Tintinalli’s emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011, 1841–8.Google Scholar
Duke Orthopaedics: Radiology of Pelvic Fractures – Wheeless’ Textbook of Orthopaedics. Dec. 14, 2013. Available at: http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/radiology_of_pelvic_fracturesGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×