Ackerman, B., ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’, Virginia Law Review, 83 (1997), pp. 771–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atlan, H., Entre le cristal et la fumée: essai sur l’organisation du vivant (Paris: Seuil, 1979).Google Scholar

Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Biaggini, G., Die Idee der Verfassung – Neuausrichtung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung?’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht, 119 (2000), pp. 445–76.Google Scholar

Botero, E. S., Entre el Juez Salomón y el Dios Sira. Decisiones interculturales e interés superior del niño (Bogotá: University of Amsterdam and Unicef, 2006).Google Scholar

Burdeau, G., Traité de Science Politique, 2nd edn (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1968), vol. I.Google Scholar

Canotilho, J. J. G., Direito constitucional. 5th edn (Coimbra: Almedina, 1991).Google Scholar

Canotilho, J. J. G., ‘Brancosos’ e interconstitucionalidade: Itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional (Coimbra: Almedina, 2006).Google Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., ‘Reflexive Transnational Law: The Privatisation of Civil Law and the Civilisation of Private Law’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 23 (2002), pp. 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., and Maurer, A., ‘Transnationales Recht – Eine Einleitung’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Carroll, L., ‘Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There [1872]’. The Complete Works of Lewis Carroll (London: The Nonesuch Press and New York: Random House, 1939), pp. 133–272.Google Scholar

Darwin, C., The Origins of Species. Introduction by Matthews, L. H. (London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1971) [6th edn, 1872].Google Scholar

Engels, F., ‘Die Lage Englands. II. Die englische Konstitution’ in Marx, K. and Engels, F. (eds), Werke. 15th edn (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1988), Vol. I, pp. 569–92 [first published in Vorwärts!, No 75, 18 September 1844].Google Scholar

Fassbender, B., ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (1998), pp. 529–619.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. K., Three Dialogues on Knowledge (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2005).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Fragmentierung des Weltrechts: Vernetzung globaler Regimes statt etatischer Rechtseinheit’ in Albert, M. and Stichweh, Rudolf (eds.), Weltstaat und Weltstaatlichkeit: Beobachtungen globaler politischer Strukturbildung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007), pp. 37–61.Google Scholar

Friedman, L. M., ‘Frontiers: National and Transnational Order’ in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 25–50.Google Scholar

Gross, O., ‘“Control Systems” and the Migration of Anomalies’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 403–30.Google Scholar

Günther, K., Der Sinn für Angemessenheit: Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988) [English trans.: The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993)].Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S., ‘Disease and Evolution’ in Dronamraju, K. R. (ed.), Selected Genetic Papers of J. B. S. Haldane (New York and London: Garland, 1990), pp. 325–34 [first published in La Ricerca Scientifica, Supplemento, 19 (1949), pp. 2–11].Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. D., ‘Sex versus Non-Sex versus Parasite’, Oikos, 35 (1980), pp. 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R. and Tanese, R., ‘Sexual Reproduction as an Adaptation to Resist Parasites (A Review)’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87 (1990), pp. 3566–73.Google ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, W. D., Henderson, P. A. and Moran, N. A., ‘Fluctuation of Environment and Coevolved Antagonist Polymorphism as Factors in the Maintenance of Sex’ in Alexander, R. D. and Tinkle, D. W. (eds.), Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (New York: Chiron Press, 1981), pp. 363–81.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Heller, H., Staatslehre (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1934).Google Scholar

Hofstadter, D., Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (Hassocks: The Harvester Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Jessup, P. C., Transnational Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Allgemeine Staatslehre (Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Berlin and Zurich: Gehlen, 1925).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State, English trans. by Wedberg, A. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn (Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1960).Google Scholar

Koselleck, R., ‘Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung’ in Koselleck, R. (ed.), Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006), pp. 365–401.Google Scholar

Lassalle, F., ‘Über Verfassungswesen’ [1962] in Friederici, H. J. (ed.), Reden und Schriften (Cologne: Röderberg, 1987), pp. 120–47.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Rechtssoziologie 3rd edn (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987) [English trans.: A Sociological Theory of Law, 2nd edn (Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, 2014)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984) [English trans.: Social Systems (Stanford University Press, 1995)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9 (1990), pp. 176–220.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., ‘Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstruktivistische Perspektiven (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990), pp. 228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993) [English trans.: Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press, 2004)].Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Die Politik der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000).Google Scholar

Maduro, M. P., A Constituição Plural: Constitucionalismo e União Européia (Cascais: Principia, 2006).Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J., Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J., Der Baum der Erkenntnis: Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens, German trans. by Ludewig, Kurt, 3rd edn (Bern, Munich and Vienna: Scherz, 1987).Google Scholar

