Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T23:35:13.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Aging and Varieties of Cognitive Control: A Review of Meta-Analyses on Resistance to Interference, Coordination, and Task Switching, and an Experimental Exploration of Age-Sensitivity in the Newly Identified Process of Focus Switching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

By
Paul Verhaeghen ,
John Cerella ,
Kara L. Bopp  and
Chandramallika Basak
Edited by
Randall W. Engle ,
Grzegorz Sedek ,
Ulrich von Hecker  and
Daniel N. McIntosh
Paul Verhaeghen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210
John Cerella
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210
Kara L. Bopp
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Hamilton College, 198 College Hill Road, Clinton, NY 13323
Chandramallika Basak
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210
Randall W. Engle
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Grzegorz Sedek
Affiliation:
Warsaw School of Social Psychology and Polish Academy of Sciences
Ulrich von Hecker
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Daniel N. McIntosh
Affiliation:
University of Denver
Get access

Summary

Adult age differences favoring the young have been demonstrated in a wide variety of tasks of fluid intelligence. Such age-sensitive tasks include (among many others): simple reaction times and choice reaction times, working memory tasks, tests of episodic memory, tests of spatial and reasoning abilities, mental rotation, and visual search performance (for exhaustive reviews, see e.g., Kausler, 1991; Salthouse, 1985, 1991; note that performance on other tasks, such as vocabulary measures, does not show negative age effects; e.g., Salthouse, 1991; Verhaeghen, 2003). The challenge for cognitive aging as a field is to identify the basic changes responsible for these declines. Given that the deficits are so widespread across the cognitive system, it is reasonable to assume that a limited number of basic mechanisms may explain a large number of the deficits.

It is no surprise, then, that much of the research on cognitive aging has centered on the investigation of the age effects of so-called cognitive primitives, that is, variables that influence the cognitive system without themselves being reducible to other psychological constructs. For a long time, the dominant theory in the field pertained to the influence of processing speed (Salthouse, 1991, 1996; for a meta-analysis, see Verhaeghen & Salthouse, 1997). This hypothesis views cognition as being driven by a processing rate and asserts that this rate is slower in older adults than in younger adults. More recently, the attention of the field has been drawn toward more process-specific accounts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology , pp. 160 - 189
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Umilta, C. & Moscovitch, M. (Eds.), Attention and performanceIV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Basak, C., & Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: Capacity differences, speed equivalence. Psychology and Aging, 18, 240–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bopp, K. L. (2003). Exploration of age-related differences in executive control processes of verbal and visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence from the repetition detection paradigm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse.Google Scholar
Bopp, K. L., & Verhaeghen, P. (2002). Aging and verbal span tasks: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Braver, T. S., & Barch, D. M. (2002). A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 809–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinley, J. F. (1965). Cognitive sets, speed and accuracy of performance in the elderly. In Welford, A. T. & Birren, J. E. (Eds.), Behavior, aging and the nervous system (pp. 114–149). Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information processing rate. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd. ed., pp. 201–221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cerella, J., Poon, L. W., & Williams, D. H. (1980). Age and the complexity hypothesis. In Poon, L. W. (Ed.), Aging in the 1980's (pp. 332–340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboz, N., Russo, R., & Fox, E. (2002). Age differences and the negative priming effect: An updated meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 17, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (1996). Experimental evidence for differential slowing in the lexical and nonlexical domains. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 3, 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, A. A., & Little, D. M. (1999). Age-related differences and similarities in dual task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 416–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In Gopher, D. & Koriat, A. (Eds.), Attention & performance, XVII, Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kausler, D. H. (1991). Experimental psychology, cognition, and human aging (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliegl, R., Mayr, U., & Krampe, R. T. (1994). Time-accuracy functions for determining process and person differences: An application to cognitive aging. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 134–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kray, J., Li, K. Z. H., & Lindenberger, U. (2002). Age-related changes in task-switching components: The role of task uncertainty. Brain and Cognition, 49, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, S. D., Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (1991). How general is general slowing? Evidence from the lexical domain. Psychology and Aging, 6, 416–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (1993). Sequential and coordinative complexity: Age-based processing limitations in figural transformations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1297–1320.Google ScholarPubMed
Mayr, U., Kliegl, R. & Krampe, R. T. (1996). Sequential and coordinative processing dynamics in figural transformations across the life span. Cognition, 59, 61–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, U., Spieler, D. H., & Kliegl, R. (2001). Aging and executive control. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDowd, J. M., & Shaw, R. J. (2000). Attention and aging: A functional perspective. In Craik, F. I. M. & Salthouse, T. A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 221–292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 817–835.Google ScholarPubMed
McElree, B. M., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short term memory: The time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myerson, J., Adams, D. R., Hale, S., & Jenkins, L. (2003). Analysis of group differences in processing speed: Brinley plots, Q–Q plots, and other conspiracies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myerson, J., Hale, S., Wagstaff, D., Poon, L. W., & Smith, G. A. (1990). The information-loss model: A mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing. Psychological Review, 97, 475–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.Google ScholarPubMed
Perfect, T. J. (1994). What can Brinley plots tell us about cognitive aging? Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 60–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Perfect, T. J., & Maylor, E. A. (2000). Rejecting the dull hypothesis: The relation between method and theory in cognitive aging research. In Perfect, T. J. & Maylor, E. A. (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., & McKoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, T. A. (1985). A theory of cognitive aging. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sliwinski, M., & Hall, C. B. (1998). Constraints on general slowing: A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients. Psychology and Aging, 13, 164–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linden, M., Brédart, S., & Beerten, A. (1994). Age-related differences in updating working memory. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P. (2000). The parallels in beauty's brow: Time-accuracy functions and their implications for cognitive aging theories. In Perfect, T. J. and Maylor, E. A. (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 50–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary scores: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P., & Basak, C. (2005). Aging and switching of the focus of attention in working memory: Results from a modified N-Back task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. (A),), 58, 134–154.Google ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P., & Cerella, J. (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention: A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 849–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P., Cerella, J., Semenec, S. C., Leo, M. E., Bopp, K. L., &. Steitz, D. W. (2002). Cognitive efficiency modes in old age: Performance on sequential and coordinative verbal and visuo-spatial tasks. Psychology and Aging, 17, 558–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., & Meersman, L. (1998a). Aging and negative priming: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., & Meersman, L. (1998b). Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., Kliegl, R., & Mayr, U. (1997). Sequential and coordinative complexity in time-accuracy function for mental arithmetic. Psychology and Aging, 12, 555–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P., & Salthouse, T. A. (1997). Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and non-linear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washylyshyn, C., Verhaeghen, P., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2003). Aging and task switching: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×