Book contents
- Constitution Makers on Constitution Making
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- Constitution Makers on Constitution Making
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Making and Remaking Kenya’s Constitution
- 3 Kosovo’s Independence Constitution
- 4 Decisions, Deadlocks and Deadlines in Making South Africa’s Constitution
- 5 Makers of Our Own History
- 6 Nepal’s Constitutional Development and the Challenges of Constitution Making
- 7 The Constituent Process in Ecuador
- 8 Burundi
- References
1 - Introduction
Constitution Makers on Constitution Making*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 November 2022
Book contents
- Constitution Makers on Constitution Making
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- Constitution Makers on Constitution Making
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Making and Remaking Kenya’s Constitution
- 3 Kosovo’s Independence Constitution
- 4 Decisions, Deadlocks and Deadlines in Making South Africa’s Constitution
- 5 Makers of Our Own History
- 6 Nepal’s Constitutional Development and the Challenges of Constitution Making
- 7 The Constituent Process in Ecuador
- 8 Burundi
- References
Summary
Constitution-making has changed dramatically in recent decades. Compared with constitutional processes in earlier eras, we observe the increasing role of the international community in constitution making, often as part of a broader intervention into a conflict, and increasing penetration of international norms into national contexts. There has also been a trend toward public participation in the process of constitution-making. In addition, constitution making is now iterated over time, with multiple rounds of decision making and bargaining.This chapter draws on the framework of Jon Elster to frame the seven case studies in the volume, drawing toegether themes and trends.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constitution Makers on Constitution MakingNew Cases, pp. 1 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Al-Ali, Zaid. 2012. “Constitution-Drafting and External Influence,” in Dixon, Rosalind and Ginsburg, Tom, eds. Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Alberdi, Juan. 1981 [1852]. Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la República Argentina, Buenos Aires. Argentina: Plus Ultra.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew. 2016. Post-Sovereign Constitution-Making: Learning and Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bisarya, Sumit. 2016. “Performance of Constitutions: Transitional Provisions,” pp. 203–232, in Ginsburg, Tom and Huq, Aziz Z, eds. Assessing Constitutional Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Nathan. 2008. “Reason, Interest, Rationality, and Passion in Constitution Drafting.” Perspectives on Politics 6: 675–689.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruno, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M. and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit and Anderson, George. 2019. Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit, Sedelius, Thomas and Kyrychenko, Julia. 2018. Semi-Presidentialism and Inclusive Governance in Ukraine. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Dann, Philippe and al-Ali, Zaid. 2006. “The Internationalized Pouvoir Constituant-Constitution-Making under External Influence in Iraq, Sudan and East Timor.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 10: 423–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind and Tom Ginsburg. 2012. “Deciding Not to Decide: Deferral in Constitutional Design.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 9: 636–72.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd, Carl LeVan, A. and Maboudi, Tofigh. 2017. Constituents before Assembly: Participation, Deliberation and Representation in the Crafting of New Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary. 2009. “Constitutional Networks,” pp. 43–63, in Kahler, Miles, ed. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom and Melton, James. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1995. “Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process.” Duke Law Journal 45: 364–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2016. “When Is a Constitution Doing Well? The Alberdian Test in the Americas,” in Ginsburg, Tom and Huq, Aziz, eds. Assessing Constitutional Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Elkins, Zachary and Blount, Justin. 2009. “Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5: 201–223.Google Scholar
Gylfason, Thorvaldur. 2016. “Constitution on Ice,” in Valur Ingimundarson, , Philippe Urlfalino, and Irma Erlingsdóttir, , eds. Iceland’s Financial Crisis: The Politics of Blame, Protest, and Reconstruction. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houlihan, Erin C. and Bisarya, Sumit. 2021. Practical Considerations for Public Participation in Constitution-Building. Stockholm: International IDEA Policy Paper No. 24.Google Scholar
International IDEA. 2016. Assessing the Performance of the South Africa Constitution. The Hague: International IDEA.Google Scholar
King, Jeff. 2013. “Constitutions as Mission Statements,” in Galligan, Denis and Versteeg, Mila, eds., The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, David. 2013. “Constitution-Making Gone Wrong.” Alabama Law Review 64: 923–978.Google Scholar
Law, David and Versteeg, Mila. 2011. “The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism.” California Law Review 99(5): 1163–1257.Google Scholar
Lerner, Hanna. 2011. Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Laurel and AuCoin, Louis. Framing the State in Times of Transition. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Partlett, Will. 2012. “The Dangers of Popular Constitution-Making.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 38(1): 193–238.
Google Scholar
Preuss, Ulrich. 2008. “The Politics of Constitution Making: Transforming Politics into Constitutions.” Law & Policy 13(2): 107–123.Google Scholar
Reyntjens, Filip. 2015. “Burundi: Institutionalizing Ethnicity to Bridge the Ethnic Divide,” pp. 27–50, in Kuperman, Alan J., ed. Constitutions and Conflict Management in Africa: Preventing Civil War through Institutional Design. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Saati, Abrak. 2015. The Participation Myth. Umea University: Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2003. “Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: The Case for Studying Cross-Constitutionalism through Negative Models.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1: 294–324.Google Scholar
Stepan, Albert. 1999. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” Journal of Democracy 10(4) (October): 19–34.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1995. “Incompletely Theorized Agreements.” Harvard Law Review 108: 1733–1772.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. “The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law.” Yale Law Journal 108: 1225–1309.Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General. 2009. Guidance Note of the Secretary General: United Nations Assistance to Constitution-Making Processes. www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/Guidance_Note_United_Nations_Assistance_to_Constitution-making_Processes_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Wallis, Joanne. 2014. Constitution Making during State Building. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 1
- Cited by