Social Epistemology, Holocaust Denial, and the Post-Millian Calculus

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139042871.012

7 - Social Epistemology, Holocaust Denial, and the Post-Millian Calculus

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Frederick Schauer

Edited by

Michael Herz and

Peter Molnar

Show author details

Michael Herz: Affiliation:
Cardozo School of Law
Peter Molnar: Affiliation:
Center for Media and Communications, Central European University, Budapest

Book contents

Get access

Summary

It is no longer news that there are countries in which it is unlawful to deny the existence of the Nazi Holocaust. Nor is it surprising that among these countries are Austria, Germany, and Israel, given the obvious historical reasons for their treatment of Holocaust denial with special sensitivity. But Holocaust denial is also a crime in Belgium, Canada, France, Spain, and Switzerland, among other countries, and a similar prohibition is now being proposed in Argentina. Moreover, existing or proposed laws also deal with denial of genocide in, for example, Armenia and Rwanda, and thus it is safe to say that the question of legal prohibitions on Holocaust denial is one of worldwide and not just regional or local interest.

Although the criminalization of Holocaust denial is thus hardly unique, it is also the case that in other countries, most obviously, but not only, the United States, the very idea of punishing the expression of an idea on account of the idea's falsity goes to the heart of principle of freedom of speech. It is not simply that Holocaust denial is legally permitted and constitutionally protected in the United States. It is that the legal and constitutional permissibility of Holocaust denial is understood as a core and not merely a fringe application of the very idea of freedom of speech under the First Amendment.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Content and Context of Hate Speech
Rethinking Regulation and Responses
, pp. 129 - 143

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139042871.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

2009

Kahn, Robert A.Holocaust Denial and the Law: A Comparative StudyPalgrave Macmillan 2004CrossRef Google Scholar

Douglas, LawrencePolicing the Past: Holocaust Denial and the LawCensorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation 67–88Robert C. Post ed.Getty Institute 1998Google Scholar

Fish, StanleyHolocaust Denial and Academic Freedom 35 Valparaiso U. L. Rev 2001Google Scholar

Fogo-Schensul, CredenceMore Than a River in Egypt: Holocaust Denial, the Internet, and International Freedom of Expression Norms 33 Gonzaga L. Rev 1998Google Scholar

Fronza, EmanuelaThe Punishment of Negationism: The Difficult Dialogue Between Law and Memory 30 Vt. L. Rev 2006Google Scholar

Kahn, Robert ACross-Burning, Holocaust Denial, and the Development of Hate Speech Law in the United States and Germany 83 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev 2006Google Scholar

Knechtle, JohnHolocaust Denial and the Concept of Dignity in the European Union 36 Florida St. U. L. Rev 2008Google Scholar

Lasson, KennethHolocaust Denial and the First Amendment: The Quest for Truth in a Free Society 6 Geo. Mason L. Rev 1997Google Scholar

McNamara, LawrenceHistory, Memory and Judgment: Holocaust Denial, the History Wars and Law's Problems with the Past 26 Sydney L. Rev 2004Google Scholar

Stein, EricHistory against Free Speech: The New German Law against the ‘Auschwitz’ – and Other – ‘Lies’ 85 Mich. L. Rev 1986CrossRef Google Scholar

Teachout, Peter R.Making ‘Holocaust Denial’ a Crime: Reflections on European Anti-Negationist Laws from the Perspective of U.S. Constitutional Experience 30 Vt. L. Rev 2006Google Scholar

Weisberg, Richard H.Fish Takes the Bait: Holocaust Denial and Post-Modern Theory 14 Law & Literature 2002CrossRef Google Scholar

Salvador-Coderch, PabloRubí-Puig, Antoni 2008 www.indret.com/code/getPdf.php?id=1186&pdf=591_en.pdf

Mill, John StuartOn LibertyW.WNorton 1975Google Scholar

Milton, John 1957

Blasi, VincentThe Ideas of the First AmendmentWest Publishing 2006

Skorupski, JohnJohn Stuart MillTaylor & Francis 1989Google Scholar

Popper, KarlThe Logic of Scientific DiscoveryRoutledge 1959Google Scholar

Popper, KarlConjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific KnowledgeRoutledge 1963Google Scholar

Popper, KarlThe Open Society and Its EnemiesRoutledge & Kegan Paul 1966Google Scholar

Hattiangadi, Jagdish N.To Save Fallibilism 92 Mind 1983Google Scholar

Schauer, FrederickFree Speech: A Philosophical EnquiryCambridgeUniversity Press 1982Google Scholar

2004

Barendt, EricFreedom of SpeechOxford University Press 1985Google Scholar

Sumner, L. WayneThe Hateful and the Obscene: Studies in the Limits of Free ExpressionUniversity of Toronto Press 2004CrossRef Google Scholar

Blasi, VincentReading Holmes Through the Lens of Schauer: The Dissent 72 Notre Dame L. Rev 1997Google Scholar

Lynch, MatthewClosing the Orwellian Loophole: The Present Constitutionality of Big Brother and the Potential for a First Amendment Cure5 First Amend. L. Rev 234 2007Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver WendellNatural Law 32 Harv. L. Rev 1918CrossRef Google Scholar

Glaser, MarkusLanger, ThomasWeber, Martin 2010

Greening, LeilaniChandler, Carla C.Why It Can't Happen to Me: The Base Rate Matters, but Overestimating Skill Leads to Underestimating Risk 27 J. Applied Soc. Psychol 1997CrossRef Google Scholar

Dawkins, RichardThe Selfish GeneOxford University Press 1976Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I.Epistemic Paternalism: Communication Control in Law and Society 88 J. Phil 1991CrossRef Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick 1991

Sunstein, Cass R.The Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary PrincipleCambridge University Press 2005CrossRef Google Scholar

Trouwborst, ArieThe Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International LawKluwer Law International 2002Google Scholar

Dana, David A.A Behavioral Economic Defense of the Precautionary Principle 97 Nw. U.L. Rev 2003Google Scholar

Nash, Jonathan RemyStanding and the Precautionary Principle 108 Colum. L. Rev 2008Google Scholar

Schauer, FrederickIs it Better to Be Safe than Sorry?: Free Speech and the Precautionary Principle 36 Pepp. L. Rev 2009Google Scholar

Heath, ChipHeath, DanMade to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others DieRandom House 2007Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I.Cox, James C.Speech, Truth, and the Free Market for Ideas 2 Legal Theory 1996CrossRef Google Scholar

Marshall, William P.In Defense of the Search for Truth as a First Amendment Justification 30 Ga. L. Rev 1995Google Scholar

Horwitz, Paul's First Amendment 46 B.C. L. Rev 2005Google Scholar

Horwitz, PaulUniversities as First Amendment Institutions: Some Easy Answers and Hard Questions 54 UCLA L. Rev 2007Google Scholar

Scanlan, John A.Aliens in the Marketplace of Ideas: The Government, the Academy, and the McCarrant-Walter Act 66 Texas L. Rev 1988Google Scholar

Schauer, FrederickTowards an Institutional First Amendment,” 89Minn. L. Rev 1256 2005Google Scholar

Weinstein, JamesInstitutional Review Boards and the Constitution 101 Nw. U.L. Rev 2007Google Scholar

Schauer, FrederickFacts and the First Amendment 57 UCLA L. Rev 2010Google Scholar

1993

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.