Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Wave functions
- 3 Linear algebra in Dirac notation
- 4 Physical properties
- 5 Probabilities and physical variables
- 6 Composite systems and tensor products
- 7 Unitary dynamics
- 8 Stochastic histories
- 9 The Born rule
- 10 Consistent histories
- 11 Checking consistency
- 12 Examples of consistent families
- 13 Quantum interference
- 14 Dependent (contextual) events
- 15 Density matrices
- 16 Quantum reasoning
- 17 Measurements I
- 18 Measurements II
- 19 Coins and counterfactuals
- 20 Delayed choice paradox
- 21 Indirect measurement paradox
- 22 Incompatibility paradoxes
- 23 Singlet state correlations
- 24 EPR paradox and Bell inequalities
- 25 Hardy's paradox
- 26 Decoherence and the classical limit
- 27 Quantum theory and reality
- Bibliography
- References
- Index
3 - Linear algebra in Dirac notation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Wave functions
- 3 Linear algebra in Dirac notation
- 4 Physical properties
- 5 Probabilities and physical variables
- 6 Composite systems and tensor products
- 7 Unitary dynamics
- 8 Stochastic histories
- 9 The Born rule
- 10 Consistent histories
- 11 Checking consistency
- 12 Examples of consistent families
- 13 Quantum interference
- 14 Dependent (contextual) events
- 15 Density matrices
- 16 Quantum reasoning
- 17 Measurements I
- 18 Measurements II
- 19 Coins and counterfactuals
- 20 Delayed choice paradox
- 21 Indirect measurement paradox
- 22 Incompatibility paradoxes
- 23 Singlet state correlations
- 24 EPR paradox and Bell inequalities
- 25 Hardy's paradox
- 26 Decoherence and the classical limit
- 27 Quantum theory and reality
- Bibliography
- References
- Index
Summary
Hilbert space and inner product
In Ch. 2 it was noted that quantum wave functions form a linear space in the sense that multiplying a function by a complex number or adding two wave functions together produces another wave function. It was also pointed out that a particular quantum state can be represented either by a wave function ψ(x) which depends upon the position variable x, or by an alternative function ψ(p) of the momentum variable p. It is convenient to employ the Dirac symbol |ψ〉, known as a “ket”, to denote a quantum state without referring to the particular function used to represent it. The kets, which we shall also refer to as vectors to distinguish them from scalars, which are complex numbers, are the elements of the quantum Hilbert space H. (The real numbers form a subset of the complex numbers, so that when a scalar is referred to as a “complex number”, this includes the possibility that it might be a real number.)
If α is any scalar (complex number), the ket corresponding to the wave function ɑψ(x) is denoted by α|ψ〉, or sometimes by |ψ〉α, and the ket corresponding to ø(x)+ψ(x) is denoted by |ø〉+|ψ〉 or |ψ〉+|ø〉, and so forth. This correspondence could equally well be expressed using momentum wave functions, because the Fourier transform, (2.15) or (2.16), is a linear relationship between ψ(x) and (p), so that αø(x)+βψ(x) and αϕ(p) + βψ(p) correspond to the same quantum state α|ψ〉+β|ø〉.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Consistent Quantum Theory , pp. 27 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001