Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building A New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers
Book contents
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Case Study Research
- Chapter 2 Building Blocks of Case Study Research
- Chapter 3 Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
- Chapter 4 Do It Again
- Chapter 5 The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
- Chapter 6 Do It Again (and Again)
- Chapter 7 Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 8 More on Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 9 A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
- Index
- References
Chapter 5 - The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2023
Book contents
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Case Study Research
- Chapter 2 Building Blocks of Case Study Research
- Chapter 3 Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans
- Chapter 4 Do It Again
- Chapter 5 The Natural Experiment, a.k.a. the Single Embedded Design
- Chapter 6 Do It Again (and Again)
- Chapter 7 Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 8 More on Sequencing Case Study Designs
- Chapter 9 A Parting Note, on an Optimistic Note
- Index
- References
Summary
We discuss the single embedded case study design in this chapter. We deliberate how this design is different from multiple and single holistic designs in terms of the levels of analysis and the nature of replication. The selection rationale and sampling are discussed next. Afterwards, we move on to the longitudinal and/or cross-sectional single embedded designs. The strengths and the weaknesses of the design in terms of internal validity, external validity, and the number of variables are discussed subsequently. This chapter also discusses the (mis)conception regarding longitudinal designs and temporal embedded units.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Combining Case Study Designs for Theory BuildingA New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers, pp. 78 - 103Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Blatter, J. & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collier, R. B. & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Andersson, U., Brannen, M. Y., Nielsen, B. B. & Reuber, A. R. (2016). From the editors: Can I trust your findings? Ruling out alternative explanations in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8), 881–897.Google Scholar
De Toni, A. F. & Pessot, E. (2021). Investigating organisational learning to master project complexity: An embedded case study. Journal of Business Research, 129, 541–554.Google Scholar
Dyer, W. G. & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
Elman, C., Gerring, J. & Mahoney, J. (2016). Case study research: Putting the quant into the qual. Sociological Methods Research, 45(3), 375–391.Google Scholar
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A. & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2011). Robert D. Putnam between Italy and the United States. Bulletin of Italian Politics, 3(2), 391–399.Google Scholar
Fletcher, M. & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2011). Case selection in international business: key issues and common misconceptions. In Piekkari, R. & Welch, C. (eds.) Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 171–191.Google Scholar
Fletcher, M., Zhao, Y., Plakoyiannaki, E. & Buck, T. (2018). Three pathways to case selection in international business: A twenty-year review. Analysis and Synthesis. International Business Review, 27(4), 755–766.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.Google Scholar
Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2, 131–150.Google Scholar
Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A. & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. & Cojocaru, L. (2016). Selecting cases for intensive analysis: A diversity of goals and methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 392–423.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. & Seawright, J. (2006). Techniques for choosing cases. In Gerring, J. (ed.) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86–150.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Piscataway: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. H. (2020, July 4). A teacher held a famous racism exercise in 1968. She’s still at it. New York Times. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2020/07/04/us/jane-elliott-anti-racism-blue-eyes-brown-eyes.html (last accessed July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Huerter O, G., Moon, J., Gold, S. & Chapple, W. (2020). Micro-processes of translation in the transfer of practices from MNE headquarters to foreign subsidiaries: The role of subsidiary translators. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(3), 389–413.Google Scholar
Hoorani, B. H., Nair, L. B. & Gibbert, M. (2019). Designing for impact: The effect of rigor and case study design on citations of qualitative case studies in management. Scientometrics, 121(1), 285–306.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (1924). A laboratory study of fear: The case of Peter. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 31, 308–315.Google Scholar
Koch, T. & Denike, K. (2006). Rethinking John Snow’s South London study: A Bayesian evaluation and recalculation. Social Science & Medicine, 63(1), 271–283.Google Scholar
Lynd, R. S. & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown; a Study in Contemporary American Culture. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Lynd, R. S. & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1875). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Presdee, M. (2003). Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. (1992). “Casing” and the process of social inquiry. In Ragin, C. & Becker, H. (eds.) What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–226.Google Scholar
Rihoux, B. & Ragin, C. C. (2008). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, D. & Ziblatt, D. (2013). The enduring indispensability of the controlled comparison. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1301–1327.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vuori, T. O. & Huy, Q. N. (2016). Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1), 9–51.Google Scholar
Welch, C., Rumyantseva, M. & Hewerdine, L. J. (2016). Using case research to reconstruct concepts: A methodology and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 111–130.Google Scholar
Zielinski, S. (2010, August 18). Cholera, John Snow and the grand experiment. Smithsonian Magazine. Available at: www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/cholera-john-snow-and-the-grand-experiment-33494689/ (last accessed July 19, 2022).Google Scholar