Book contents
- Complex Words
- Complex Words
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: Advances in Morphology
- Part I Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
- Part II Structure of Complex Words
- Part III Corpus-Based Case Studies
- 13 Competition between Synthetic NN Compounds and NN.gen Phrasal Nouns in Polish
- 14 An S Is an ’S, or Is It? Plural and Genitive Plural Are Not Homophonous
- 15 The Role of Word-Formation Families and Subfamilies in the Organization of German Diminutive Compounds
- 16 Semantic Patterns in Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English
- 17 Onomatopoeia
- 18 Dingsbums and Thingy
- Index
- References
16 - Semantic Patterns in Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English
from Part III - Corpus-Based Case Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- Complex Words
- Complex Words
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: Advances in Morphology
- Part I Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
- Part II Structure of Complex Words
- Part III Corpus-Based Case Studies
- 13 Competition between Synthetic NN Compounds and NN.gen Phrasal Nouns in Polish
- 14 An S Is an ’S, or Is It? Plural and Genitive Plural Are Not Homophonous
- 15 The Role of Word-Formation Families and Subfamilies in the Organization of German Diminutive Compounds
- 16 Semantic Patterns in Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English
- 17 Onomatopoeia
- 18 Dingsbums and Thingy
- Index
- References
Summary
The paper researches all the occurrences of a stratified sample of lemmas tagged both as noun and as verb in the British National Corpus, plus a set of parallel samples of denominal verbs derived by affixation intended for comparison. This design records the distribution of semantic categories not according to the lemmas in the sample, but according to how much and where they are actualized in each occurrence of the lemma (i.e. it separates the various senses within the lemmas). The sample starts out from the lowest frequency of occurrence (1). In the case of conversion, the sample spans from frequency 1 to frequency 960. Semantic categories are recorded according to the analysis of the concordances available under each of the lemmas recorded in the sample, and based on the terms of the definitions available in the Oxford English Dictionary for each sense of each lemma. The results show that the patterns described for noun-to-verb conversion have a rather dissimilar relevance with respect to each other. The distribution of semantic categories according to their occurrences in the senses attested by each of the occurrences reported for the lemmas of the corpus sample in conversion and in affixation is quite uneven.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complex WordsAdvances in Morphology, pp. 311 - 334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Baeskow, H. (2019). Denominal verbs in morphology. In Lieber, R., ed., The Oxford Encyclopedia of Morphology, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-502.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. and Huddleston, R. (2002). Lexical word-formation. In Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K., eds., The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1621–1721.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. and Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagasheva, A. (2017). Comparative semantic concepts in affixation. In Santana-Lario, J. and Valera, S., eds., Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Bern: P. Lang, pp. 33–66.Google Scholar
Cetnarowska, B. (1993). The Syntax, Semantics and Derivation of Bare Nominalisations in English, Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. and Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, 767–811.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2004–). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (1999). Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. In Panther, K.-U. and Günter, R., eds., Metonymy in Language and Thought, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Don, J., Trommelen, M. and Zonneveld, W. (2000). Conversion and category indeterminacy. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C. and Mugdan, J., eds., Morphologie. Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. An international handbook on inflection and word–formation. 1. Halband, Vol. 1, in collaboration with Kesselheim, W. and Skopeteas, S., Berlin: W. de Gruyter, pp. 943–952.Google Scholar
Fernández-Alcaina, C. (2017). Availability and unavailability in English word-formation. In Santana-Lario, J. and Valera, S., eds., Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Bern: P. Lang, pp. 163–206.Google Scholar
Fernández-Alcaina, C. (2020). Lemma Extractor, GitHub Repository. Available at https://github.com/cristinaalcaina/Lemma_extractor.Google Scholar
Gottfurcht, C. A. (2008). Denominal verb formation in English, PhD dissertation, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Karius, I. (1985). Die Ableitung der denominalen Verben mit Nullsuffigierung im Englischen, Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D., ed. (1974). Studies in Syntax and Word-Formation. Selected Articles by Hans Marchand, München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1994). Verbal derivation in English: a historical survey or Much Ado About Nothing. In Britton, D., ed., English Historical Linguistics 1994. Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8. ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 September 1994), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, pp. 93–117.Google Scholar
Kisselew, M., Rimell, L., Palmer, A. and Padó, S. (2016). Predicting the direction of derivation in English conversion. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 11 August 2016, Berlin: Germany, pp. 93–98.Google Scholar
Lara-Clares, A. (2016). Scáthach: BNC Frequency List Tool. Available at: scathach.laraclares.com.Google Scholar
Lara-Clares, C. (2017). Competition in Present Day English nominalization by zero-affixation vs. -ation. In Santana-Lario, J. and Valera, S., eds., Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Bern: P. Lang, pp. 207–244.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. (2009). Conversion as zero-affixation: evidence from affix interaction. Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 9(1), 135–160.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (2006). The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology, 16(2), 247–272.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1963). On a question of contrary analysis with derivationally connected but morphologically uncharacterized words. English Studies, 44, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1964). A set of criteria for the establishing of derivational relationships between words unmarked by derivational morphemes. Indogermanische Forschungen, 69, 10–19.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, 2nd ed., München: C. Beck.Google Scholar
Martsa, S. (2007). Construction of meaning during conversion. Presented at the HUSSE/8 Conference, Szeged, 25–28 January 2007.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press, March 2020. Web. 20 May 2019.Google Scholar
Plag, I. (2018). Word-Formation in English, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (2010). Variable direction in zero-derivation and the unity of polysemous lexical items. Word Structure, 3(1), 82–97.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N. and Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. (1988). Zero derivation and the Overt Analogue Criterion. In Hammond, M. and Noonan, M., eds., Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 155–175.Google Scholar
Tournier, J. (2010). Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’anglais contemporain, 2nd ed., Paris and Geneve: Champion–Slaktine.Google Scholar
Valera, S. (2017). Conversion and figurative extension of meaning. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 14(2), 2–17.Google Scholar
Valera, S. (forthcoming). Main morphological formal means 3: approaches to conversion. In Fábregas, A., Acedo-Matellán, V., Armstrong, G., Cuervo, M. C. and Pujol, I., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Morphology, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.