Meirmans, S., ‘The Evolution of the Problem of Sex’ in Schön, I., Martens, K. and van Dijk, P. (eds.), Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merry, S. E., ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle’, American Anthropologist, 108 (2006), pp. 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michaelis, R., ‘Was ist nichtstaatliches Recht? – Eine Einführung’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar

Neiman, M., and Koskella, B., (2009), ‘Sex and Red Queen’ in Schön, I., Martens, K. and van Dijk, P. (eds.), Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 133–59.Google Scholar

Neves, M., ‘Justicia y Diferencia en una Sociedad Global Compleja’, Doxa – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 24 (2001), pp. 349–77.Google Scholar

Neves, M., ‘A força simbólica dos direitos humanos’, Revista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado, 4 (2005), pp. 1–35 [English trans.: ‘The Symbolic Force of Human Rights’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33 (2007), pp. 411–44].Google Scholar

Neves, M., Entre Têmis e Leviatã: uma relação difícil – o Estado democrático de direito a partir e além de Luhmann e Habermas (São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006).Google Scholar

Neves, M., Transconstitucionalismo (São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2009) [English trans.: Transconstitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2013)].Google Scholar

Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism and Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited?’, Common Market Law Review, 36 (1999), pp. 703–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union’, European Law Review, 27 (2002), pp. 511–29.Google Scholar

Pires, F. L., Introdução ao direito constitucional europeu (seu sentido, problemas e limites) (Coimbra: Almedina, 1997).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1990 [orig. 1972]).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples, with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Ridley, M., The Red Queen: Sex and Evolution of Human Nature (New York: Harper Collins, 2003).Google Scholar

Roach, K., ‘The Post-9/11 Migration of Britain’s Terrorism Act 2000’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 373–402.Google Scholar

Scheppele, K. L., ‘The Migration of Anti-constitutional Ideas: the Post-9/11 Globalization of Public Law and the International State of Emergency’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press), pp. 347–73.Google Scholar

Segato, R. L., ‘Antropologia e direitos humanos: alteridade e ética no movimento de expansão dos direitos universais’, Mana: Estudos de antropologia social, 12 (2006), pp. 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segato, R. L., ‘Que cada pueblo teja los hilos de su historia. El pluralismo jurídico en diálogo didáctico con legisladores’ in Chenaut, N., Gómez, M., Ortiz, H. and Sierra, M. T. (eds.), Justicia y diversidad en América Latina. Pueblos indígenas ante la globalización (Mexico: CIESAS and Quito: FLACSO, 2011), pp. 357–81.Google Scholar

Smend, R., ‘Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht’ in Smend, R., (ed.) Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze, 2nd edn (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1968 [orig. 1928]), pp. 119–276.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., (1982). ‘Reflexives Recht: Entwicklungsmodelle des Rechts in vergleichender Perspektive’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 68 (1982), pp. 13–59.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Recht als autopoietisches System (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989) [English trans.: Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993)].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 63 (2003), pp. 1–28 [English trans.: ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’, in C. Joerges, I.-J. Sand and G. Teubner (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 3–28].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Die Anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch “private” transnationale Akteure’, Der Staat, 45 (2006), pp. 161–87 [English trans.: ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Verfassungsfragmente: gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2012) [English trans.: Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalisation (Oxford University Press, 2012)].Google Scholar

Teubner, G., and Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Cannibalizing Epistemes: Will Modern Law Protect Traditional Cultural Expressions?’ in Graber, C. B. and Burri-Nenova, M. (eds.), Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

Thornhill, C., A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Die internationale Gemeinschaft’, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 33 (1995), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Tushnet, M., ‘The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law’, paper presented at the seminar ‘The Changing Role of Highest Courts in an Internationalizing World’, sponsored by the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law, 23–24 October 2008 (available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317766).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Valen, L., ‘Molecular Evolution as Predicted by Natural Selection’, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 3 (1974), pp. 89–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Viellechner, L. ‘Was heißt Transnationalität im Recht?’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Von Foerster, H., ‘On Constructing Reality’ in von Foerster, H. (ed.), Observing Systems (Seaside: Intersystems Publications, 1981), pp. 288–309.Google Scholar

Weber, M., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, Winckelmann, J. (ed.), 5th edn (Tübingen: Mohr, 1985) [1st edn 1922].Google Scholar

Weiler, J., The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Welsch, W., Vernunft: Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft, 2nd edn (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar

Welsch, W., Unsere postmoderne Moderne, 6th edn (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘The Protection of Indigenous Peoples in International Law’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 59 (1999), pp. 369–82.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, P., ‘Transnational Law’ in Smits, J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (London: Edward Elgar, 2006), pp. 738–54.Google Scholar