Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:14:32.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Decisions, Deadlocks and Deadlines in Making South Africa’s Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2022

Tom Ginsburg
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Sumit Bisarya
Affiliation:
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance
Get access

Summary

South Africa’s 1996 constitution has been described as the birth certificate of a new, non-apartheid state. Following the Harare declaration in 1989, the process of ending apartheid accelerated, in which the writing of a new constitution played an important role. Throughout the process, there was gridlock involving the makeup of the constituent assembly and constitutional stipulations involving the death penalty, lockout clauses, the language of education, the appointment of judges and other issues. In the twenty-five years since the adoption of the constitution, it has proven to be a robust bulwark against infighting and instability. There are several lessons from South Africa’s constitutive process. While the constitution is best understood within the context of South Africa’s history and the ANC’s resistance to apartheid, an essential aspect of the process was that many of the disputes were settled collectively in “package deals” and through novel deadlock-breaking mechanisms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carter, Gwedolen M. and Karis, Thomas, eds. 1972. From Protest to Challenge: A Documentary History of African Politics in South Africa 1882–1964. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, Hassen. 1998. The Soul of Nation: Constitution-Making in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1995Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-making Process.” Duke Law Journal 45: 364396.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×