from Part III - Institutions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Research on protest policing has become an important niche within social movement studies. There is widespread acknowledgement in this field that police strategies and tactics are in part an adaptation to contemporary forms of protest and that this adaption has occurred through a process of tactical interaction and gradual institutionalization of different forms of protests (Combes and Fillieule 2011). However, thus far police organizational adaptation has not been explicitly framed as a type of social movement outcome. The argument in this chapter is that analyzing police organizational change in response to protest events as a social movement outcome contributes to a better understanding of both consequences of social movements and developments in protest policing.
Research on social movement outcomes has previously focused on political, cultural, and biographical outcomes (Giugni 2008). Outcomes regarding changes in institutionalized organizational practices do not fall neatly into any of these categories and have received considerably less attention (for an exception, see Zald et al. 2005). Furthermore, this type of social movement outcome is largely unintended (Tilly 1999). It is related less to the substantial demands and framings of social movements than to the “repertoires of action” (Tilly 1978) associated with movements and protest campaigns.
Historically, government interest in suppressing violent protests during the early to mid-nineteenth century played a significant role in the development of the modern police force. In Britain, concerns about riots and social disorder were used to justify the creation of modern police forces (Reiner 1998, 2000). Similarly, in Sweden the failure of the city guards to contain the March 1848 riots in Stockholm, which resulted in the death of eighteen protesters, constituted a tipping point in a process that led to a modernized Stockholm city police authority (Furuhagen 2004). Presumably, it was not only fear of a popular uprising among the ruling class that contributed to such events. Compared to most other police tasks, large-scale public order policing is a generally far more public and direct measure of police performance. Crowd control failures are difficult to conceal and likely to lead to criticism and political pressure for reform.
Later examples of the impact of protests on police organizations include the development of a “negotiated management” approach to protest policing in response to protests during the late 1960s and early 1970s (McCarthy and McPhail 1998).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.