Intelligence as Smart Heuristics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607073.011

10 - Intelligence as Smart Heuristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 November 2009

Markus Raab

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Jean E. Pretz

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jean E. Pretz: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

“The great end of life is not knowledge but action”

Thomas H. Huxley (1825–1895)

Humans and other animals differ in the amount of intelligence ascribed to them or that can be tested. Observed behavior reflects the underlying cognitive abilities of the individual that are either thought of as a general device system or a system of more or less independent parts. On this continuum, the view of intelligence as fast and frugal heuristics orientates toward a concept that models intelligence as parts (tools) of a larger system (adaptive toolbox). This view departs from the notion of intelligence as an assembly of “factors”: either one (g), a few, or many. The idea that one could model the intelligence of a person by the values of one or several factors became prominent after the invention of factor analysis, a statistical tool, in the early twentieth century. A key problem with this tool-driven metaphor of intelligence is that it does not describe how cognition translates into behavior. The consequence of this missing link is that the usefulness of factor values to predict behavior is quite limited (Sternberg, Grigorenko, & Bundy, 2001). More importantly, the exclusive focus on paper-and-pencil tasks has estranged the notion of intelligence from the abilities and heuristics that are relevant for everyday behavior as well as for solving the problems that experts struggle with.

In this chapter, we propose a radically different view of intelligence that links cognition with behavior in terms of heuristics.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Cognition and Intelligence
Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind
, pp. 188 - 207

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607073.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books

Ayton, P., & Önkal, D. (1997). Forecasting football fixtures: Confidence and judged proportion correct. Unpublished manuscript

Borges, B., Goldstein, D. G., Ortmann, A., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). Can ignorance beat the stock market? In G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, & ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 59–74). New York: Oxford University Press

Boyd, R., & Lorberbaum, J. P. (1987). No pure strategy is evolutionary stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game. Nature, 327, 58–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2001). Norms and bounded rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 281–296). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the “Take-the-Best” heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1332–1346Google Scholar PubMed

Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the adaptive toolbox: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 611–625Google Scholar PubMed

Cosmides, C. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cosmides, C., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press

Cosmides, C., & Tooby, J. (2002). Unraveling the enigma of human intelligence: Evolutionary psychology and the multimodular mind. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The evolution of intelligence (pp. 145–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, & ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97–118). New York: Oxford University Press

Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Duchaine, B., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2001). Evolutionary psychology and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 225–230CrossRef Google Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A. (1996). Interface between culturally based preferences and genetic preferences: Female mate choice in Poecilia Reticulata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 2770–2773CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Modules, frames, frigeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of spheres. In J. R. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge and representation and natural-language understanding (pp. 25–36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Galef, B. G. Jr. (1987). Social influences on the identification of toxic foods by Norway rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 327–332CrossRef Google Scholar

Galef, B. G. Jr., McQuoid, L. M., & Whiskin, E. E. (1990). Further evidence that Norway rats do not socially transmit learned aversions to toxic baits. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 199–205CrossRef Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books

Gardner, H., Kornhuber, M. L., & Wake, W. K. (1996). Intelligence: Multiple perspectives. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace

Gigerenzer, G. (1997). The modularity of social intelligence. In A. Whiten & R. W. Byrne (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence II (pp. 264–288). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The Take The Best Heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 75–95). New York: Oxford University Press

Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition, 43, 127–171CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Rethinking rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance. How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press

Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75–90CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 566–581Google Scholar PubMed

Hossner, E. J. (1995). Module der Motorik [Motor Modules]. Schorndorf, Germany: Hofmann

Hubbard, A. W., & Seng, S. N. (1954). Visual movements of batters. Research Quarterly of American Association of Health and Physical Education, 25, 42–57Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger

Johnson, J., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 215–229CrossRef

Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Klein, G., Wolf, S., Militello, L., & Zsambok, C. (1995). Characteristics of skilled option generation in chess. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 63–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Kollock, P. (1994). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 313–345CrossRef Google Scholar

Kummer, H., Daston, L., Gigerenzer, G., & Silk, J. B. (1997). The social intelligence hypothesis. In P. Weingarten, S. D. Mitchell, P. J. Richardson, & S. Maasen (Eds.), Human by nature: Between biology and the social sciences (pp. 157–179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Laland, K. N. (2001). Imitation, social learning, and preparedness as mechanisms of bounded rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 233–247). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Marsh, B. (2002). Heuristics as social tools. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 49–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Martignon, L., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). Why does one-reason decision making work? A case study in ecological rationality. In G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, & ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 119–140). New York: Oxford University Press

Martignon, L., & Hoffrage, U. (2002). Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparisons. Theory and Decision, 52, 29–71CrossRef Google Scholar

McLeod, P., & Dienes, Z. (1996). Do fielders know where to go to catch the ball or only how to get there? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 531–543Google Scholar

Messick, D. M., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1995). Individual heuristics and the dynamics of cooperation in large groups. Psychological Review, 102, 131–145CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Newell, B., & Shanks, D. R. (in press). Take-the-best or look at the rest? Factors influencing ‘one-reason’ decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionGoogle Scholar

Newell, B., Rakow, T., Weston, N. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Search strategies in decision-making: The success of “success.”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 117–137CrossRef Google Scholar

Noble, J., & Todd, P. M. (2002). Imitation or something simpler? Modelling simple mechanisms for social information processing. In K. Dautenhahn & C. Nehaniv (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 423–440). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press

Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). When do people use simple heuristics and how can we tell? In G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, & ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 141–167). New York: Oxford University Press

Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Whiting, H. T. A., & Bootsma, R. J. (1991). Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 315–322Google Scholar PubMed

Seeley, T. D., & Buhrmann, S. C. (2001). Nest-site selection in honey bees: How well do swarms implement the ‘best-of-N’ decision rule? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 416–427CrossRef Google Scholar

Selten, R. (2001). What is bounded rationality? In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality (pp. 13–36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Shephard, R. N. (2001). On the possibility of universal mental laws: A reply to my critics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 712–748CrossRef Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118CrossRef Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138CrossRef Google Scholar

Snow, R. E. (1994). A person–situation interaction theory of intelligence in outline. In A. Demetriou & A. Efklides (Eds.), Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development (pp. 11–28). Amsterdam: North-HollandCrossRef

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359–375CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2002). The evolution of intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Bundy, D. A. (2001). The predictive value of IQ. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 1–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang, Y., & Frost, B. J. (1992). Time to collision is signaled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons. Nature, 356, 236–238CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, G. C. (1996). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.